My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!

2003-06-01 Thread Steven Lake
Hi all.  I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it
and everything on it works great...except the wheel.  I can't get KDE to
do anything with the wheel.  How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my
scroll wheel?  Much apreciated on the info.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gated restart

2003-06-01 Thread DanB
How do you restart Gated. Are reload the gated.conf file.

Dan

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD and Windows XP

2003-06-01 Thread redrik
I feel bad about not finding this answer myself as I know how to do 
it with Win XP.  My searching skills seem to be rusty.

Question:

How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server?

When I try to map a drive I get :
  The account is not authorized to log in from this station.


What I think the answer is:

I think it's the Plain Text Password issue.  I've dealt with it before 
on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a 
Plain Text Password.

I've been searching for a few hours as I know it must be a common 
issue and the answer is there somewhere.  If you can point me in 
the right direction it would be a great help.

Thanks.

Nigel Holloway


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!

2003-06-01 Thread cas
 From: Steven Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2003/05/31 Sat AM 09:00:55 EDT
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!
 
   Hi all.  I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it
 and everything on it works great...except the wheel.  I can't get KDE to
 do anything with the wheel.  How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my
 scroll wheel?  Much apreciated on the info.

try adding this to /etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Section InputDevice
Identifier Mouse0
Driver mouse
Option Protocol Auto
Option Device   /dev/sysmouse
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Panics on large writes to NFS mounted FAT filesystems

2003-06-01 Thread DoubleF
Hello,

A 4.8-R server NFS-exports its fat32 filesystem /E (called
this way on both hosts) to a 4.8-R client through a 100Mbps network
(FWIW, those are the only hosts on the network). Any large write (such
as  cat /dev/zero  /E/zero) results in 10-30M being written to the
server, and then the server page faults. The fat32 filesystem is clean
and has 10G empty before the killer write, but afterwards it is
(naturally) damaged.

It does not seem to be a hardware problem, because just the same
transfer made by netcat listening/writing to /E/zero on the server and
sending on the client does not cause any problem, and writing to a
UFS share on the same server does not, either.

The kernel is custom with nfs and fat compiled in (the problem
is reproducible under GENERIC kernel, and the results, including the
trace, are quite alike). The fault message is as follows:

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address   = 0x1
fault code  = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc015d36f
stack pointer   = 0x10:0xccf70d80
frame pointer   = 0x10:0xccf70d9c
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 102 (nfsd)
interrupt mask  = net tty bio cam
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
syncing disks... panic: lockmgr: non-zero exclusive count
Uptime: 3m0s

This is the kernel backtrace (AFAICT the relevant part is from
#14 down):

#0  0xc0161c9a in dumpsys ()
#1  0xc0161a6b in boot ()
#2  0xc0161e90 in poweroff_wait ()
#3  0xc015c3c9 in lockmgr ()
#4  0xc018c934 in vop_stdlock ()
#5  0xc0217f65 in ufs_vnoperate ()
#6  0xc0196a89 in vn_lock ()
#7  0xc018f85b in vget ()
#8  0xc021016f in ffs_sync ()
#9  0xc0191887 in sync ()
#10 0xc0161806 in boot ()
#11 0xc0161e90 in poweroff_wait ()
#12 0xc028500a in trap_fatal ()
#13 0xc0284cdd in trap_pfault ()
#14 0xc02848c7 in trap ()
#15 0xc015d36f in malloc ()
#16 0xc01dd6aa in nfsrv_dorec ()
#17 0xc01e1bd0 in nfssvc_nfsd ()
#18 0xc01e1863 in nfssvc ()
#19 0xc028522e in syscall2 ()
#20 0xc0278da5 in Xint0x80_syscall ()
#21 0x804813e in ?? ()

Is this a known problem? Comments? (Dont-do-it-then is all right,
but that's not interesting...)

DoubleF

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD and Windows XP

2003-06-01 Thread BSD baby
 How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server?
 When I try to map a drive I get :
   The account is not authorized to log in from this station.
 I think it's the Plain Text Password issue.  I've dealt with it before 
 on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a 
 Plain Text Password.

It sounds like you're talking about Samba?

If so, here's my samba config file that works with WinXP *and* Win98:
(Note: I set up a username called shared as the only shared directory.)


/usr/local/etc/smb.conf
-
[global]
valid users = shared
force user = shared
guest account = shared
default case = lower
case sensitive = no
remote announce = 192.168.0.5/YourWindowsWorkgroupName
auto services = global
default = global
dns proxy = no 
encrypt passwords = no
null passwords = yes
security = share
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192
max log size = 50
server string = dev
netbios name = dev
netbios aliases = dev
workgroup = YourWindowsWorkgroupName
log file = /var/log/samba.log


# Share Definitions ==

[shared]
path = /home/shared/
writable = yes
force user = shared
force group = shared
guest account = shared
public = yes

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread David Gerard

OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it
came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time.

So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from
ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It
starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal
error).

The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that
when I see it doing so.

What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one
must jump through to get it to behave itself?


- d.



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Doug Poland
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote:
 
 OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it
 came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time.
 
 So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from
 ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It
 starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal
 error).
 
 The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that
 when I see it doing so.
 
 What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one
 must jump through to get it to behave itself?
 
I had been using linux binaries with success.  I've been trying to build
native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing.  I've never been able to compile
any version of OO.org from source.


-- 
Regards,
Doug
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


file: table is full.

2003-06-01 Thread Hugo Saro
Hi list,

I have a fbsd server as a gateway on my home lan. It's
running 4.7-STABLE , specs p200 mmx 80mb ram 2 hdd's
.. it works fine , but I do get a regular (sort of)
problem.

