Re: HP LC II Netserver ACPI problem

2005-05-28 Thread Paul Dufresne
> 1. Can't use ACPI on here. Machine not capable, apparently.
> Hence, the following:
In my BIOS, I can enable and disable ACPI. (IBM PC 300GL).
Could it be just that ACPI is disable in BIOS?
 
> 2. Have apic enabled in kernel & no problems that I know of
Watch out ACPI and apic are two different things.
Your problem is with ACPI, when I boot without ACPI (option
2 in 5.4-RELEASE, I get the same error messages.
Couldn't these messages be simply ignored?

--Paul
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 21:09,  the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC 
contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave):
>>> OK your drive is recognized as at1
>>> Here is the page from the handbook on www.freebsd.org - if you
>>> follow the
>>> instructions you should be OK:
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 16.3 Adding Disks
>>> Originally contributed by David O'Brien.
>>>
>>> Lets say we want to add a new SCSI disk to a machine that currently
>>> ...
>>
>> Excuse me if I'm being slow, but exactly where did you glean that
>> information?
>> I don't have any at1 node in /dev, at1 isn't mentioned anywhere in the
>> boot messages, and Fdisk still acts like it only knows of one drive.
>
>He is wrong.
I agree
>
>It appears he misread the second ATA bus ata1 as a drive.
>
true
Change that drive to master on the second bus as Kent suggested and then 
follow the instructions in the handbook
David


-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.4 NFS install broken?

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:40:05PM -0700, Steve Rikli wrote:
> How does one create the NFS installation directory for FreeBSD-5.4 ?
> 
> I.e. is it supposed to be as simple as dumping the entire contents
> of CD#1 & CD#2 into a directory on an NFS server, and pointing
> 'sysinstall' to it?
> 
> I've been doing 4.x & 5.x NFS installs successfully with an NFS
> server's repositories setup in that manner, but with FreeBSD-5.4 ,
> 'sysinstall' prompted for the next "disc", and I had no apparent
> way of selecting a different media or different source.
> 
> I'm thinking I must not be getting (parts of?) CD#2 into the right
> place, and/or need to update a table-of-contents file, or something
> equally simple.

There were some changes to the installer before 5.4-RELEASE, and it's
possible that none of the users tested this during the pre-release
period :(  Talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kris


pgpTsU5XgWiK8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave):


OK your drive is recognized as at1
Here is the page from the handbook on www.freebsd.org - if you
follow the
instructions you should be OK:

---
16.3 Adding Disks
Originally contributed by David O'Brien.

Lets say we want to add a new SCSI disk to a machine that currently
...



Excuse me if I'm being slow, but exactly where did you glean that
information?
I don't have any at1 node in /dev, at1 isn't mentioned anywhere in the
boot messages, and Fdisk still acts like it only knows of one drive.



He is wrong.

It appears he misread the second ATA bus ata1 as a drive.

Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:31 pm, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am
> Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
>
> > On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08,  the author Ulf Magnusson
> > contributed to the
> >
> > dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> > >From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48,  the author Ulf Magnusson
> > >> contributed to the
> > >>
> > >> dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> > >> >I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD.
> >
> > I've>> >attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it
> > as a
> >
> > >> slave>device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the
> > >> Secondary Slave.>

FreeBSD has been known to have problems recognizing slave only drives. 
Change it to a master and see what happens.

Kent

> > >>
> > >> >The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it
> > >> > among
> > >>
> > >> the>dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried
> > >> disabling>UDMA on the drive, to no avail.
> > >>
> > >> >System info:
> > >> >
> > >> >Epox Nforce2 motherboard
> > >> >FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11
> > >>
> > >> 17:32:06>CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB 
> > >> i386
> > >>
> > >> >Parts of dmesg output:
> > >> >
> > >> >atapci0:  port
> > >> >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0
> > >> > on
> > >>
> > >> pci0>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> > >>
> > >> >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> > >> >...
> > >> >ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master
> > >> > UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Can you please attach the full output from dmesg
> > >>
> > >> daid
> > >
> > >Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
> > >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992,
> >
> > 1993, 1994
> >
> > >The Regents of the University of California. All rights
> >
> > reserved.>FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005
> >
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB
> > >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> > >CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
> > >  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x644  Stepping = 4
> >
> >Features=0x183fbff >PGE,MCA,
> >
> > >CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR>
> > >  AMD Features=0xc044
> > >real memory  = 536805376 (511 MB)
> > >avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB)
> > >mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature:
> > >ACPI APIC Table: 
> > >ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
> > >npx0:  on motherboard
> > >npx0: INT 16 interface
> > >acpi0:  on motherboard
> > >acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> > >Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> > >acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on
> >
> > acpi0>cpu0:  on acpi0
> >
> > >acpi_button0:  on acpi0
> > >pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
> > >pci0:  on pcib0
> > >agp0:  mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at
> > >device 0.0 on
> > > pci0
> > >pci0:  at device 0.1 (no driver attached)
> > >pci0:  at device 0.2 (no driver attached)
> > >pci0:  at device 0.3 (no driver attached)
> > >pci0:  at device 0.4 (no driver attached)
> > >pci0:  at device 0.5 (no driver attached)
> > >isab0:  at device 1.0 on pci0
> > >isa0:  on isab0
> > >pci0:  at device 1.1 (no driver attached)
> > >ohci0:  mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff
> >
> > irq 22
> >
> > >at devic
> > >e 2.0 on pci0
> > >usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
> > >usb0:  on ohci0
> > >usb0: USB revision 1.0
> > >uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> > >uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
> > >ohci1:  mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff
> >
> > irq 21
> >
> > >at devic
> > >e 2.1 on pci0
> > >usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
> > >usb1:  on ohci1
> > >usb1: USB revision 1.0
> > >uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> > >uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
> > >pci0:  at device 2.2 (no driver attached)
> > >pcib1:  at device 8.0 on pci0
> > >pci1:  on pcib1
> > >xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f mem
> > >0xe300-0xe300
> > >007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1
> > >miibus0:  on xl0
> > >xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0
> > >xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> > >xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1
> > >pcm0:  port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0
> >
> > on pci1
> >
> > >pcm0: 
> > >atapci0:  port
> > >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17
> > >7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
> > >ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> > >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> > >pci0:  at device 13.0 (no driver attached)
> > >pcib2:  at device 30.0 on pci0
> > >pci2:  on pcib2
> > >nvidia0:  mem
> > >0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0
> > >xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2
> > >acpi_tz0:  on acpi0
> > >fdc0:  port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 d

Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation

2005-05-28 Thread Kelly D. Grills
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 08:33:29PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> 
> My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. 
> Personally, I think that is ridiculous.
> 
> I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, 
> < http://www.tzo.com >. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with 
> them?
> 
> If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it.

I've been very satisfied with http://zoneedit.com for several years now.

-- 
Kelly D. Grills
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpKUTUj20hWw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


5.4 NFS install broken?

2005-05-28 Thread Steve Rikli
How does one create the NFS installation directory for FreeBSD-5.4 ?

I.e. is it supposed to be as simple as dumping the entire contents
of CD#1 & CD#2 into a directory on an NFS server, and pointing
'sysinstall' to it?

I've been doing 4.x & 5.x NFS installs successfully with an NFS
server's repositories setup in that manner, but with FreeBSD-5.4 ,
'sysinstall' prompted for the next "disc", and I had no apparent
way of selecting a different media or different source.

I'm thinking I must not be getting (parts of?) CD#2 into the right
place, and/or need to update a table-of-contents file, or something
equally simple.

If there's a different/better way (e.g. not using CDs at all) to
build a FreeBSD-5.4 repository suitable for NFS installation purposes,
advice on that would also be welcome.

The Handbook chapter on installations is pretty good, but it sort
of glosses over the details in the Advanced Installation (2.13.6.1) 
section, and I suspect it might not be quite as simple for 5.4 .

Thanks,
sr.
-- 
|| Steve Rikli  ||| My group's mission statement -  ||
|| Systems Administrator|||   "You want *what*?  By *WHEN*?"||
||  ||| - Simon Burr,   ||
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |||   in alt.sysadmin.recovery  ||
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation

2005-05-28 Thread Andras Kende
> My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address.
> Personally, I think that is ridiculous.
>
> I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO,
> < http://www.tzo.com >. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with
> them?
>
> If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Gerard Seibert
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The most important question when any new computer architecture is
> introduced is "So what?"
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>


dynds.org


Andras Kende
http://www.kende.com

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Ulf Magnusson


- Original Message -
From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am
Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08,  the author Ulf Magnusson 
> contributed to the 
> dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> >From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48,  the author Ulf Magnusson
> >> contributed to the
> >>
> >> dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> >> >I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. 
> I've>> >attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it 
> as a
> >>
> >> slave>device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary
> >> Slave.>
> >>
> >> >The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among
> >>
> >> the>dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried
> >> disabling>UDMA on the drive, to no avail.
> >>
> >> >System info:
> >> >
> >> >Epox Nforce2 motherboard
> >> >FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11
> >>
> >> 17:32:06>CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB  i386
> >>
> >> >Parts of dmesg output:
> >> >
> >> >atapci0:  port
> >> >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on
> >>
> >> pci0>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> >>
> >> >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> >> >...
> >> >ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> >> >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> >> >
> >>
> >> Can you please attach the full output from dmesg
> >>
> >> daid
> >
> >Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
> >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 
> 1993, 1994
> >The Regents of the University of California. All rights 
> reserved.>FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB
> >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> >CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
> >  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x644  Stepping = 4
> >
>
>Features=0x183fbff >CM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR>
> >  AMD Features=0xc044
> >real memory  = 536805376 (511 MB)
> >avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB)
> >mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature:
> >ACPI APIC Table: 
> >ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
> >npx0:  on motherboard
> >npx0: INT 16 interface
> >acpi0:  on motherboard
> >acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> >Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> >acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on 
> acpi0>cpu0:  on acpi0
> >acpi_button0:  on acpi0
> >pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
> >pci0:  on pcib0
> >agp0:  mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at
> >device 0.0 on
> > pci0
> >pci0:  at device 0.1 (no driver attached)
> >pci0:  at device 0.2 (no driver attached)
> >pci0:  at device 0.3 (no driver attached)
> >pci0:  at device 0.4 (no driver attached)
> >pci0:  at device 0.5 (no driver attached)
> >isab0:  at device 1.0 on pci0
> >isa0:  on isab0
> >pci0:  at device 1.1 (no driver attached)
> >ohci0:  mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff 
> irq 22
> >at devic
> >e 2.0 on pci0
> >usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
> >usb0:  on ohci0
> >usb0: USB revision 1.0
> >uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> >uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
> >ohci1:  mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff 
> irq 21
> >at devic
> >e 2.1 on pci0
> >usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
> >usb1:  on ohci1
> >usb1: USB revision 1.0
> >uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> >uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
> >pci0:  at device 2.2 (no driver attached)
> >pcib1:  at device 8.0 on pci0
> >pci1:  on pcib1
> >xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f mem
> >0xe300-0xe300
> >007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1
> >miibus0:  on xl0
> >xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0
> >xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> >xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1
> >pcm0:  port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 
> on pci1
> >pcm0: 
> >atapci0:  port
> >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17
> >7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
> >ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> >pci0:  at device 13.0 (no driver attached)
> >pcib2:  at device 30.0 on pci0
> >pci2:  on pcib2
> >nvidia0:  mem
> >0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0
> >xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2
> >acpi_tz0:  on acpi0
> >fdc0:  port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 
> on acpi0
> >fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
> >sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 
> 0x10 on
> >acpi0
> >sio0: type 16550A
> >sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
> >sio1: type 16550A
> >ppc0:  port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-
> 0x37f irq
> >7 on acp
> >i0
> >ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode
> >ppbus0:  on ppc0
> >lpt0:  on ppbus0
> >lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
> >atkbdc0:  port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
> >atkbd0:  irq 1 on atkbdc

Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

2005-05-28 Thread Chris Hill

On Sat, 28 May 2005, Bob Hall wrote:


On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:


Can someone please change this in the source:

   hostname nor servname provided, or not known


That's a bit archaic, but perfectly correct. See the most recent edition
of Fowler's.


Not to mention that it's a little bit more informative than Fafa's 
proposed "Unknown location".


--
Chris Hill   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** [ Busy Expunging <|> ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08,  the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the 
dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48,  the author Ulf Magnusson
>> contributed to the
>>
>> dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>> >I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
>> >attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a
>>
>> slave>device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary
>> Slave.>
>>
>> >The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among
>>
>> the>dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried
>> disabling>UDMA on the drive, to no avail.
>>
>> >System info:
>> >
>> >Epox Nforce2 motherboard
>> >FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11
>>
>> 17:32:06>CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB  i386
>>
>> >Parts of dmesg output:
>> >
>> >atapci0:  port
>> >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on
>>
>> pci0>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
>>
>> >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
>> >...
>> >ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
>> >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
>> >
>>
>> Can you please attach the full output from dmesg
>>
>> daid
>
>Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
>Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
>The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
>FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB
>Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
>CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
>  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x644  Stepping = 4
>
>Features=0x183fbffCM OV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR>
>  AMD Features=0xc044
>real memory  = 536805376 (511 MB)
>avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB)
>mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature:
>ACPI APIC Table: 
>ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
>npx0:  on motherboard
>npx0: INT 16 interface
>acpi0:  on motherboard
>acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
>Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
>acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0
>cpu0:  on acpi0
>acpi_button0:  on acpi0
>pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
>pci0:  on pcib0
>agp0:  mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at
>device 0.0 on
> pci0
>pci0:  at device 0.1 (no driver attached)
>pci0:  at device 0.2 (no driver attached)
>pci0:  at device 0.3 (no driver attached)
>pci0:  at device 0.4 (no driver attached)
>pci0:  at device 0.5 (no driver attached)
>isab0:  at device 1.0 on pci0
>isa0:  on isab0
>pci0:  at device 1.1 (no driver attached)
>ohci0:  mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22
>at devic
>e 2.0 on pci0
>usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
>usb0:  on ohci0
>usb0: USB revision 1.0
>uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
>uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
>ohci1:  mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21
>at devic
>e 2.1 on pci0
>usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
>usb1:  on ohci1
>usb1: USB revision 1.0
>uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
>uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
>pci0:  at device 2.2 (no driver attached)
>pcib1:  at device 8.0 on pci0
>pci1:  on pcib1
>xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f mem
>0xe300-0xe300
>007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1
>miibus0:  on xl0
>xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0
>xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
>xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1
>pcm0:  port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1
>pcm0: 
>atapci0:  port
>0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17
>7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
>ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
>pci0:  at device 13.0 (no driver attached)
>pcib2:  at device 30.0 on pci0
>pci2:  on pcib2
>nvidia0:  mem
>0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0
>xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2
>acpi_tz0:  on acpi0
>fdc0:  port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
>fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
>sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on
>acpi0
>sio0: type 16550A
>sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
>sio1: type 16550A
>ppc0:  port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq
>7 on acp
>i0
>ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode
>ppbus0:  on ppc0
>lpt0:  on ppbus0
>lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
>atkbdc0:  port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
>atkbd0:  irq 1 on atkbdc0
>kbd0 at atkbd0
>pmtimer0 on isa0
>orm0:  at iomem 0xcc000-0xcc7ff,0xc-0xcb7ff on isa0
>sc0:  at flags 0x100 on isa0
>sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
>vga0:  at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
>ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/13.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1
>ums0: 4 buttons and Z dir.
>Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1403190916 Hz quality 800
>Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
>ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63

Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Ulf Magnusson
From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48,  the author Ulf Magnusson 
> contributed to the 
> dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> >I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
> >attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a 
> slave>device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary 
> Slave.>
> >The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among 
> the>dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried 
> disabling>UDMA on the drive, to no avail.
> >
> >
> >System info:
> >
> >Epox Nforce2 motherboard
> >FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 
> 17:32:06>CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB  i386
> >
> >
> >Parts of dmesg output:
> >
> >atapci0:  port
> >0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on 
> pci0>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> >ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> >...
> >ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> >
> >
> Can you please attach the full output from dmesg
> 
> daid

Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06 CEST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1403.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x644  Stepping = 4
 
Features=0x183fbff
  AMD Features=0xc044
real memory  = 536805376 (511 MB)
avail memory = 511438848 (487 MB)
mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature:
ACPI APIC Table: 
ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
npx0:  on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0:  on motherboard
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0
cpu0:  on acpi0
acpi_button0:  on acpi0
pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0:  on pcib0
agp0:  mem 0xe000-0xe1ff at
device 0.0 on
 pci0
pci0:  at device 0.1 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 0.2 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 0.3 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 0.4 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 0.5 (no driver attached)
isab0:  at device 1.0 on pci0
isa0:  on isab0
pci0:  at device 1.1 (no driver attached)
ohci0:  mem 0xe4001000-0xe4001fff irq 22
at devic
e 2.0 on pci0
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb0:  on ohci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
ohci1:  mem 0xe4004000-0xe4004fff irq 21
at devic
e 2.1 on pci0
usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb1:  on ohci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
pci0:  at device 2.2 (no driver attached)
pcib1:  at device 8.0 on pci0
pci1:  on pcib1
xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f mem
0xe300-0xe300
007f irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1
miibus0:  on xl0
xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0
xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:1c:4b:d1
pcm0:  port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1
pcm0: 
atapci0:  port
0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x17
7,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
pci0:  at device 13.0 (no driver attached)
pcib2:  at device 30.0 on pci0
pci2:  on pcib2
nvidia0:  mem
0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xdbff,0xd000-0
xd0ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2
acpi_tz0:  on acpi0
fdc0:  port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on
acpi0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
sio1: type 16550A
ppc0:  port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq
7 on acp
i0
ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode
ppbus0:  on ppc0
lpt0:  on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
atkbdc0:  port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
atkbd0:  irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
pmtimer0 on isa0
orm0:  at iomem 0xcc000-0xcc7ff,0xc-0xcb7ff on isa0
sc0:  at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
vga0:  at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/13.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1
ums0: 4 buttons and Z dir.
Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1403190916 Hz quality 800
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:42,  the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue 
on Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation:
>On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:33,  the author Gerard Seibert contributed to the
>
>dialogue on Dynamic Hosting Recommendation:
>>My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address.
>>Personally, I think that is ridiculous.
>>
>>I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO,
>>< http://www.tzo.com >. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with
>>them?
>>
>>If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it.
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>Depends what you want it for. If you want to run a web site and do not
> intend to generate transactions then a "fake permanent" (sometimes called
>masquerading)  IP could work dor you -- but this means your IP address is a
>moving one and any business with a modicum of security will know the moment
>they check you out.
>
>You cannot successfully use masquerading to establish a successful business
>web site. But it might be great for home use. Personally I would shop around
>and look for a better deal .. I mean an extra charge of $25 a month is, I
>agree, ridiculous. You could probably get a hosting deal for that kind of
>money!!!
>
>My two pennorth
PS
I forgot to mention that "mean" ISPs will probably filter your packets and 
soon know you are masquerading -- it is easy to do and then you will be more 
vulnerable to being cut off.. so you might want to think carefully before you 
go down that route. If it is just for fun OK - but if you want to be a 
serious player than I would forget about masquerading -  you might not want 
to give people the mistaken impression that you are cheapskating..
David
-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?

2005-05-28 Thread Warren Block

On Fri, 27 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the
end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that
doesn't eject the last page when the print job is
finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual.

My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but
its not clear to me what I need to add.


What printer filter do you have now?

-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Dynamic Hosting Recommendation

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 17:33,  the author Gerard Seibert contributed to the 
dialogue on Dynamic Hosting Recommendation:
>My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address.
>Personally, I think that is ridiculous.
>
>I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO,
>< http://www.tzo.com >. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with
>them?
>
>If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it.
>
>Thanks.
Depends what you want it for. If you want to run a web site and do not intend 
to generate transactions then a "fake permanent" (sometimes called 
masquerading)  IP could work dor you -- but this means your IP address is a 
moving one and any business with a modicum of security will know the moment 
they check you out.  

You cannot successfully use masquerading to establish a successful business 
web site. But it might be great for home use. Personally I would shop around 
and look for a better deal .. I mean an extra charge of $25 a month is, I 
agree, ridiculous. You could probably get a hosting deal for that kind of 
money!!! 

My two pennorth

david

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Dynamic Hosting Recommendation

2005-05-28 Thread Gerard Seibert
My cable company wants $25. a month just for a static IP address. 
Personally, I think that is ridiculous.


