My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!
Hi all. I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it and everything on it works great...except the wheel. I can't get KDE to do anything with the wheel. How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my scroll wheel? Much apreciated on the info. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gated restart
How do you restart Gated. Are reload the gated.conf file. Dan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD and Windows XP
I feel bad about not finding this answer myself as I know how to do it with Win XP. My searching skills seem to be rusty. Question: How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server? When I try to map a drive I get : The account is not authorized to log in from this station. What I think the answer is: I think it's the Plain Text Password issue. I've dealt with it before on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a Plain Text Password. I've been searching for a few hours as I know it must be a common issue and the answer is there somewhere. If you can point me in the right direction it would be a great help. Thanks. Nigel Holloway ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!
From: Steven Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/05/31 Sat AM 09:00:55 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!! Hi all. I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it and everything on it works great...except the wheel. I can't get KDE to do anything with the wheel. How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my scroll wheel? Much apreciated on the info. try adding this to /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol Auto Option Device /dev/sysmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panics on large writes to NFS mounted FAT filesystems
Hello, A 4.8-R server NFS-exports its fat32 filesystem /E (called this way on both hosts) to a 4.8-R client through a 100Mbps network (FWIW, those are the only hosts on the network). Any large write (such as cat /dev/zero /E/zero) results in 10-30M being written to the server, and then the server page faults. The fat32 filesystem is clean and has 10G empty before the killer write, but afterwards it is (naturally) damaged. It does not seem to be a hardware problem, because just the same transfer made by netcat listening/writing to /E/zero on the server and sending on the client does not cause any problem, and writing to a UFS share on the same server does not, either. The kernel is custom with nfs and fat compiled in (the problem is reproducible under GENERIC kernel, and the results, including the trace, are quite alike). The fault message is as follows: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x1 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc015d36f stack pointer = 0x10:0xccf70d80 frame pointer = 0x10:0xccf70d9c code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 102 (nfsd) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... panic: lockmgr: non-zero exclusive count Uptime: 3m0s This is the kernel backtrace (AFAICT the relevant part is from #14 down): #0 0xc0161c9a in dumpsys () #1 0xc0161a6b in boot () #2 0xc0161e90 in poweroff_wait () #3 0xc015c3c9 in lockmgr () #4 0xc018c934 in vop_stdlock () #5 0xc0217f65 in ufs_vnoperate () #6 0xc0196a89 in vn_lock () #7 0xc018f85b in vget () #8 0xc021016f in ffs_sync () #9 0xc0191887 in sync () #10 0xc0161806 in boot () #11 0xc0161e90 in poweroff_wait () #12 0xc028500a in trap_fatal () #13 0xc0284cdd in trap_pfault () #14 0xc02848c7 in trap () #15 0xc015d36f in malloc () #16 0xc01dd6aa in nfsrv_dorec () #17 0xc01e1bd0 in nfssvc_nfsd () #18 0xc01e1863 in nfssvc () #19 0xc028522e in syscall2 () #20 0xc0278da5 in Xint0x80_syscall () #21 0x804813e in ?? () Is this a known problem? Comments? (Dont-do-it-then is all right, but that's not interesting...) DoubleF ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD and Windows XP
How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server? When I try to map a drive I get : The account is not authorized to log in from this station. I think it's the Plain Text Password issue. I've dealt with it before on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a Plain Text Password. It sounds like you're talking about Samba? If so, here's my samba config file that works with WinXP *and* Win98: (Note: I set up a username called shared as the only shared directory.) /usr/local/etc/smb.conf - [global] valid users = shared force user = shared guest account = shared default case = lower case sensitive = no remote announce = 192.168.0.5/YourWindowsWorkgroupName auto services = global default = global dns proxy = no encrypt passwords = no null passwords = yes security = share socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 max log size = 50 server string = dev netbios name = dev netbios aliases = dev workgroup = YourWindowsWorkgroupName log file = /var/log/samba.log # Share Definitions == [shared] path = /home/shared/ writable = yes force user = shared force group = shared guest account = shared public = yes ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal error). The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that when I see it doing so. What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one must jump through to get it to behave itself? - d. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal error). The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that when I see it doing so. What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one must jump through to get it to behave itself? I had been using linux binaries with success. I've been trying to build native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing. I've never been able to compile any version of OO.org from source. -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
file: table is full.