When there's some problem with my ISP and dhclient
keeps trying getting an IP, eventually when I get home
i'll have lots of message spammed in the console, and
ps w ls etc will say too many open files in system. I
normally solved this by killing some processes,
unplugging and plugging the network cables, and by
killing dhclient. When it fired up again it would be
working. But today i couldn't even kill because it
said it couldn't open some .so (I'm sure they're
there)

Eventually kill worked, i could top and ps but it got
back to the same again. I thought on logging off to
free some memory etc. big mistake. I can't even login
now! :-(

Right after i try to login on the server, i get this:

/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot open
/usr/lib/libutil.so.3

I can't SSH to it either, the connection is dropped
about 5 seconds after i try. I could ssh about 2 times
but it said it couldn't open another .so because too
many open files in system and shut the connection
down.

I lost the keyboard on the server too but reconnecting
it enabled it again. Right now i'm just waiting about
3 hours to reboot it, trying to avoid it since it's
been up for ages.. But i'd like to know what might be
causing this and how to avoid it next time. It
_always_ happens when i loose IP for several hours and
dhclient can't get another ip.

Any ideas welcome.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread David Gerard
Mark Rowlands ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030601 02:49]:
 On Saturday 31 May 2003 5:18 pm, Doug Poland wrote:
  On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote:

   OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it
   came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that
   time.
   So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from
   ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It
   starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an
   internal error).
   The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that
   when I see it doing so.
   What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one
   must jump through to get it to behave itself?

  I had been using linux binaries with success.  I've been trying to build
  native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing.  I've never been able to compile
  any version of OO.org from source.

 why not use the freebsd package ? :-
 http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
 

Yes, but does it actually work reliably? I would have expected the official
port to achieve basic function, but it observably doesn't. Hence asking.


- d.



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: fdisk/disklabel - Error: unable to write data to disk ad0

2003-06-01 Thread Joshua Oreman
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200 or thereabouts, Herbert seemed to write:
 Hei!
 
 On Thursday May 29th I installed FreeBSD 5.1 Beta2. The next day I've
 update to CURRENT from May 30th. I have a 60 GB ATA harddisk and during
 installation I created only 1 20 GB slice for FreeBSD. Today I wanted
 to use the other 40 GB of my hard disk and create two more slices each
 20 GB. Well, fdisk reports that the disk geometry is wrong and sets it
 to 7476/255/63, the same disk geometry the BIOS reports. When I try to
 save the changes in fdisk, I get the following error messages:
 
   Error: Unable to write data to disk ad0
   Disk partition write returned an error status!

It's GEOM preventing you from shooting yourself in the foot. Feature, not bug :-)

 
 Hmm, I tried both in multiuser and singleuser mode.
 Finally I booted with the floppies I had used to setup FreeBSD 5.1B2.
 Fdisk also reports that the disk geometry is wrong and sets it to
 7476/255/63. But creating the slices and saving the changes did work:
 
 The data for partition 1 is:
 sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
 [snip]
 The data for partition 2 is:
 sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BS
 [snip]
 The data for partition 3 is:
 sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
 [snip]
 The data for partition 4 is:
 UNUSED
 
 Now I have booted FreeBSD from hard disk and try to create partitions
 within the new slices. But again I get:
 
 Error: unable to write data to disk ad0
 
 Now I am booting with the install floppies again. I guess this is 
 working fine.
 Any ideas what I am doing wrong?

Nothing - you should boot from install floppy to partition any drive which is
even partially being used, even if you don't change the used parts. (I had
this problem too due to a swapspace on the drive.)

HTH,
-- Josh

 
 Regards,
 Herbert
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Tom Snell
David Gerard wrote:
OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it
came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time.
So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from
ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It
starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal
error).
The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that
when I see it doing so.
What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one
must jump through to get it to behave itself?
Like another poster mentioned, I can't say I've ever had much luck 
attempting to compile OO from source.  After several attempts beginning 
with OO 1.0, I began downloading the binary package from the OpenOffice 
FreeBSD Project at http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ .  OO is still a 
little quirky in FBSDI've seen it completely crash XWindows when 
attempting to open docs in Writer, whether in .doc or its own .swx 
format, or crash just OO itself.  The latest available build, 
openoffice-1.0.3_2 (built on 4.8-RELEASE with FBSD GCC 3.2.1) is what I 
feel is the most stable build so farit's behaving a lot better and I 
work with it regularly.  Kudos to the FBSD OpenOffice teamit's a 
massive project, but needs support for such a key desktop app.  BTW, one 
of the coolest features, available since 1.0.2 I believe, is the setup 
of the built-in PDF Converter, basically setting up a pipe to 
ghostscript in the openoffice-spadmin utility.it rocksopened a 
41-page MS Word doc in OO, printed to PDF Converter, got a nice .pdf doc 
in about 2 seconds!  This in itself is worth having OO installed.
--
   ___  ___
  / __/__ ___ / _ )/ __/ _ \  Tom Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 / _// __/ -_) -_) _  |\ \/ // /  FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
/_/ /_/  \__/\__//___//  XFree86 4.3.0  WindowMaker 0.80.2
 make buildworld...for a better tomorrow!

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gdm2-2.4.1.3

2003-06-01 Thread DoubleF
 hi, 

Hello,

 /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/
 drwxr-xr-x3 root  gdm 512 May 29 18:47 gdm
 
 gdm.conf in /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/
 -rw-r--r--   1 root  gdm2628 May 31 10:20 gdm.conf
 
 #chown gdm .keep_me
 chown: gdm: illegal user name
 _
 
 what am i doing wrong?!

