RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:10 AM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients
 
 
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  767 Feb 22 20:11 .cshrc
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  248 Feb 22 20:11 .login
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  158 Feb 22 20:11 .login_conf
  -rw---  1 tedm  staff  373 Feb 22 20:11 .mail_aliases
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  331 Feb 22 20:11 .mailrc
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  797 Feb 22 20:11 .profile
  -rw---  1 tedm  staff  276 Feb 22 20:11 .rhosts
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  975 Feb 22 20:11 .shrc
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff767 Jan 24  2007 .cshrc
  -rw---  1 tedm  staff 35 Feb 26 14:18 .lesshst
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff248 Jan 24  2007 .login
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff158 Jan 24  2007 .login_conf
  -rw---  1 tedm  staff373 Jan 24  2007 .mail_aliases
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff331 Jan 24  2007 .mailrc
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff805 Apr 11  2007 .profile
  -rw---  1 tedm  staff276 Jan 24  2007 .rhosts
  -rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff975 Jan 24  2007 .shrc
  drwx--  2 tedm  staff512 Feb  1 23:52 .ssh
  See the difference?  There ISN'T any.  It's the same
  program.
 
 
 there are different amount spaces. it could be a problem for them.
 

I cut some of the directory listing so as not to consume
a lot of space - the spaces are different because some of
the listing had files in it that were larger, and the
program merely added the spaces so the columns would
line up.  (you will note the total at the bottom didn't
add up)

Do you have the total client list of clients that
are having problems?

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  767 Feb 22 20:11 .cshrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  248 Feb 22 20:11 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  158 Feb 22 20:11 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  373 Feb 22 20:11 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  331 Feb 22 20:11 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  797 Feb 22 20:11 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  276 Feb 22 20:11 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  975 Feb 22 20:11 .shrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff767 Jan 24  2007 .cshrc
-rw---  1 tedm  staff 35 Feb 26 14:18 .lesshst
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff248 Jan 24  2007 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff158 Jan 24  2007 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff373 Jan 24  2007 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff331 Jan 24  2007 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff805 Apr 11  2007 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff276 Jan 24  2007 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff975 Jan 24  2007 .shrc
drwx--  2 tedm  staff512 Feb  1 23:52 .ssh
See the difference?  There ISN'T any.  It's the same
program.



there are different amount spaces. it could be a problem for them.


Likely he just made a mistake and selected lukeftpd in
the inetd.conf file rather than the normal ftpd.


no

ftp stream  tcp nowait  root/usr/libexec/ftpd   ftpd -l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /usr/libexec/ftpd
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  97656 24 lut 11:59 /usr/libexec/ftpd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /usr/libexec/lukemftpd
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  128488 24 lut 11:59 /usr/libexec/lukemftpd





He would also need to select the passive switch in the
client, not the server, with whatever radio button
it uses.


i don't know what's radio button it is ;) i don't use such clients. others 
use

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

same with unix opera, shows empty directory.

there is no nat in between, so both passive and active should work


On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:10 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients



-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  767 Feb 22 20:11 .cshrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  248 Feb 22 20:11 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  158 Feb 22 20:11 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  373 Feb 22 20:11 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  331 Feb 22 20:11 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  797 Feb 22 20:11 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  276 Feb 22 20:11 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  975 Feb 22 20:11 .shrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff767 Jan 24  2007 .cshrc
-rw---  1 tedm  staff 35 Feb 26 14:18 .lesshst
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff248 Jan 24  2007 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff158 Jan 24  2007 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff373 Jan 24  2007 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff331 Jan 24  2007 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff805 Apr 11  2007 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff276 Jan 24  2007 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff975 Jan 24  2007 .shrc
drwx--  2 tedm  staff512 Feb  1 23:52 .ssh
See the difference?  There ISN'T any.  It's the same
program.



there are different amount spaces. it could be a problem for them.



I cut some of the directory listing so as not to consume
a lot of space - the spaces are different because some of
the listing had files in it that were larger, and the
program merely added the spaces so the columns would
line up.  (you will note the total at the bottom didn't
add up)

Do you have the total client list of clients that
are having problems?

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Doug Hardie


On Feb 26, 2008, at 23:43, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Hardie
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:12 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients



On Feb 26, 2008, at 22:58, Wojciech Puchar wrote:


is ftpd changed compared to 6.2?
all normal clients (like classic ftp, lftp) works fine, unix mozilla
ftp client, and few winftp clients shows empty catalog.

i know that's crappy clients, but worked with 6.2 (i think ;)

any solution? (except the best - changing to working clients)


You might try using the PASSIV switch.


That could be it, but I really doubt it, here's the output
from 2 different systems I have, one running 6.2 the other 6.3:

C:\Documents and Settings\tedmftp XXX.XXX.XXX
Connected to XXX.XXX.XXX.
220 XXX.XXX.XXX FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
User (XXX.XXX.XXX:(none)): tedm
331 Password required for tedm.
Password:
230 User tedm logged in.
ftp dir
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for '/bin/ls'.
total 16
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  767 Feb 22 20:11 .cshrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  248 Feb 22 20:11 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  158 Feb 22 20:11 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  373 Feb 22 20:11 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  331 Feb 22 20:11 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  797 Feb 22 20:11 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff  276 Feb 22 20:11 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff  975 Feb 22 20:11 .shrc
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 441 bytes received in 0.00Seconds 441000.00Kbytes/sec.
ftp

C:\Documents and Settings\tedmftp YYY.YYY.YYY
Connected to YYY.YYY.YYY.
220 YYY.YYY.YYY FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready.
User (YYY.YYY.YYY:(none)): tedm
331 Password required for tedm.
Password:
230 User tedm logged in.
ftp dir
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for '/bin/ls'.
total 760344
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff767 Jan 24  2007 .cshrc
-rw---  1 tedm  staff 35 Feb 26 14:18 .lesshst
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff248 Jan 24  2007 .login
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff158 Jan 24  2007 .login_conf
-rw---  1 tedm  staff373 Jan 24  2007 .mail_aliases
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff331 Jan 24  2007 .mailrc
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff805 Apr 11  2007 .profile
-rw---  1 tedm  staff276 Jan 24  2007 .rhosts
-rw-r--r--  1 tedm  staff975 Jan 24  2007 .shrc
drwx--  2 tedm  staff512 Feb  1 23:52 .ssh
226 Transfer complete.
ftp: 2350 bytes received in 0.30Seconds 7.81Kbytes/sec.
ftp

See the difference?  There ISN'T any.  It's the same
program.

Likely he just made a mistake and selected lukeftpd in
the inetd.conf file rather than the normal ftpd.

He would also need to select the passive switch in the
client, not the server, with whatever radio button
it uses.