I have been looking for a solution. One I found was TZO, 
< http://www.tzo.com >. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with 
them?


If someone can recommend another service, I would be glad to look into it.

Thanks.


--
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The most important question when any new computer architecture is 
introduced is "So what?"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48,  the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the 
dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
>attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave
>device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave.
>
>The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among the
>dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disabling
>UDMA on the drive, to no avail.
>
>
>System info:
>
>Epox Nforce2 motherboard
>FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06
>CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB  i386
>
>
>Parts of dmesg output:
>
>atapci0:  port
>0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
>ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
>ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
>...
>ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
>Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
>
>
Can you please attach the full output from dmesg

daid

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD

2005-05-28 Thread Ulf Magnusson
I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave
device. It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave.

The drive isn't detected by FreeBSD. There's no entry for it among the
dmesg messages, and no device node gets created. I've tried disabling
UDMA on the drive, to no avail.


System info:

Epox Nforce2 motherboard
FreeBSD obygden 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Wed May 11 17:32:06
CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEB  i386


Parts of dmesg output:

atapci0:  port
0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 9.0 on pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
...
ad0: 38166MB  [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a



Ulf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

2005-05-28 Thread Bob Hall
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Can someone please change this in the source:
> 
>hostname nor servname provided, or not known

That's a bit archaic, but perfectly correct. See the most recent edition
of Fowler's.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

2005-05-28 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-05-28 16:13, Fafa Hafiz Krantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
> Can someone please change this in the source:
>
>hostname nor servname provided, or not known
>
> To for instance:
>
>Unknown location.

Hi,
I've notified Hajimu UMEMOTO, who has been working around this area.

Thanks :)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Debugging Threaded Applications

2005-05-28 Thread Doug Hardie
Are there any working tools available for debugging a threaded  
application in 5.3/5.4?  Ktrace works fine but doesn't identify the  
threads so its almost impossible to figure out whats going on in a  
complex threaded application.  Strace doesn't show threads either.   
Pstack causes all sorts of problems with the running application -  
usually creating multiple copies of it none of which work anymore. 
 
___

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


FreeBSD 5.3/5.4 - pxeboot hosting on em0 Intel 82540EM

2005-05-28 Thread David P. Discher


Netboot and Installing FreeBSD over em0 GigE link

I am having an issue with pxeboot/BTX loader mounting/contacting a  
TFTP server or NFS server that is hosted on machine with an Intel  
GigE em0 ethernet card.


pxeboot comes over (via 82540EM bios), loader comes over, but the  
load says it can figure out what the root disk is.   So the loader  
cannot find /boot/defaults/loader.conf, that is were it stops.


Any ideas ?  Anyone use the if_em on FreeBSD to perform netboots/ 
netinstalls ?



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:0:   class=0x02 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086  
rev=0x02 hdr=0x00

vendor   = 'Intel Corporation'
device   = '82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller'
class= network
subclass = ethernet


Two near identical machines using this card in a cross-over (as the  
private link).


I have a third machine that I have networked booted with the same  
kernel and loader/pxeboot binaries, and mfsboot, but both machines in  
that configuration are using fxp cards.


( BTW - the pxeboot documentation needs some correction for the 5.4  
release.

  Will post my notes later. )


-
David P. Discher  *  * C: x
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *AIM: DavidDPD* H: x
-


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: root not getting system email

2005-05-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Denny White wrote:
> 
> 
> Can someone please help me with this.
> I read where it's safer to have an
> admin read root's mail than for the
> root user himself. So, I did the
> /etc/aliases & newaliases thing, I
> tried the aliase in /etc/mail & did
> a "make" there & a make restart,
> tried a .forward file in roots home
> directory, tried the virtusertable
> & local-host-names & mailertable in
> /etc/mail, & so far nothing but trouble.
> Here's the type of messages I'm getting
> when the system fails to relay roots
> mail:
> 
> May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278:
> Losing ./qfj4SK270A002278: savemail panic
> May 28 15:02:06 dualman sm-mta[2277]: j4SK250A002277:
> SYSERR(root): rewrite: excessive recursion (max 50),
> ruleset canonify
> May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278:
> SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere
> 
> It also says the local user cannot be found,
> which I think is my screwup for whatever way
> I entered the user in aliases and virtusertable.
> Would it be wiser just to undo everything, and
> just try using the .forward file for root?
> Trying to get everything on here working right
> so I can teach myself how to do a cvsup & learn
> to rebuild & merge everything, but this is for
> sure holding me back. Thanks for any help I can
> get.
> 


It's obvious your sendmail config is messed up. The easiest fix would be
to undo EXACTLY what you changed from the default install until you can
learn enough about sendmail to know the full implications of your
alterations.

All you should need to do to get system mail delivered to any other user
is add email address (or valid user account name) to the root entry of
/etc/mail/aliases, then run `newaliases`. As long as DNS is working
properly you should be fine.

If you can't get back to a fresh install, start by giving us some more
information: /etc/mail/aliases and your *.mc file would be nice for
starters.

G
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: APC BX800-CN UPS or something similar

2005-05-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugene Hercun wrote:
> I'm considering purchasing an APC BX800-CN UPS for my home file
> server. What I don't understand, is what happens when the power comes
> back on? Does the UPS somehow turn the computer back on?

Depends on your BIOS. Look for a setting something like "automatic power
restore" that will detect when line power comes back and will restart
the system. Otherwise, nothing.

 >Also, there are a number of deamons that could be run for APC UPS's
but which one
> is most popular?


/usr/ports/sysutils/nut but with an APC you can always check out
/usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd, which is simpler to configure but less
powerful (go figure).

If that model ups only uses usb to talk to the computer you may want to
do some checking on the hardware compatibility listing under the release
you're using (www.freebsd.org). Last time I looked (admittedly ~2003) it
wasn't supported nearly as well as the serial cabled ones.

G

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Where's the grammar: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

2005-05-28 Thread Fafa Hafiz Krantz

Hello!

Can someone please change this in the source:

   hostname nor servname provided, or not known

To for instance:

   Unknown location.

It appears for instance when I:

([EMAIL PROTECTED])(23:05:05/28/05)
(%:~) ssh fafef
ssh: fafef: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

([EMAIL PROTECTED])(23:11:05/28/05)
(%:~) telnet kask
kask: hostname nor servname provided, or not known

Thanks!

--

Fafa Hafiz Krantz
  Research Designer @ http://www.home.no/barbershop
  Enlightened @ http://www.home.no/barbershop/smart/sharon.pdf



-- 
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


root not getting system email

2005-05-28 Thread Denny White

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Can someone please help me with this.
I read where it's safer to have an
admin read root's mail than for the
root user himself. So, I did the
/etc/aliases & newaliases thing, I
tried the aliase in /etc/mail & did
a "make" there & a make restart,
tried a .forward file in roots home
directory, tried the virtusertable
& local-host-names & mailertable in
/etc/mail, & so far nothing but trouble.
Here's the type of messages I'm getting
when the system fails to relay roots
mail:

May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278:
Losing ./qfj4SK270A002278: savemail panic
May 28 15:02:06 dualman sm-mta[2277]: j4SK250A002277:
SYSERR(root): rewrite: excessive recursion (max 50),
ruleset canonify
May 28 15:02:07 dualman sm-mta[2278]: j4SK270A002278:
SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere

It also says the local user cannot be found,
which I think is my screwup for whatever way
I entered the user in aliases and virtusertable.
Would it be wiser just to undo everything, and
just try using the .forward file for root?
Trying to get everything on here working right
so I can teach myself how to do a cvsup & learn
to rebuild & merge everything, but this is for
sure holding me back. Thanks for any help I can
get.





-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCmN6Ey0Ty5RZE55oRAn8dAKCWXOlhvwT7UGGxsKg7rKWZPiVsvwCbBqjo
cFvRUcyfj5cCVXQ9GJfHY0A=
=qqf0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Vizion wrote:
> To
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This thread from freebsd-question refers to release notes and is passed to 
> you 
> on recomendation of  Giorgos Keramidas who contributed to the dialogue on Re: 
> Migration Guide:

As Giorgos said, the release notes of 5.4 are frozen and no changes can
be made to them.

The release notes for 5-STABLE and 6-CURRENT have no references to the
Migration Guide.  There used to be some boiler-plate references to
src/UPDATING but they were probably removed during those releases where
the Migration Guide existed.  Some suitably motivated doc committer
could update them if necessary and bring them back.

Note that the Migration Guide was intended to address concerns of users
upgrading from 4.X to 5.X.  This is implied in its abstract and is
specifically stated in the introduction.

Bruce.

> >On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30,  the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed
> >> to
> >>
> >> the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide:
> >> >On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Hi
> >> >> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade
> >> >> from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x
> >> >> to 5.x.
> >> >
> >> >The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and
> >> >/usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 -> 5.4, so there is
> >> >no need for a special "Migration Guide".
> >>
> >> I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be
> >> updated to reflect that position by removing all reference  to the
> >> presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to
> >> 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference.
> >
> >Certainly.  It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you
> >note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
> 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13

2005-05-28 Thread Gunde Svan
Hi,

I checked out
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#WLAN
and saw that NetGear WG311T was supported by Atheros
driver (ath). I went out to the store and got my self
a NetGear WG311T PCI Card. I put it in my box that
runs FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p15 #4. I Recompiled the
kernel with:

device ath
device ath_hal
device wlan

Unfortunately it did not work. I got this error
message from dmesg:

ath0:  mem 0xfeae-0xfeae irq 11
at device 13.0 on pci2
ath0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ath0: unable to attach hardware; HAL status 13
device_attach: ath0 attach return 6

ifconfig do not show anything... what do I need to do
to get the card to work?
It says it should work on the FreeBSD's homepage, so I
assume it should work.

thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


silk

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
Hi
Has anyone any experience with any native XML query engines on freebsd (are 
there any) or as an alternative using a front end, like silk, to a relational 
database such as mysql?
Does anyone know if there is a silk (or silk-like) port to freebsd.?
Thanks

david
-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: help with: ports over unionfs on a jail

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:48:30AM +, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
> hey,
> i have the ports dir mounted over unionfs on a jail
> (/usr/ports  /usr/jail/usr/ports unionfs rw  0   0)
> and when i do a "make install" for some port within a jail it says:
> make: No such file or directory
> 
> i have no idea of whats going on :/, i'll appreciate some help

Could be a unionfs bug (see the manpage).

