On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
Has there been any movement on getting tlmgr working on FreeBSD? The
inability to get and install updates is annoying.
Basically there are two ways of dealing with TeXLive;
1) Install it from ports. This also means using ports to update
Hello there,
I wanted to use rctl within a jail to add more fine grained setting for
some users, and default ones to. But it does not seem to work. Is it
supported? Do we need to add a special flag to the jail creation?
# rctl -a loginclass:default:maxproc:deny=30
rctl: rctl_add_rule: Operation
Hi,
Is there a simple way of testing whether a given script was called via cron,
I'd rather find a solution that would work from within the script rather
than setting an environment variable in the crontab.
thanks
Paul.
(anyone here going to EuroBSD con?)
--
-
Paul
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:26:09 +0200
Roland Smith articulated:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
Has there been any movement on getting tlmgr working on FreeBSD?
The inability to get and install updates is annoying.
Basically there are two ways of dealing with TeXLive;
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:26:59 +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Is there a simple way of testing whether a given script was called via cron,
I'd rather find a solution that would work from within the script rather
than setting an environment variable in the crontab.
I'd suggest the script creates
In the last episode (Sep 16), Paul Macdonald said:
Is there a simple way of testing whether a given script was called via cron,
I'd rather find a solution that would work from within the script rather
than setting an environment variable in the crontab.
You check to see if stdin is a
Hi there!
Is there any way to enable persistence between reboots when using FreeBSD
from a USB stick?
Thanks in advance!
atar.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:26:59 +0100
Paul Macdonald articulated:
Hi,
Is there a simple way of testing whether a given script was called
via cron,
I'd rather find a solution that would work from within the script
rather than setting an environment variable in the crontab.
thanks
Paul.
Hello,
just a few days ago i setup my first FreeBSD server, so i am new to this OS.
I already tried to find the information i was looking for, but to no luck.
I try to add a line in /etc/hosts.allow which would allow and log all
attempts using SSH (sshd).
I found
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:20:00 -
atar atar.yo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to enable persistence between reboots when using
FreeBSD from a USB stick?
What exactly do you mean by enable persistence between reboots ?
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
Thanks for replying, Steve.
As for your question, I mean if it is possible for example to write a file
to the filesystem and that the file will not be deleted on the next boot.
actually, I didn't succeed to write a file to the filesystem because it
is automatically mounted as readonly
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:25 PM, atar atar.yo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for replying, Steve.
As for your question, I mean if it is possible for example to write a file
to the filesystem and that the file will not be deleted on the next boot.
actually, I didn't succeed to write a file to the
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:36 AM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
just a few days ago i setup my first FreeBSD server, so i am new to this
OS.
I already tried to find the information i was looking for, but to no luck.
I try to add a line in /etc/hosts.allow which would allow
atar atar.yo...@gmail.com writes:
Will the 'mount -o rw /' command work although the filesystem has
already been mounted as readonly?
You'll need the -u option as well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Will the 'mount -o rw /' command work although the filesystem has already
been mounted as readonly?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hello,
1.
Transparent Superpages was in FreeBSD for a few years.
I would like to know if there is any benchmark or real world performance
experience about this setting.
2.
I have seen somewhere that non-transparent superpages was being developed in
HEAD too.
Any insight on it? Please correct
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:57 PM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rick,
sorry that i did not reply to all, from now on i will use reply to all.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I will also open port 80 for web access, but i do not want to log those.
Because i expect a huge amount
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM, atar atar.yo...@gmail.com wrote:
the text in your citation doesn't appear in the following URL:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/**man.cgi?query=mountapropos=0**
Hello Rick,
sorry that i did not reply to all, from now on i will use reply to all.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I will also open port 80 for web access, but i do not want to log those.
Because i expect a huge amount of traffic on my server.
So i only want to log successfull and unsuccessfull
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 07:59:32AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:26:09 +0200
Roland Smith articulated:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
Has there been any movement on getting tlmgr working on FreeBSD?