Ted



I guess my response wasn't as clear as I thought it was.  Ftp clients  
have a default for passive mode.  Some default to using it and others  
to having it off.  I have encountered ftp clients in the PC world that  
have problems with the default mode.  Often its because of a firewall  
issue somewhere along the line.  Changing that setting in the client  
by using the PASSIV command often works for me.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I cut some of the directory listing so as not to consume
a lot of space - the spaces are different because some of
the listing had files in it that were larger, and the
program merely added the spaces so the columns would
line up.  (you will note the total at the bottom didn't
add up)

Do you have the total client list of clients that
are having problems?



unix mozilla, windoze internet exploder.

i know it's not freebsd fault, just asked what could make that problem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

even more strange when trying to go through squid proxy:

An FTP authentication failure occurred while trying to retrieve the URL: 
ftp://.../

Squid sent the following FTP command:
PASS yourpassword
and then received this reply
Can't change root.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Erik Norgaard

Wojciech Puchar wrote:
what is a limit of amount of arguments passed to program? is it 
hardwired or can be changed.


i found it to be in order of few thousands parameteres


searching google results in an article for linux

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6060

gives some ideas to work arounds, the most radical to recompile the 
kernel. Then a sysctl -a seems to indicate it is also a kernel 
limitation on FreeBSD:


kern.argmax: 262144

I'm not certain that this is the limit of command line arguments, and I 
 haven't tried to set it. Nor is it clear to me if this is the number 
of arguments or the number of characters in the argument string. In the 
latter case, a few thousand argumenst could easily reach that limit.


Cheers, Erik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar
what is a limit of amount of arguments passed to program? is it hardwired 
or can be changed.


i found it to be in order of few thousands parameteres

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 6.3, ftpd and crappy clients

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I guess my response wasn't as clear as I thought it was.  Ftp clients have a 
default for passive mode.  Some default to using it and others to having it 
off.  I have encountered ftp clients in the PC world that have problems with 
the default mode.  Often its because of a firewall issue somewhere along the 
line.  Changing that setting in the client by using the PASSIV command often 
works for me.



there is no nat and firewall in between.
and i tried unix ftp client with passive off and on - both works.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ARP Messages

2008-02-27 Thread Erik Norgaard

Maechler Philippe wrote:
 -   
|   server|  switch  switch  
|192.168.3.222|[(3.x/24)]--[(3.x/24)]
|80.242.192.80|bge1| 
  -|

   |bge0---
   |   |
[switch][Gateway 80.242.192.65]---[INTERNET]   |
   |   |
   |   |
[switch]   |
   |   |
   |bge0   |
 - |
|  80.242.192.81 00:19:bb:25:7b:63||
| 192.168.3.226  00:19:bb:25:7b:64|
 -

Do you see the same loop as I do?

Request goes out on one interface, response comes back on the
other - 

pretty much what the message says.



Yes I see the loop, the error messages make sense but don't
understand it :/ 
I set up extra routes for the private network so how can a packet

from the public interface arrive at a private one?

I'll recheck the cabeling, the routes on the servers and the
switch the're connected to and give you feedback here


Well, it appears to me that you are on the wrong box to solve the 
problem. The server sends an error message as it should.


What happens is that your unnamed box receives an arp request on its 
bge0 interface, but sends the respond on its bge1 interface. You can use 
snort to listen for arp packets to see what's going on.


I do not know why you have created a loop, with correct routing and 
firewall there should be no need for a loop. The easy solution is to 
pull a cable - either one on that unnamed box.


Cheers, Erik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Path MTU netstat

2008-02-27 Thread Sergey
I want to see currently discovered Path MTU.

I tried netstat -rnaW, but it doesn't show any cloned routes, but i clearly
see Path MTU discovery working, by watching tcpdump tracing. An application
sends full sized packet with DF bit, receives ICMP Unreach Frag message and
retransmits downsized packet again.

I need this, because there is another  6.2-RELEASE-p3  host, which doesn't
perfom Path MTU discovery, although:
# sysctl -a | grep path_mtu
net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery: 1

I tried disabling firewall, simplifying routing, but none helps.

Anyone help?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 10:16:20 Erik Norgaard wrote:

 Then a sysctl -a seems to indicate it is also a kernel 
 limitation on FreeBSD:

 kern.argmax: 262144

 I'm not certain that this is the limit of command line arguments, and I
   haven't tried to set it. Nor is it clear to me if this is the number
 of arguments or the number of characters in the argument string. In the
 latter case, a few thousand argumenst could easily reach that limit.

/usr/include/sys/syslimits.h:
#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__powerpc__)
#define ARG_MAX 65536   /* max bytes for an exec function */
#else
#define ARG_MAX 262144  /* max bytes for an exec function */
#endif

In other words: there's no limit to the amount of arguments, but the byte 
length of the arguments.

-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:

Hello,


From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very

busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
load average of about 1).

But this time:
2008-02-27 10:03:36 1JUICO-0002Bs-23 no immediate delivery: load average 15.88

Where can I look for more information about what happened. The server
was rebooted early in the morning so its swap consumption was almost
non-existent. Around 10 it suddenly consumed probably around 200MB of
swap, now it stands at 135MB which is pretty normal with this machine
(it only has 512 RAM). SWAP usage is normal with this machine but it
usually is a matter of 2-3 days before it gradually takes over 10-13%
of swap space.

I tried by looking at:
http access log
auth.log
maillog
messages

Nothing in there indicating an outburst of sudden activities.

heh - I now think I may be wrong. The load average did not necessarily
produce so much swap consumption so fast. At 10:13 I run a cron job
optimising all mysql tables. So maybe in fact the swap was used by
mysql operations, although I am still interested to now what casued
load average to go above 15 at 10:03.

10:00AM  up  3:14, 0 users, load averages: 0.40, 0.13, 0.05
10:01AM  up  3:15, 0 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.14, 0.05
10:02AM  up  3:16, 0 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.11, 0.05
10:03AM  up  3:17, 0 users, load averages: 11.54, 3.09, 1.15
10:04AM  up  3:18, 0 users, load averages: 13.26, 5.69, 2.28
10:05AM  up  3:19, 0 users, load averages: 4.98, 4.69, 2.14
10:06AM  up  3:20, 0 users, load averages: 1.79, 3.80, 1.99


Thanks for any pointers.


No way to know.  You'll have to set up more detailed logging, e.g. a 
script that runs ps if load is over a certain limit.


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2008-02-27 10:16, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
 what is a limit of amount of arguments passed to program? is it
 hardwired or can be changed.
 
 i found it to be in order of few thousands parameteres
 
 searching google results in an article for linux
 
 http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6060
 
 gives some ideas to work arounds, the most radical to recompile the
 kernel.  Then a sysctl -a seems to indicate it is also a kernel
 limitation on FreeBSD:
 
 kern.argmax: 262144
 
 I'm not certain that this is the limit of command line arguments, and
 I  haven't tried to set it. Nor is it clear to me if this is the
 number of arguments or the number of characters in the argument
 string. In the latter case, a few thousand argumenst could easily
 reach that limit.

sysctl -d helps here:

$ sysctl -d kern.argmax
kern.argmax: Maximum bytes of argument to execve(2)

It is worth noting, however, that there are usually fairly easy ways to
work with huge lists of command-line arguments.  Instead of writing
things like this, for example:

for file in *.ogg ; do
blah ${file}
done

one can easily write:

find . -name '*.ogg' | \
while read file ; do \
blah ${file}
done

xargs(1) is another popular tool for processing large argument lists:

find -name '*.ogg' | xargs blah

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


OpenOffice 2.3 BASE, PostgreSQL 8.3 with JDB/ODBC: NO SSL possible?

