On 1/23/2010 10:51 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:35:32 -0600, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I hope ifconfig will help more then dmesg as I have no way of getting
files (like dmesg.log that I created) off the box (floppy drive isn't
even hooked up,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 05:31:53AM -0600, Programmer In Training wrote:
Thanks, this probably wouldn't be such an issue if I hadn't thrown away
the box two-three weeks ago (at least, I think I threw it out; I've had
the card for about a two years).
no...@pci0:2:2:0: class 0x2
Do not CC me. I am subscribed to the list. There is no need. THANK YOU.
On 1/24/2010 6:22 AM, Roland Smith wrote:
snip
zgrep Libertas /usr/share/man/man4/*
/usr/share/man/man4/if_malo.4.gz:.Nd Marvell Libertas IEEE 802.11b/g
wireless network driver
So go and read if_malo(4). It looks like
On 1/24/2010 6:27 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
Do not CC me. I am subscribed to the list. There is no need. THANK YOU.
On 1/24/2010 6:22 AM, Roland Smith wrote:
snip
zgrep Libertas /usr/share/man/man4/*
/usr/share/man/man4/if_malo.4.gz:.Nd Marvell Libertas IEEE 802.11b/g
wireless
Doug Hardie wrote:
1. pf allows short cuts, but these also makes it more difficult to debug. I'd
separate NAT from filtering,
Ok. I guess you want some white space between them? Here it is with the white
space and comments:
ext_if=dc0
table blackhole persist file /etc/blackhole
Hello,
I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network
depending on its topology (don't know if it's the good word) : I
would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged
in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired
interface, if no bring up
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:48:32PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote:
Using Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) and GNOME Terminal 2.28.1, $TERM is Xterm.
$ echo $TERM
Xterm
$
The only thing I'd change about the mapping is that I'd rather flash the
screen instead of ringing the bell.
Put:
2010/1/22, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into
it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in
1 slice if the swap comes first?
Similar problem here: I have a full-zfs system in a bsd slice, but I
have the
Romain Garbage wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a way to automate the configuration of my network
depending on its topology (don't know if it's the good word) : I
would like to check the wired interface to see if a cable is plugged
in (by looking at carrier status), if so, bring up the wired
[http://www.cappmea.com/cadcam4/]
The Tooth Preparation for CAD CAM Technology
Dr. Nadim Aboujaoude
Speaker at the 4th CAD/CAM Computerized
Dentistry International
Conference.
The development of the computer aided technology in
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:35:20PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 23 January 2010, at 22:42, John wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On 24 January 2010 am 01:08:27 John wrote:
doing this on a new machine! And I don't need any migration
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hi,
I recently found
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010
Mouse selection in both xfce4's Terminal and the FreeBSD console is a
bit touchy. Select a block, click in another window to paste, and...
it's now highlighted a block in the target window. Or maybe a whole
line.
Mouse speed and click-to-focus are fine the way they are, it'd just be
nice
Note: Since my issue is slow performance right off the bat and not
performance degradation over time, I decided to start a separate
discussion. After installing a fresh pure ZFS 8.0 system and building
all my ports, I decided to do some benchmarking. At this point, about
a dozen of ports has been
Well,
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which
I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS
P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes
for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate expensive audio
board
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed
benefit regarding writes,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly
Leslie Jensen said the following on 2010-01-23 15:54:
When I install Thunderbird3
thunderbird-3.0.1
thunderbird-dictionaries-20060220_4
thunderbird3-i18n-3.0.1
It does not adapt to what I have in /etc/make.conf
# Firefox-i18n
FIREFOX_I18N=sv-SE
# Thunderbird-i18n
THUNDERBIRD_I18N=sv-SE
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS writes to a mirror pair
requires two independent writes. If these writes go down independent I/O
paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. If the
writes
go through a bandwidth-limited shared path
In message cf9b1ee01001240759j2476cf3es2babd8b32a90f...@mail.gmail.com, Dan N
aumov writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote=
:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Well,
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which
I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS
P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes
for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :(
The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my
Greetings!
A short question: is there a way to determine usb-storage and md-device
capacity( for further fdisk and bsdlabel applying ) from within a sh script,
in which device's /dev file-name is present? Something similar to atacontrol
cap | grep lba...
In the last episode (Jan 25), Ivan Borodin said:
Greetings!
A short question: is there a way to determine usb-storage and md-device
capacity( for further fdisk and bsdlabel applying ) from within a sh script,
in which device's /dev file-name is present? Something similar to atacontrol
cap
Hello.
I am trying to create an accounting daemon that would be more precise
than usual BSD system accounting. It should read the whole process
tree from time to time (say, every 10 seconds) and log changes in
usage of CPU, I/O operations and memory per process. After daemon
notices process exit,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I'll post here later on today, after
I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer).
No possibility to transfer the file via wired network? Your
RealTek NIC works out of the box. Or
Hi,
On 24 January 2010 pm 14:42:11 John wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:55:14AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
how did you handle the strange group IDs?
Have not done that yet. My current best plan (which I'm not
really crazy about, but haven't come up with anything better)
is to do
Hi,
On 24 January 2010 pm 15:35:20 Doug Hardie wrote:
On 23 January 2010, at 22:42, John wrote:
I just tried it with FreeBSD 7.2 creating a tar file. Digging
through the file it shows the ascii names for owner and group -
not uid/gid. I un-tar'd it on a Mac and sure enough it used
the
I am not sure why, but here was my solution.
I determined through a lot of poking that the Master Boot Record of each
drive. Here is what I found out:
1. My backup drive (ad0) had the FreeBSD boot manager installed.
2. My main drive (twed0) had the FreeBSD MBR installed.
So, what is the
I'm just curious as to whether FreeBSD8.0 can support raw sockets on
some jails and not on others.
I'm trying to find the jail flags to allow this to happen. Not having
much luck.
Any ideas?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 1/24/2010 6:35 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I'll post here later on today, after
I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer).
No possibility to transfer the file via wired network?
On 1/24/2010 9:55 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/24/2010 6:35 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:13:05 -0600, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
I'll post here later on today, after
I've burned the file to disc (no floppy drive on either computer).
No
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message cf9b1ee01001240759j2476cf3es2babd8b32a90f...@mail.gmail.com, Dan
N
aumov writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with
which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots
at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards,
It's possible to get an adapter that plugs into
You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and
polkit.
--- En date de : Ven 22.1.10, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat..fu-berlin.de a
écrit :
De: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Objet: polkit-0.95_3: update fails
À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
Please don't crosspost to -ports and -questions.
On 01/24/10 22:35, Alexandre L. wrote:
You could read /usr/ports/UPDATING because there is section for policikit and
polkit.
Correct. I'll add (since I could see from the OP that you're a
portmaster user) that I tested the following and it
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:19:58AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I posted this recently on the GnuPG forum; however, no one had ever
seen it before.
FreeBSD-7.2
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.14
libgcrypt 1.4.4
gpa 0.9.0
I honestly have no idea what the problem is here. I recently
installed GnuPG on my
42 matches
Mail list logo
