On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Matthew Seaman spaketh thusly:
-}
-}Yes. That's the generally accepted meaning of the concept of a 'hot
-}spare.' The fact that the spare hasn't been automatically bought
-}on-line in this case is a bug. There's an open PR on the subject:
-}
-}http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/que
On 28/02/2012 15:21, Randy Schultz wrote:
> Got a zpool that lost a drive:
>Feb 24 20:46:01 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): lost device
>Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): Synchronize cache
> failed, status == 0xa, scsi status ==
>0x0
>Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (d
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Randy Schultz spaketh thusly:
-}
-}I thought the spare was supposed to come online and be resilvered
-}automatically. Did I miss some config thing
-}or did I just misunderstand how the hot spare bit works?
Gah. Forgot to check the beasty forums (tnx Mark for the gentle poke
Howdy howdy,
Got a zpool that lost a drive:
Feb 24 20:46:01 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): lost device
Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): Synchronize cache failed,
status == 0xa, scsi status ==
0x0
Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): removing device entry