2008-02-27 Thread O. Hartmann

Hello,
I got a problem in connecting a BASE Client (OpenOffice DB Client) to a 
remote, SSL-secured PostgreSQL server. Both, client and server, running 
FreeBSD 7.0, but this does only matter for the OO client side. With OO 
under Windows it is either with ODBC or JDBC possible to connect via SSL 
to the DB server, but this is not for OO under FreeBSD using JDBC/ODBC 
as recently compiled from the ports.


I searched the net and found that because postges-odbc is compiled 
against libpg.so on FreeBSD/UNIX and SSL connectivity is therein, it 
should be up to the ODBC driver how to connect , but I did not find any 
explanation what to switch on or of in odbc.ini.


Even with JDBC (postgres-jdbc), where SSL should be a standard with JDK 
1.5, I can not find any information about a knob or even any help on 
that so I guess the specific driver, either JDBC or ODBC should be 
capable of negotiating the connection type.


This works without problems with Windows clients running OO or M$-Office 
using JDBC or ODBC from www.potgresql.org.


Can anybody help or give a hint?

Regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7

2008-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7


Oliver Herold wrote:

Hi,

I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,

http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html

is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something verified only for the state of development back in August
2007?

I have been trying to replicate this.  ISC have kindly given me access
to their test data but I am seeing Linux performing much slower than
FreeBSD with the same ISC workload.



Kris,

  Every couple years we go through this with ISC.  They come out with
a new version of BIND then claim that nothing other than Linux can
run it well.  I've seen this nonsense before and it's tiresome.

Incidentally, the query tool they used, queryperf, has been changed
to dnsperf.  Someone needs to look at that port - /usr/ports/dns/dnsperf -
as it has a build depend of bind9 - well bind 9.3.4 is part of 6.3-RELEASE
and I was rather irked when I ran the dnsperf port maker and the
maker stupidly began the process of downloading and building the
same version of BIND that I was already running on my server.

* I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
configuration but have not yet found the cause.


It's called Anti-FreeBSD bias.  You won't find anything.


This is false, but I didnt expect any better from you.

ISC widely rely on FreeBSD internally, and contribute *lots* of 
resources to the FreeBSD project including hosting one half of 
ftp.freebsd.org and employing several FreeBSD developers.



e.g. NSD
(ports/dns/nsd) is a much faster and more scalable DNS server than BIND
(because it is better optimized for the smaller set of features it
supports).



When you make remarks like that it's no wonder ISC is in the business
of slamming FreeBSD.  People used to make the same claims about djbdns
but I noticed over the last few years they don't seem to be doing
that anymore.


What, you mean factual statements?  NSD *is* faster, it *is* more 
scalable, it *does* support fewer features than BIND, and it *is* more 
optimized for those features (e.g. it tries to precompute DNS responses, 
which it can do because it doesn't support dynamic updates, etc).  The 
ISC devels acknowledge this.  BIND has architectural constraints from 
being a more complete DNS server solution.



If nsd is so much better than yank bind out of the base FreeBSD and
replace it with nsd.  Of course that will make more work for me
when I regen our nameservers here since nsd will be the first thing
on the rm list.


You're funny, Ted.  Somehow you got out of my killfile though, guess 
I'll fix that.


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: hardware problem

2008-02-27 Thread Frank Shute
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:38:09PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:

 hi guys,
just take every part out and dust with a brush, reseat the m-board
 and hook on the power supply, switch on the power and both fans spin
 for quite a while, seeing this, I switch it off and start to connect
 all the cables. After all is done, i turn on the power again, and this
 time it stop again after a short spin. and I looked everywhere on the
 board and found some silverish dust on the board, i dust it away, but
 this time, the fans and the LED light on the board never spin or lit
 up when i switch it on, i wonder if something i did kill the power
 this time, any idea?? thank you for your help.
 
 TFC
 

Having been round the houses with my new build which displayed similar
problems, I would say that what is most likely is that it is a power
supply problem.

There was a shaky attachment somewhere which loosened when you moved
and finally gave up the ghost.

Your best approach, is to get a new power supply or case with power
supply depending on how old your case is.

If that doesn't work, then it's probably your motherboard and unless
your CPU is quite new and you can extract it, you'll probably be
looking at new CPU and RAM also ie. expensive.

If you want to get a new case, then have a look at an Antec Sonata
III. It's quiet, comes with all the bits you need and has USB ports
and e-SATA on the front. Cost me about 75GBP. 500W power supply which
is a bit excessive for my needs though.

Best of luck!

-- 

 Frank 


 Contact info: http://www.esperance-linux.co.uk/misc/contact.html 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello,

From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very
busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
load average of about 1).

But this time:
2008-02-27 10:03:36 1JUICO-0002Bs-23 no immediate delivery: load average 15.88

Where can I look for more information about what happened. The server
was rebooted early in the morning so its swap consumption was almost
non-existent. Around 10 it suddenly consumed probably around 200MB of
swap, now it stands at 135MB which is pretty normal with this machine
(it only has 512 RAM). SWAP usage is normal with this machine but it
usually is a matter of 2-3 days before it gradually takes over 10-13%
of swap space.

I tried by looking at:
http access log
auth.log
maillog
messages

Nothing in there indicating an outburst of sudden activities.

heh - I now think I may be wrong. The load average did not necessarily
produce so much swap consumption so fast. At 10:13 I run a cron job
optimising all mysql tables. So maybe in fact the swap was used by
mysql operations, although I am still interested to now what casued
load average to go above 15 at 10:03.

10:00AM  up  3:14, 0 users, load averages: 0.40, 0.13, 0.05
10:01AM  up  3:15, 0 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.14, 0.05
10:02AM  up  3:16, 0 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.11, 0.05
10:03AM  up  3:17, 0 users, load averages: 11.54, 3.09, 1.15
10:04AM  up  3:18, 0 users, load averages: 13.26, 5.69, 2.28
10:05AM  up  3:19, 0 users, load averages: 4.98, 4.69, 2.14
10:06AM  up  3:20, 0 users, load averages: 1.79, 3.80, 1.99


Thanks for any pointers.

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello,

2008/2/27, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
   Hello,
  
  From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very
   busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
   around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
   server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
   load average of about 1).
  
   But this time:
   2008-02-27 10:03:36 1JUICO-0002Bs-23 no immediate delivery: load average 
 15.88
  
   Where can I look for more information about what happened. The server
   was rebooted early in the morning so its swap consumption was almost
   non-existent. Around 10 it suddenly consumed probably around 200MB of
   swap, now it stands at 135MB which is pretty normal with this machine
   (it only has 512 RAM). SWAP usage is normal with this machine but it
   usually is a matter of 2-3 days before it gradually takes over 10-13%
   of swap space.
  
   I tried by looking at:
   http access log
   auth.log
   maillog
   messages
  
   Nothing in there indicating an outburst of sudden activities.
  
   heh - I now think I may be wrong. The load average did not necessarily
   produce so much swap consumption so fast. At 10:13 I run a cron job
   optimising all mysql tables. So maybe in fact the swap was used by
   mysql operations, although I am still interested to now what casued
   load average to go above 15 at 10:03.
  
