Re: Zlib version in FreeBSD - 3 releases behind?
On 03/07/13 19:53, Kris Sridhar wrote: Gentlemen, The library (/lib/libz.so.6) in FreeBSD 9.1R does seem to have Zlib 1.2.4 based on the complaints from the following at least: libarchive.so.* libssh.so.* grep gzip I've provided objdump -p output from my machine: fBSD9# objdump -p libz.so.6 libz.so.6: file format elf32-i386-freebsd Program Header: LOAD off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**12 filesz 0x000124c4 memsz 0x000124c4 flags r-x LOAD off0x000124c4 vaddr 0x000134c4 paddr 0x000134c4 align 2**12 filesz 0x02e0 memsz 0x02e4 flags rw- DYNAMIC off0x00012588 vaddr 0x00013588 paddr 0x00013588 align 2**2 filesz 0x00d8 memsz 0x00d8 flags rw- STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr 0x align 2**2 filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rw- Dynamic Section: NEEDED libc.so.7 SONAME libz.so.6 INIT0x13f0 FINI0xe1b4 HASH0xb4 STRTAB 0xaec SYMTAB 0x3fc STRSZ 0x49f SYMENT 0x10 PLTGOT 0x1367c PLTRELSZ0x1b0 PLTREL 0x11 JMPREL 0x1240 REL 0x1130 RELSZ 0x110 RELENT 0x8 VERDEF 0x106c VERDEFNUM 0x5 VERNEED 0x1110 VERNEEDNUM 0x1 VERSYM 0xf8c RELCOUNT0x1e Version definitions: 1 0x01 0x09d5f4e6 libz.so.6 2 0x00 0x07e5cf30 ZLIB_1.2.4.0 3 0x00 0x053ecdd0 ZLIBprivate_1.0 ZLIB_1.2.4.0 4 0x00 0x07e5c230 ZLIB_1.2.7.0 ZLIB_1.2.4.0 5 0x00 0x077a28b2 FBSD_1.2 ZLIB_1.2.4.0 Version References: required from libc.so.7: 0x077a28b0 0x00 06 FBSD_1.0 fBSD9# uname -r 9.1-RELEASE If Zlib 1.2.7 were installed independently from tar.gz downloaded from zlib.net site, it produces, /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.7 which is different from /lib/libz.so.6 of course. But this installs a /usr/local/include/zlib.h that is identical to /usr/src/lib/libz/zlib.h as well as /usr/include/zlib.h The complaint mentioned before from dependent objects like libarchive that the /lib/libz.so.6 containing ZLIB_1_2_4 is missing results if one removes /lib/libz.so.6 and replaces with a symlink to the new version like: /lib/libz.so.6 -- /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.7 Given the version definitions from the objdump -p of the original /lib/libz.so.6 that was installed as part of a fresh, clean install of FreeBSD 9.1R, as provided above, any thoughts on the Zlib version actually baked into the release please? Thanks. Kris I note that /usr/src/lib/libz/ChangeLog starts ChangeLog file for zlib Changes in 1.2.7 (2 May 2012) and the Symbol.map file has four sections, two of which are labelled ZLIB_1.2.7.0 and ZLIB_1.2.4.0. This is getting beyond my experience as I'm very rusty on library handling tools, a core developer is what you need. However, a wild guess would be that it supports (or is intended to support) both 1.2.4 and 1.2.7 features. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: fetchmail/sendmail: Domain of sender address does not exist
From free...@edvax.de Fri Mar 8 07:50:06 2013 On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:55:57 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: And Matthias already helped me sort it out. Could you write to the list how you solved the problem? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-March/081919.html Anton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [kde-freebsd] kde3 maintainer contact
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:51:47 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: Istvan Gabor suseuse...@lajt.hu writes: I have a few specific questions regarding kde3 in freebsd. As there is no freebsd kde3 list I would like to ask my questions directly from port maintainer(s). Do you know how can I contact them? There isn't one. There is a k...@freebsd.org mailing list, but it's listed as maintaining kde4, not kde3. KDE 3 ports are not maintained. You can use general ports@ mailist, CCing to k...@freebsd.org won't hurt, but not expect much response. Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Squid 3.2 Reverse Proxy with HTTPS
I am stuck in a kind of desperate situation, I have been managing several FreeBSD systems as forward proxy servers with Squid on them for 13 years, and a few with reverse proxies for around 4 years. But for the last few months, I have been struggling with HTTPS uploads failing on the reverse proxies. I have personally built and destroyed over 20 virtual machines, and spent countless hours on this. Every time duplicating the problem, no matter how basic I strip the process down, I have tried FreeBSD 8.3, 9.0, 9.1, with Squid 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.8, and a couple different versions of the Squid 3.1 port. Everything installs without errors, services all start, pages load all looks great, until you try to do a