Kris


pgpNJUim6Nl77.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linking with linux shared library

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:10:13PM -0700, Simeon Nifos wrote:
> Hallo everybody,
> 
> 1:) Suppose I have a Linux Library library.so. 
> And I want to link it with my main.c compiled
> in FreeBSD. How can I achieve that?

You can't.  You may not need to though.  What are you really trying to
achieve? :)

Kris


pgpTtHzNGdKwS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:45:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 05/27/05 09:28 PM, Mike Tancsa sat at the `puter and typed:
> > On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
> > you wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch,
> > >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc.
> > >
> > >hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it
> > >sees a capable processor? 
> > 
> > Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on
> > RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some
> > things worse.
> 
> Are you sure about that?  I'm using the BSD scheduler on 5.3
> (upgrading to 5.4 later today), with HT enabled, and I don't have
> problems.  In fact, I can do a make buildworld AND play neverwinter
> nights at the same time without seeing any problems.

He means that some workloads will be slower with HT than without.
It's very much workload-specific though, so you have to test and see
how it performs for you.

Kris



pgpWdqZsv14js.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 09:28,  the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC 
contributed to the dialogue on Re: Top Posting  (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not 
finding my NIC]):
>someone wrote:
 Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
 backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and
 then are
 foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
 Tha means scanning and rescanning.
 Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
 I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well
 before
 the internet began.
 Take care
>
>Utter BS.  
expletives are funny -- for those of use with a sense of humor :-)

>You don't have to move back and forth to the top and to 
>the bottom. 

You need to move to the bottom before you post to remove unnecessary bottom 
material in any case. It is easy to forget to clean up when you top post - so 
why not move there and then post in the knowledge that you are thereby 
following the rules.

You have to move back and forth if there are a series of postings and the 
first posting is at the bottom and the last at the top. You move down to read 
the post and then up past what you have read through the previous post and 
then down through that one etc..

I understand that people need to feel that their contribution is important. 
For this reason I wonder,if for some people, the idea of bottom posting does 
not appeal because it puts their words after those contributed by others. 



>A lot of us follow a thread and don't like to have to 
>read the whole thread each time an update is made.
>>
You dont have to read -- you just go to the end (sometimes you are surprised 
by postings you may have missed because you assumed you had read the whole 
thread and find out you had missed something- (I find top posters often fall 
into that trap) -- clean up and then post.
 
My reaction is there is truth in what you say for those who remember previous 
postings however for the majority who have not (including those who take the 
postings as a daily archive for corporate reference) that is not true. 

That is why the rule on all FreeBSD lists is against top posting -- and always 
has been (as it is for most mail lists)

Do you not think that in the immediacy of the dialogue it is easy to forget 
that the greatest value of our current contributions is the value they have 
as an archive? .

>There are times 
>when top posting is MORE APPROPRIATE and times when top post is LESS
>APPROPRIATE.  
I hear you -- you do not need to shout  the question is more 
appropriate for whom? The reader or the writer?? For the to and fro of 
personal  correspondence I think I might be tempted to agree with you. But to 
make an assumption that everyone is following the posting well I think that 
is one assumption too many. 

>Top posting is not evil 
I would concur -- but as my argument does not depend upon "evilness" it is not 
to my mind a relevant point :-)

>and often is EASIER to read.
Your notion depends upon the mental model you have created for yourself to 
represent the mailing list world.  Why should you make such an assumption if 
your model does not take into account the reality that the communication is 
going to thousands of people most of whom will not read what is said for 
days? 
How can you make such an assumption if your model of readership does not take 
into account the fact that the majority of readers will not have any 
recollection of previous contributions?
>

>But long drawn on threads are often read easier with
>top posting so that those of us who remember what happened earlier in
>the thread can get to the meat of it and we can just scroll down as
>much as necessary to catch up.  If everyone top posted in a thread it
>is easy to read that way.
Are you not contradicting yourself here..
>
>Email user since before 1984.

Well me to -- well before then and before tcp/ip-- Oh the days of uucp - when 
you had to know the route 

take care
david


-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: need help

2005-05-28 Thread Dmitry Mityugov

Hi,

i have a FreeBsd 4.11 i used it as a firewall and a gateway. it was
working properly as for 2 months. now seems theres a problem.. i can
ping any from outside. but the users cant browse even ping a yahoo.com
you guys have any idea wahts gonna be a problem. i did ipfw add allow
ip from any to any. but still no luck



What messages does ping generate? Can't this be a DNS problem? I mean, can 
your users ping yahoo.com by it's IP address?


Dmitry

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


APC BX800-CN UPS or something similar

2005-05-28 Thread Eugene Hercun
I'm considering purchasing an APC BX800-CN UPS for my home file
server. What I don't understand, is what happens when the power comes
back on? Does the UPS somehow turn the computer back on? Also, there
are a number of deamons that could be run for APC UPS's but which one
is most popular?

Eugene
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This thread from freebsd-question refers to release notes and is passed to you 
on recomendation of  Giorgos Keramidas who contributed to the dialogue on Re: 
Migration Guide:
>On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30,  the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed
>> to
>>
>> the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide:
>> >On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade
>> >> from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x
>> >> to 5.x.
>> >
>> >The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and
>> >/usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 -> 5.4, so there is
>> >no need for a special "Migration Guide".
>>
>> I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be
>> updated to reflect that position by removing all reference  to the
>> presence of updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to
>> 5.4 and replace it with a handbook page reference.
>
>Certainly.  It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you
>note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-05-28 08:58, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30,  the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to
> the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide:
> >On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade
> >> from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x
> >> to 5.x.
> >
> >The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and
> >/usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 -> 5.4, so there is
> >no need for a special "Migration Guide".
>
> I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated
> to reflect that position by removing all reference  to the presence of
> updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace
> it with a handbook page reference.

Certainly.  It's too late to fix the release notes of 5.4, but if you
note such places please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


someone wrote:


Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and  
then are

foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
Tha means scanning and rescanning.
Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well  
before

the internet began.
Take care





Utter BS.  You don't have to move back and forth to the top and to  
the bottom.  A lot of us follow a thread and don't like to have to  
read the whole thread each time an update is made.  There are times  
when top posting is MORE APPROPRIATE and times when top post is LESS  
APPROPRIATE.  Top posting is not evil and often is EASIER to read.   
And often not.  But long drawn on threads are often read easier with  
top posting so that those of us who remember what happened earlier in  
the thread can get to the meat of it and we can just scroll down as  
much as necessary to catch up.  If everyone top posted in a thread it  
is easy to read that way.


Email user since before 1984.

Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:42,  the author [EMAIL PROTECTED] contributed to 
the dialogue on RE: Top Posting  (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC]):

>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion
>Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
>
>
>On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed
>to the
>
>dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>>On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov
>
>contributed to
>
>>> the
>>>
>>> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>>> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> thread
>>> >> this
>>> >> to
>>> >> post
>>> >> top
>>> >> not
>>> >> do
>>> >> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is
>
>easier to
>
>>> >This is not a newsgroup.
>>> >Yes, please.
>>>
>>> this is a mail list -- not a private communication
>>> This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the
>
>top!!!
>
>>> Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic
>
>world!
>
>>Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them
>>have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons.
>>
>>> Netiquette is consideration for others
>>
>>It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone
>
>else to it.
>I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I
>wrote!!
>
>>> think of how easy it is to read -
>>>
>>> See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of
>
>events ..
>
>>> and therefore understand what you say.
>>> If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those
>
>who might
>
>>> be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore
>
>you.
>
>>> Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite
>
>rude. .
>
>>> ,
>>> Think about long paragraphs
>>> Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then
>
>responding
>
>>> to it..
>>> Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience
>>
>>I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why.
>
>Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-)
>
>>> Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
>>> backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and
>
>then are
>
>>> foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
>>> Tha means scanning and rescanning.
>>> Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
>>> I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well
>
>before
>
>>> the internet began.
>>> Take care
>>
>>N/P.
>>
>>I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you
>
>live -
>
>>well, I'll follow that.
>
>I dont know what Greg posted
>Take care
>David
>hay enough of this BS about top posting.  You have to wake up to the
>fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX
>bigots. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the
>rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new
>comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted
>views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing
>your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing
>you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better
>with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and
>need government help to save you from perishing at seas.
>
>
If you really believe that top posting is better then this list gives you your 
democratic opportunity to convince me and everyone else who reads your 
posting. I am sad if you feel personally attacked by the suggestion that top 
posting is more thoughtful way of making a contribution to a discussion than 
bottom posting. If you hold a contrary view then please give us all the 
benefit of your advice.

I  am sad you seem to feel the need to make personal attacks on someone who 
hold an alternative view in the belief that that will advance your cause or 
intimidate debate. Unfortunately there is  there is nothing i can do to 
convince you that such an aggresive approach may be as counter-productive on 
this list as it has been elsewhere.

In the long term I believe you could realize that the act of top posting has 
the same effect whether we post from any type of computer system - (I use win 
XP/2000/98, apple, Linux or Freebsd) so do not believe you need to be 
influenced by the fact you are using Microsoft Outlook as your mailer. 

I believe, in a technical mailing list,  the theme of concern for the reader 
is the central issue and that theme remains the same whatever mailer or OS 
you happen to use. I would like to persuade you to concentrate on that issue 
and not be be sidetracked by discussing my connection to the sea, which is as 
irrelevant to the discussion as your connection to Ohio. I want to hear what 
y

Re: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread Jerry McAllister
> 
> 
> hay enough of this BS about top posting.  You have to wake up to the
> fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX
> bigots. 

No top posting has been the rule for the list for a long time - since 
the beginning as far as I know.The rule has nothing to do with UNIX.

It is completely about being able to have a reasonable exchange of 
information.   The list postings are conversational if they have more 
than one response and they often have many.   Several people created 
cute little demonstrations of what it is like to read upside down 
conversations.  It tends to discourage those with real knowledge, but 
too much real work to do to waste their time and energy deciphering 
non-sequential conversations, to contribute their useful information.

>   Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the
> rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new
> comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted
> views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing
> your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing
> you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better
> with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and
> need government help to save you from perishing at seas.