   10:00AM  up  3:14, 0 users, load averages: 0.40, 0.13, 0.05
   10:01AM  up  3:15, 0 users, load averages: 0.23, 0.14, 0.05
   10:02AM  up  3:16, 0 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.11, 0.05
   10:03AM  up  3:17, 0 users, load averages: 11.54, 3.09, 1.15
   10:04AM  up  3:18, 0 users, load averages: 13.26, 5.69, 2.28
   10:05AM  up  3:19, 0 users, load averages: 4.98, 4.69, 2.14
   10:06AM  up  3:20, 0 users, load averages: 1.79, 3.80, 1.99
  
  
   Thanks for any pointers.

 No way to know.  You'll have to set up more detailed logging, e.g. a
  script that runs ps if load is over a certain limit.

Thank you Kris! Is anybody willing to share such a script (if there is one)?

Thanks!

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Path MTU netstat

2008-02-27 Thread Sergey
I want to see currently discovered Path MTU.

I tried netstat -rnaW, but it doesn't show any cloned routes, but i clearly
see Path MTU discovery working, by watching tcpdump tracing. An application
sends full sized packet with DF bit, receives ICMP Unreach Frag message and
retransmits downsized packet again.

I need this, because there is another  6.2-RELEASE-p3  host, which doesn't
perfom Path MTU discovery, although:
# sysctl -a | grep path_mtu
net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery: 1

I tried disabling firewall, simplifying routing, but none helps.

Anyone help?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

one can easily write:

find . -name '*.ogg' | \
while read file ; do \
blah ${file}
done

xargs(1) is another popular tool for processing large argument lists:

find -name '*.ogg' | xargs blah


unless program blah starts slowly, and it's better to give it 2000 
params at once.


but i've asked to be sure what is actual limit, and used xargs -n 2000 to 
do the rest.


thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: hardware problem

2008-02-27 Thread D G Teed
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of D G Teed
   Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:22 AM
   To: DAve
   Cc: FreeBSD Questions
   Subject: Re: hardware problem
  
  
   Every system I've seen with his description of the problem, where
   the power supply can't even run it's own fan, is having a power supply
   problem.  Power supplies are very often low quality these days and can't
   handle the stresses of typical electrical grid fluctuations.

  My experience has not been that the power supplies can't handle the
  electrical grid.

  What I've mostly seen is that the power supply FANS get dust in them,
  the fans slow down or stop, airflow through the supply drops, and
  then the supply overheats.  Once it overheats, the supply will never
  be reliable again and must be thrown out.

I've been able to routinely clean out the dust with canned air, and
they still die more frequently than say motherboards.  Even quality
brands like Antec.  I often replace the fan if it is showing signs
of noise from bearing getting burned out.  I'm speaking mainly
of home and small office PCs.  This is something that won't
happen as much in a server room since the air is cleaner, but
I'd guess the O.P. wasn't in that environment since he is wasting
3 days before trying another power supply.

Power supplies do have a limit of life related to the quality
of your electricity (and excessive heat). I can recall the bad
electrolyte scandle with several motherboard brands 5 years ago.
The explanation of the shortened capacitor lifespan due to the
electrolyte missing an ingredient was a bit of an education
into what capacitors do.  They do have a limited lifespan
related to heat and the number of hours they are exposed to a high
ripple current.

Here is an excellent wikipedia entry on capacitor plague
which will explain it in layman's terms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague

If you have not read about this before, it may be an eye opener.

--Donald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Danielisz Laszlo wrote:

Hello!

Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

Laci


In a couple of hours.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Danielisz Laszlo
Hello!

Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

Laci




  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Danielisz Laszlo
Nice, I can't wait!

- Original Message 
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Danielisz Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:27:08 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0

Danielisz Laszlo wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?
 
 Laci

In a couple of hours.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Alphons Fonz van Werven

Kris Kennaway wrote:


Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?



In a couple of hours.


This may sound like a stupid joke, but it's actually true. As I'm writing
this there's no announcement on http://www.freebsd.org yet, but I checked
the Dutch FTP site and 7.0-RELEASE is there.

A big thank you to everyone who helped make it possible,

Alphons

--
All right, that does it Bill [Donahue]. I'm pretty sure that killing Jesus
is not very Christian.
 -- pope Benedict XVI, South Park episode #158

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SOLVED: Re: IPMON log to syslog doesn't work

2008-02-27 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:26:22PM +0100, Mel wrote:
 On Tuesday 26 February 2008 17:31:27 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:01:13PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
   On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:42:51PM +0100, Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:25:37 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Mel wrote:
  On Tuesday 26 February 2008 14:20:32 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
   I'm trying to troubleshoot my ipfilter firewall, and I cannot get
   any log data, i.e. /var/log/ipfilter.log is empty.
 
  I solved it following the IPF FAQ:
  http://www.phildev.net/ipf/IPFipmon.html#ipmon1
 
  Q. I have IPMon logging to syslog, but syslog doesn't
 log anything, why not?
 
  A. IPF logs as local0 so you'll want something to the effect of:
 local0.debug /var/log/ipf.log in your syslog.conf.
 NOTE: There has to be atleast one TAB in that line, not just spaces.
 
  so I changed security.* to local0.* in /etc/syslog.conf:
 
  # grep local0 /etc/syslog.conf
  local0.*/var/log/ipfilter.log
  #
 
  and now I have (lots) of logs in the log file:
 
  # tail -2 /var/log/ipfilter.log
  Feb 26 16:20:05 mech-cluster238 ipmon[24166]: 16:20:05.248083 2x dc0 @0:20
  b 137 .222.187.85,137 - 137.222.187.255,137 PR udp len 20 78 IN broadcast
  Feb 26 16:20:07 mech-cluster238 ipmon[24166]: 16:20:06.876597 dc0 @0:21 b
  137.22 2.187.10,138 - 137.222.187.255,138 PR udp len 20 212 IN broadcast #
 
  # ls -al /var/log/ipfilter.log
  -rw-r-  1 root  wheel  74889 26 Feb 16:21 /var/log/ipfilter.log
  #
 
  But now I wonder if the FBSD handbook has an error in section
  28.5.7 IPMON Logging:
 
  Add the following statement to /etc/syslog.conf:
  security.* /var/log/ipfilter.log
 
   The security.* means to write all the logged
   messages to the coded file
 
  Shall I submit this as a manual error, or is it more complex?
 
 I was just looking at that. The weird thing is the following:
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/ipfilter/tools/ipmon.c?rev=1.4.2.2
 #ifndef   LOGFAC
 #define   LOGFAC  LOG_LOCAL0
 #endif
 
 In the contrib/ipfilter/Makefile it is set to security, but...freebsd builds 
 with src/sbin/ipf/ipmon and there it is indeed LOG_LOCAL0.
 
 So either you could request docfix or Makefile fix. There's probably a reason 
 why it's set hardcoded like that to LOG_LOCAL0.

I reported this handbook error to the freebsd-doc list.

I also noted that the ipmon man page does say that the default facility
is local0, but it can be changed with -L facility. I tried this but
it doesn't seem to work:

# ps ax|grep ipmon
27199  ??  Ss 0:00.11 /sbin/ipmon -sDn -L security
27245  p0  R+ 0:00.01 grep ipmon
#

so it is working, but no new messages appear in the log. With local0
I get several messages a minute. 

-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD 6.2+PHP+700 sites = DNS Issues?