The correct command to set user to nobody and group to gdm would be

# chown nobody:gdm .keep_me

What your command does is to set user to gdm (which is nonexistent) and
leave group as it is.

HTH,
DoubleF

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD and Windows XP

2003-06-01 Thread clayton rollins


On Sat, 31 May 2003 23:48:55 +0930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote


I feel bad about not finding this answer myself as I know how to do
it with Win XP.  My searching skills seem to be rusty.
Question:

How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server?

When I try to map a drive I get :
  The account is not authorized to log in from this station.
What I think the answer is:

I think it's the Plain Text Password issue.  I've dealt with it before
on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a
Plain Text Password.
I've been searching for a few hours as I know it must be a common
issue and the answer is there somewhere.  If you can point me in
the right direction it would be a great help.
Thanks.

Nigel Holloway

I just went through this with win 2k...

control panel - administrative tools - local security policy and set send 
non-encrypted passwords to third party samba... to enabled.

Hope that works,
Clayton
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: file: table is full.

2003-06-01 Thread Jez Hancock
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Hugo Saro wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 I have a fbsd server as a gateway on my home lan. It's
 running 4.7-STABLE , specs p200 mmx 80mb ram 2 hdd's
 .. it works fine , but I do get a regular (sort of)
 problem.
 
 When there's some problem with my ISP and dhclient
 keeps trying getting an IP, eventually when I get home
 i'll have lots of message spammed in the console, and
 ps w ls etc will say too many open files in system. I
 normally solved this by killing some processes,
 unplugging and plugging the network cables, and by
 killing dhclient. When it fired up again it would be
 working. But today i couldn't even kill because it
 said it couldn't open some .so (I'm sure they're
 there)
Try increasing the number of available file descriptors.  You can do
this dynamically at boot time using something like:

kern.maxuser=64

in /etc/sysctl.conf, 
which assigns a suitable number of file descriptors for 64 users - for
more info see 'man tuning' - but also increases various other kernel
flags as well.  

Make sure to check your current 'maxusers' sysctl setting - something
like:

sysctl -a | grep maxusers

should work... also look at some of the other sysctl settings whilst
you're at it:

sysctl -a | grep file 

maybe?

I get this on my system:

[19:15:37] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/munk# sysctl -a | grep file
kern.maxfiles: 8168
kern.bootfile: /kernel
kern.maxfilesperproc: 7351
kern.openfiles: 751
kern.corefile: %N.core
kern.filedelay: 30
p1003_1b.mapped_files: 0

where my maxusers is set dynamically by the kernel (options MAXUSERS 0
in the kernel config file iirc), and at boot is set to 256.

Looking at the amount of ram you have though, be careful not to increase
the number of file descriptors too much otherwise you'll get a lot of
swapping out to disk going on.

In general however check your logfiles to see why so many file
descriptors are being eaten up.  For example I once used cronolog to log
httpd transfers and errors for around 300 users, and each cronolog instance
required 2 processes/file descriptors, meaning a total of 1200 file
descriptors just for logging!  The number of file descriptors soon maxed
out because the available fds wasn't enough.

Also see the manpage for 'fstat', which tells you about what files are
currently open on your system.

HTH,
Jez
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Tim Kellers
I've been able to successfully build (and use) OpenOffice on 4.7-STABLE, 
4.8-STABLE, and 5.1 BETA since 1.0.2 --I'm currently using 1.0.3.  Before 
that, I had no success in building 1.0.0 or 1.0.1, (I didn't try building 
those versions on CURRENT)but I did have immediate success using the Linux 
version under emulation.

I have had trouble (read that no success) getting any version to print using 
kprint and CUPS (and I've tried the configuration the kde folks suggest), but 
I can print using good old lpd/lpr, so I'm happy enough with that.

Because the time to build is so long, since version 1.0.3, I've been able to 
pkg_create -b openoffice on my fastest, roomiest machine, and pkg_add 
openoffice over an NFS mount, to new workstations.

I don't know if the hardware manufacturer is significant, but all the machines 
I've either built it on or pkg_add'd it to are/were Dell Optiplex PIII and P4 
workstations and Poweredge PIII servers (both single and dual processors).

One undocumented observation about the build/install process I can make:  it 
seems to me that I started having success building OpenOffice when I 
installed FreeBSD on new computers, and built OpenOffice before I filled it 
up with a zillion other ports.

Just my .02

Tim Kellers
CPE/NJIT
On Saturday 31 May 2003 01:05 pm, David Gerard wrote:
 Mark Rowlands ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030601 02:49]:
  On Saturday 31 May 2003 5:18 pm, Doug Poland wrote:
   On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote:
OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2,
it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at
that time.
So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2
from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of
works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies
with an internal error).
The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe
that when I see it doing so.
What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop
one must jump through to get it to behave itself?
  
   I had been using linux binaries with success.  I've been trying to
   build native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing.  I've never been able
   to compile any version of OO.org from source.
 
  why not use the freebsd package ? :-
  http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/

 Yes, but does it actually work reliably? I would have expected the official
 port to achieve basic function, but it observably doesn't. Hence asking.


 - d.