Hi list, I have a fbsd server as a gateway on my home lan. It's running 4.7-STABLE , specs p200 mmx 80mb ram 2 hdd's .. it works fine , but I do get a regular (sort of) problem. When there's some problem with my ISP and dhclient keeps trying getting an IP, eventually when I get home i'll have lots of message spammed in the console, and ps w ls etc will say too many open files in system. I normally solved this by killing some processes, unplugging and plugging the network cables, and by killing dhclient. When it fired up again it would be working. But today i couldn't even kill because it said it couldn't open some .so (I'm sure they're there) Eventually kill worked, i could top and ps but it got back to the same again. I thought on logging off to free some memory etc. big mistake. I can't even login now! :-( Right after i try to login on the server, i get this: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Cannot open /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 I can't SSH to it either, the connection is dropped about 5 seconds after i try. I could ssh about 2 times but it said it couldn't open another .so because too many open files in system and shut the connection down. I lost the keyboard on the server too but reconnecting it enabled it again. Right now i'm just waiting about 3 hours to reboot it, trying to avoid it since it's been up for ages.. But i'd like to know what might be causing this and how to avoid it next time. It _always_ happens when i loose IP for several hours and dhclient can't get another ip. Any ideas welcome. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
Mark Rowlands ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030601 02:49]: On Saturday 31 May 2003 5:18 pm, Doug Poland wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal error). The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that when I see it doing so. What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one must jump through to get it to behave itself? I had been using linux binaries with success. I've been trying to build native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing. I've never been able to compile any version of OO.org from source. why not use the freebsd package ? :- http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ Yes, but does it actually work reliably? I would have expected the official port to achieve basic function, but it observably doesn't. Hence asking. - d. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fdisk/disklabel - Error: unable to write data to disk ad0
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200 or thereabouts, Herbert seemed to write: Hei! On Thursday May 29th I installed FreeBSD 5.1 Beta2. The next day I've update to CURRENT from May 30th. I have a 60 GB ATA harddisk and during installation I created only 1 20 GB slice for FreeBSD. Today I wanted to use the other 40 GB of my hard disk and create two more slices each 20 GB. Well, fdisk reports that the disk geometry is wrong and sets it to 7476/255/63, the same disk geometry the BIOS reports. When I try to save the changes in fdisk, I get the following error messages: Error: Unable to write data to disk ad0 Disk partition write returned an error status! It's GEOM preventing you from shooting yourself in the foot. Feature, not bug :-) Hmm, I tried both in multiuser and singleuser mode. Finally I booted with the floppies I had used to setup FreeBSD 5.1B2. Fdisk also reports that the disk geometry is wrong and sets it to 7476/255/63. But creating the slices and saving the changes did work: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) [snip] The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BS [snip] The data for partition 3 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) [snip] The data for partition 4 is: UNUSED Now I have booted FreeBSD from hard disk and try to create partitions within the new slices. But again I get: Error: unable to write data to disk ad0 Now I am booting with the install floppies again. I guess this is working fine. Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Nothing - you should boot from install floppy to partition any drive which is even partially being used, even if you don't change the used parts. (I had this problem too due to a swapspace on the drive.) HTH, -- Josh Regards, Herbert ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal error). The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that when I see it doing so. What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one must jump through to get it to behave itself? Like another poster mentioned, I can't say I've ever had much luck attempting to compile OO from source. After several attempts beginning with OO 1.0, I began downloading the binary package from the OpenOffice FreeBSD Project at http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ . OO is still a little quirky in FBSDI've seen it completely crash XWindows when attempting to open docs in Writer, whether in .doc or its own .swx format, or crash just OO itself. The latest available build, openoffice-1.0.3_2 (built on 4.8-RELEASE with FBSD GCC 3.2.1) is what I feel is the most stable build so farit's behaving a lot better and I work with it regularly. Kudos to the FBSD OpenOffice teamit's a massive project, but needs support for such a key desktop app. BTW, one of the coolest features, available since 1.0.2 I believe, is the setup of the built-in PDF Converter, basically setting up a pipe to ghostscript in the openoffice-spadmin utility.it rocksopened a 41-page MS Word doc in OO, printed to PDF Converter, got a nice .pdf doc in about 2 seconds! This in itself is worth having OO installed. -- ___ ___ / __/__ ___ / _ )/ __/ _ \ Tom Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] / _// __/ -_) -_) _ |\ \/ // / FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE /_/ /_/ \__/\__//___// XFree86 4.3.0 WindowMaker 0.80.2 make buildworld...for a better tomorrow! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gdm2-2.4.1.3
hi, Hello, /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/ drwxr-xr-x3 root gdm 512 May 29 18:47 gdm gdm.conf in /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root gdm2628 May 31 10:20 gdm.conf #chown gdm .keep_me chown: gdm: illegal user name _ what am i doing wrong?! The correct command to set user to nobody and group to gdm would be # chown nobody:gdm .keep_me What your command does is to set user to gdm (which is nonexistent) and leave group as it is. HTH, DoubleF ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD and Windows XP
On Sat, 31 May 2003 23:48:55 +0930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote I feel bad about not finding this answer myself as I know how to do it with Win XP. My searching skills seem to be rusty. Question: How do I get my new Win XP box to talk to me FreeBSD Server? When I try to map a drive I get : The account is not authorized to log in from this station. What I think the answer is: I think it's the Plain Text Password issue. I've dealt with it before on Win 98 but can't figure out how to configure Win XP to allow a Plain Text Password. I've been searching for a few hours as I know it must be a common issue and the answer is there somewhere. If you can point me in the right direction it would be a great help. Thanks. Nigel Holloway I just went through this with win 2k... control panel - administrative tools - local security policy and set send non-encrypted passwords to third party samba... to enabled. Hope that works, Clayton _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: file: table is full.
