Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it is not. What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the package/port stay

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it is not. What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the package/port stay restricted until the

win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Yousef Adnan Raffah
I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it is not. What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the package/port stay restricted until the developer/port owner fix the security

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote: I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it is not. What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the package/port stay restricted until the

Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Robert Huff
Hello: 2) make rmconfig Thanks. Never heard of that option before. Note also make showconfig. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list