 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Repositioning /var | /tmp to avoid disk full condition

2003-06-01 Thread Joseph Maxwell
Hello,
The 3rd edition of The Complete FreeBSD suggest repositioning the /var
directory ( and even /tmp) to prevent filling up that partition. I
ignored it and did just that today, filled it up. So I attempted the
repositioning with the following recommended command steps and results:

 cd /var
 tar cf - . | (cd /usr/var; tar xf - )
 cd /
 rm -rf /var
 ln -s /usr/var /var

However the  'rm -rf /var' returned

 rm: /var: Device busy

After trying all known tricks to me to remove /var, I concluded that
since it was mounted from the /etc/fstab I should dismount it and remove
the directory (link point ?) and create a soft link there as
recommended. However, on rebooting boot was aborted, was thrown into
single users mode. After some findangling eventually got the system back
up as before with the /var directory, except that now it contains only
the /var/cron and /var/run directories.

The original /var contained

 /var/account:
 /var/at:
 /var/backups:
 /var/crash:
 /var/cron:
 /var/db:
 /var/games:
 /var/log:
 /var/lost+found:
 /var/mail:
 /var/msgs:
 /var/preserve:
 /var/qmail:
 /var/run:
 /var/rwho:
 /var/smtpd:
 /var/spool:
 /var/tmp:
 /var/webmin:
 /var/yp:

How can I restore the full functioning structural integrity as before,
of course the contents of the /usr/var directory was wiped out somwhere
along the way, sans log, sans mail, sans everything. Just want to
continue as before.

Thanks.

--  Joe  --



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Why won't gaim show me online??

2003-06-01 Thread Steven Lake
Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name
to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to
anyone else even though I see others as online.  Anyone know why that
would be?  All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name.  If anyone can
think of a better client than this, I'm game for it.  :)  If not, then if
someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: XFree86 4.3.0 anti-alias font problem

2003-06-01 Thread Doug Poland
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:33:51AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm on a 4.8-STABLE box with XFree86 4.3.0.  I'm going through the handbook
 (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-fonts.html)
 and adding anti-aliased fonts to my system.
 
 The problem I'm having is adding TrueType and the bitstream-vera fonts
 to my fontpath via xset.
 
 Following the handbook, I've...
 
 * Created the directory: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType
 * Copied .ttf fonts from my windows partition to above directory
 * run the following command: ttmkfdir  fonts.dir
 
 I do get a message from ttmkfdir which states:
   unknown font foundry code SYRC
 
 A look at the files in the directory reveals nothing remotely similar
 to SYRC.  The fonts.dir file appears valid but admittedly I'm not sure
 what I'm looking at.
 
 To continue, when I run:
 
 * xset fp+ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType
 
 I see:
 
   xset:  bad font path element (#64), possible causes are:
   Directory does not exist or has wrong permissions
   Directory missing fonts.dir
   Incorrect font server address or syntax
 
 In my case, the directory does exist and has the same permissions as
 the other font directories.  The fonts.dir file does exist.  And I'm
 not sure what the 3rd possible cause is.
 
 Curiously, I get the exact same error when I try to add the
 bitstream-vera fonts (added via x11-fonts/bitstream-vera port) to the
 fontpath.  
 
 * xset fp+ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/
   xset:  bad font path element (#64), possible causes are:
   Directory does not exist or has wrong permissions
   Directory missing fonts.dir
   Incorrect font server address or syntax
 
 I must be missing something here.  Does anyone have any suggestions?
 
For the archives, the problem went away when I restarted X.

-- 
Regards,
Doug
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why won't gaim show me online??

2003-06-01 Thread Tim Kellers
How about AIM?

/usr/ports/net/aim

It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too.

Tim Kellers
CPE/NJIT


On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
   Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name
 to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to
 anyone else even though I see others as online.  Anyone know why that
 would be?  All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name.  If anyone can
 think of a better client than this, I'm game for it.  :)  If not, then if
 someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful.

 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why won't gaim show me online??

2003-06-01 Thread yussef
im pretty gaim compiles natively. its simply a gtk2 based app.
could this be some kind of firewalling issue? perhaps you're blocking
packets being sent to the AOL server. just a thought..
also, you could try naim. much simpler, and doesnt hog up nearly as
much screen real estate.

yussef

On Sat, 31 May 2003 15:42:40-0400 Tim
Kellers[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How about AIM?
 
 /usr/ports/net/aim
 
 It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too.
 
 Tim Kellers
 CPE/NJIT
 
 
 On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
  Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen
  name
  to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as
  offline to anyone else even though I see others as online.  Anyone
  know why that would be?  All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name.
   If anyone can
  think of a better client than this, I'm game for it.  :)  If not,
  then if someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful.
 
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 4.8 running on Dell 1655MC Blade Server

2003-06-01 Thread Brent Wiese
I can't answer your question directly, but you may want to check out RLX...
Much higher density (300ex model):

http://www.rlx.com/

I know they're approved for Linux, but maybe they'll approve a FreeBSD image
for you. Their support seems to be pretty responsive.

Brent


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Williams
 Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 1:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: FreeBSD 4.8 running on Dell 1655MC Blade Server
 
 
 Hi, 
  
 We are thinking of purchasing a couple of Dell 1655MC Blade 
 servers to replace a number of web servers. Can anyone 
 confirm that FreeBSD 4.8 is compatible with this kit? Dell 
 cannot confirm that it will work with FreeBSD. Any info on 
 this would be appreciated. 
  
 Cheers, 
  
 Tim Williams
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd- questions
 
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!

2003-06-01 Thread Hasse
On Saturday 31 May 2003 15.00, Steven Lake wrote:
   Hi all.  I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it
 and everything on it works great...except the wheel.  I can't get KDE to
 do anything with the wheel.  How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my
 scroll wheel?  Much apreciated on the info.