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Hugo Saro wrote: Hi list, I have a fbsd server as a gateway on my home lan. It's running 4.7-STABLE , specs p200 mmx 80mb ram 2 hdd's .. it works fine , but I do get a regular (sort of) problem. When there's some problem with my ISP and dhclient keeps trying getting an IP, eventually when I get home i'll have lots of message spammed in the console, and ps w ls etc will say too many open files in system. I normally solved this by killing some processes, unplugging and plugging the network cables, and by killing dhclient. When it fired up again it would be working. But today i couldn't even kill because it said it couldn't open some .so (I'm sure they're there) Try increasing the number of available file descriptors. You can do this dynamically at boot time using something like: kern.maxuser=64 in /etc/sysctl.conf, which assigns a suitable number of file descriptors for 64 users - for more info see 'man tuning' - but also increases various other kernel flags as well. Make sure to check your current 'maxusers' sysctl setting - something like: sysctl -a | grep maxusers should work... also look at some of the other sysctl settings whilst you're at it: sysctl -a | grep file maybe? I get this on my system: [19:15:37] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/munk# sysctl -a | grep file kern.maxfiles: 8168 kern.bootfile: /kernel kern.maxfilesperproc: 7351 kern.openfiles: 751 kern.corefile: %N.core kern.filedelay: 30 p1003_1b.mapped_files: 0 where my maxusers is set dynamically by the kernel (options MAXUSERS 0 in the kernel config file iirc), and at boot is set to 256. Looking at the amount of ram you have though, be careful not to increase the number of file descriptors too much otherwise you'll get a lot of swapping out to disk going on. In general however check your logfiles to see why so many file descriptors are being eaten up. For example I once used cronolog to log httpd transfers and errors for around 300 users, and each cronolog instance required 2 processes/file descriptors, meaning a total of 1200 file descriptors just for logging! The number of file descriptors soon maxed out because the available fds wasn't enough. Also see the manpage for 'fstat', which tells you about what files are currently open on your system. HTH, Jez ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE
I've been able to successfully build (and use) OpenOffice on 4.7-STABLE, 4.8-STABLE, and 5.1 BETA since 1.0.2 --I'm currently using 1.0.3. Before that, I had no success in building 1.0.0 or 1.0.1, (I didn't try building those versions on CURRENT)but I did have immediate success using the Linux version under emulation. I have had trouble (read that no success) getting any version to print using kprint and CUPS (and I've tried the configuration the kde folks suggest), but I can print using good old lpd/lpr, so I'm happy enough with that. Because the time to build is so long, since version 1.0.3, I've been able to pkg_create -b openoffice on my fastest, roomiest machine, and pkg_add openoffice over an NFS mount, to new workstations. I don't know if the hardware manufacturer is significant, but all the machines I've either built it on or pkg_add'd it to are/were Dell Optiplex PIII and P4 workstations and Poweredge PIII servers (both single and dual processors). One undocumented observation about the build/install process I can make: it seems to me that I started having success building OpenOffice when I installed FreeBSD on new computers, and built OpenOffice before I filled it up with a zillion other ports. Just my .02 Tim Kellers CPE/NJIT On Saturday 31 May 2003 01:05 pm, David Gerard wrote: Mark Rowlands ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030601 02:49]: On Saturday 31 May 2003 5:18 pm, Doug Poland wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort of works. It starts up, but crashes when you try to save anything (dies with an internal error). The README claims it works with FreeBSD 4.5 and up, but I'll believe that when I see it doing so. What are others' experiences so far? Is there some undocumented hoop one must jump through to get it to behave itself? I had been using linux binaries with success. I've been trying to build native 1.0.3 but the build keeps failing. I've never been able to compile any version of OO.org from source. why not use the freebsd package ? :- http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ Yes, but does it actually work reliably? I would have expected the official port to achieve basic function, but it observably doesn't. Hence asking. - d. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repositioning /var | /tmp to avoid disk full condition
Hello, The 3rd edition of The Complete FreeBSD suggest repositioning the /var directory ( and even /tmp) to prevent filling up that partition. I ignored it and did just that today, filled it up. So I attempted the repositioning with the following recommended command steps and results: cd /var tar cf - . | (cd /usr/var; tar xf - ) cd / rm -rf /var ln -s /usr/var /var However the 'rm -rf /var' returned rm: /var: Device busy After trying all known tricks to me to remove /var, I concluded that since it was mounted from the /etc/fstab I should dismount it and remove the directory (link point ?) and create a soft link there as recommended. However, on rebooting boot was aborted, was thrown into single users mode. After some findangling eventually got the system back up as before with the /var directory, except that now it contains only the /var/cron and /var/run directories. The original /var contained /var/account: /var/at: /var/backups: /var/crash: /var/cron: /var/db: /var/games: /var/log: /var/lost+found: /var/mail: /var/msgs: /var/preserve: /var/qmail: /var/run: /var/rwho: /var/smtpd: /var/spool: /var/tmp: /var/webmin: /var/yp: How can I restore the full functioning structural integrity as before, of course the contents of the /usr/var directory was wiped out somwhere along the way, sans log, sans mail, sans everything. Just want to continue as before. Thanks. -- Joe -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why won't gaim show me online??
Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to anyone else even though I see others as online. Anyone know why that would be? All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name. If anyone can think of a better client than this, I'm game for it. :) If not, then if someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 4.3.0 anti-alias font problem
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:33:51AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: Hi, I'm on a 4.8-STABLE box with XFree86 4.3.0. I'm going through the handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-fonts.html) and adding anti-aliased fonts to my system. The problem I'm having is adding TrueType and the bitstream-vera fonts to my fontpath via xset. Following the handbook, I've... * Created the directory: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType * Copied .ttf fonts from my windows partition to above directory * run the following command: ttmkfdir fonts.dir I do get a message from ttmkfdir which states: unknown font foundry code SYRC A look at the files in the directory reveals nothing remotely similar to SYRC. The fonts.dir file appears valid but admittedly I'm not sure what I'm looking at. To continue, when I run: * xset fp+ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType I see: xset: bad font path element (#64), possible causes are: Directory does not exist or has wrong permissions Directory missing fonts.dir Incorrect font server address or syntax In my case, the directory does exist and has the same permissions as the other font directories. The fonts.dir file does exist. And I'm not sure what the 3rd possible cause is. Curiously, I get the exact same error when I try to add the bitstream-vera fonts (added via x11-fonts/bitstream-vera port) to the fontpath. * xset fp+ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/ xset: bad font path element (#64), possible causes are: Directory does not exist or has wrong permissions Directory missing fonts.dir Incorrect font server address or syntax I must be missing something here. Does anyone have any suggestions? For the archives, the problem went away when I restarted X. -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why won't gaim show me online??
How about AIM? /usr/ports/net/aim It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too. Tim Kellers CPE/NJIT On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote: Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to anyone else even though I see others as online. Anyone know why that would be? All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name. If anyone can think of a better client than this, I'm game for it. :) If not, then if someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why won't gaim show me online??
im pretty gaim compiles natively. its simply a gtk2 based app. could this be some kind of firewalling issue? perhaps you're blocking packets being sent to the AOL server. just a thought.. also, you could try naim. much simpler, and doesnt hog up nearly as much screen real estate. yussef On Sat, 31 May 2003 15:42:40-0400 Tim Kellers[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about AIM? /usr/ports/net/aim It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too. Tim Kellers CPE/NJIT On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote: Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to anyone else even though I see others as online. Anyone know why that would be? All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name. If anyone can think of a better client than this, I'm game for it. :) If not, then if someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD 4.8 running on Dell 1655MC Blade Server
I can't answer your question directly, but you may want to check out RLX... Much higher density (300ex model): http://www.rlx.com/ I know they're approved for Linux, but maybe they'll approve a FreeBSD image for you. Their support seems to be pretty responsive. Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Williams Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 1:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD 4.8 running on Dell 1655MC Blade Server Hi, We are thinking of purchasing a couple of Dell 1655MC Blade servers to replace a number of web servers. Can anyone confirm that FreeBSD 4.8 is compatible with this kit? Dell cannot confirm that it will work with FreeBSD. Any info on this would be appreciated. Cheers, Tim Williams ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd- questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!
On Saturday 31 May 2003 15.00, Steven Lake wrote: Hi all. I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it and everything on it works great...except the wheel. I can't get KDE to do anything with the wheel. How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my scroll wheel? Much apreciated on the info. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. Try to edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config and in the section Section InputDevice, put something like this : Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol auto Option Device /dev/sysmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 Option Buttons 5 EndSection -- Regards Hasse Webmaster @ Swedehost.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My scroll wheel on my mouse won't work!!
