Re: which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Thursday 01 March 2012 07:57:53 Gary Kline wrote:
> which of the many adblockers should i try?

I use /etc/hosts to block unwanted sites.

I used 

http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

as a starting point and added other sites over time.

If course, adds which are served from the visited host are not blocked that 
way. Let them earn some money.

Erich
> 
> thanks in advance for your insights!
> 
> -- 
>  Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
>  Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc
>   The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
>  Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community.
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:55:44PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> 
>   agree with noscript. i dont recall the other one, but i was
>   blocking just too much and opened everything up. i'll try  
>   'add block plus'

I'm pretty sure the extension you want is called Adblock Plus, not Add
Block Plus.

It has been a little bit since I've dealt with these extensions, though,
because I started using another browser that offers things like plugin
and JavaScript whitelisting as a core feature.  Take my memory of it for
what it's worth.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM -0800, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800
> From: Kurt Buff 
> Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker?
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> 
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett  wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline  wrote:
> >
> >> which of the many adblockers should i try?
> >>
> >> thanks in advance for your insights!
> >>
> > imho Add Block Plus is the best
> 
> Agreed, and for further security, I also use NoScript and Request Policy.
> 
> Many folks won't like the latter two, as they tend to block an awful
> lot until you get them tuned, but they make me happ(y|ier) while
> browsing. If you do use them, you will at least begin to see how
> complex web browsing has become...
> 
> Kurt


agree with noscript. i dont recall the other one, but i was
blocking just too much and opened everything up. i'll try  
'add block plus'

thanks much,

gary

> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc
  The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
 Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Kurt Buff
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett  wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline  wrote:
>
>> which of the many adblockers should i try?
>>
>> thanks in advance for your insights!
>>
> imho Add Block Plus is the best

Agreed, and for further security, I also use NoScript and Request Policy.

Many folks won't like the latter two, as they tend to block an awful
lot until you get them tuned, but they make me happ(y|ier) while
browsing. If you do use them, you will at least begin to see how
complex web browsing has become...

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Jason Garrett
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline  wrote:

> which of the many adblockers should i try?
>
> thanks in advance for your insights!
>
> imho Add Block Plus is the best

> --
>  Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service
> Unix
> Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc
>  The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
> Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community.
>
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


which FF ad blocker?

2012-02-29 Thread Gary Kline
which of the many adblockers should i try?

thanks in advance for your insights!

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
 Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc
  The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
 Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD And ARM

2012-02-29 Thread bsali...@gmail.com
Hi Tim,

FreeBSD-arm should be the list to look into
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm


On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Tim Daneliuk  wrote:
> I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the
> right place would be appreciated:
>
> Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI
> ARM SBC?  At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp
> boundary machines.
>
> Thanks,
> ---
> Tim Daneliuk
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: VBox network boot

2012-02-29 Thread Andrei Brezan

On 29/02/2012 01:08, Da Rock wrote:

On 02/29/12 03:04, Carl Johnson wrote:

Warren Block  writes:


On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote:


I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead,
bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for
network booting in VBox on FBSD host?

To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the
PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type.  If the host is FreeBSD, the
vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded.

Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary.  I
was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress.  I then noticed
your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working.  I
would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete.
I took it for granted the bridge part (I usually use it anyway), but I 
would never have guessed the PCnet card in a blue fit! There was even 
a PR on virtualbox for the issue of the lack of PXE with Oracle 
basically saying "too bad, so sad...". Apparently PXE licensing didn't 
allow them to distribute it directly, but offer an extension pack 
(which doesn't work on FBSD) instead. Ergo my conclusion. Apparently 
(based on this thread) it only affects intel cards though...


Where is your page Warren, and why didn't it show up in my searches? 
;) I'll follow it from here on out I think...


Thanks guys... saved me a lot more fussing!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Hi all,

You can also look at https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads and 
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#intro-installing for info 
related to the extension pack where you can find the PXE boot ROM for 
the Intel E1000 cards, unfortunately it's PUEL, virtualbox on FBSD is 
OSE. My worst case scenario was with a custom linux kernel on the guest 
that didn't had drivers for Amd cards, I had to do something like this:


NIC 1:   MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface 
'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 
Am79C970A, Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0
NIC 2:   MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface 
'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM, 
Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0


Regards,

--
Andrei Brezan
email

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread jb
jb  gmail.com> writes:

> ... 
> Dmitry and Adam,
> I think your description of excessive heads parking may be very close.
> I will try this remedy and will let you know.
> jb
> 

OK. Thanks.
jb






___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer 
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
>>> > > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
>>> > compiling. I
>>> > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
>>> > > >>> installed
>>> > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Heres what I do:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> ./configure
>>> > > >>> gmake
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> and the problem looks like this:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> [snip]
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is
>>> > not a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error:
>>> `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is
>>> > not
>>> > > >>> a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64
>>> bit
>>> > > >>> base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
>>> not
>>> > a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error:
>>> > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
>>> >
>>> > > >>> is not
>>> > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is
>>> > not a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error:
>>> `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is
>>> > not
>>> > > >>> a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64
>>> bit
>>> > > >>> base/index expression
>>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
>>> not
>>> > a
>>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you
>>> every
>>> > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out
>>> of
>>> > > >> trouble if I remember correctly).
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working
>>> > solo.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > > Ok - thanks!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I'm currently doing this:
>>> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > Andy
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from
>>> ports. I
>>> > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
>>> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>>> > >
>>> > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the
>>> other
>>> > > ones below in the article.
>>> > >
>>> > > Here's some outputs:
>>> > >
>>> > > # gmake -v
>>> > > GNU Make 3.82
>>> > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
>>> > > Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
>>> > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
>>> > > >
>>> > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>>> > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>>> > >
>>> > > # gcc -v
>>> > > Using built-in specs.
>>> > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
>>> > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
>>> > > Thread model: posix
>>> > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
>>> > >
>>> > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's
>>> what
>>> > > causes the problems)?
>>> > >
>>> > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
>>> > orginal
>>> > > post.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
>>> > >
>>> > > All the best,
>>> > > Andy
>>> > > ___
>>> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>> >
>>> > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?
>>> >
>>> > should be
>>> > # export CC=gcc46
>>> > or
>>> > # setenv CC gcc46
>>> >
>>> > if building from source
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Waitman Gobble
>>> > San Jose California USA
>>> >
>>>
>>> Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago.
>>>
>>> So, I'm making some progress.
>>>
>>> I now export CC=gcc47
>>>
>>> and by addin

Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Andy Wodfer
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Waitman Gobble  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble 
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
>> > > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
>> > compiling. I
>> > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
>> > > >>> installed
>> > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Heres what I do:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> ./configure
>> > > >>> gmake
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> and the problem looks like this:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [snip]
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is
>> > not a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)'
>> is
>> > not
>> > > >>> a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64
>> bit
>> > > >>> base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
>> not
>> > a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error:
>> > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
>> >
>> > > >>> is not
>> > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is
>> > not a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)'
>> is
>> > not
>> > > >>> a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64
>> bit
>> > > >>> base/index expression
>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
>> not
>> > a
>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you
>> every
>> > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out
>> of
>> > > >> trouble if I remember correctly).
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working
>> > solo.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > > Ok - thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm currently doing this:
>> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>> > > >
>> > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Andy
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from
>> ports. I
>> > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
>> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>> > >
>> > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the
>> other
>> > > ones below in the article.
>> > >
>> > > Here's some outputs:
>> > >
>> > > # gmake -v
>> > > GNU Make 3.82
>> > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
>> > > Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
>> > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
>> > > >
>> > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>> > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> > >
>> > > # gcc -v
>> > > Using built-in specs.
>> > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
>> > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
>> > > Thread model: posix
>> > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
>> > >
>> > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
>> > > causes the problems)?
>> > >
>> > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
>> > orginal
>> > > post.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
>> > >
>> > > All the best,
>> > > Andy
>> > > ___
>> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> >
>> > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?
>> >
>> > should be
>> > # export CC=gcc46
>> > or
>> > # setenv CC gcc46
>> >
>> > if building from source
>> >
>> > --
>> > Waitman Gobble
>> > San Jose California USA
>> >
>>
>> Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago.
>>
>> So, I'm making some progress.
>>
>> I now export CC=gcc47
>>
>> and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what
>> does this mean/do???)
>>
>> I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail.
>>
>> However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message:
>>
>> CC  libavco

Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> > > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
> > compiling. I
> > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
> > > >>> installed
> > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Heres what I do:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ./configure
> > > >>> gmake
> > > >>>
> > > >>> and the problem looks like this:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [snip]
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is
> > not a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)'
> is
> > not
> > > >>> a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > > >>> base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
> not
> > a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error:
> > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
> >
> > > >>> is not
> > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is
> > not a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)'
> is
> > not
> > > >>> a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64
> bit
> > > >>> base/index expression
> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is
> not
> > a
> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
> > > >>>
> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you
> every
> > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
> > > >> trouble if I remember correctly).
> > > >>
> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working
> > solo.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > Ok - thanks!
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently doing this:
> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> > > >
> > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > >
> > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports.
> I
> > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> > >
> > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other
> > > ones below in the article.
> > >
> > > Here's some outputs:
> > >
> > > # gmake -v
> > > GNU Make 3.82
> > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
> > > Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
> > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> > > >
> > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> > >
> > > # gcc -v
> > > Using built-in specs.
> > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
> > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
> > > Thread model: posix
> > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
> > >
> > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
> > > causes the problems)?
> > >
> > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
> > orginal
> > > post.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > > Andy
> > > ___
> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
> > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?
> >
> > should be
> > # export CC=gcc46
> > or
> > # setenv CC gcc46
> >
> > if building from source
> >
> > --
> > Waitman Gobble
> > San Jose California USA
> >
>
> Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago.
>
> So, I'm making some progress.
>
> I now export CC=gcc47
>
> and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what
> does this mean/do???)
>
> I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail.
>
> However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message:
>
> CC  libavcodec/vp5.o
> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages:
> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
> base/index expression
> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
> base/index 

Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Andy Wodfer
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble  wrote:

>
> On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
> compiling. I
> > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
> > >>> installed
> > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
> > >>>
> > >>> Heres what I do:
> > >>>
> > >>> ./configure
> > >>> gmake
> > >>>
> > >>> and the problem looks like this:
> > >>>
> > >>> [snip]
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is
> not a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is
> not
> > >>> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > >>> base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not
> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error:
> `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
>
> > >>> is not
> > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is
> not a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is
> not
> > >>> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > >>> base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not
> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
> > >>>
> > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every
> > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
> > >> trouble if I remember correctly).
> > >>
> > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working
> solo.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Ok - thanks!
> > >
> > > I'm currently doing this:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> > >
> > > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Andy
> > >
> >
> > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I
> > updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> >
> > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other
> > ones below in the article.
> >
> > Here's some outputs:
> >
> > # gmake -v
> > GNU Make 3.82
> > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
> > Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
> http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> > >
> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> >
> > # gcc -v
> > Using built-in specs.
> > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
> > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
> > Thread model: posix
> > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
> >
> > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
> > causes the problems)?
> >
> > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
> orginal
> > post.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
> >
> > All the best,
> > Andy
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
> is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?
>
> should be
> # export CC=gcc46
> or
> # setenv CC gcc46
>
> if building from source
>
> --
> Waitman Gobble
> San Jose California USA
>

Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago.