As I say, no top posting was not his idea.  He has just learned it
from those with more experience on this list.   Hope you will catch
up eventually.   Get with it!

jerry

> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])
> 
> 
> On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed
> to the
> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov
> contributed to
> >> the
> >>
> >> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
> >> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> thread
> >> >> this
> >> >> to
> >> >> post
> >> >> top
> >> >> not
> >> >> do
> >> >> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is
> easier to
> >> >
> >> >This is not a newsgroup.
> >> >Yes, please.
> >>
> >> this is a mail list -- not a private communication
> >> This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the
> top!!!
> >> Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic
> world!
> >
> >Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them
> >have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons.
> >
> >> Netiquette is consideration for others
> >
> >It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone
> else to it.
> I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I
> wrote!!
> >
> >> think of how easy it is to read -
> >>
> >> See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of
> events ..
> >> and therefore understand what you say.
> >> If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those
> who might
> >> be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore
> you.
> >> Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite
> rude. .
> >> ,
> >> Think about long paragraphs
> >> Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then
> responding
> >> to it..
> >> Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience
> >
> >I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why.
> 
> Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-)
> >
> >> Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
> >> backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and
> then are
> >> foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
> >> Tha means scanning and rescanning.
> >> Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
> >> I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well
> before
> >> the internet began.
> >> Take care
> >
> >N/P.
> >
> >I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you
> live -
> >well, I'll follow that.
> I dont know what Greg posted
> Take care
> David
> 
> 
> --
> 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
> English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch
> S/V Taurus.
>  Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama
> Canal.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

___
freebsd

Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 07:30,  the author Giorgos Keramidas contributed to 
the dialogue on Re: Migration Guide:
>On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi
>> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade
>> from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x
>> to 5.x.
>
>The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and
>/usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 -> 5.4, so there is
>no need for a special "Migration Guide".

I think that may be arguable but if true the release notes needs to be updated 
to reflect that position by removing all reference  to the presence of 
updating notes in the migration guide for upgrade from 5.x to 5.4 and replace 
it with a handbook page reference.

David

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:58,  the author Robert Slade contributed to the 
dialogue on Re: Migration Guide:
>On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:52, Vizion wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from
>> 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x.
>>
>> Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> david
>
>David,
>
>Unless I am missing something, it is just a case of cvsup see the
>instructions in the handbook.

I understand that -- but I was thinking about contents of the Migration guide 
which does not seem to include notes  which the release document states are 
in the migration guide!

david
>
>Rob
>
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Man page viewing problems

2005-05-28 Thread J. Johnston

Lowell Gilbert wrote:


"J. Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 


After searching the mailing list I couldn't find much regarding this
issues (or manpages on groff)
   



Well, if you can't show man pages, then you would have a problem with
reading the ones about the formatter for the man pages...

But the documentation for groff is in info pages anyway; the man pages
for it are only a secondary output of the info.  Try "info groff".

 


I viewed the pages on another machine.


%man make.conf
Formatting page, please wait.../usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file
/usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii'
Failed.
/usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file
/usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii'
   



Looks like the fonts files are missing.  Do you have the file
/usr/share/groff_font/devascii/DESC? 
 

Yes the file exists. I copied groff, troff, grotty from another machine 
replacing my local copies and now manpages work correctly.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

 



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?

2005-05-28 Thread Rick Preston
Hi,

I believe that :sh is called suppress header and that it suppresses
the banner page.  Form feed is a control character.  hex 0c.  In the
past I have added it to the bottom of my text or PCL documents or
added it in the printer interface script on UNIX systems that use the
lpsystem print subsystem.  I'm not sure if it would go in the :if or
:of in the printcap or even how to add it (why I didn't respond
earlier)  I haven't worked on the BSD spooler since FreeBSD 3.3 so I'm
a little rusty.

You might look at the printer, I've seen on some where you can add a
timeout to eject the last page and if you are doing job based or page
based printing, you can set the value low.  If you are doing line
based printing, that could cause the printer to eject the paper before
you finish printing.

good luck,


On 5/28/05, Mike Jeays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the
> > end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that
> > doesn't eject the last page when the print job is
> > finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual.
> >
> > My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but
> > its not clear to me what I need to add.
> >
> > I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Harold.
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 
> I think you have to remove the :sh parameter in /etc/printcap
> 
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Files corrupt after copy!!!

2005-05-28 Thread Bigbrother




> I just copied my entire "home" directory from my Windows XP harddrive
(ad6)
> running NTFS over to my FreeBSD harddrive (ad4) running UFS2:
> ..

In the past I had faced a similar program. I found out that the errors were
caused by the DMA controller.
So I have disabled DMA hard disc and no write errors occur.

So In the rc.d directory I have created a script that runs 'atacontrol mode
[0-3] pio4 pio4' .

Thus I make all hard discs to operate in PIO4 mode. Even though it is a bit
slow I do not have any write errors at any disc any more. My machine has the
following two controllers:

atapci0:  port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on
pci0
atapci1:  port
0x8400-0x843f,0x8800-0x8803,0x9000-0x9007,0x9400-0x9403,0x
9800-0x9807 mem 0xda00-0xda01 irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0


So try to use PIO4 mode for your discs and see if your data is ok.



---
Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll
be warm for the rest of his life 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?

2005-05-28 Thread Mike Jeays
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 23:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the
> end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that
> doesn't eject the last page when the print job is
> finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual.
> 
> My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but
> its not clear to me what I need to add.
> 
> I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release.
> 
> Thanks in advance. 
> 
> Harold.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

I think you have to remove the :sh parameter in /etc/printcap


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Man page viewing problems

2005-05-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"J. Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> After searching the mailing list I couldn't find much regarding this
> issues (or manpages on groff)

Well, if you can't show man pages, then you would have a problem with
reading the ones about the formatter for the man pages...

But the documentation for groff is in info pages anyway; the man pages
for it are only a secondary output of the info.  Try "info groff".

> %man make.conf
> Formatting page, please wait.../usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file
> /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii'
> Failed.
> /usr/bin/groff: can't find `DESC' file
> /usr/bin/groff:fatal error: invalid device `ascii'

Looks like the fonts files are missing.  Do you have the file
/usr/share/groff_font/devascii/DESC? 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problems while starting rc.d local files

2005-05-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Vittorio De Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Towards the end of the boot process while starting the processes 
> under /usr/local/etc/rc.d (I think)  freebsd 5.4 warns about something wrong 
> that I cannot find in the log files dmesg.boot, dmesg, messages.
> The warning (nothing fatal happens!) I eye is as follows:
> 
> Pre-seeding PRNG: kickstart
> Loading configuration files
> This: not found
> 
> 
> and the sentence " This: not found" pops up till the end of the boot.
> 
> Where can I find a glue on what's happening, what's going wrong?

One of the startup scripts is trying to execute a line that starts
with the word "This".  Does that word appear in your rc.conf file?
Have you edited any of the files in /etc/rc.d to mistakenly contain
that, perhaps by removing the comment character ("#") from the start
of a line?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-05-27 10:52, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade
> from 5.3 to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x
> to 5.x.

The usual update procedure, described in the Handbook and
/usr/src/UPDATING works fine for 5.3 -> 5.4, so there is
no need for a special "Migration Guide".

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


5.4 nfs install

2005-05-28 Thread dave
Hello,
Trying to do a 5.4 nfs install. I've copied both disks to an nfs share,
however i'm getting an error that i'm only using disk0 and that perl is on
disk1, insert it. I've only got the one nfs installpoint and it has both
disks copied to it. Is there an extra step with 5.4?
Thanks.
Dave.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


running psybnc

2005-05-28 Thread HECHIMA SALES
hallow .. admin,
i want running psybnc in there
but why i can't
my psybnc is not work in mirc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Robert Slade
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:52, Vizion wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 
> to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x.
> 
> Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> david

David,

Unless I am missing something, it is just a case of cvsup see the
instructions in the handbook.

Rob

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4

2005-05-28 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 05/27/05 09:28 PM, Mike Tancsa sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
> you wrote:
> >> 
> >> Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch,
> >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc.
> >
> >hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it
> >sees a capable processor? 
> 
> Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on
> RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some
> things worse.

Are you sure about that?  I'm using the BSD scheduler on 5.3
(upgrading to 5.4 later today), with HT enabled, and I don't have
problems.  In fact, I can do a make buildworld AND play neverwinter
nights at the same time without seeing any problems.

Lou
-- 
Louis LeBlanc  FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net
Fully Funded Hobbyist,   KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net
Key fingerprint = C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51  4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2

I do desire we may be better strangers.
-- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread bob

hay enough of this BS about top posting.  You have to wake up to the
fact there are many people who belong to this list who are not UNIX
bigots. Us win/outlook people have just as much right to post as the
rest of you. And more to the point who the hell pointed this new
comer of just 10 days (vizion) as the cop to be forcing his slanted
views on the rest of us. To vizion aren't you suppose to be sailing
your boat right now bound for Europe via Panama Canal. Only thing
you have contributed is more background noise. This list was better
with out you. so concentrate on your sailing before you get lost and
need government help to save you from perishing at seas.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vizion
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:17 PM
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])


On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed
to the
dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov
contributed to
>> the
>>
>> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> thread
>> >> this
>> >> to
>> >> post
>> >> top
>> >> not
>> >> do
>> >> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is
easier to
>> >
>> >This is not a newsgroup.
>> >Yes, please.
>>
>> this is a mail list -- not a private communication
>> This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the
top!!!
>> Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic
world!
>
>Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them
>have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons.
>
>> Netiquette is consideration for others
>
>It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone
else to it.
I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I
wrote!!
>
>> think of how easy it is to read -
>>
>> See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of
events ..
>> and therefore understand what you say.
>> If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those
who might
>> be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore
you.
>> Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite
rude. .
>> ,
>> Think about long paragraphs
>> Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then
responding
>> to it..
>> Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience
>
>I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why.

Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-)
>
>> Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
>> backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and
then are
>> foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
>> Tha means scanning and rescanning.
>> Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
>> I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well
before
>> the internet began.
>> Take care
>
>N/P.
>
>I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you
live -
>well, I'll follow that.
I dont know what Greg posted
Take care
David


--
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch
S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama
Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2005-05-28 Thread FreeBSD questions mailing list


On 28 mei 2005, at 09:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





[...]


you're welcome

maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook?