I got it working! thanks for all the suggestions everyone! :) On Sat, 31 May 2003, Hasse wrote: On Saturday 31 May 2003 15.00, Steven Lake wrote: Hi all. I got a microsoft optical mouse with a scroll wheel in it and everything on it works great...except the wheel. I can't get KDE to do anything with the wheel. How do I setup my mouse daemon to use my scroll wheel? Much apreciated on the info. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. Try to edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config and in the section Section InputDevice, put something like this : Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol auto Option Device /dev/sysmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 Option Buttons 5 EndSection -- Regards Hasse Webmaster @ Swedehost.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: lynx on 4.8-stable
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:09:45AM -0400, John wrote: Hello, A few recommendations. 1. Check your environment variables and compare the list to the variables listed in the lynx manpage. There are some that affect proxies. Good suggestion. $ env http_proxy=http://localhost:3128/ gopher_proxy=http://localhost:3128/ https_proxy=http://localhost:3128/ 2. Please double check your lynx.cfg (locate lynx.cfg) to make sure there are no proxies installed. ie: something like: http_proxy:http://name.domain.foo:3128/ https_proxy:http://name.domain..foo:3128/ The lynx.cfg file is stock; the proxy settings are all commented out. Try explicity setting no_proxy:* That works. Thanks. I'd still like to know what is creating the proxy settings. There's nothing in the bash or lynx files. Bob Hall ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Repositioning /var | /tmp to avoid disk full condition
cd /var tar cf - . | (cd /usr/var; tar xf - ) cd / rm -rf /var ln -s /usr/var /var However the 'rm -rf /var' returned rm: /var: Device busy After trying all known tricks to me to remove /var, I concluded that since it was mounted from the /etc/fstab I should dismount it and remove the directory (link point ?) and create a soft link there as However, on rebooting boot was aborted, was thrown into single users mode. Probably all you need to do is remove the line about /var from your /etc/fstab (or just comment it out) _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why won't gaim show me online??
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Tim Kellers wrote: How about AIM? /usr/ports/net/aim It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too. Tim Kellers CPE/NJIT AIM does require linux emulation, but gaim doesn't. Ken On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote: Just installed gaim out of the ports and added my AIM screen name to it and I can send and recieve messages, but it shows me as offline to anyone else even though I see others as online. Anyone know why that would be? All I need Gaim for is for my one AIM name. If anyone can think of a better client than this, I'm game for it. :) If not, then if someone can help me solve this I would be very grateful. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gated Where the gated.conf file at.
Router is running gated. but there is no gated.conf file in /etc/. Where would be the gated.conf file located? Is there a differant file somewhere. Dan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
On Sat, 31 May 2003 11:34:25 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have done something pretty silly and not sure now how to recover. I installed 5.0 release on my desktop which was primarily a Win2k machine and now there is no option to dual boot. Well there is but when I choose the F1 ??? option instead of booting win2k is give me a message telling me that NTLDR cannot be found. Can anyone shed any light on a work around for this. I am truly stumped. Thanks LukeK Is Win2K on a different hard drive than FreeBSD? If so, then to use the FreeBSD bootloader, you must install it on both drives. GAG, which has been suggested, is a nice bootloader, and the FAQ on the FreeBSD web site has some directions to boot both FreeBSD and Win using the NT/Win2K bootloader. That's 3 options, should be enough to find a solution that works for you. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firebird broken?
I had this problem too, if it's not that you don't have SYSVIPC in your kernel then it's fairly easy to get rid of... # ipcs -s Semaphores: T ID KEYMODE OWNERGROUP xx xxxx xx xxxx # ipcrm -s id from above - Original Message - From: Socketd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM Subject: Firebird broken? Hi all When installing Firebird (1.0.2) on my FreeBSD 4.8 server I get: source/interbase/bin/gbak -c misc/metadata.gbak source/refDatabases/jrd/metadata.gdb can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4operating system directive semget failed can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4No such file or directory can't format message 12:256 -- message system code -4can't format message 12:33 -- message system code -4 can't format message 12:169 -- message system code -4can't format message 12:83 -- message system code -4 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/firebird/work/firebird-1.0.2.908. *** Error code 1 Hope someone can help. Please cc to me as I am not on the list. br socketd ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work for me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be found. I could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload. Cheers - Original Message - From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003年6月1日 7:29 Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot On Sat, 31 May 2003 11:34:25 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have done something pretty silly and not sure now how to recover. I installed 5.0 release on my desktop which was primarily a Win2k machine and now there is no option to dual boot. Well there is but when I choose the F1 ??? option instead of booting win2k is give me a message telling me that NTLDR cannot be found. Can anyone shed any light on a work around for this. I am truly stumped. Thanks LukeK Is Win2K on a different hard drive than FreeBSD? If so, then to use the FreeBSD bootloader, you must install it on both drives. GAG, which has been suggested, is a nice bootloader, and the FAQ on the FreeBSD web site has some directions to boot both FreeBSD and Win using the NT/Win2K bootloader. That's 3 options, should be enough to find a solution that works for you. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:12:08 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work for me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be found. I could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload. Why a whole new installation? Why not just repair the currently installed Win2K? (Boot from your Win2K CD. You can automatically repair or manually fix the master boot record and boot sector, which will cause the computer to boot Win2K again. Then you can install GAG, the FreeBSD bootloader or use the Win2K bootloader. Or is it as simple as forgetting to change the BIOS cback to booting from your hard drive after booting from CD? If you're still flummoxed, provide more info about your setup and you'll get more help. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of the redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot boot. I cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me remember the admin passwd. So I installed GAG. GAG detects all installed OS's but when trying to boot to Win2K it gives the same error ie NTLDR is missing press Ctrl+Alt+Del to reboot. Grub gave the same errors even though it also detected the installation. I thought to be a bit creative and revert to a RedHat install to recover the MBR but it complains about incorrectly aligned partitions or some such. The disk is not hosed but the MBR is not healthy. The bios is fine I have been changing that to boot from CD/Floppy/HDD when necessary. Any additional light you can shed on this would be appreciated. Thanks LukeK - Original Message - From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003年6月1日 9:26 Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:12:08 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the advice but neither GAG, Grub or FreeBSD bootloaders work for me it would appear that NTLDR has either been damaged or cannot be found. I could not get to that installation at all. It is a bit problematic as I usually only re-install once a year and don't (of course) have a recent backup that will suffice. I think I will need to install Win2K onto a different partition and see if I can mount the old Win2K partition to recover the data before doing the proper full swipe and reload. Why a whole new installation? Why not just repair the currently installed Win2K? (Boot from your Win2K CD. You can automatically repair or manually "fix" the master boot record and boot sector, which will cause the computer to boot Win2K again. Then you can install GAG, the FreeBSD bootloader or use the Win2K bootloader. Or is it as simple as forgetting to change the BIOS cback to booting from your hard drive after booting from CD? If you're still flummoxed, provide more info about your setup and you'll get more help. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Apache question - Method Not Allowed
This only relates to FreeBSD in that apache happens to be running on it. But I am stumped and would appreciate any ideas I have apache configured to allow CGI under suExec. This is all working. Except I have a form that gets The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL ... CGI and SSI are globally turned on and work with lots of domains hosted on the same instance of apache. I get no entries in either log file and no errors in suexec_log. The error follows this script and form, i.e. if I copy it into a site where forms are working, I still get this error. _ Douglas Denault [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:45:44 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of the redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot boot. I kind of doubt FreeBSD-5 had its way with the MBR, or at least a FreeBSD installation has never done anything to the MBR I haven't told it to (correctly or mistakenly;). See whether the Win2K partition is set active. I cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me remember the admin passwd. Doh! indeed. Then if setting the Win2K partition active doesn't work, I'm out of better options than your suggestion to do a fresh install and mount the old Win2K partition from there. But I'm no guru. Anyone else have a suggestion? Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to have FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times before with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the older versions and the latest. The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a number of tools to check on this ) but no cigar. Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something to fix this. LukeK - Original Message - From: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003年6月1日 11:29 Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:45:44 +0900, lukek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK thanks for the offer of assistance. The machine in question has two drives ad0 and ad1. On ad0 there was a native NTFS partition with Win2K installed. On a separate partion I had Redhat. I decided to get rid of the redhat installation and use FreeBSD again. So I installed FreeBSD-5.0Release. It had its way with the MBR and now Win2K cannot boot. I kind of doubt FreeBSD-5 "had its way with the MBR," or at least a FreeBSD installation has never done anything to the MBR I haven't told it to (correctly or mistakenly;). See whether the Win2K partition is set active. I cannot use the recovery option because I cannot for the life of me remember the admin passwd. Doh! indeed. Then if setting the Win2K partition active doesn't work, I'm out of better options than your suggestion to do a fresh install and mount the old Win2K partition from there. But I'm no guru. Anyone else have a suggestion? Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, lukek wrote: You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to have FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times before with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the older versions and the latest. The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a number of tools to check on this ) but no cigar. Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something to fix this. LukeK Tell me something: Does FreeBSD boot? It seems to me Win2k is somehow broken but, if FreeBSD can boot then you can read the NTFS slice, therefore you can make a backup of your data storesd in Win2k slice. mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt will mount slice 1 of ATA disk 0 if it contains an NTFS file system. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot
thanks for that hint. I am in the process of doing precisely that. I figure I can cp all the files to the samba share and then swipe and reload and should be able to get all the important stuff back. It is just a matter of spending my time now to accomplish this. Appreciated the help on this. Winblows did somehow get broken and even trying to reinstall winblows did not work it actually came up with the same problem so I am now just hoping that disk is not trashed. Thanks LukeK - Original Message - From: "Eduardo Viruena Silva" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "lukek" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Jud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003年6月1日 12:37 Subject: Re: Doh ! Installed FBSD5.0 and no more dual boot On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, lukek wrote: You are absolutely correct during the installation process I chose to have FreeBSD install it's own boot loader just as I had a number of times before with older versions but there must be a subtle difference between the older versions and the latest. The disk is showing that the NTFS partition is active ( I have used a number of tools to check on this ) but no cigar. Thanks for your assistance thus far. I will keep looking for something to fix this. LukeK Tell me something: Does FreeBSD boot? It seems to me Win2k is somehow broken but, if FreeBSD can boot then you can read the NTFS slice, therefore you can make a backup of your data storesd in Win2k slice. mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt will mount slice 1 of ATA disk 0 if it contains an NTFS file system. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
TWM focus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ! I know this is not the list for that since it is not FreeBSD specific, but I tried the XFree86 list and did not get any answer... Since I'm sure some of you must are using TWM, I give it a shot. How can I make TWM to automatically focus a new window ? Each time I launch an application, a square (empty window) appears under my mouse pointer and I have to click to make the window appear, which is pretty annoying. If you have any idea... Thanks in advance. - -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org gpg key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+2aXkY3Hnhkr+5cQRAmZGAJ0dOSKaEhIyYY/X+99lQFMAl07NxQCfUD1S lxu+ptkuSCt+256gsb/uHwg= =u7IE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-05-11 - 2003-05-31
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists and/or The FreeBSD Diary http://www.freebsddiary.org/. These are the articles posted during this period: 21-May : Postfix - virtual domains (part II) A bit more detail on the options http://freebsddiary.org/postfix-virtual-domains.php?2 -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/ - practical examples FreshPorts- http://www.FreshPorts.org/ - the place for ports FreshSource - http://www.FreshSource.org/ - the place for source ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing a network interface
Can somebody help me with this question? Whne trying to install additional network interfaces with using /stand/sysinstall I get the screen Network interface information required However ethernet card details are not detected in the menu. I am using freebsd version 4.4 In an earlier installation with a realtek card , the details came up and installation was possible. How do I make sure that the card is detected in the installation? Thanks Verghese George Melbourne Australia ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing a network interface
when you rebooted after installing the card did it show up in dmesg ? Check if the interface has been detected by #dmesg |grep rl ( rl if it is a realtek card or whatever the abbreviation is for your manufacturer ) If the card is there then all you have to do is use the ifconfig cmd to bring the interface up. To make this automatic edit rc.conf to suit your setup and it should be fine BTW which release/version are you using ? LukeK - Original Message - From: "Verghese George" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003年6月1日 16:57 Subject: Installing a network interface Can somebody help me with this question? Whne trying to install additional network interfaces with using /stand/sysinstall I get the screen "Network interface information required" However ethernet card details are not detected in the menu. I am using freebsd version 4.4 In an earlier installation with a realtek card , the details came up and installation was possible. How do I make sure that the card is detected in the installation? Thanks Verghese George Melbourne Australia ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Duplex printing with HP DeskJet 6122
Hi folks, We just got an HP DeskJet 6122 for printing Unix docs. It comes with a duplexing unit, which works when driven by the supplied Windows driver. However, I'd really rather have this thing connected to my FreeBSD workstation. I've tried CUPS and LPRng, and neither of the two support this printer's duplexing feature out of the box. Does anyone have any suggestions? Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Hams and BSD mailing list.