So, I'm making some progress.

I now export CC=gcc47

and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what
does this mean/do???)

I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail.

However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message:

CC  libavcodec/vp5.o
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages:
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:548: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:669: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:920: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1136: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expres

Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote:

>
> On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> > > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> > >>>
> > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
> compiling. I
> > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
> > >>> installed
> > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
> > >>>
> > >>> Heres what I do:
> > >>>
> > >>> ./configure
> > >>> gmake
> > >>>
> > >>> and the problem looks like this:
> > >>>
> > >>> [snip]
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is
> not a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is
> not
> > >>> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > >>> base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not
> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error:
> `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
> > >>> is not
> > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is
> not a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is
> not
> > >>> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> > >>> base/index expression
> > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not
> a
> > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
> > >>>
> > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every
> > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
> > >> trouble if I remember correctly).
> > >>
> > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working
> solo.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Ok - thanks!
> > >
> > > I'm currently doing this:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> > >
> > > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Andy
> > >
> >
> > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I
> > updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> >
> > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other
> > ones below in the article.
> >
> > Here's some outputs:
> >
> > # gmake -v
> > GNU Make 3.82
> > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
> > Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
> http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> > >
> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> >
> > # gcc -v
> > Using built-in specs.
> > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
> > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
> > Thread model: posix
> > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
> >
> > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
> > causes the problems)?
> >
> > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
> orginal
> > post.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
> >
> > All the best,
> > Andy
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
> is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?
>
> should be
> # export CC=gcc46
> or
> # setenv CC gcc46
>
> if building from source
>
> --
> Waitman Gobble
> San Jose California USA
>
OOps my bad, that's the gcc development version... stable is 4.6.2.. or
gcc46 ... didn't notice there was a port :)

Waitman
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer"  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> > freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
> >>>
> >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when
compiling. I
> >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
> >>> installed
> >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
> >>>
> >>> Heres what I do:
> >>>
> >>> ./configure
> >>> gmake
> >>>
> >>> and the problem looks like this:
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not
a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is
not
> >>> a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> >>> base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
> >>> is not
> >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not
a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is
not
> >>> a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
> >>> base/index expression
> >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
> >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
> >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
> >>>
> >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every
> >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
> >> trouble if I remember correctly).
> >>
> >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo.
> >>
> >>
> > Ok - thanks!
> >
> > I'm currently doing this:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
> >
> > I will report back on how it goes. :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andy
> >
>
> So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I
> updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>
> However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other
> ones below in the article.
>
> Here's some outputs:
>
> # gmake -v
> GNU Make 3.82
> Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
> Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> >
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>
> # gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
> Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]
>
> How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
> causes the problems)?
>
> Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my
orginal
> post.
>
> Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)
>
> All the best,
> Andy
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo?

should be
# export CC=gcc46
or
# setenv CC gcc46

if building from source

--
Waitman Gobble
San Jose California USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Andy Wodfer
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer  wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
> freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>>>
>>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
>>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
>>> installed
>>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
>>>
>>> Heres what I do:
>>>
>>> ./configure
>>> gmake
>>>
>>> and the problem looks like this:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not
>>> a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
>>> base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
>>> is not
>>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not
>>> a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
>>> base/index expression
>>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
>>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
>>>
>> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every
>> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
>> trouble if I remember correctly).
>>
>> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo.
>>
>>
> Ok - thanks!
>
> I'm currently doing this:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html
>
> I will report back on how it goes. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>

So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I
updated /etc/make.conf as described here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html

However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other
ones below in the article.

Here's some outputs:

# gmake -v
GNU Make 3.82
Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2
Copyright (C) 2010  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD]

How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what
causes the problems)?

Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my orginal
post.

Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-)

All the best,
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


IGB driver

2012-02-29 Thread Коньков Евгений
HI, Freebsd-questions.

Can I use 7-STABLE and checkout latest IGB drivers from HEAD? Will
them work?

-- 
С уважением,
 Коньков  mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage)

2012-02-29 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, ill...@gmail.com wrote:


On 29 February 2012 10:33, Robert Huff  wrote:


Warren Block writes:

 >    I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
 > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
 >    Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
 > shows a label being added when the partition is created,

 (untested)
 # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0


       I did this, and nothing exploded.  :-)
       When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under
/dev?  Immediately?  After rebooting?  I want to edit fstab, but
want to be clear on how.



The label(s) should be accessible immediately, HOWEVER:
if the filesystem is mounted rw they'll be lost on reboot.  So
you probably want to do the labelling from single-user mode.


With filesystem labels, yes.  Should not be a problem with gpart labels 
on a partition.  (Just tried it.)___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage)

2012-02-29 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Robert Huff wrote:



Warren Block writes:

>I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
> (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
>Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
> shows a label being added when the partition is created,

 (untested)
 # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0


I did this, and nothing exploded.  :-)
When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under
/dev?  Immediately?  After rebooting?  I want to edit fstab, but
want to be clear on how.


They will be in /dev/gpt/.  Labels created with glabel are in 
/dev/label/, and filesystem labels go in directories named for the 
filesystem like /dev/ufs/.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: VBox network boot

2012-02-29 Thread Carl Johnson
Warren Block  writes:

> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Carl Johnson wrote:
>
>> Warren Block  writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote:
>>>
 I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead,
 bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for
 network booting in VBox on FBSD host?
>>>
>>> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the
>>> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type.  If the host is FreeBSD, the
>>> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded.
>>
>> Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary.
>
> Updated in the PXE article, thanks.