POST on HTTPS. I thought at first it was just when the size was over a certain amount, but that turned out to be a wrong assumption. I have a test scenario that can duplicate the problem with exact same results every time. In the end my test is just simple HTML form that submits a file to a PHP script that saves it. I have a directory of 7 .png image files that are screenshots from some documentation I wrote for our PC support desk. 3 of the files upload successfully, and 4 of them fail. Its the same 3 and 4 every time, I can't find any thing in common between that ones that succeed and fail. They will all work if you use http going to the same exact HTML form and PHP script. If I remove Squid and go directly to the Apache process using HTTPS all files upload fine. After a lot of debugging, and painstakingly reading very long Squid debugging logs. I found out that Squid appears to continue waiting for the end of the file after the client browser has stopped sending data, for almost 5 minutes, before just returning complete, and not actually submitting the file to the Apache process. If you actually stop the browser while its sitting there waiting for a response, the file gets submitted to Apache process and saves successfully. I have a couple existing production servers that are running 9.0, with Squid 3.1.21, that are working, but I am in desperate need of updating them to meet requirements. I have posted several messages to the Squid mailing list, received some initial suggestions that didn't get anywhere, but I haven't been able to get any more help. I am hoping to find someone else out there that is running FreeBSD with Squid in a Reverse proxy setup with HTTPS that has not ran into this issue and is willing to share configurations with me, so I can possibly find out what's wrong with my setup. Or if you have also ran into this issue, perhaps we can share notes and possibly find something to will make it possible to file a bug report somewhere. Even though I can reproduce this without fail none of my debugging output actually gives an error, it just doesn't behave correctly. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
What is your favorite board for a micro system?
Hi! What is your favorite mini/micro/nano/pico-itx platform for home projects? I currently run a home server on an Intel mini-itx board but was looking around for something fun to play with with the following specs: - mini-itx or smaller, low profile - fanless - low power 12V external PSU - 1 LAN, preferably 2 - 2 USB2/3 - Flash bootable, but with option for hdd boot - GPIO would be fun - hdmi out would be nice I have tried VIA boards but found they were flacky... Any suggestion regarding ARM vs Intel based? Thanks, Erik -- M: +34 666 334 818 T: +34 915 211 157 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: What is your favorite board for a micro system?
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:53:27 +0100 Erik Nørgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote: Hi! What is your favorite mini/micro/nano/pico-itx platform for home projects? I currently run a home server on an Intel mini-itx board but was looking around for something fun to play with with the following specs: - mini-itx or smaller, low profile - fanless - low power 12V external PSU - 1 LAN, preferably 2 - 2 USB2/3 - Flash bootable, but with option for hdd boot - GPIO would be fun - hdmi out would be nice I have tried VIA boards but found they were flacky... Any suggestion regarding ARM vs Intel based? Can't think of any off hand in that small of form factor, but I strongly suggest looking to see what you can find running an Intel Atom. I've been very happy with those and their related chipsets so far for microATX boards. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: What is your favorite board for a micro system?
On 8 March 2013, at 15:53, Erik Nørgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote: Hi! What is your favorite mini/micro/nano/pico-itx platform for home projects? I currently run a home server on an Intel mini-itx board but was looking around for something fun to play with with the following specs: - mini-itx or smaller, low profile - fanless - low power 12V external PSU - 1 LAN, preferably 2 - 2 USB2/3 - Flash bootable, but with option for hdd boot - GPIO would be fun - hdmi out would be nice I have tried VIA boards but found they were flacky... Any suggestion regarding ARM vs Intel based? Look at the Mac Mini. Only has one LAN though. It does have a fan but I have never had it come on. Runs 9.1 (amd or i386) although booting is currently a challenge. I am working on that. It does require 120 VAC though. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