Due to popular demand :) I have created a mailing list at qth.net for Amateur Radio Operators to discuss using BSD operating systems with Amateur Radio (Ham radio). The list is aimed at all Ham operators whether you're just looking for logging software or doing DSP developmental work. You can subscribe via a web page at; http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/bsd-ham or by sending an email to; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carl, vk1kcm. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-applets-2.2.2 build still fails
After reinstalling, it still fails. Obviously something is still missing or wrong. Any ideas what to do? portupgrade -PrRf glib-2\* results the following errors: gstreamer-plugins-0.6.0_1: Patch patch-configure failed to apply cleanly. gnometerminal-2.2.1: usr/X11R6/lib/libvte.so undefined reference to 'unlockpt' 'mbsrtowcs' 'grantpt' 'ptsname' gnomeapplets2-2.2: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.5 not found (4.8 release, ports updated to current...) - Jukka On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 02:55, Jukka Huvinen wrote: I'm still trying to portupgrade to the current XFree86 + gdm2 + gnome2. Managed to complete XFree86 and gdm2 (at least portupgrade passed through). But gnome2 fails when building gnome-applets! (The package is not available and forced to build from sources.) It requires libc_r.so.5, but there is only libc_r.so.4 in /usr/lib (See below...) What should I do? Help! Looks like you're trying to build GNOME on 4.x with FreeBSD 5.x binaries installed. Try doing a portupgrade --rRf glib-2\*. That should take care of all your library problems. Joe - Jukka -- cc -O -pipe -o multiload-applet-2 cpuload.o linux-proc.o load-graph.o loadavg.o main.o memload.o netload.o properties.o swapload.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/local/lib ../screen-exec/.libs/libscreen-exec.al -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpanel-applet-2 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lXinerama -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lXft -lfreetype -lz -lXext -lXrender -lfontconfig -lpangox-1.0 -lX11 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -llinc -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lgtop-2.0 -lgtop_sysdeps-2.0 -lgtop_common-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv /usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libc_r.so.5, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/local/lib/libgtop_common-2.0.so: undefined reference to `statvfs' gmake[2]: *** [multiload-applet-2] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2/multiload' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2' gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2. --- Skipping 'x11/gnome2' (gnome2-2.2.1_1) because 'x11/gnomeapplets2' (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) failed ! x11/gnomeapplets2 (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) (new compiler error) * x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.2.1_1) -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast Routing Table Modification
Hi, I am working on a project that required me to modify the routing behaviours at the kernel level. I have been searching information from the Internet and FreeBSD.org. But no luck at all. Basically, I need to do the following: 1. pick up the multicast packets before they are routed in the kernel 2. then redirect all the multicast packets to my kernel module which add extended entry to the routing table. The problem is I am new to kernel programming and FreeBSD. Thus I have a hard time finding the right information sources. Any comment is welcome. Thanks in advance for the help. Dixon Siu ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnome-applets-2.2.2 build still fails
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Jukka Huvinen wrote: After reinstalling, it still fails. Obviously something is still missing or wrong. Any ideas what to do? portupgrade -PrRf glib-2\* results the following errors: gstreamer-plugins-0.6.0_1: Patch patch-configure failed to apply cleanly. gnometerminal-2.2.1: usr/X11R6/lib/libvte.so undefined reference to 'unlockpt' 'mbsrtowcs' 'grantpt' 'ptsname' Fixed the above. Upgrading vte fixed the problem. gnomeapplets2-2.2: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc_r.so.5 not found Where is libc_r ?? (4.8 release, ports updated to current...) - Jukka On Sat, 31 May 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 02:55, Jukka Huvinen wrote: I'm still trying to portupgrade to the current XFree86 + gdm2 + gnome2. Managed to complete XFree86 and gdm2 (at least portupgrade passed through). But gnome2 fails when building gnome-applets! (The package is not available and forced to build from sources.) It requires libc_r.so.5, but there is only libc_r.so.4 in /usr/lib (See below...) What should I do? Help! Looks like you're trying to build GNOME on 4.x with FreeBSD 5.x binaries installed. Try doing a portupgrade --rRf glib-2\*. That should take care of all your library problems. Joe - Jukka -- cc -O -pipe -o multiload-applet-2 cpuload.o linux-proc.o load-graph.o loadavg.o main.o memload.o netload.o properties.o swapload.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/local/lib ../screen-exec/.libs/libscreen-exec.al -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lpanel-applet-2 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lXinerama -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lXft -lfreetype -lz -lXext -lXrender -lfontconfig -lpangox-1.0 -lX11 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -llinc -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lgtop-2.0 -lgtop_sysdeps-2.0 -lgtop_common-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv /usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libc_r.so.5, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/local/lib/libgtop_common-2.0.so: undefined reference to `statvfs' gmake[2]: *** [multiload-applet-2] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2/multiload' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2/work/gnome-applets-2.2.2' gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnomeapplets2. --- Skipping 'x11/gnome2' (gnome2-2.2.1_1) because 'x11/gnomeapplets2' (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) failed ! x11/gnomeapplets2 (gnomeapplets2-2.2.0_1) (new compiler error) * x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.2.1_1) -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gdm2-2.4.1.3
hi, i have tried to set up the Gnome Desktop Manager on my freshly installed 4.8-STABLE box, but some errors refuse to disappear: error msg: gdm_config_parse: Authdir /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/gdm is not owned by user nobody, group gdm. Aborting. _ what i have already done: #pkg_info -L gdm2-2.4.1.3 /usr/X11R6/bin/gdm ... added this line in the group file in /etc/ gdm:*:11: same for passwd in /etc/ gdm:*:11:11:Gnome Desktop Manager:/usr/X11R6/etc/gdm:/sbin/nologin and set the entry in the /etc/ttys to /gdmon i couldn' manage to set the owner of the dir/files: (why?!) /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/ drwxr-xr-x3 root gdm 512 May 29 18:47 gdm gdm.conf in /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root gdm2628 May 31 10:20 gdm.conf #chown gdm .keep_me chown: gdm: illegal user name _ what am i doing wrong?! any help will be appreciated;-) thanx in advance *bsd-n00b ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]