 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
Try to edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config
and in the section Section InputDevice, put something like this :

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse0
Driver  mouse
Option  Protocol auto
Option  Device /dev/sysmouse
Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
Option  Buttons 5
EndSection
-- 
Regards
   Hasse
  Webmaster @ Swedehost.com

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!

2003-06-01 Thread Steven Lake
I got it working!  thanks for all the suggestions everyone!  :)

On Sat, 31 May 2003, Hasse wrote:

 On Saturday 31 May 2003 15.00, Steven Lake wrote:
  Hi all.  I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it
  and everything on it works great...except the wheel.  I can't get KDE to
  do anything with the wheel.  How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my
  scroll wheel?  Much apreciated on the info.
 
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Hi.
 Try to edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config
 and in the section Section InputDevice, put something like this :

 Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Mouse0
 Driver  mouse
 Option  Protocol auto
 Option  Device /dev/sysmouse
 Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
 Option  Buttons 5
 EndSection
 --
 Regards
Hasse
   Webmaster @ Swedehost.com



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: lynx on 4.8-stable

2003-06-01 Thread Bob Hall
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:09:45AM -0400, John wrote:
 Hello,
 
A few recommendations.
 
1. Check your environment variables and compare the list to
   the variables listed in the lynx manpage. There are some
   that affect proxies.

Good suggestion.
$ env
http_proxy=http://localhost:3128/
gopher_proxy=http://localhost:3128/
https_proxy=http://localhost:3128/
 
2. Please double check your lynx.cfg (locate lynx.cfg) to
   make sure there are no proxies installed. ie: something
   like:
 
   http_proxy:http://name.domain.foo:3128/
   https_proxy:http://name.domain..foo:3128/

The lynx.cfg file is stock; the proxy settings are all commented out.
  
   Try explicity setting no_proxy:*

That works. Thanks.

I'd still like to know what is creating the proxy settings. There's 
nothing in the bash or lynx files.

Bob Hall
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Repositioning /var | /tmp to avoid disk full condition

2003-06-01 Thread Lee Harr
cd /var
tar cf - . | (cd /usr/var; tar xf - )
cd /
rm -rf /var
ln -s /usr/var /var
However the  'rm -rf /var' returned

rm: /var: Device busy

After trying all known tricks to me to remove /var, I concluded that
since it was mounted from the /etc/fstab I should dismount it and remove
the directory (link point ?) and create a soft link there as
However, on rebooting boot was aborted, was thrown into
single users mode.
Probably all you need to do is remove the line about /var
from your /etc/fstab  (or just comment it out)
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why won't gaim show me online??

2003-06-01 Thread Kenneth Culver
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 03:42  PM, Tim Kellers wrote:

How about AIM?

/usr/ports/net/aim

It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too.

Tim Kellers
CPE/NJIT
AIM does require linux emulation, but gaim doesn't.

Ken

On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
	Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name
to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline 
to
anyone else even though I see others as online.  Anyone know why that
would be?  All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name.  If anyone can
think of a better client than this, I'm game for it.  :)  If not, 
then if
someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gated Where the gated.conf file at.

2003-06-01 Thread DanB
Router is running gated. but there is no gated.conf file in /etc/. Where
would  be the gated.conf file located? Is there a differant file
somewhere.

Dan

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread Jud
On Sat, 31 May 2003 11:34:25 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,
I have done something pretty silly and not sure now how to recover. I
installed 5.0 release on my desktop which was primarily a Win2k machine 
and
now there is no option to dual boot. Well there is but when I choose the 
F1
??? option instead of booting win2k is give me a message telling me that
NTLDR cannot be found.

Can anyone shed any light on a work around for this. I am truly stumped.

Thanks

LukeK
Is Win2K on a different hard drive than FreeBSD?  If so, then to use the 
FreeBSD bootloader, you must install it on both drives.  GAG, which has 
been suggested, is a nice bootloader, and the FAQ on the FreeBSD web site 
has some directions to boot both FreeBSD and Win using the NT/Win2K 
bootloader.

That's 3 options, should be enough to find a solution that works for you.

Jud

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firebird broken?

2003-06-01 Thread Markie
I had this problem too, if it's not that you don't have SYSVIPC in your
kernel then it's fairly easy to get rid of...

# ipcs -s
Semaphores:
T ID KEYMODE   OWNERGROUP
xx   xxxx   xx   xxxx
# ipcrm -s id from above

- Original Message -
From: Socketd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM
Subject: Firebird broken?


 Hi all

 When installing Firebird (1.0.2) on my FreeBSD 4.8 server I get:

 source/interbase/bin/gbak -c misc/metadata.gbak
 source/refDatabases/jrd/metadata.gdb
 can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4operating system
 directive semget failed
 can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4No such file or
 directory
 can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4can't format
 message 12:33 -- message system code -4
 can't format message 12:169 -- message system code -4can't format
 message 12:83 -- message system code -4
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/firebird/work/firebird-1.0.2.908.
 *** Error code 1

 Hope someone can help.

 Please cc to me as I am not on the list.

 br
 socketd
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread lukek
thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work for
me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be found. I
could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I
usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent
backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a
different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to
recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload.

Cheers


- Original Message -
From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003年6月1日 7:29
Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot


 On Sat, 31 May 2003 11:34:25 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi,
  I have done something pretty silly and not sure now how to recover. I
  installed 5.0 release on my desktop which was primarily a Win2k machine
  and
  now there is no option to dual boot. Well there is but when I choose the
  F1
  ??? option instead of booting win2k is give me a message telling me that
  NTLDR cannot be found.
 