Arno



Perhaps the Vinum chapter should say up front that Vinum works with  
FreeBSD 4.x but not with 5.x


jd



yeah better idea
Arno
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Vinum problems on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE

2005-05-28 Thread FreeBSD questions mailing list


On 28 mei 2005, at 02:21, Kris Kirby wrote:



Trying to make a mirror of two slices, but I see to be running into  
some

issues here. I'm not on questions, so please CC me on all replies.

Maybe it's a good idea to subscribe cuz then you would have been able  
to read what we wrote about this for the lastcouple of days



# /etc/vinum.conf
volume var
plex name var.p0 org concat
drive va device /dev/ad0s1g
sd name var.p0.s0 drive va length 256m
plex name var.p1 org concat
drive vb device /dev/ad1s1d
sd name var.p1.s0 drive vb length 256m

When I create it, using -f, I get:

vinum -> l
2 drives:
D vaState: up   /dev/ad0s1g A:  
1791/2048 MB

(87%) <- note triple allocation
D vbState: up   /dev/ad1s1d A: 255/512 MB
(49%)

1 volumes: V var State: up Plexes:  2 Size:  256 MB

2 plexes:
P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks:  1 Size:  256 MB
P var.p1 C State: faulty Subdisks:  1 Size:  256 MB

2 subdisks:
S var.p0.s0 State: up D: va Size:  256 MB
S var.p1.s0 State: empty D: vb Size:  256 MB


vinum does not like FBSD 5.4
or vice versa
it is not supported

you could manually 'setstate up var.p1.s0' and 'setstate up var.p1'
that should work
i tested it with a raid 1 mirror, removed the HD that came up ok and  
checked if the mirror would still come up, which it did

i do definitely not recommend it though
while you aren't still useing the raid, go use something else than vinum


Doesn't seem like this is right. I also run into a problem when  
trying to

do a resetconfig:

vinum -> resetconfig
 WARNING!  This command will completely wipe out your vinum  
configuration.

 All data will be lost.  If you really want to do this, enter the text

 NO FUTURE
 Enter text -> NO FUTURE
Can't find vinum config: Inappropriate ioctl for device

you'll be getting this all the time if yu continue to use vinum in  
FBSD 5.4
and the configuration is still there after I try to resetconfig.  
When I
reboot and do I vinum start, I get an error that there are no  
drives in

the vinum config.


do 'vinum read' but expect to have kernel panics...



FreeBSD ginsu.catonic.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Fri May 27
01:28:15 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/ 
compile/SMP

i386

dmesg availible on request. No securelevel in place, at -1. Thanks in
advance.


again, i'd stay away from vinum/gvinum in FBSD 5.x  if i were you...
if you don't, come join me in the mental institute for stubbern vinum  
users :)

Arno
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: how to build packages quickly?

2005-05-28 Thread Abu Khaled
On 5/28/05, Luciano Musacchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> for those who know gentoo, theres a program (quickpkg) that makes a binary
> package (from already installed ones) without the need to recompile the port,
> its possible to do that in fbsd?
> 
> thanks
> --

pkg_create -b pkg-name might be what you need.
man pkg_create for more info

-- 
Kind regards
Abu Khaled
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4

2005-05-28 Thread Paul Dufresne
> > Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch,
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc.
> 
> hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use
>HT even if it sees a capable processor? 

Not sure but after reading:

I whould try:
# echo "machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1" >> /boot/loader.conf

but I am a newbie to FreeBSD using a Pentium II, and indeed
the only user -I hope- of my system.

--Paul
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC

2005-05-28 Thread Dmitry Mityugov
On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the
> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> thread
> >> this
> >> to
> >> post
> >> top
> >> not
> >> do
> >> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to
> >
> >This is not a newsgroup.
> >Yes, please.
> this is a mail list -- not a private communication
> This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!!
> Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world!

Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them
have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons.

> Netiquette is consideration for others

It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it.

> think of how easy it is to read -
> 
> See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events ..
> and therefore understand what you say.
> If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be
> otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore you.
> Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude.
> .
> ,
> Think about long paragraphs
> Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to
> it..
> Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience

I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why.

> Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards
> and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to
> move upwards to read the subsequent posting
> Tha means scanning and rescanning.
> Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
> I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the
> internet began.
> Take care

N/P.

I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live -
well, I'll follow that.

Dmitry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Problems while starting rc.d local files

2005-05-28 Thread Vittorio De Martino
Towards the end of the boot process while starting the processes 
under /usr/local/etc/rc.d (I think)  freebsd 5.4 warns about something wrong 
that I cannot find in the log files dmesg.boot, dmesg, messages.
The warning (nothing fatal happens!) I eye is as follows:

Pre-seeding PRNG: kickstart
Loading configuration files
This: not found


and the sentence " This: not found" pops up till the end of the boot.

Where can I find a glue on what's happening, what's going wrong?

 Vittorio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


need help

2005-05-28 Thread Angelo Munez

Hi,

i have a FreeBsd 4.11 i used it as a firewall and a gateway. it was working 
properly as for 2 months. now seems theres a problem.. i can ping any from 
outside. but the users cant browse even ping a yahoo.com you guys have any idea 
wahts gonna be a problem. i did ipfw add allow ip from any to any. but still no 
luck 

thnks.,...






-
Yahoo! Mail
 Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

2005-05-28 Thread David

All software - duty-free prices
http://yhxp.b0xqestmq3tiqub.shopofyourdream.com




Oppression can only survive through silence.   
Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


help with: ports over unionfs on a jail

2005-05-28 Thread Luciano Musacchio
hey,
i have the ports dir mounted over unionfs on a jail
(/usr/ports  /usr/jail/usr/ports unionfs rw  0   0)
and when i do a "make install" for some port within a jail it says:
make: No such file or directory

i have no idea of whats going on :/, i'll appreciate some help

(the jail is built the way man says and /usr/bin/make exists)
-- 
"Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban" -- Steve Jobs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2005-05-28 Thread FreeBSD questions mailing list


On 27 mei 2005, at 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





[...]

not very encouraging... Is it a RAID 5 you were able to make work
under 5.4?

jd



hey
yeah a 3x160 GB RAID5 and 2x80 GB RAID 1 in FreeBSD 5.4-p1
 i get the same error message everytime i start vinum or whenever i
execute a command in vinum
and really loads of kernel panics whenever i try to get it to work
after a crash
i have an unorthodox way of recovering from this because it's nearly
impossible to do stuff in vinum without causing kernel panics
yesterday evrything was ruined again (after upgrading to p1)
i wiped the complete config (rest config - NO FUTURE)
read in the config file (create RAID5)
set every state up manually (setstate up ...)
and rebuild parity
took about 10 hours to rebuild but then everything is back up and
running

i tried Gvinum too but that doesn't have the setstate nor the ruibld
parity command and still you can't stop gvinum (gvinum stop doesn't
work, nor does kldunload geom_vinum.ko)

i have no way of changing to a different soft raid due to lack of
space to backup so i'm stuck with this for as lo0ng as it takes :)

so, one advice "don't do it"
hehehe
Arno



Many thanx... I guess I better stick with 4.11

jd



you're welcome

maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook?

Arno

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?

2005-05-28 Thread Chris
On 5/27/05, Ryan Rempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical
> installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have
> pentium4's.
> 
> What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an
> athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4? Would a pentium4
> run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp? Or should I use a "lowest
> common denominator" (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?).
> 
> I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all
> -- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all --
> would a more "tuned" setting actually make that much difference?

I would use i686 or pentium3 as a safe setting, assuming you not using
any real old 486 or 586 cpu's.

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Top Posting (was: [Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC])

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Friday 27 May 2005 12:09,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the 
dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to
>> the
>>
>> dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>> >On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> thread
>> >> this
>> >> to
>> >> post
>> >> top
>> >> not
>> >> do
>> >> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to
>> >
>> >This is not a newsgroup.
>> >Yes, please.
>>
>> this is a mail list -- not a private communication
>> This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!!
>> Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world!
>
>Please don't ask me to invent my own habits my friend. Most of them
>have been inspired by other people, and for good reasons.
>
>> Netiquette is consideration for others
>
>It is always good to Google for an item before referring someone else to it.
I dont agree with that -- otherwise I would google everything I wrote!!
>
>> think of how easy it is to read -
>>
>> See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events ..
>> and therefore understand what you say.
>> If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might
>> be otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore you.
>> Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude. .
>> ,
>> Think about long paragraphs
>> Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding
>> to it..
>> Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience
>
>I don't agree with this. Please, don't ask me why.

Dont need to know -- but I appreciate your relevant interjection :-)
>
>> Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move
>> backwards and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are
>> foprced to move upwards to read the subsequent posting
>> Tha means scanning and rescanning.
>> Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader.
>> I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before
>> the internet began.
>> Take care
>
>N/P.
>
>I read what Greg just posted here... If this is indeed how you live -
>well, I'll follow that.
I dont know what Greg posted
Take care
David


-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Acer 4151LMI notebook help needed

2005-05-28 Thread Wojciech Puchar
1) mouse is not found. it is recognized as PS/2 mouse by NetBSD 
2.0 live CD, Linux 2.4 (Knoppix tested), Windows XP.


with FreeBSD (5.4) it isn't recognized at all

2) kernel boots at all when selecting "2 - ACPI enabled" from boot menu. 
default boot reboots just after starting kernel. anyway LOTS of errors 
goes when booting


3) Novatel Wireless Merlin U530 (UMTS/GPRS) PCMCIA module doesn't 
work. it isn't attached at all. with linux it's detected as serial port
and then pppd/chat combination works perfect to connect to internet (by GSM 
operator).


thank you for any help  Wojtek

PS. 3 DVD's from full mirror already done and works fine. wasn't that 
difficult :)



Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May  8 10:21:06 UTC 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
ACPI APIC Table: 
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz (1596.01-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x6d8  Stepping = 8
  