Thank you, that makes it perfectly clear.  I had initially ignored that
suggestion, thinking that it wasn't important!
-- 
Carl Johnsonca...@peak.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread jb
Adam Vande More  gmail.com> writes:

> ... 
> > # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0
> >
> > 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032   001   001   000Old_age   Always
> > -
> >  779337
> >
> 
> Likely the noise you are hearing roughly corresponds to Load_Cycle_Count.
> Yours is quite high.  You may be able to use  sysutils/ataidle to disable
> the parking like so:
> 
> ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0
> 
> Not entirely sure if this works on the ada driver, so if not you might want
> to ask on freebsd-stable@ or boot up in a Live CD of Linux and use the
> tools there.
> 

Dmitry and Adam,
I think your description of excessive heads parking may be very close.
I will try this remedy and will let you know.
jb


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread jb
Erich Dollansky  ovitrap.com> writes:

> ... 
> I have no idea what causes the noise. What is the machine doing when you hear
> it?
> 
> Erich
> 

I use it as a desktop.
Mostly web browsing, Firefox, there is always some background activity in
there, like financial data streaming, etc.
But this sound is so concerning: click ...click-clack, click-clack ... etc.

$ top
last pid: 62014;  load averages:  0.09,  0.06,  0.06up 4+02:07:06  18:56:08
63 processes:  1 running, 62 sleeping
CPU 0:  0.8% user,  0.0% nice,  2.0% system,  0.0% interrupt, 97.2% idle
CPU 1:  3.1% user,  0.0% nice,  0.8% system,  0.0% interrupt, 96.1% idle
Mem: 190M Active, 890M Inact, 261M Wired, 312K Cache, 112M Buf, 644M Free
Swap: 3043M Total, 3043M Free

  PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
58910 jb   22  200   319M   262M uwait   0  14:07  1.07% firefox-bi
 1283 root  1  200  9716K  1148K select  1   5:15  0.98% moused
 3344 root  2  230 14156K  4940K select  0   8:31  0.00% upowerd
 1865 root  1  200  9612K  1104K select  1   7:17  0.00% powerd
 1978 haldaemon 2  200 23300K  6292K piperd  0   7:07  0.00% hald
58961 jb1  200   118M 30068K select  0   5:08  0.00% npviewer.b
58845 jb1  200   374M   309M select  1   4:37  0.00% Xorg
58951 jb2  200 70360K 31416K kqread  0   2:10  0.00% plugin-con
 1757 messagebus1  200  9812K  2520K select  0   1:46  0.00% dbus-daemo
59121 jb5  220 56108K 29028K uwait   1   0:32  0.00% pan
 1902 root  1  200 11324K  3360K select  1   0:23  0.00% sendmail
58882 jb1  200 11944K  2904K select  0   0:22  0.00% gam_server
59173 jb2  200 40164K 20444K piperd  1   0:15  0.00% Terminal
58883 jb2  200 40168K 19744K piperd  1   0:09  0.00% xfce4-pane
58884 jb1  200 39932K 20396K select  0   0:07  0.00% xfdesktop
[jb@localhost ~]$ 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, jb  wrote:

> Hi,
> I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk
> when
> it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other
> OSs).
> Is there any way to figure out what it means ?
> Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ?
>
> # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0
>
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032   001   001   000Old_age   Always
> -
>  779337
>


Likely the noise you are hearing roughly corresponds to Load_Cycle_Count.
Yours is quite high.  You may be able to use  sysutils/ataidle to disable
the parking like so:

ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0

Not entirely sure if this works on the ada driver, so if not you might want
to ask on freebsd-stable@ or boot up in a Live CD of Linux and use the
tools there.


-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread Dmitry S. Kasterin
Hi!

2012/2/29, jb :
> Hi,
> I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when
> it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs).
> Is there any way to figure out what it means ?

Some time ago I had a similar problem with an external WD Scorpio Blue disk.
As my point of view, it tends to park its heads too often, even under
heavy load,
so this results in a clicking.

As far as I remember, you can check Load_Cycle_Count from SMART output.
Take some measurements during minute or two. Rapid growth of this parameter
indicates a problem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Thursday 01 March 2012 00:18:03 jb wrote:
> I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when
> it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs).
> Is there any way to figure out what it means ?
> Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ?
>  
nothing seems to be wrong with the disk from my point of view.

I have no idea what causes the noise. What is the machine doing when you hear 
it?