  Can anyone shed any light on a work around for this. I am truly stumped.
 
  Thanks
 
  LukeK

 Is Win2K on a different hard drive than FreeBSD?  If so, then to use the
 FreeBSD bootloader, you must install it on both drives.  GAG, which has
 been suggested, is a nice bootloader, and the FAQ on the FreeBSD web site
 has some directions to boot both FreeBSD and Win using the NT/Win2K
 bootloader.

 That's 3 options, should be enough to find a solution that works for you.

 Jud



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread Jud
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:12:08 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work 
for
me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be found. 
I
could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I
usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent
backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a
different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to
recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload.
Why a whole new installation?  Why not just repair the currently installed 
Win2K?  (Boot from your Win2K CD.  You can automatically repair or manually 
fix the master boot record and boot sector, which will cause the computer 
to boot Win2K again.  Then you can install GAG, the FreeBSD bootloader or 
use the Win2K bootloader.

Or is it as simple as forgetting to change the BIOS cback to booting from 
your hard drive after booting from CD?

If you're still flummoxed, provide more info about your setup and you'll 
get more help.

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread lukek
OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two
drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K
installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of the
redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed
FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot boot. I
cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me remember
the admin passwd. So I installed GAG. GAG detects all installed OS's but
when trying to boot to Win2K it gives the same error ie NTLDR is missing
press Ctrl+Alt+Del to reboot.

Grub gave the same errors even though it also detected the installation. I
thought to be a bit creative and revert to a RedHat install to recover the
MBR but it complains about incorrectly aligned partitions or some such. The
disk is not hosed but the MBR is not healthy.

The bios is fine I have been changing that to boot from CD/Floppy/HDD when
necessary.

Any additional light you can shed on this would be appreciated.

Thanks

LukeK


- Original Message -
From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003年6月1日 9:26
Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot


 On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:12:08 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work
  for
  me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be
found.
  I
  could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I
  usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent
  backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a
  different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to
  recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload.

 Why a whole new installation?  Why not just repair the currently installed
 Win2K?  (Boot from your Win2K CD.  You can automatically repair or
manually
 "fix" the master boot record and boot sector, which will cause the
computer
 to boot Win2K again.  Then you can install GAG, the FreeBSD bootloader or
 use the Win2K bootloader.

 Or is it as simple as forgetting to change the BIOS cback to booting from
 your hard drive after booting from CD?

 If you're still flummoxed, provide more info about your setup and you'll
 get more help.

 Jud


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Apache question - Method Not Allowed

2003-06-01 Thread doug
This only relates to FreeBSD in that apache happens to be running on it. But I
am stumped and would appreciate any ideas

I have apache configured to allow CGI under suExec. This is all working. Except
I have a form that gets The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL
...

CGI and SSI are globally turned on and work with lots of domains hosted on the
same instance of apache. I get no entries in either log file and no errors in
suexec_log. The error follows this script and form, i.e. if I copy it into a
site where forms are working, I still get this error.



_
Douglas Denault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread Jud
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:45:44 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two
drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K
installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of 
the
redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed
FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot 
boot.
I kind of doubt FreeBSD-5 had its way with the MBR, or at least a FreeBSD 
installation has never done anything to the MBR I haven't told it to 
(correctly or mistakenly;).  See whether the Win2K partition is set active.

I
cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me 
remember
the admin passwd.
Doh! indeed.  Then if setting the Win2K partition active doesn't work, I'm 
out of better options than your suggestion to do a fresh install and mount 
the old Win2K partition from there. But I'm no guru.  Anyone else have a 
suggestion?

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread lukek
You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to have
FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times before
with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the older
versions and the latest.

The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a number
of tools to check on this ) but no cigar.

Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something to
fix this.

LukeK

- Original Message -
From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003年6月1日 11:29
Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot


 On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:45:44 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two
  drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K
  installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of
  the
  redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed
  FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot
  boot.

 I kind of doubt FreeBSD-5 "had its way with the MBR," or at least a
FreeBSD
 installation has never done anything to the MBR I haven't told it to
 (correctly or mistakenly;).  See whether the Win2K partition is set
active.

  I
  cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me
  remember
  the admin passwd.

 Doh! indeed.  Then if setting the Win2K partition active doesn't work, I'm
 out of better options than your suggestion to do a fresh install and mount
 the old Win2K partition from there. But I'm no guru.  Anyone else have a
 suggestion?

 Jud


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread Eduardo Viruena Silva
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, lukek wrote:

 You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to have
 FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times before
 with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the older
 versions and the latest.

 The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a number
 of tools to check on this ) but no cigar.

 Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something to
 fix this.

 LukeK

Tell me something:   Does FreeBSD boot?

It seems to me Win2k is somehow broken but, if FreeBSD can boot
then you can read the NTFS slice, therefore you can make a backup
of your data storesd in Win2k slice.

mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt

will mount slice 1 of ATA disk 0 if it contains an NTFS file system.



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot

2003-06-01 Thread lukek
thanks for that hint. I am in the process of doing precisely that. I figure
I can cp all the files to the samba share and then swipe and reload and
should be able to get all the important stuff back. It is just a matter of
spending my time now to accomplish this.

Appreciated the help on this. Winblows did somehow get broken and even
trying to reinstall winblows did not work it actually came up with the same
problem so I am now just hoping that disk is not trashed.

Thanks
LukeK

- Original Message -
From: "Eduardo Viruena Silva" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003年6月1日 12:37
Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot


 On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, lukek wrote:

  You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to
have
  FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times
before
  with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the
older
  versions and the latest.
 