Features=0xafe9fbff
real memory  = 536735744 (511 MB)
avail memory = 515563520 (491 MB)
ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1
ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
npx0:  on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0:  on motherboard
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR
acpi_ec0:  port 0x66,0x62 on acpi0
ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned 
AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] 
(Node 0xc19bea00), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._STA] 
(Node 0xc19bea00), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned 
AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT2._STA] 
(Node 0xc19be8e0), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT2._STA] 
(Node 0xc19be8e0), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0
cpu0:  on acpi0
acpi_throttle0:  on cpu0
acpi_lid0:  on acpi0
acpi_button0:  on acpi0
acpi_button1:  on acpi0
pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0:  on pcib0
pcib1:  irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0
pci1:  on pcib1
pci1:  at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
uhci0:  port 0x1200-0x121f 
irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0
usb0:  on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1:  port 0x1220-0x123f 
irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0
usb1:  on uhci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2:  port 0x1240-0x125f 
irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0
usb2:  on uhci2
usb2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci3:  port 0x1260-0x127f 
irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0
usb3:  on uhci3
usb3: USB revision 1.0
uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
pci0:  at device 29.7 (no driver attached)
pcib2:  at device 30.0 on pci0
pci2:  on pcib2
fwohci0:  mem 
0xb0008000-0xb000bfff,0xb0004000-0xb00047ff irq 20 at device 0.0 on pci2
fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0)
fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4.
fwohci0: EUI64 00:02:3f:53:71:40:00:e9
fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports.
fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes.
firewire0:  on fwohci0
fwe0:  on firewire0
if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:40:00:e9
fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:40:00:e9
fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant
sbp0:  on firewire0
fwohci0: Initiate bus reset
bfe0:  mem 0xb0002000-0xb0003fff irq 21 at 
device 1.0 on pci2
miibus0:  on bfe0
bmtphy0:  on miibus0
bmtphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
bfe0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:b0:61:0a:8b
pci2:  at device 2.0 (no driver attached)
cbb0:  at device 4.0 on pci2
cardbus0:  on cbb0
pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0
pci2:  at device 4.1 (no driver attached)
pci2:  at device 4.2 (no driver attached)
pci2:  at device 4.3 (no driver attached)
pci2:  at device 4.4 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 30.2 (no driver attached)
pci0:  at device 30.3 (no driver attached)
isab0:  at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0:  on isab0
atapci0:  port 
0x1100-0x110f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
pci0:  at device 31.3 (no driver attached)
acpi_acad0:  on acpi0
ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] retu

HP LC II Netserver ACPI problem

2005-05-28 Thread Denny White

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Following is from dmesg:

vga0:  at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
unknown:  can't assign resources (port)
unknown:  can't assign resources (irq)
unknown:  can't assign resources (port)
unknown:  can't assign resources (port)
unknown:  can't assign resources (port)

I've read and googled for days and the following is
what I'v either learned or think I've learned:

1. Can't use ACPI on here. Machine not capable, apparently.
   Hence, the following:

ACPI-0159: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could not get RSDP, AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES
ACPI-0213: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could not load tables: AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES
ACPI: table load failed: AE_NO_ACPI_TABLES

2. Have apic enabled in kernel & no problems that I know of
3. I think I'm supposed to disable plug and play in the
   bios but I can't find any simple way to do it. There
   are some choices under the "Configuration" portion of
   the bios menu under
 ISA non-Plug-and-Play Devices
   List of Memory resources, all available, none reserved
   List of Interrupt resources, all available, none reserved
   List of DMA resources, all available, none reserved
   List of I/O resources, all available, none reserved

I have no idea how to match them up with the output of vga0
shown above, that is, to reserve the proper areas for its use.
I tried working with it the other night & wound up locking
the computer up rock solid. Would not boot. Had to pull the
cmos battery & put back & reset everything back to where it
had been to boot again. One of the first things I did after
reading in the mail archives, googling, etc., was to boot
to ACPI enabled, I assume which loads a kernel module instead
of it having to be compiled in. Have output of that error
message above too.
Any help would sure be appreciated. Tired of no sleep, trying
to figure this out.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCl5eay0Ty5RZE55oRAkMuAJ9CiDSYXnQxCrRFnWH43QZWW7JI2wCgk0P6
DddWLVPPwlPZkUuU3/67Ao8=
=yD5c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: vinum: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2005-05-28 Thread web



[...]

you're welcome

maybe the complete vinum chapter should be removed from the handbook?

Arno


Perhaps the Vinum chapter should say up front that Vinum works with FreeBSD 
4.x but not with 5.x


jd


Janos Dohanics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.3dresearch.com/ 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
On Friday 27 May 2005 11:18,  the author Dmitry Mityugov contributed to the 
dialogue on Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC:
>On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> thread
>> this
>> to
>> post
>> top
>> not
>> do
>> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to
>
>This is not a newsgroup.
>Yes, please.
this is a mail list -- not a private communication
This is not a file in which the latest letter gets pinned to the top!!!
Please do not bring habits from the paper world to the electronic world!

Netiquette is consideration for others
think of how easy it is to read - 

See how people can, with bottom posting, see the sequence of events .. 
and therefore understand what you say.
If you come to a mail list, like this, and want help then those who might be 
otherwise be willing to help might be discouraged and  ignore you. 
Forcing people to read your stuff out of sequence is really quite rude.
.
,
Think about long paragraphs
Think about reading the output from mail list threads and then responding to 
it..
Top posting is really inconsiderate and shows lack of experience
Think about the effect of long paragraphs and then having to move backwards 
and forwards and you read one paragraph downwards and then are foprced to 
move upwards to read the subsequent posting
Tha means scanning and rescanning.
Top posting  is neither sensible or practicable for the reader. 
I learnt from those who showed me when I started using email well before the 
internet began. 
Take care

David

-- 
40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


/usr/local/etc/rc.d and rcNG style scripts question

2005-05-28 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC

I read the handbook and the man page for rc and one question remains.

For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d it appears that the assumption is  
that all scripts are old style and so, no matter if they are rcGN  
style scripts or not, they will all run in lexographic order, right?


Thanks
Chad

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:38:46PM -0500, Ryan Rempel wrote:
> I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical
> installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have
> pentium4's.
> 
> What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an
> athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4?  Would a pentium4
> run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp?

No and no.

> Or should I use a "lowest
> common denominator" (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?).

I think i686 should be OK.

> I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all
> -- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all --
> would a more "tuned" setting actually make that much difference?

Probably not much of one.  More important are your kernel settings
(e.g. not compiling your kernel with i386/i486 support).

Kris


pgpI0693XRjLz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-28 Thread Damian Sobieralski
 I'm test piloting bacula on a FreeBSD 5.4-REL system.  All seemed to
work well in monitored tests. So last night I set up a job to run at
night.  When I came in this morning, all seemed to go well...the backup
happened but I noticed 3 messages on the console:

(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer

  Realizing this means what it does at face value, was any data lost
(should i take this as a "warning" or as an "error") ?


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


portupgrade, pkgdb hang

2005-05-28 Thread Robert S
I am a newcomer to freebsd and am still trying to get to grips with
package management.

When I try to do a binary upgrade of a package it hangs.  Recently I
tried to upgrade sylpheed-claws and nothing happened for 2 hours.  I
got the following message:

# portupgrade -v -P sylpheed-claws
--->  Session started at: Sat, 28 May 2005 08:53:35 +
[Updating the pkgdb  in /var/db/pkg ... - 260
packages found (-1 +7) (...)

I get similar behaviour when I try to do pkgdb -F

I am running through a proxy and have
PACKAGESITE="ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/Latest/";
in my /etc/profile

I assume that I'm doing something wrong.  Can somebody help?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4

2005-05-28 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>> 
>> Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch,
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc.
>
>hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it
>sees a capable processor? 

Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on
RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some
things worse.

---Mike

Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net
Providing Internet Access since 1994
[EMAIL PROTECTED], (http://www.tancsa.com)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Weird NFS problems

2005-05-28 Thread Jon Dama
Oh, something else to try:

I checked through my notes and discovered that I had gotten UDP to work in
a similar configuration before.  What I did was bind the IP address to
fxp0 instead of em0.  By doing this, the kernel seems to send the data at
a pace suitable for the slow interface.



-Jon

On Fri, 27 May 2005, Don Lewis wrote:

> On 26 May, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> > I'm having some problems with NFS serving on a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
> > machine. The FreeBSD machine is the NFS/NIS server for a group of four
> > Linux clusters. The network archictecture looks like this:
> >
> > 234/24   234/24
> > Cluster 1 ---|--- Cluster 3
> >| ---
> > em0|  File server | fxp0
> >|  --
> > Cluster 2 ---|--- Cluster 4
> > 234/24230/24
> >
> >
> > em0 and fxp0 are bridged, and em0 has a 234/24 IP address while fxp0 is
> > just in promiscuous mode. 234/24 is an 802.1q VLAN on the fxp0 side of
> > the server, so packets are untagged at the switch just before fxp0, and
> > are forwarded to em0 through the bridge.
> >
> > The problem manifests itself in large UDP NFS requests from Clusters 3
> > and 4. The export can be mounted fine from both those clusters, and
> > small transfers such as with ls work fine, but the moment any serious
> > data transfer starts, the entire mount just hangs. Running ethereal on
> > the file server shows a a lot of fragmented packets, and RPC
> > retransmissions on just a single request. Reducing the read and write
> > NFS buffers on the Linux clients to 1kB from the default of 4kB solves
> > the issue, but kills the transfer rate. The moment I go to 2kB, the
> > problem reappearss. Clusters 1 and 2 use the default of 4kB buffers, and
> > have no problems communicating to em0.
> >
> > Poking through the list archives, I ran across this message
> > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2003-May/001007.html)
> > that reveals a bug in the fxp(4) driver in 4-RELEASE that incorrectly
> > detects the capabilities of the NIC. Is this still an issue in
> > 5-RELEASE, or am I looking at a different problem? Any ideas on how I
> > can get the NFS buffers up to a reasonable level?
>
> That problem was fixed quite some time ago.
>
> Which transfer direction fails?
>   Client writing to server
>   Client reading from server
>   Both?
>
> Do you see all the fragments in the retransmitted request?
>
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


test

2005-05-28 Thread Denny White

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



checking if server down or some other
problem with subscription. sorry.



