Re: Since SquirrelMail Looks Like It Will Never Be Supported Again...

2013-08-31 Thread Frank Leonhardt
On 30/08/2013 22:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote: SquirrelMail seems to be forever on hold because of an incompatibility with PHP 5. So I am going to have to replace it as our Webmail interface. I'm a bit confused about this - you seem to be saying that Squirrelmail won't work on PHP 5? I've been

Re: Since SquirrelMail Looks Like It Will Never Be Supported Again...

2013-08-31 Thread Reko Turja
-Original Message- From: Frank Leonhardt On 30/08/2013 22:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote: SquirrelMail seems to be forever on hold because of an incompatibility with PHP 5. So I am going to have to replace it as our Webmail interface. I'm a bit confused about this - you seem to be saying

Re: Since SquirrelMail Looks Like It Will Never Be Supported Again...

2013-08-31 Thread Frank Leonhardt
On 31/08/2013 10:32, Reko Turja wrote: -Original Message- From: Frank Leonhardt On 30/08/2013 22:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote: SquirrelMail seems to be forever on hold because of an incompatibility with PHP 5. So I am going to have to replace it as our Webmail interface. I'm a bit

Re: Since SquirrelMail Looks Like It Will Never Be Supported Again...

2013-08-31 Thread Reko Turja
-Original Message- From: Frank Leonhardt FWIW I'm using Dovecote 1 or 2 for the IMAP. In particular, Dovecot 1 with Squirrelmail has been really hammered, but has never broken. I sometimes get time-outs copying thousands of emails in one hit, but that's fair enough and nothing has

Re: Since SquirrelMail Looks Like It Will Never Be Supported Again...

2013-08-31 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On August 31, 2013 8:35:27 AM +0100 Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote: On 30/08/2013 22:20, Tim Daneliuk wrote: SquirrelMail seems to be forever on hold because of an incompatibility with PHP 5. So I am going to have to replace it as our Webmail interface. I'm a bit confused

find ports that aren't required anymore

2013-08-31 Thread Dale Scott
I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to reduce ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports installed that aren't required anymore? Will pkg_delete also delete any dependencies no

Re: find ports that aren't required anymore

2013-08-31 Thread Mark Felder
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote: I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to reduce ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports installed that aren't required

Re: find ports that aren't required anymore

2013-08-31 Thread Dale Scott
Cool, thanks Mark. Guess that's also a reason to learn new pkg tools. . On 2013-08-31, at 1:41 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote: I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to reduce ports in use and simplify

FreeBSD.org

2013-08-31 Thread Sedney Rodriguez
Sent from my iPhone ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org