2008-02-27 Thread Simon Street
Hi,

I have a customer with a cPanel install on 6.2, Apache/2.2.8 with
PHP/5.2.5 (DSO)

The server is having problem with dns resolution:
Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: php_network_getaddresses:
getaddrinfo failed: hostname nor servname provided, or not known in
/snip/support.php on line 2.

This script works fine on the CLI but inside apache it fails.

I've been told by cpanel support that this is a problem with FreeBSD
more than anything and I'm wondering if anyone has any suggestions on
fixes, either sysctl tweaks or otherwise.
cPanel have tried changing FD options on apache but to no avail.

Upgrading to 6.3 is an option if that will fix it.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Simon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Mark Tinguely

  From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very
  busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
  around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
  server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
  load average of about 1).

By any chance, do you run SpamAssassin? I have seen load average bursts with
SA. It seems to me that spam sites are bursting spam to attempt to bring
down the anti-spam filters.

As mentioned by others a ps (or I prefer pstree) list will help
solve the issue.

--Mark Tinguely
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2008-02-27 12:49, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 one can easily write:

  find . -name '*.ogg' | \
  while read file ; do \
  blah ${file}
  done

 xargs(1) is another popular tool for processing large argument lists:

  find -name '*.ogg' | xargs blah

 unless program blah starts slowly, and it's better to give it 2000 params
 at once.

 but i've asked to be sure what is actual limit, and used xargs -n 2000 to
 do the rest.

Yeah, that's a fair point.  xargs is good for that :-)

 thank you

You are welcome, of course.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Manolis Kiagias



Kris Kennaway wrote:

Danielisz Laszlo wrote:

Hello!

Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

Laci


In a couple of hours.

Kris

And if you are in fact running an -RC version, -RELEASE is already 
offered via


freebsd-update -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade

Running it on three systems since yesterday.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Rudi Kramer - MWEB
I did some digging and found it on the main ftp server:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/7.0/

Rudi
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 2:27 PM
To: Danielisz Laszlo
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0

Danielisz Laszlo wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?
 
 Laci

In a couple of hours.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card

2008-02-27 Thread Unga
Hi all

I want to buy a FreeBSD 7.x compatible wired Gigabit
(10/100/1000Mbps) PCI-based network card. Please let
me know what cards are recommended and work
successfully with FreeBSD 7.x.

Many thanks in advance.

Kind regards
Unga


  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


someone know about a SAA7130HL Multi Media Capture Device Driver?

2008-02-27 Thread Sdävtaker
Im running:
FreeBSD FreeSBIE.LiveCD 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #11: Wed Feb  7
16:52:42 UTC 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj.gmv-i386/usr/src/sys/FREESBIE
i386

pciconf -l -v gives me:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10:0:class=0x048000 card=0x20041a7f chip=0x71301131
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor   = 'Philips Semiconductors'
device   = 'SAA7130HL Multi Media Capture Device'
class= multimedia

Someone know about any driver that can make this work?
Thanks.
Sdav
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


can't ping own ip configured on tun device‏

2008-02-27 Thread Warner Lambert

On my gateway I configured a tunnel device (tun0) and connected it with a 
remote host using OpenSSH. Ifconfig looks as follows:tun0: 
flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1500inet 10.254.254.1 
-- 10.254.254.2 netmask 0xff00 Opened by PID 4619I can ping or 
connect via ssh to 10.254.25.2 but I am unable to ping my own address 
(10.254.254.1).  Is this supposed to work like that? Eventually I would like to 
have daemons listening only eg. on 10.254.254.1:80. How would I achieve this if 
I the machine doesen't even recognize 10.254.254.1 as it's own address.On the 
other side it's exactly otherwise arround, I can ping the gateway (?) but not 
the own address.Am I missing something important? Is this standard behavior for 
tun devices?Thanks.Warner
_
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star 
power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote:

I did some digging and found it on the main ftp server:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/7.0/

Rudi


People always try to get the jump on the official release announcement, 
but don't consider that until the email arrives in your mailbox saying 
it is released then the ISO images etc are subject to last minute change 
without notice.  Use at your own risk :)


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card

2008-02-27 Thread Sean Cavanaugh

I personally use Netgear GA311 gigabit cards with no issue in my systems.

-Sean

--
From: Unga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:11 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card


Hi all

I want to buy a FreeBSD 7.x compatible wired Gigabit
(10/100/1000Mbps) PCI-based network card. Please let
me know what cards are recommended and work
successfully with FreeBSD 7.x.

Many thanks in advance.

Kind regards
Unga




Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Huff

Kris Kennaway writes:

  People always try to get the jump on the official release announcement, 
  but don't consider that until the email arrives in your mailbox saying 
  it is released then the ISO images etc are subject to last minute change 
  without notice.  Use at your own risk :)

It would also be polite (and perhaps operationally
advantageous) to give the mirror sites a chance to insure they have
the full distriution and make any tactical adjustments they need.


Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread RW
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:15:51 +0200
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 It is worth noting, however, that there are usually fairly easy ways
 to work with huge lists of command-line arguments.  Instead of writing
 things like this, for example:
 
   for file in *.ogg ; do
   blah ${file}
   done

I've seen loops like this suggested as an alternative to 

blah *.ogg 

and the two cases are clearly different, because in the loop you only
pass one argument to  blah, and the limitation is in how much space
the shell will allow for the expansion of *.ogg. I've not hit this
limit with /bin/sh. Anyone know what it is? 

 
 one can easily write:
 
   find . -name '*.ogg' | \
   while read file ; do \
   blah ${file}
   done

If blah is interactive, it will try to take its input from the pipe
instead of the terminal. Is there a way around this? (I know xargs can
handle it with -o)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Huff
Lystopad Oleksandr writes:

   I want to buy a FreeBSD 7.x compatible wired Gigabit
   (10/100/1000Mbps) PCI-based network card. Please let
   me know what cards are recommended and work
   successfully with FreeBSD 7.x.

  Intel cards works fine!
  
  man em:

Emphatically agree.  The Pro/1000 series aren't cheap (or easy
to find in generic retail outlets), but I am a convert.  It doesn't
hurt that the driver is written by Intel.


Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: usb external hd question

2008-02-27 Thread RW
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:58:14 +0100
Miguel Giral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 also, a side question. When attaching a geli provider, i get this:
 
 GEOM_ELI: Device ad4s3.eli created.
 GEOM_ELI: Encryption: Blowfish-CBC 256
 GEOM_ELI: Crypto: software
 WARNING: Expected rawoffset 14548865, found 14548865
 
 i've been getting it since i edited the label of ad4s3.eli
 I don't really know if it's a bad thing to get that warning, since
 both numbers are the same. 

If you look at the source code (in /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_bsd.c), it's
dividing the offsets by a sector-size when it prints them out. So they
only the same when rounded-down to a sector boundary. I guess you are
using a larger sector-size for geli, and specified a fraction of a
sector somewhere in the disklabel.

BTW it doesn't make much difference, but I don't see any point in using
anything other than 448 bits for blowfish under geli. Unlike the other
ciphers, no part of its performance is affected by keysize. 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card

2008-02-27 Thread Lystopad Oleksandr
 Hello, Unga!

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:11:39AM -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card:
 Hi all
 
 I want to buy a FreeBSD 7.x compatible wired Gigabit
 (10/100/1000Mbps) PCI-based network card. Please let
 me know what cards are recommended and work
 successfully with FreeBSD 7.x.
 