Erich


> # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0
> smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
> 
> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
> Model Family: Western Digital Scorpio Blue Serial ATA
> Device Model: WDC WD1600BEVS-08RST2
> Serial Number:WD-WXC308897633
> LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2abfdb88c
> Firmware Version: 11.01G11
> User Capacity:160,041,885,696 bytes [160 GB]
> Sector Size:  512 bytes logical/physical
> Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
> ATA Version is:   7
> ATA Standard is:  Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
> Local Time is:Wed Feb 29 18:01:06 2012 CET
> SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
> SMART support is: Enabled
> 
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
> 
> General SMART Values:
> Offline data collection status:  (0x00)   Offline data collection activity
>   was never started.
>   Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
> Self-test execution status:  (   0)   The previous self-test routine 
> completed
>   without error or no self-test has ever 
>   been run.
> Total time to complete Offline 
> data collection:  ( 6780) seconds.
> Offline data collection
> capabilities:  (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
>   Auto Offline data collection on/off 
> support.
>   Suspend Offline collection upon new
>   command.
>   Offline surface scan supported.
>   Self-test supported.
>   Conveyance Self-test supported.
>   Selective Self-test supported.
> SMART capabilities:(0x0003)   Saves SMART data before entering
>   power-saving mode.
>   Supports SMART auto save timer.
> Error logging capability:(0x01)   Error logging supported.
>   General Purpose Logging supported.
> Short self-test routine 
> recommended polling time:  (   2) minutes.
> Extended self-test routine
> recommended polling time:  (  87) minutes.
> Conveyance self-test routine
> recommended polling time:  (   6) minutes.
> SCT capabilities:(0x103f) SCT Status supported.
>   SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
>   SCT Feature Control supported.
>   SCT Data Table supported.
> 
> SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
> Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE  UPDATED 
> WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>   1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   200   200   051Pre-fail  Always  
>  -
>   0
>   3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   188   188   021Pre-fail  Always  
>  -
>   1558
>   4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   972
>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   200   200   140Pre-fail  Always  
>  -
>   0
>   7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   200   200   051Pre-fail  Always  
>  -
>   0
>   9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   087   087   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   10148
>  10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   051Pre-fail  Always  
>  -
>   0
>  11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012   100   100   051Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   0
>  12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   773
> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   200   200   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   29
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032   001   001   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   779337
> 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   115   104   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   32
> 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   200   200   000Old_age   Always  
>  -
>   0
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   200   200   000Old_age   Always  

hard disk behavior

2012-02-29 Thread jb
Hi,
I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when
it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs).
Is there any way to figure out what it means ?
Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ?
 
# /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0
smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Western Digital Scorpio Blue Serial ATA
Device Model: WDC WD1600BEVS-08RST2
Serial Number:WD-WXC308897633
LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2abfdb88c
Firmware Version: 11.01G11
User Capacity:160,041,885,696 bytes [160 GB]
Sector Size:  512 bytes logical/physical
Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is:   7
ATA Standard is:  Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
Local Time is:Wed Feb 29 18:01:06 2012 CET
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status:  (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status:  (   0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever 
been run.
Total time to complete Offline 
data collection:( 6780) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities:(0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off 
support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities:(0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability:(0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine 
recommended polling time:(   2) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time:(  87) minutes.
Conveyance self-test routine
recommended polling time:(   6) minutes.
SCT capabilities:  (0x103f) SCT Status supported.
SCT Error Recovery Control supported.
SCT Feature Control supported.
SCT Data Table supported.

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE  UPDATED 
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   200   200   051Pre-fail  Always   -
  0
  3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   188   188   021Pre-fail  Always   -
  1558
  4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always   -
  972
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   200   200   140Pre-fail  Always   -
  0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   200   200   051Pre-fail  Always   -
  0
  9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   087   087   000Old_age   Always   -
  10148
 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   051Pre-fail  Always   -
  0
 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012   100   100   051Old_age   Always   -
  0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always   -
  773
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   200   200   000Old_age   Always   -
  29
193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032   001   001   000Old_age   Always   -
  779337
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   115   104   000Old_age   Always   -
  32
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   200   200   000Old_age   Always   -
  0
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   200   200   000Old_age   Always   -
  0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   253   000Old_age   Offline  -
  0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e   200   200   000Old_age   Always   -
  0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x0009   100   253   051Pre-fail  Offline  -
  0

SMART Error Log Version: 1
No Errors Logged

SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num  Test_DescriptionStatus 

Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage)

2012-02-29 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 29 February 2012 10:33, Robert Huff  wrote:
>
> Warren Block writes:
>>  >    I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
>>  > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
>>  >    Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
>>  > shows a label being added when the partition is created,
>>
>>  (untested)
>>  # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0
>
>        I did this, and nothing exploded.  :-)
>        When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under
> /dev?  Immediately?  After rebooting?  I want to edit fstab, but
> want to be clear on how.
>

The label(s) should be accessible immediately, HOWEVER:
if the filesystem is mounted rw they'll be lost on reboot.  So
you probably want to do the labelling from single-user mode.

-- 
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: fixating USB Storage

2012-02-29 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
> I really need to do a combined article that covers all the 
> different types of labels.  It's on the list.

Please be so kind and also mention ufsid "labels"
(unique file system id) in that article.

Why?

"Any partitions with ufsid labels can be mounted
 in this way, eliminating the need to create permanent
 labels for them manually, while still enjoying the
 benefits of device-name independent mounting."

... even though they are "not normal words" in a typical
reader's mind. :-)

They can be found explained in The FreeBSD Handbook at 20.7.1:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-glabel.html
(bottom of the page)




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD And ARM

2012-02-29 Thread Arthur Chance

On 02/29/12 15:30, Tim Daneliuk wrote:

I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the
right place would be appreciated:

Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI
ARM SBC? At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp
boundary machines.


+1 on the question as I'd like to use these devices for a variety of 
things (stratum 1 NTP server with a USB GPS attached, cheap and cheerful 
low power file/web server, media box maybe) and I'm far happier with 
FBSD than Linux.


For firewall use remember that the Model B has only one ether socket 
(and the Model A has none). Anyone know how good USB ether adapters are? 
I've never used one.


Of course, all this presumes you can actually get one, which has proved 
difficult - all 10,000 units in the first batch went in a few minutes. :-(

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage)

2012-02-29 Thread Robert Huff

Warren Block writes:
>  >I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
>  > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
>  >Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
>  > shows a label being added when the partition is created,
>  
>  (untested)
>  # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0

I did this, and nothing exploded.  :-)
When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under
/dev?  Immediately?  After rebooting?  I want to edit fstab, but
want to be clear on how.

Respectfully,


Robert Huff


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD And ARM

2012-02-29 Thread Tim Daneliuk

I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the
right place would be appreciated:

Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI
ARM SBC?  At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp
boundary machines.