  The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a
number
  of tools to check on this ) but no cigar.
 
  Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something
to
  fix this.
 
  LukeK

 Tell me something:   Does FreeBSD boot?

 It seems to me Win2k is somehow broken but, if FreeBSD can boot
 then you can read the NTFS slice, therefore you can make a backup
 of your data storesd in Win2k slice.

 mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt

 will mount slice 1 of ATA disk 0 if it contains an NTFS file system.





___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

TWM focus

2003-06-01 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi !

I know this is not the list for that since it is not FreeBSD specific, 
but I tried the XFree86 list and did not get any answer... Since I'm 
sure some of you must are using TWM, I give it a shot.

How can I make TWM to automatically focus a new window ?
Each time I launch an application, a square (empty window) appears under
my mouse pointer and I have to click to make the window appear, which
is pretty annoying.
If you have any idea...

Thanks in advance.

- -- 
Antoine Jacoutot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lphp.org
gpg key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+2aXkY3Hnhkr+5cQRAmZGAJ0dOSKaEhIyYY/X+99lQFMAl07NxQCfUD1S
lxu+ptkuSCt+256gsb/uHwg=
=u7IE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-05-11 - 2003-05-31

2003-06-01 Thread Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical 
examples and how-to guides.  This message is posted weekly
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the aim of letting people
know what's available on the website.  Before you post a question
here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list 
archives http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists 
and/or The FreeBSD Diary http://www.freebsddiary.org/. 

These are the articles posted during this period:

21-May : Postfix - virtual domains (part II)
 A bit more detail on the options
 http://freebsddiary.org/postfix-virtual-domains.php?2


-- 
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/ - practical examples
FreshPorts- http://www.FreshPorts.org/   - the place for ports
FreshSource   - http://www.FreshSource.org/  - the place for source

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Installing a network interface

2003-06-01 Thread Verghese George
Can somebody help me with this question?
Whne trying to install additional network interfaces with using
/stand/sysinstall

I get the screen Network interface information required

However ethernet card details are not detected in the menu. I am using
freebsd version 4.4 

In an earlier installation with a realtek card , the details came up and
installation was possible.

How do I make sure that the card is detected in the installation?


Thanks 

Verghese George
Melbourne
Australia
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Installing a network interface

2003-06-01 Thread lukek
when you rebooted after installing the card did it show up in dmesg ? Check
if the interface has been detected by

#dmesg |grep rl ( rl if it is a realtek card or whatever the abbreviation is
for your manufacturer )


If the card is there then all you have to do is use the ifconfig cmd to
bring the interface up. To make this automatic edit rc.conf to suit your
setup and it should be fine

BTW which release/version are you using ?

LukeK

- Original Message -
From: "Verghese George" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003年6月1日 16:57
Subject: Installing a network interface


 Can somebody help me with this question?
 Whne trying to install additional network interfaces with using
 /stand/sysinstall

 I get the screen "Network interface information required"

 However ethernet card details are not detected in the menu. I am using
 freebsd version 4.4

 In an earlier installation with a realtek card , the details came up and
 installation was possible.

 How do I make sure that the card is detected in the installation?


 Thanks

 Verghese George
 Melbourne
 Australia
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Duplex printing with HP DeskJet 6122

2003-06-01 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi folks,

We just got an HP DeskJet 6122 for printing Unix docs.  It comes with a
duplexing unit, which works when driven by the supplied Windows driver.

However, I'd really rather have this thing connected to my FreeBSD
workstation.

I've tried CUPS and LPRng, and neither of the two support this printer's
duplexing feature out of the box.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Ciao,
Sheldon.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New Hams and BSD mailing list.

2003-06-01 Thread Carl Makin
Due to popular demand :) I have created a mailing list at qth.net for 
Amateur Radio Operators to discuss using BSD operating systems with 
Amateur Radio (Ham radio).

The list is aimed at all Ham operators whether you're just looking for 
logging software or doing DSP developmental work.

You can subscribe via a web page at;

http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/bsd-ham

or by sending an email to;

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Carl,
vk1kcm.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gnome-applets-2.2.2 build still fails

2003-06-01 Thread Jukka Huvinen

After reinstalling, it still fails. Obviously something is still
missing or wrong. Any ideas what to do?

portupgrade -PrRf glib-2\* results the following errors:

gstreamer-plugins-0.6.0_1:
Patch patch-configure failed to apply cleanly.

gnometerminal-2.2.1:
usr/X11R6/lib/libvte.so undefined reference to 'unlockpt'
'mbsrtowcs' 'grantpt' 'ptsname'

gnomeapplets2-2.2:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.5 not found

(4.8 release, ports updated to current...)

- Jukka


On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:

 On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 02:55, Jukka Huvinen wrote:
  I'm still trying to portupgrade to the current XFree86 + gdm2 + gnome2.
  Managed to complete XFree86 and gdm2 (at least portupgrade passed
  through).
 
  But gnome2 fails when building gnome-applets! (The package is not
  available and forced to build from sources.)
 
  It requires libc_r.so.5, but there is only libc_r.so.4 in /usr/lib
  (See below...)
 
  What should I do? Help!

 Looks like you're trying to build GNOME on 4.x with FreeBSD 5.x binaries
 installed.  Try doing a portupgrade --rRf glib-2\*.  That should take
 care of all your library problems.