 Many thanks in advance.

Intel cards works fine!

man em:

The em driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters
based on the Intel 82540, 82541ER, 82541PI, 82542, 82543, 82544, 82545,
82546, 82546EB, 82546GB, 82547, 82571, 81572 and 82573 Ethernet
controller chips.  The driver supports Transmit/Receive checksum offload
and Jumbo Frames only on 82540, 82543, 82544 and 82546-based adapters.

-- 
 Oleksandr Lystopad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, February 27, 2008 15:06:00 +0200 Manolis Kiagias 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Kris Kennaway wrote:

Danielisz Laszlo wrote:

Hello!

Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

Laci


In a couple of hours.

Kris


And if you are in fact running an -RC version, -RELEASE is already offered via

freebsd-update -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade

Running it on three systems since yesterday.


I recompiled the kernel yesterday.

# uname -v
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #2: Tue Feb 26 09:07:31 CST 2008

--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2008-02-27 14:21, RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:15:51 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
  one can easily write:
  
  find . -name '*.ogg' | \
  while read file ; do \
  blah ${file}
  done
 
 If blah is interactive, it will try to take its input from the pipe
 instead of the terminal. Is there a way around this? (I know xargs can
 handle it with -o)

You can use /dev/tty as input in the loop iteration:

find . -name '*.ogg' | \
while read file ; do \
blah ${file}  /dev/tty ; \
done

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Nightmare on FreeBSD Street: NIC Drivers

2008-02-27 Thread Shigeaki Tagashira

Hello,

It needs the e1000phy patch for working on your motherboard.
Have you applied it?

---
Shigeaki Tagashira

W. D. wrote:

Compiled, built kernel, and world per:

http://www.f.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html

Still getting timeout errors.  Seems like more of them
with this nfe driver.  


FreeBSD 6.2, Asus M2NPV-VM, nVidia Ethernet.

Can anyone help me debug this problem or suggest a solid,
reliable, and compatible PCI NIC to use instead?






Start Here to Find It Fast!™ - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/
$8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 27), Wojciech Puchar said:
 one can easily write:
 
  find . -name '*.ogg' | \
  while read file ; do \
  blah ${file}
  done
 
 xargs(1) is another popular tool for processing large argument lists:
 
  find -name '*.ogg' | xargs blah
 
 unless program blah starts slowly, and it's better to give it 2000
 params at once.
 
 but i've asked to be sure what is actual limit, and used xargs -n
 2000 to do the rest.

That's less than xargs's default of 5000 :)  The xargs manpage explains
it all.

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello,

2008/2/27, Mark Tinguely [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very
busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
load average of about 1).


 By any chance, do you run SpamAssassin? I have seen load average bursts with
  SA. It seems to me that spam sites are bursting spam to attempt to bring
  down the anti-spam filters.

  As mentioned by others a ps (or I prefer pstree) list will help
  solve the issue.

Thanks. I do have SA but I studied the logs carefully and no outside
connections, except for one with a vary small message desitined for
mailman subscription arrived at around that time.


-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Bart Silverstrim

Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:

Hello,

2008/2/27, Mark Tinguely [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   From the MRTG data I can see that suddenly on a currently not very
   busy machine the load averege went over 15 or more. This happened
   around 10 in the morning. Not many entries in httpd access log, smtp
   server was not too much loaded (at that time it generally produces a
   load average of about 1).


By any chance, do you run SpamAssassin? I have seen load average bursts with
 SA. It seems to me that spam sites are bursting spam to attempt to bring
 down the anti-spam filters.

 As mentioned by others a ps (or I prefer pstree) list will help
 solve the issue.


Thanks. I do have SA but I studied the logs carefully and no outside
connections, except for one with a vary small message desitined for
mailman subscription arrived at around that time.


Is it possible that there's a message in your queue that's *being 
processed*, so it may have arrived earlier than near that time and 
causes the spike?


What tests is SA running?  Or something with your DNS settings that is 
holding up SA while trying to look something up?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7RC2 and VMware tools

2008-02-27 Thread Dimitri Yioulos
On Monday 18 February 2008 5:02 pm, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
 On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:58:26 -0500, John Nielsen wrote

  On Monday 18 February 2008 01:47:14 pm Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
   On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:29:28 -0500, John Nielsen wrote
  
On Monday 18 February 2008 12:31:37 pm Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
 On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:44:17 -0500, John Nielsen wrote

  On Sunday 17 February 2008 01:06:28 pm Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
   I'm not sure whether to have posted this here or on a VMware
   list; apologies if I'm in the wrong place.
  
   The other day, I did a fresh install of v. 7RC2 from the
   minimal CD on a CentOS 5.1 box running VMware server 1.0.4.  I
   had previously successfully installed v. 6.2, and upgraded to
   6.3 on the same box. All has gone well, except for the
   installation of VMware Tools. Getting the Tools tarball and
   extracting the requisite files was trivial. However, when I try
   to run Vmware-Config-Tools.pl, I get a message saying that the
   program must be run on a virtual machine. Well, it is.  Is
   there a needed FBSD package I'm missing (the Tools install
   program doesn't complain about it).  A known issue, or bug,
   maybe?  Or is VMware support not yet enabled?  Help would be
   greatly appreciated.
 
  I just went through almost the same thing, installing FreeBSD 7
  under VMware Workstation on Windows. The config-tools script has
  a hard-coded version check which looks for libc.so.6 under /lib
  only. Rather than mess with the script, I just hard-linked the
  library from /usr/local/lib/compat (where it was installed by the
  compat6x port). Seemed to work fine after that. You'll need to be
  careful not to erase it if you ever run make delete-old-libs,
  though.

 Thanks for the response!

 A symlink won't do for the above?
   
Try it and see! I think I decided on a hard link since the script
uses something like if [ -f /lib/libc.so.6 ] so it's looking only
for a regular file and not a symlink.
  
   Hmm, when I try to hard-link (ln /usr/compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6
   libc.so.6), I get ln: ./libc.so.6: Cross-device link.  But, when I
   do a symlink, which takes, I get /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared
   object ld-linux.so.2 not found, required by libc.so.6 when i run
   vmware-config-tools.pl.  So, I symlink ld-linux.so.2, and run tools.
   Then, I get /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol __stdoutp
   referenced from COPY relocation in /usr/local/sbin/vmware-checkvm.
   Arrgh.  Any other ideas?
 
  You have /usr on a different partition than / in your VM, so you can't do
  a hard link. I would just copy the file back to /lib and not worry about
  it. Linking in other random libraries will cause problems, as you've
  observed.
 
  JN

 If I copy libc.so.6 to /lib, then tools complains about ld-linux.so.2.  If
 I copy ld-linux.so.2, it then complains about /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
 Undefined symbol __stdoutp referenced from COPY relocation in
 /usr/local/sbin/vmware-checkvm.  This is pretty much the same as if I
 symlink the two files.  Even though I'm a glass half-full guy, this is
 beginning to look dire (but it's the worst thing to happen to me, I'm sure
 I'll live).  Still, it would be nice to get this working.

I did this a few days ago:

/lib/libc.so. existed.  I symlinked libc.so.6 to it.  I then proceeded to 
install VMware Tools without complaint.