Thanks,
---
Tim Daneliuk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: fixating USB Storage

2012-02-29 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Robert Huff wrote:



Polytropon writes:


 Label the drives and use labels instead of device names.

 Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here:
 http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html


Good piece, but it doesn't explicitly cover one case and "man"
provides no example.
I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
(obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
shows a label being added when the partition is created,


(untested)
# gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0

There's also http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html , 
which talks about filesystem labels.  UFS labels can be added later with 
tunefs(8).  I really need to do a combined article that covers all the 
different types of labels.  It's on the list.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Andy Wodfer
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock <
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:

> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
>
>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).
>>
>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is
>> installed
>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.
>>
>> Heres what I do:
>>
>> ./configure
>> gmake
>>
>> and the problem looks like this:
>>
>> [snip]
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
>> base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)'
>> is not
>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
>> base/index expression
>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
>> valid 64 bit base/index expression
>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
>>
> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every
> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of
> trouble if I remember correctly).
>
> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo.
>
>
Ok - thanks!

I'm currently doing this:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html

I will report back on how it goes. :-)

Cheers,
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Da Rock

On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:

I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).

I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed
from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.

Heres what I do:

./configure
gmake

and the problem looks like this:

[snip]
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,2)' is not
a valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1
Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every 
time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of 
trouble if I remember correctly).


The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo.

HTH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Help compiling ffmpeg from source

2012-02-29 Thread Andy Wodfer
I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64).

I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I
must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed
from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there.

Heres what I do:

./configure
gmake

and the problem looks like this:

[snip]
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,2)' is not
a valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression
/var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a
valid 64 bit base/index expression
gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1

Any idea what I can do to fix this?

Thanks!
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: fixating USB Storage

2012-02-29 Thread Robert Huff

Polytropon writes:

>  Label the drives and use labels instead of device names.
>  
>  Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here:
>  http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html

Good piece, but it doesn't explicitly cover one case and "man"
provides no example.
I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was
(obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached.
Can I add a label to that partition later?  "man gpart" only
shows a label being added when the partition is created,


Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: fixating USB Storage

2012-02-29 Thread Maciej Milewski
Dnia wtorek, 28 lutego 2012 15:32:18 bsali...@gmail.com pisze:
> Maciej
> 
> I didn't know if the label would work in loader.conf.
> 
> This solution suggested by Adam worked and seems much simpler than
> labeling the filesystem.
Depends on your needs. For me it was essential to have the same name of the 
disk no matter to what server I connect it. Label is working fine for me. 
Anyway I'm glad that you resolved your problem.
Have a nice day,
Maciej
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Traiano Welcome



On 29/02/2012 13:03, "Damien Fleuriot"  wrote:

>
>
>On 2/29/12 10:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>> This does, however, raise an interesting question.
>>>
>>> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd
>>>support and engineering ?
>>> Like, a la RHEL or SLES.
>> 
>> None that I know of.  People have tried to set up such things in the
>> past, and unfortunately have failed miserably.
>> 
>> The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is
>> supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their
>> offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed.
>> 
>> Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in
>> this way would be a good thing.  As a central provider that will help
>> promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that
>> nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide
>> employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some
>> obvious benefits.
>> 
>
>That was the point of my question exactly.
>
>Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that high
>profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a
>support contract.
>
>That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise
>Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they
>also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it.
>
>
>Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a
>professional OS.



I can vouch for the fact that most of the big ISPs in South Africa (for
example) are big users of FreeBSD, but often end up purchasing RedHat or
SuSE support contracts to run vendor applications that are only supported
on an O.S with a clear line of enterprise vendor support ...




>
>
>
>
>> Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is
>> an entirely different matter.  It's a competitive market out there, an a
>> new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft,
>> Oracle and other well established behemoths.  While I think that FreeBSD
>> and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed,  what is
>> missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell
>> FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that
>> they can invest.  That's pretty rare to find in combination with the
>> sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects
>>for.
>> 
>>  Cheers,
>> 
>>  Matthew
>> 
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/02/2012 11:03, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that high
> profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a
> support contract.
> 
> That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise
> Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they
> also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it.
> 
> Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a
> professional OS.

Like I said though -- the problem is not with having such a business,
but with establishing the business.  Even a company like iXSystems that
has been active in this area for more than 10 years has not managed to
grow into a company with a visible global presence.

It is also the case that many large concerns simply will not deal with
small companies: unless your balance-sheet and turnover are "big enough"
you just don't get a look in on any contracts that may be available.
(Yes, this is a short-sighted approach, but you can appreciate the
reasoning behind it: small companies are much riskier propositions, and
do tend to go bust much more easily.)

If there's anybody out there that knows how to do this -- take an idea
and turn it into a working business -- but doesn't have the right idea
yet: look over here!

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Damien Fleuriot


On 2/29/12 10:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> This does, however, raise an interesting question.
>>
>> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and 
>> engineering ?
>> Like, a la RHEL or SLES.
> 
> None that I know of.  People have tried to set up such things in the
> past, and unfortunately have failed miserably.
> 
> The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is
> supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their
> offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed.
> 
> Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in
> this way would be a good thing.  As a central provider that will help
> promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that
> nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide
> employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some
> obvious benefits.
> 

That was the point of my question exactly.

Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that high
profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a
support contract.

That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise
Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they
also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it.


Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a
professional OS.




> Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is
> an entirely different matter.  It's a competitive market out there, an a
> new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft,
> Oracle and other well established behemoths.  While I think that FreeBSD
> and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed,  what is
> missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell
> FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that
> they can invest.  That's pretty rare to find in combination with the
> sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects for.
> 
>   Cheers,
> 
>   Matthew
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread jb
Mariusz Herman  advatech.pl> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for 
> FreeBSD.
> ...

This may help (NetBSD and FreeBSD support comes in pairs):
http://netbsd.org/gallery/consultants.html
jb
  




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> This does, however, raise an interesting question.
> 
> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and 
> engineering ?
> Like, a la RHEL or SLES.

None that I know of.  People have tried to set up such things in the
past, and unfortunately have failed miserably.

The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is
supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their
offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed.

Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in
this way would be a good thing.  As a central provider that will help
promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that
nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide
employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some
obvious benefits.

Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is
an entirely different matter.  It's a competitive market out there, an a
new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft,
Oracle and other well established behemoths.  While I think that FreeBSD
and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed,  what is
missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell
FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that
they can invest.  That's pretty rare to find in combination with the
sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects for.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/02/2012 08:59, Mariusz Herman wrote:
> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for 
> FreeBSD.

You seem to be under a misapprehension of what FreeBSD.org is.  We
aren't an Operating Systems vendor that offers a product for sale.
Instead, we are a group of like-minded people who like to produce and
give away, for free, an operating system.

There isn't really any overarching company that offers FreeBSD support
in the way you are looking for; instead, you should look for a
contractor -- the freebsd-j...@freebsd.org list might be a better place
to ask.

Considering the list of hardware you've supplied -- I can't see any
obvious problems with FreeBSD compatibility (but I could be wrong) --
however, that's the sort of thing that tends to get sorted out in the
first day or so of work.  Could you expand a bit more on what you want
in terms of FreeBSD support?  What the purpose of the system is to be,
what applications you want to run, expectations of what you want the
support person to provide?

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


ODP: Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Mariusz Herman
Hi,

Thank you  a lot for link. That would very helpful.

Have a nice day.

_ 
Kind regards
Mariusz Herman
Sales Support Specialist

e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl 
tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
kom. +48 661 917 210



 
Advatech Sp. z o.o.
ul. Klecińska 123
54-413 Wrocław
tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
www.advatech.pl

Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział 
Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł

 




Od: Traiano Welcome 
Do: Damien Fleuriot , Mariusz Herman 
DW: freebsd questions 
Data:   2012-02-29 10:31
Temat:  Re: request a quote





On 29/02/2012 11:23, "Damien Fleuriot"  wrote:

>5-star rating this gem right now.
>
>
>
>
>
>This does, however, raise an interesting question.
>
>Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support
>and engineering ?
>Like, a la RHEL or SLES.


The only one that comes a close match is:

 
http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/freebsd-support?gclid=CLjugvH
vwq4CFUcTfAodSQp_Vw

I saw their advert in BSD Mag.




>
>Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the
>real support.
>
>
>
>On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for
>> FreeBSD.
>> 
>> For configuration:
>> 
>> Lp
>> Model
>> Description
>> Qty
>> 1.0
>> 7100139
>> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family
>> 4
>> 1.1
>> 7100142
>> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs
>> 4
>> 1.2
>> 7100140
>> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory
>> installation)
>> 8
>> 1.3
>> 7100166
>> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation)
>> 16
>> 1.4
>> 7100152
>> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation)
>> 48
>> 1.5
>> 2352A
>> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation)
>> 80
>> 1.6
>> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2
>> One 300 GB 1 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory
>> installation)
>> 8
>> 1.7
>> 6331A-N
>> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation)
>> 16
>> 1.8
>> 8370A
>> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation)
>> 4
>> 1.9
>> SG-SAS6-INT-Z
>> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory
>>Installation)
>> 4
>> 1.10
>> 4446A-Z-N
>> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP
>> 8
>> 1.11
>> 5394A
>> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation)
>> 32
>> 1.12
>> 2365A
>> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation)
>> 4
>> 1.13
>> 2364A
>> Cable management arm (for factory installation)
>> 4
>> 1.14
>> SR-JUMP-1MC13
>> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A
>> (for factory installation)
>> 8
>> 
>> _
>> Kind regards
>> Mariusz Herman
>> Sales Support Specialist
>> 
>> e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl
>> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
>> kom. +48 661 917 210
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Advatech Sp. z o.o.
>> ul. Klecińska 123
>> 54-413 Wrocław
>> tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
>> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
>> www.advatech.pl
>> 
>> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
>> Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział
>> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
>> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
>> Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł
>> 
>>=
>>=== 
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Jerome Herman

On 29/02/2012 10:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:

5-star rating this gem right now.





This does, however, raise an interesting question.

Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and 
engineering ?
Like, a la RHEL or SLES.

Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the real 
support.


There a few indeed, but I am not quite sure how the mailing list 
mainteners would take it if we were to publicize them here.

The makers of PC-BSD offers this kind of service.

Jerome Herman





On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman  wrote:


Hi,

I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for
FreeBSD.