 Joe

 
  - Jukka
 
 
  --
 
  cc -O -pipe -o multiload-applet-2 cpuload.o linux-proc.o load-graph.o
  loadavg.o main.o memload.o netload.o properties.o swapload.o
  -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread  -L/usr/local/lib
  ../screen-exec/.libs/libscreen-exec.al -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpanel-applet-2
  -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2
  -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lXinerama
  -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lXft -lfreetype -lz -lXext
  -lXrender -lfontconfig -lpangox-1.0 -lX11 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2
  -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -llinc
  -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lgtop-2.0 -lgtop_sysdeps-2.0
  -lgtop_common-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv
  /usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libc_r.so.5, needed by
  /usr/X11R6/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
  /usr/local/lib/libgtop_common-2.0.so: undefined reference to `statvfs'
  gmake[2]: *** [multiload-applet-2] Error 1
  gmake[2]: Leaving directory
  `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2/multiload'
  gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
  gmake[1]: Leaving directory
  `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2'
  gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
  *** Error code 2
 
  Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2.
  ---  Skipping 'x11/gnome2' (gnome2-2.2.1_1) because 'x11/gnomeapplets2'
  (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) failed
  ! x11/gnomeapplets2 (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) (new compiler error)
  * x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.2.1_1)
 
  --
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --
 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Multicast Routing Table Modification

2003-06-01 Thread Dixon Siu
Hi,

 

I am working on a project that required me to modify the routing behaviours
at the kernel level. I have been searching information from the Internet and
FreeBSD.org. But no luck at all. Basically, I need to do the following:

1. pick up the multicast packets before they are routed in the kernel

2. then redirect all the multicast packets to my kernel module which add
extended entry to the routing table.

 

The problem is I am new to kernel programming and FreeBSD. Thus I have a
hard time finding the right information sources.

 

Any comment is welcome. Thanks in advance for the help.

 

Dixon Siu


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gnome-applets-2.2.2 build still fails

2003-06-01 Thread Jukka Huvinen


On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Jukka Huvinen wrote:


 After reinstalling, it still fails. Obviously something is still
 missing or wrong. Any ideas what to do?

 portupgrade -PrRf glib-2\* results the following errors:

 gstreamer-plugins-0.6.0_1:
 Patch patch-configure failed to apply cleanly.

 gnometerminal-2.2.1:
 usr/X11R6/lib/libvte.so undefined reference to 'unlockpt'
 'mbsrtowcs' 'grantpt' 'ptsname'

Fixed the above. Upgrading vte fixed the problem.


 gnomeapplets2-2.2:
 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.5 not found

Where is libc_r ??


 (4.8 release, ports updated to current...)

 - Jukka


 On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:

  On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 02:55, Jukka Huvinen wrote:
   I'm still trying to portupgrade to the current XFree86 + gdm2 + gnome2.
   Managed to complete XFree86 and gdm2 (at least portupgrade passed
   through).
  
   But gnome2 fails when building gnome-applets! (The package is not
   available and forced to build from sources.)
  
   It requires libc_r.so.5, but there is only libc_r.so.4 in /usr/lib
   (See below...)
  
   What should I do? Help!
 
  Looks like you're trying to build GNOME on 4.x with FreeBSD 5.x binaries
  installed.  Try doing a portupgrade --rRf glib-2\*.  That should take
  care of all your library problems.
 
  Joe
 
  
   - Jukka
  
  
   --
  
   cc -O -pipe -o multiload-applet-2 cpuload.o linux-proc.o load-graph.o
   loadavg.o main.o memload.o netload.o properties.o swapload.o
   -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread  -L/usr/local/lib
   ../screen-exec/.libs/libscreen-exec.al -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpanel-applet-2
   -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2
   -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lXinerama
   -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lXft -lfreetype -lz -lXext
   -lXrender -lfontconfig -lpangox-1.0 -lX11 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2
   -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -llinc
   -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lgtop-2.0 -lgtop_sysdeps-2.0
   -lgtop_common-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv
   /usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libc_r.so.5, needed by
   /usr/X11R6/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
   /usr/local/lib/libgtop_common-2.0.so: undefined reference to `statvfs'
   gmake[2]: *** [multiload-applet-2] Error 1
   gmake[2]: Leaving directory
   `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2/multiload'
   gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
   gmake[1]: Leaving directory
   `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2'
   gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
   *** Error code 2
  
   Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2.
   ---  Skipping 'x11/gnome2' (gnome2-2.2.1_1) because 'x11/gnomeapplets2'
   (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) failed
 ! x11/gnomeapplets2 (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) (new compiler error)
 * x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.2.1_1)
  
   --
   ___
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
   http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
   To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  --
  PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gdm2-2.4.1.3

2003-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi, 
i have tried to set up the Gnome Desktop Manager on my freshly installed
4.8-STABLE box, but some errors refuse to disappear:

error msg:
gdm_config_parse: Authdir /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/gdm is not owned by 
user nobody, group gdm. Aborting.

_
what i have already done:

#pkg_info -L gdm2-2.4.1.3
/usr/X11R6/bin/gdm
...

added this line in the group file in /etc/
gdm:*:11:

same for passwd in /etc/
gdm:*:11:11:Gnome Desktop Manager:/usr/X11R6/etc/gdm:/sbin/nologin

and set the entry in the /etc/ttys to 
/gdmon

i couldn' manage to set the owner of the dir/files: (why?!)

/usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/
drwxr-xr-x3 root  gdm 512 May 29 18:47 gdm

gdm.conf in /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/
-rw-r--r--   1 root  gdm2628 May 31 10:20 gdm.conf

#chown gdm .keep_me
chown: gdm: illegal user name
_

what am i doing wrong?!




any help will be appreciated;-)
thanx in advance
*bsd-n00b
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]