However, I'm not sure if there's a vmware FreeBSD NIC driver.  If there is, 
it's not being used (as per dmesg, the AMD PCnet-PCI driver appears to be 
used).  On a Linux vm (please, no stone throwing  :-)  ), to use the vmxnet 
driver, I'd stop the network service, load the vmxnet driver module, then 
restart the service.  Is there a similar procedure on FreeBSD?

Thanks.

Dimitri

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Danielisz Laszlo
I can see now 7.0 is available on ftp.freebsd.org too.

- Original Message 
From: Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:23:44 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0

--On Wednesday, February 27, 2008 15:06:00 +0200 Manolis Kiagias 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Danielisz Laszlo wrote:
 Hello!

 Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

 Laci

 In a couple of hours.

 Kris

 And if you are in fact running an -RC version, -RELEASE is already offered via

 freebsd-update -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade

 Running it on three systems since yesterday.

I recompiled the kernel yesterday.

# uname -v
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #2: Tue Feb 26 09:07:31 CST 2008

-- 
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote:
   I did some digging and found it on the main ftp server:
   ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/7.0/
  
   Rudi

  People always try to get the jump on the official release announcement,
  but don't consider that until the email arrives in your mailbox saying
  it is released then the ISO images etc are subject to last minute change
  without notice.  Use at your own risk :)

  Kris

Just curious - is there a reason why the generic kernel is still being
built with debug symbols? I thought that was only used during the
pre-release phase.

- Max
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:50:32AM -0800, Danielisz Laszlo wrote:

 Hello!
 
 Do you have any idea the FreeBSD 7.0 when will come out?

Pretty soon now.   Looks like the final touches are being worked on now.

jerry

 
 Laci
 
 
 ___
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


problem with linuxthreads when installing mysql5

2008-02-27 Thread Nicolas Letellier

Hello,

When I want to install mysql5-server (with portinstall and these 
options: WITH_CHARSET=latin1 WITH_COLLATION=latin1_swedish_ci 
WITH_OPENSSL=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes WITH_LINUXTHREADS=yes), I've got 
this error:


===  Installing for linuxthreads-2.2.3_23
===   Generating temporary packing list
===  Checking if devel/linuxthreads already installed
===   linuxthreads-2.2.3_23 is already installed
 You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
 by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly.
 If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/linuxthreads
 without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
 in your environment or the make install command line.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa 
/tmp/portinstall.26307.1 env make WITH_CHARSET=latin1 
WITH_COLLATION=latin1_swedish_ci WITH_OPENSSL=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes 
WITH_LINUXTHREADS=yes

** Fix the problem and try again.
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 49 packages 
found (-0 +1) . done]

** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
   ! databases/mysql50-client  (unknown build error)



So... I delete linuxthreads (with pkg_deinstall) and I retry... The 
error is the same. Installing mysql50-server with linuxthread option 
installes linuxthread port two times... The first time, it works, the 
second, I got this message.


Why 'portinstall mysql5-server' installs two times linuxthreads? How 
solve this problem?


Thanks,

-Nicolas

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

2000 to do the rest.


That's less than xargs's default of 5000 :)  The xargs manpage explains
it all.
with this defaults i've got argument list too long because every 
argument is 70-80 bytes by average.


thanks for all help!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 27), Wojciech Puchar said:
 2000 to do the rest.
 
 That's less than xargs's default of 5000 :)  The xargs manpage explains
 it all.
 with this defaults i've got argument list too long because every argument 
 is 70-80 bytes by average.

Hm.  That shouldn't happen, since xargs also reads kern.argmax and
limits the total argument size to 4096 bytes less than that.  If you
can reproduce this with a simple testcase, it should be easy to fix.

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7

2008-02-27 Thread Sam Leffler

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7


Oliver Herold wrote:


Hi,

I saw this bind benchmarks just some minutes ago,

http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html

is this true for FreeBSD 7 (current state: RELENG_7/7.0R) too? Or is
this something verified only for the state of development back in August
2007?
  

I have been trying to replicate this.  ISC have kindly given me access
to their test data but I am seeing Linux performing much slower than
FreeBSD with the same ISC workload.




Kris,

  Every couple years we go through this with ISC.  They come out with
a new version of BIND then claim that nothing other than Linux can
run it well.  I've seen this nonsense before and it's tiresome.

Incidentally, the query tool they used, queryperf, has been changed
to dnsperf.  Someone needs to look at that port - /usr/ports/dns/dnsperf -
as it has a build depend of bind9 - well bind 9.3.4 is part of 6.3-RELEASE
and I was rather irked when I ran the dnsperf port maker and the
maker stupidly began the process of downloading and building the
same version of BIND that I was already running on my server.

  

* I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
configuration but have not yet found the cause.



It's called Anti-FreeBSD bias.  You won't find anything.

  

e.g. NSD
(ports/dns/nsd) is a much faster and more scalable DNS server than BIND
(because it is better optimized for the smaller set of features it
supports).




When you make remarks like that it's no wonder ISC is in the business
of slamming FreeBSD.  People used to make the same claims about djbdns
but I noticed over the last few years they don't seem to be doing
that anymore.

If nsd is so much better than yank bind out of the base FreeBSD and
replace it with nsd.  Of course that will make more work for me
when I regen our nameservers here since nsd will be the first thing
on the rm list.
  


Please save your rhetoric for some other forum.  The ISC folks have been 
working with us to understand what's going on.  I'm not aware of any 
anit-FreeBSD slams going on; mostly uninformed comments.


We believe FreeBSD does very well in any comparisons of the sort being 
discussed and there's still lots of room for improvement.


As to nsd vs bind, understand they are very different applications w/ 
totally different goals.  Comparing performance is not entirely fair and 
certainly is difficult.  Kris investigated the performance of nsd mostly 
to understand how bind might scale if certain architectural changes were 
made to eliminate known bottlenecks in the application.


   Sam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: problem with linuxthreads when installing mysql5

2008-02-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 17:45:47 Nicolas Letellier wrote:

 When I want to install mysql5-server (with portinstall and these
 options: WITH_CHARSET=latin1 WITH_COLLATION=latin1_swedish_ci
 WITH_OPENSSL=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes WITH_LINUXTHREADS=yes), I've got
 this error:

 ===  Installing for linuxthreads-2.2.3_23
 ===   Generating temporary packing list
 ===  Checking if devel/linuxthreads already installed
 ===   linuxthreads-2.2.3_23 is already installed
   You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
   by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly.
   If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/linuxthreads
   without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
   in your environment or the make install command line.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client.
 ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
 /tmp/portinstall.26307.1 env make WITH_CHARSET=latin1
 WITH_COLLATION=latin1_swedish_ci WITH_OPENSSL=yes BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes
 WITH_LINUXTHREADS=yes
 ** Fix the problem and try again.
 [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 49 packages
 found (-0 +1) . done]
 ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
 ! databases/mysql50-client  (unknown build error)



 So... I delete linuxthreads (with pkg_deinstall) and I retry... The
 error is the same. Installing mysql50-server with linuxthread option
 installes linuxthread port two times... The first time, it works, the
 second, I got this message.

 Why 'portinstall mysql5-server' installs two times linuxthreads? How
 solve this problem?

Because mysql50-server port thinks -lthread can only have shlib version 3 or 
5, while if built with gcc 4 (FreeBSD 7.x), you get 6 or 7.

So, you can wait for the port to be fixed or not use linuxthreads.