===
Unix is like a wigwam. No gates,
no windows, and an apache inside.
===


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCmEoHy0Ty5RZE55oRAg0+AJ9Z3zm0k+B8+hZAwKYfpaVMH7ZkUwCdFN0z
DBSeua7hmMAMJ9WMWTap0B8=
=nYOx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


[Fwd: mlock: not setgid mail]

2005-05-28 Thread Richard McIntyre

Anyone ?
--- Begin Message ---

All,

I have searched several places and everything I have seen reports that 
the only thing I need to do is chown /usr/local/libexec/mlock to 
root:mail but it currently is... take a look:


May 24 12:54:59 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29327]: (64) not setgid mail
May 24 12:57:08 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29382]: (64) not setgid mail
May 24 12:57:08 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[29384]: (64) not setgid mail
May 24 13:03:33 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30399]: (64) not setgid mail
May 24 13:04:23 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30401]: (64) not setgid mail
May 24 13:04:32 tco1 /usr/local/libexec/mlock[30403]: (64) not setgid mail

tco1# ls -ail /usr/local/libexec/
total 4104
1626383 drwxr-xr-x   6 root  wheel  512 May 24 13:00 .
1625088 drwxr-xr-x  16 root  wheel  512 May  6 13:36 ..
1746408 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  512 May  3 22:35 autoconf259
1746417 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  512 May  3 22:35 automake19
1627965 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel63624 May 24 13:00 imapd
1627966 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel14568 May 24 13:00 ipop2d
1627967 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel22344 May 24 13:00 ipop3d
1672841 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  512 May  3 00:22 libtool13
1626599 drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  512 May  2 23:43 libtool15
1627968 -rwx--s--x   1 root  mail  5808 May 24 13:00 mlock
1628238 -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel  4050712 May  5 17:08 mysqld

I'm quite perplexed as to what to do about this, I also read a 
suggestion to rebuild the /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw so I did, but that has 
not assisted any.


Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated.

FYI: I'm currently using sendmail - imap-uw w/SSL - spamassassin - clamav

Thanks again,
Richard

tco1# uname -a
FreeBSD tco1.thecompanyonline.com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: 
Mon May  2 22:32:50 EDT 2005 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/TCO1.2005.05.02.001  i386

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--- End Message ---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Good CPUTYPE setting for make.conf for mixed environment?

2005-05-28 Thread jason henson

Ryan Rempel wrote:


I've got several machines that I want to maintain identical
installations on. Some of them have athlon-xp CPUs and some have
pentium4's.

What would be a good CPUTYPE setting to use in make.conf? Would an
athlon-xp run well (or at all) if I used pentium4? Would a pentium4
run well (or at all) if I used athlon-xp? Or should I use a "lowest
common denominator" (and if so, what -- something like i686 perhaps?).

I guess the other question is whether I should worry about this at all
-- I've got no CPUTYPE setting in make.conf at the moment at all --
would a more "tuned" setting actually make that much difference?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

 

I would say if you are not fully loaded it would make no difference.  
Then if you are you need to check to see if even using CPUTYPE=i686 
speeds up some and slows some down.  It does not really matter for the 
kernel, the kernel does not use SSE or any special instructions AFAIK.


/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Adding a FormFeed to an LPR printcap file?

2005-05-28 Thread modelt20
Hello:

Could someone suggest a way to add a form feed to the
end of a print document in LPR? I have a printer that
doesn't eject the last page when the print job is
finished; and I can't seem to find this in the manual.

My guess is I need to add it to my printer filter, but
its not clear to me what I need to add.

I'm running freeBSD 5.3-Release.

Thanks in advance. 

Harold.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


how to build packages quickly?

2005-05-28 Thread Luciano Musacchio
hi,
for those who know gentoo, theres a program (quickpkg) that makes a binary 
package (from already installed ones) without the need to recompile the port, 
its possible to do that in fbsd?

thanks
-- 
"Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban" -- Steve Jobs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Vinum problems on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kirby

Trying to make a mirror of two slices, but I see to be running into some 
issues here. I'm not on questions, so please CC me on all replies.

# /etc/vinum.conf
volume var
plex name var.p0 org concat
drive va device /dev/ad0s1g
sd name var.p0.s0 drive va length 256m
plex name var.p1 org concat
drive vb device /dev/ad1s1d
sd name var.p1.s0 drive vb length 256m

When I create it, using -f, I get:

vinum -> l
2 drives:
D vaState: up   /dev/ad0s1g A: 1791/2048 MB 
(87%) <- note triple allocation
D vbState: up   /dev/ad1s1d A: 255/512 MB 
(49%)

1 volumes: V var State: up Plexes:  2 Size:  256 MB

2 plexes: 
P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks:  1 Size:  256 MB
P var.p1 C State: faulty Subdisks:  1 Size:  256 MB

2 subdisks: 
S var.p0.s0 State: up D: va Size:  256 MB
S var.p1.s0 State: empty D: vb Size:  256 MB

Doesn't seem like this is right. I also run into a problem when trying to 
do a resetconfig:

vinum -> resetconfig
 WARNING!  This command will completely wipe out your vinum configuration.
 All data will be lost.  If you really want to do this, enter the text

 NO FUTURE
 Enter text -> NO FUTURE
Can't find vinum config: Inappropriate ioctl for device

and the configuration is still there after I try to resetconfig. When I 
reboot and do I vinum start, I get an error that there are no drives in 
the vinum config. 

FreeBSD ginsu.catonic.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Fri May 27 
01:28:15 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SMP  
i386

dmesg availible on request. No securelevel in place, at -1. Thanks in 
advance.

--
Kris Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!"
 This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:30:46AM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:05:48 +0400
> Dmitry Mityugov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On 5/27/05, Jacob S wrote:
> > > Hello list,
> > > 
> > > I upgraded a few 5.3 servers to 5.4 yesterday and everything seemed
> > > to go well. After booting the new kernel, dmesg correctly showed 2
> > > logical cpus (1 xeon with HT).
> > > 
> > > However, when I look at top's output, it always shows at least 50%
> > > cpu idle time - even when the load is above 10. To confirm this, I
> > > ran burnP6 from the cpuburn port - even with over a hundred apache
> > > processes going, exim running and a few other things, top still
> > > reported the cpu as 50% idle. The 'C' column in top, between 'State'
> > > and 'Time' also shows everything as being run on cpu 0.
> > > 
> > > `ps ax | grep cpu` reports this:
> > >  11  ??  RL 0:00.00 [idle: cpu1]
> > >  12  ??  RL   931:45.24 [idle: cpu0]
> > > 108  ??  DL 0:04.02 [schedcpu]
> > > 
> > > So it looks like smp support is enabled and it sees the HT enabled
> > > processor, but it's not using the second logical cpu. Is there
> > > something I missed in compiling the kernel, or is this a bug? I have
> > > confirmed it on two 5.4 servers now.
> > 
> > Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch,
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc.
> 
> hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it
> sees a capable processor? 

By default..it's a trivial matter of setting a loader tunable.  Please
read the advisory.

Kris


pgp4zRpCkeSYZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT

2005-05-28 Thread Tom Farrell
Multihoming two wan links can be accomplisheed by using zebra or just ipfw
and natd.


- Original Message -
From: "Muhammad Reza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; 
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT


> At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote:
>
> >
> >> I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
> >> to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in
> >> it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How
> >> can I bind the connections together without any other sort of router?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I setup something similar that may be useful We have a small
> > office with a 12/24ths of a T-1 line for an absurd amount of money as
> > our primary connection. Cheap residential cable service became
> > available with quadruple the bandwidth [incoming only] for cheap.
> >
> > I installed an extra NIC the to cable modem and setup the Squid proxy
> > / cache on a f'bsd box that was already running other services. Then
> > used some Squid options and IPFW to get all Squid's traffic running
> > over the cable line. This gets us faster web and ftp downloads, and
> > off-loads the T-1 for other things.
> >
> > -Wayne
> > ___
> >
> I have similar network configuration (dual home ISP without routing
> protocol enabled), and looking for some solution with BSD robust TCP/IP
> stack.
> PF came with this solution;
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
> but this solution is based on packet filtering anyway, not routing. You
> no need to specified your default gateway and you will have problem if
> you have Squid running on your gateway box or have NAT rule, that
> translate your host public address into private LAN host  address, and
> (maybe) many more...
> Meanwhile, my gateway box is Linux-2.4.x with iproute2, and can
> accomplished this matter.
> But i really want to change this into *BSD, i heard that guys from
> OpenBSD work on this
> (http://www.openbsd.org/plus36.html, Permit multiple default route), but
> not worked in my test.
> .. what about FreeBSD ?
>
> regards
> .:NewBie:.
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


why can't FBSD create /dev/ad0s2e?

2005-05-28 Thread Gary Kline
On my one box that has a 5G windows installation, I had 
(after the w2k)  my RH-8.0.  Last night I deleted the 
Linux stuff leaving only "NTFS".  I then tryed to install'
FreeBSD on the remaining ~~34G, but when I went to the
menu to create the slices, a screen showed the err message
"Can't create /dev/ad0s2e [or whatever]."

Am I doing something dense?  Upon quitting F1 pointed to "??"
which I let bring up windows.  Only a week ago I booted RH 
without any problem so it doesn't seem likely that the 
roughly 33-34GB are suddenly trashed.  I did try to use 
*all* of the remaining disk, then use the FBSD bootloader,
then chose "A" for the automatic default.  Got error message;
then started over and tried using 30G, then 25G, then 15 and
10GB.  

Any suggestions on what I can try next?

gary



-- 
   Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org Public service Unix

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Freebsd 5.4 not finding my NIC

2005-05-28 Thread Dmitry Mityugov
This is not a newsgroup.

On 5/27/05, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thread
> this
> to
> post
> top
> not
> do
> Please :-):-) (I have moved your input to bottom!) - it is easier to

Yes, please.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Migration Guide

2005-05-28 Thread Vizion
Hi

Have I missed something -- I do not see any notes for source upgrade from 5.3 
to 5.4 in the Migration guide. There see notes on upgrade 4.x to 5.x.

Are the procedures notes to be found elsewhere?

Thanks

david

40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters.
English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus.
 Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: avr-gcc

2005-05-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:03:52PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote:
> avr-gcc-3.4.3_1 is marked as broken: System's Pod::Man too old to 
> generate the documentation..
> 
> anyone here used this or know how to get it working?

Install a newer version of perl.

Kris


pgpA2LUWOWWeI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


linking with linux shared library

2005-05-28 Thread Simeon Nifos
Hallo everybody,

1:) Suppose I have a Linux Library library.so. 
And I want to link it with my main.c compiled
in FreeBSD. How can I achieve that?

Thanks in advance!
Simeon!



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"