The inability to get and install updates is
What does the '-u' option do? I've not find in the 'mount' man page any
explanation on this option.
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
atar atar.yo...@gmail.com writes:
Will the 'mount -o rw /' command work although the filesystem has
already been mounted as
Hi Aurikus,
Selecting Reply all when replying to messages on the list allows the
entire list to benefit from the discussion.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:05 AM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rick.
thanks a lot for your quick reply.
Does your recommendation - to use
atar atar.yo...@gmail.com writes:
What does the '-u' option do? I've not find in the 'mount' man page
any explanation on this option.
The man page includes:
-u The -u flag indicates that the status of an already mounted file
system should be changed. Any of the options
the text in your citation doesn't appear in the following URL:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mountapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+9.1-RELEASEarch=i386format=html
However, Thanks for the citation.
Regards,
atar.
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org write:
atar
On 16/09/2013 14:36, aurikus grande wrote:
I try to add a line in /etc/hosts.allow which would allow and log all
attempts using SSH (sshd).
Actually, by default all logins via ssh are already logged to
/var/log/auth.log
Verb. Sap. tcpwrappers are mostly a lot less useful than they appear to
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:39:17 +0200
Roland Smith articulated:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 07:59:32AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:26:09 +0200
Roland Smith articulated:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
Has there been any movement on getting tlmgr
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:57:51AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:00:22 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Personally I don't think TeX is a good fit for the ports tree (because of
duplication of effort).
I have to add that I think that the chosen strategy (provide a full port and a
Most web servers handle their own logging.
I do _not_ want the web server acces to be logged (at least as of now).
Have you looked at /var/log/auth.log?
yes, and as you mentioned in your previous update, it logs the success
login (only). Unsuccessfull attempts are being sent to /var/log/messages
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:44 PM, aurikus grande auri...@gmail.com wrote:
Most web servers handle their own logging.
I do _not_ want the web server acces to be logged (at least as of now).
Which is fine, but still configured via your web server.
Have you looked at /var/log/auth.log?
yes,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Seriously though, tlmgr is the name of the package and configuration
manager included in TeX Live. It operates completely separately from
any package manager the operating system may provide. I fail to see why
it was disabled.
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:32:43 -, atar wrote:
What does the '-u' option do? I've not find in the 'mount' man page any
explanation on this option.
That's strange. I'm currently looking at man mount on a
FreeBSD 8.2 system and the following paragraph is readable:
-u The -u flag
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:33:15 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:57:51AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:00:22 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Personally I don't think TeX is a good fit for the ports tree (because of
duplication of effort).
I have to add
On 8/25/2013 2:39 PM, Carmel wrote:
Using portupgrade-devel-20130718,3 installed from the ports system,
attempting to update texlive-base always ends like this:
--- Build of print/texlive-base ended at: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:25:25 -0400
(consumed 00:11:57)
--- Updating dependency info
---
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:28:17 -0400, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:05:04PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:26:59 +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Is there a simple way of testing whether a given script was called via
cron,
I'd rather find a solution
Dear All ,
I have NFS 3 in FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 .
The clients are FreeBSD , Linux , Windows XP through Samba on the same
files .
The Windows XP is able to access , use and modify files created or modified
by any other operating system user .
In contrary , FreeBSD and Linux users are NOT able to
From your non MS$ clients, open a shell and type umask, what returns?
Sounds like your default umask needs changing is all.
I would suggest going with a umask of 775 and ensuring all ppl requiring mod
access be group members of what you have settled on.
- aurf
On Sep 16, 2013, at 8:41 PM,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:53 PM, aurfalien aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
From your non MS$ clients, open a shell and type umask, what returns?
Sounds like your default umask needs changing is all.
I would suggest going with a umask of 775 and ensuring all ppl requiring
mod access be group
When a file is modified by a user ,
Whats that users umask?
- aurf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
When a file is modified by a user
Also curious whats that users group?
- aurf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
39 matches
Mail list logo
