The reality is that Oracle is meant to be a very expensive solution
for companies that don't know what to do. This makes Red Hat etc an
ideal contender for this situation as it promises full enterprise
support.
Whether it is the truth or if its even a good solution is completely
irreverent to
On 25/09/2009 10:28 PM, Saifi Khan wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
What could be the reason for that ?
Best ask direct of commerci
On Sun 27 Sep 2009 at 12:25:50 PDT Chris Rees wrote:
This guy replying to your post was a troll, basically. Ignore him, and
Yep. It shows that some Linux fans are just as prone to creating FUD as
their adversaries in the Windows world.
I'd like to think the BSD community is better than that.
2009/9/25 Saifi Khan :
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
>> > > > i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
>> > > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
>> > > >
>> > > > What could be the reason for that ?
>> > >
>> > > Best ask direc
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:28:20AM -0400, telmn...@757.org wrote:
>
> I'd be willing to bet there is little to no commercial demand for Oracle
> on FreeBSD.
I wonder how much difference Oracle availability on FreeBSD would make,
here.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.
Dag-Erling Smørgrav a écrit :
Saifi Khan writes:
The response seems to suggest [...]
...nothing except that whoever wrote it has absolutely no idea what
they're talking about.
DES
I know that the question was about "native" FreeBSD port but did someone
tried / used Oracle on to
oops. After replying to all, I noticed that this thread is
cross-posted to both freebsd-questions and freebsd-advocacy.
(Although I removed advocacy from this reply.)
fyi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
>
>> That whoever wrote that post is very closed minded, has no problem
>> condemning something prior to investigation, and perhaps wears a pair of
>> glasses that only come in one shade.
>
> Oracle is an expensive business application that is expected to b
That whoever wrote that post is very closed minded, has no problem
condemning something prior to investigation, and perhaps wears a pair of
glasses that only come in one shade.
Oracle is an expensive business application that is expected to be VERY
reliable. It's expected to have a high end s
Saifi Khan wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
>
> What could be the reason for that ?
Best ask direct of commercial applicati
Saifi Khan writes:
> The response seems to suggest [...]
...nothing except that whoever wrote it has absolutely no idea what
they're talking about.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
2009/9/25 Saifi Khan
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> > > > > i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
> > > > >
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
> > > > >
> > > > > What could be the reason for that ?
> > > >
> > > > Best a
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > i noticed that there is no Oracle available for FreeBSD
> > > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
> > > >
> > > > What could be the reason for that ?
> > >
> > > Best ask direct of commercial application ve
13 matches
Mail list logo