For configuration:

Lp
Model
Description
Qty
1.0
7100139
Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family
4
1.1
7100142
Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs
4
1.2
7100140
2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory
installation)
8
1.3
7100166
Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation)
16
1.4
7100152
Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation)
48
1.5
2352A
2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation)
80
1.6
RB-SS2CF-300G10K2
One 300 GB 1 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory
installation)
8
1.7
6331A-N
2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation)
16
1.8
8370A
DVD-RW drive (for factory installation)
4
1.9
SG-SAS6-INT-Z
Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation)
4
1.10
4446A-Z-N
Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP
8
1.11
5394A
PCIe filler panel (for factory installation)
32
1.12
2365A
Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation)
4
1.13
2364A
Cable management arm (for factory installation)
4
1.14
SR-JUMP-1MC13
Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A
(for factory installation)
8

_
Kind regards
Mariusz Herman
Sales Support Specialist

e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl
tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
kom. +48 661 917 210




Advatech Sp. z o.o.
ul. Klecińska 123
54-413 Wrocław
tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
www.advatech.pl

Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział
Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Traiano Welcome


On 29/02/2012 11:23, "Damien Fleuriot"  wrote:

>5-star rating this gem right now.
>
>
>
>
>
>This does, however, raise an interesting question.
>
>Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support
>and engineering ?
>Like, a la RHEL or SLES.


The only one that comes a close match is:

 http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/freebsd-support?gclid=CLjugvH
vwq4CFUcTfAodSQp_Vw

I saw their advert in BSD Mag.




>
>Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the
>real support.
>
>
>
>On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for
>> FreeBSD.
>> 
>> For configuration:
>> 
>> Lp
>> Model
>> Description
>> Qty
>> 1.0
>> 7100139
>> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family
>> 4
>> 1.1
>> 7100142
>> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs
>> 4
>> 1.2
>> 7100140
>> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory
>> installation)
>> 8
>> 1.3
>> 7100166
>> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation)
>> 16
>> 1.4
>> 7100152
>> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation)
>> 48
>> 1.5
>> 2352A
>> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation)
>> 80
>> 1.6
>> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2
>> One 300 GB 1 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory
>> installation)
>> 8
>> 1.7
>> 6331A-N
>> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation)
>> 16
>> 1.8
>> 8370A
>> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation)
>> 4
>> 1.9
>> SG-SAS6-INT-Z
>> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory
>>Installation)
>> 4
>> 1.10
>> 4446A-Z-N
>> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP
>> 8
>> 1.11
>> 5394A
>> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation)
>> 32
>> 1.12
>> 2365A
>> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation)
>> 4
>> 1.13
>> 2364A
>> Cable management arm (for factory installation)
>> 4
>> 1.14
>> SR-JUMP-1MC13
>> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A
>> (for factory installation)
>> 8
>> 
>> _
>> Kind regards
>> Mariusz Herman
>> Sales Support Specialist
>> 
>> e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl
>> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
>> kom. +48 661 917 210
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Advatech Sp. z o.o.
>> ul. Klecińska 123
>> 54-413 Wrocław
>> tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
>> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
>> www.advatech.pl
>> 
>> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
>> Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział
>> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
>> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
>> Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł
>> 
>>=
>>=== 
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Damien Fleuriot
5-star rating this gem right now.





This does, however, raise an interesting question.

Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and 
engineering ?
Like, a la RHEL or SLES.

Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the real 
support.



On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for 
> FreeBSD.
> 
> For configuration:
> 
> Lp
> Model
> Description
> Qty
> 1.0
> 7100139
> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family
> 4
> 1.1
> 7100142
> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs
> 4
> 1.2
> 7100140
> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory 
> installation)
> 8
> 1.3
> 7100166
> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation)
> 16
> 1.4
> 7100152
> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation)
> 48
> 1.5
> 2352A
> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation)
> 80
> 1.6
> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2
> One 300 GB 1 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory 
> installation)
> 8
> 1.7
> 6331A-N
> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation)
> 16
> 1.8
> 8370A
> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation)
> 4
> 1.9
> SG-SAS6-INT-Z
> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation)
> 4
> 1.10
> 4446A-Z-N
> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP
> 8
> 1.11
> 5394A
> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation)
> 32
> 1.12
> 2365A
> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation)
> 4
> 1.13
> 2364A
> Cable management arm (for factory installation)
> 4
> 1.14
> SR-JUMP-1MC13
> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A 
> (for factory installation)
> 8
> 
> _ 
> Kind regards
> Mariusz Herman
> Sales Support Specialist
> 
> e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl 
> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
> kom. +48 661 917 210
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Advatech Sp. z o.o.
> ul. Klecińska 123
> 54-413 Wrocław
> tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
> www.advatech.pl
> 
> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
> Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział 
> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
> Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł
> 
>  
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


request a quote

2012-02-29 Thread Mariusz Herman
Hi,

I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for 
FreeBSD.

For configuration:

Lp
Model
Description
Qty
1.0
7100139
Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family
4
1.1
7100142
Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs
4
1.2
7100140
2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory 
installation)
8
1.3
7100166
Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation)
16
1.4
7100152
Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation)
48
1.5
2352A
2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation)
80
1.6
RB-SS2CF-300G10K2
One 300 GB 1 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory 
installation)
8
1.7
6331A-N
2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation)
16
1.8
8370A
DVD-RW drive (for factory installation)
4
1.9
SG-SAS6-INT-Z
Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation)
4
1.10
4446A-Z-N
Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP
8
1.11
5394A
PCIe filler panel (for factory installation)
32
1.12
2365A
Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation)
4
1.13
2364A
Cable management arm (for factory installation)
4
1.14
SR-JUMP-1MC13
Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A 
(for factory installation)
8

_ 
Kind regards
Mariusz Herman
Sales Support Specialist

e-mail: mher...@advatech.pl 
tel. (+4871) 772 66 08
kom. +48 661 917 210



 
Advatech Sp. z o.o.
ul. Klecińska 123
54-413 Wrocław
tel. (+4871)  772 66 00
fax. (+4871) 798 57 75
www.advatech.pl

Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 145269
Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział 
Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego
NIP: PL 899-21-85-891
Kapitał zakładowy  50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł

 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"