You could fix the port yourself, by altering the following line:
LIB_DEPENDS+=   lthread.[35]:${PORTSDIR}/devel/linuxthreads
to:
LIB_DEPENDS+=   lthread.[3-7]:${PORTSDIR}/devel/linuxthreads

in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/Makefile

BUTthere might be a reason the port maintainer excludes these version 
numbers.
-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7RC2 and VMware tools

2008-02-27 Thread John Nielsen
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 11:14:26 am Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
 On Monday 18 February 2008 5:02 pm, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
  On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:58:26 -0500, John Nielsen wrote
 
   On Monday 18 February 2008 01:47:14 pm Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:29:28 -0500, John Nielsen wrote
   
 On Monday 18 February 2008 12:31:37 pm Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
  On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:44:17 -0500, John Nielsen wrote
 
   On Sunday 17 February 2008 01:06:28 pm Dimitri Yioulos 
wrote:
I'm not sure whether to have posted this here or on a
VMware list; apologies if I'm in the wrong place.
   
The other day, I did a fresh install of v. 7RC2 from the
minimal CD on a CentOS 5.1 box running VMware server
1.0.4.  I had previously successfully installed v. 6.2,
and upgraded to 6.3 on the same box. All has gone well,
except for the installation of VMware Tools. Getting the
Tools tarball and extracting the requisite files was
trivial. However, when I try to run
Vmware-Config-Tools.pl, I get a message saying that the
program must be run on a virtual machine. Well, it is. 
Is there a needed FBSD package I'm missing (the Tools
install program doesn't complain about it).  A known
issue, or bug, maybe?  Or is VMware support not yet
enabled?  Help would be greatly appreciated.
  
   I just went through almost the same thing, installing
   FreeBSD 7 under VMware Workstation on Windows. The
   config-tools script has a hard-coded version check which
   looks for libc.so.6 under /lib only. Rather than mess with
   the script, I just hard-linked the library from
   /usr/local/lib/compat (where it was installed by the
   compat6x port). Seemed to work fine after that. You'll need
   to be careful not to erase it if you ever run make
   delete-old-libs, though.
 
  Thanks for the response!
 
  A symlink won't do for the above?

 Try it and see! I think I decided on a hard link since the
 script uses something like if [ -f /lib/libc.so.6 ] so it's
 looking only for a regular file and not a symlink.
   
Hmm, when I try to hard-link (ln /usr/compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6
libc.so.6), I get ln: ./libc.so.6: Cross-device link.  But,
when I do a symlink, which takes, I get
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object ld-linux.so.2 not
found, required by libc.so.6 when i run
vmware-config-tools.pl.  So, I symlink ld-linux.so.2, and run
tools. Then, I get /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol
__stdoutp referenced from COPY relocation in
/usr/local/sbin/vmware-checkvm. Arrgh.  Any other ideas?
  
   You have /usr on a different partition than / in your VM, so you
   can't do a hard link. I would just copy the file back to /lib and
   not worry about it. Linking in other random libraries will cause
   problems, as you've observed.
  
   JN
 
  If I copy libc.so.6 to /lib, then tools complains about
  ld-linux.so.2.  If I copy ld-linux.so.2, it then complains about
  /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol __stdoutp referenced
  from COPY relocation in /usr/local/sbin/vmware-checkvm.  This is
  pretty much the same as if I symlink the two files.  Even though I'm
  a glass half-full guy, this is beginning to look dire (but it's the
  worst thing to happen to me, I'm sure I'll live).  Still, it would be
  nice to get this working.

 I did this a few days ago:

 /lib/libc.so. existed.  I symlinked libc.so.6 to it.  I then proceeded
 to install VMware Tools without complaint.

 However, I'm not sure if there's a vmware FreeBSD NIC driver.  If there
 is, it's not being used (as per dmesg, the AMD PCnet-PCI driver appears
 to be used).  On a Linux vm (please, no stone throwing  :-)  ), to use
 the vmxnet driver, I'd stop the network service, load the vmxnet driver
 module, then restart the service.  Is there a similar procedure on
 FreeBSD?

FreeBSD 7 handles the NIC with the le(4) driver, which is built in to the 
GENERIC kernel by default. In order for the hardware to be available for 
the vmxnet driver to attach to, le needs to be disabled. I would do this 
by building a custom kernel that doesn't include it, but it may also be 
possible using device.hints.

Once you're able to boot without another driver attaching to the hardware, 
you should be able to load the vmxnet module and have it see the 
hardware. If it's available and will work with 7.0, that is..  I've been 
happy enough with re(4) that I haven't gone that route myself. Further, 
64-bit VM's use an e1000 NIC which is supported by the em driver.

JN

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Mark Tinguely

  Is it possible that there's a message in your queue that's *being 
  processed*, so it may have arrived earlier than near that time and 
  causes the spike?

Bart is correct that the SA processing occurs before sendmail log entry.

Lately, I have had problems with the latest spamass-milter. Occasionally,
something is forking off another spamass-milter and the original one is
in some tight loop eating processor time. I am not sure if it is the newer
spamass-milter or the fact that I also added the dkim-milter into the mix.

FYI:
I sent to the original questioner a crude C program to monitor his current
loadaverage. This monitor will save the output of the command ps -aux to
a timestamped temporary file when the current loadaverage exceeds a defined
amount (15.0).

--Mark Tinguely
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: argument list too long

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar
sorry i wrongly described what i've did. i should say that my total list 
was about 5000 positions, and xargs -n 2000 solved this.


now i tested - xargs without -n works OK too.

thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sudden peak in load average

2008-02-27 Thread Bart Silverstrim

Mark Tinguely wrote:
 Is it possible that there's a message in your queue that's *being 
 processed*, so it may have arrived earlier than near that time and 
 causes the spike?


Bart is correct that the SA processing occurs before sendmail log entry.

Lately, I have had problems with the latest spamass-milter. Occasionally,
something is forking off another spamass-milter and the original one is
in some tight loop eating processor time. I am not sure if it is the newer
spamass-milter or the fact that I also added the dkim-milter into the mix.

FYI:
I sent to the original questioner a crude C program to monitor his current
loadaverage. This monitor will save the output of the command ps -aux to
a timestamped temporary file when the current loadaverage exceeds a defined
amount (15.0).


Another thing to look at would be the output of something like lsof, so 
that if it is spamassassin, maybe there's a possibility that it could be 
narrowed down to a particular temporary file unless there's another way 
to see if there's a particular message chewing away on SA's analysis?


It doesn't take a big message to skew SA asunder if it has the right bit 
of information in it...

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Performance Issues on 6.3

2008-02-27 Thread Lyle Miller

Natham wrote:

Hi i have a server with four disk atached, 2 raid 0 and 2 raid 1. Im
getting a low performance on file trasfers  over network to windows
clients  i get only about 30MB/s. Looking at gstat i got both disk are
trasfering 15000kBps each over a gigabit connection(client and
server). How can improve performance for my data server?

  

i dont know if this will eventually help in your case .

... but 

i noticed a link on www.freebsd.org under 'in the media'

look for 'squeeze your gigabit nic for top performance' dated 2007-10.

gl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Performance Issues on 6.3

2008-02-27 Thread Natham
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Lyle Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Natham wrote:
   Hi i have a server with four disk atached, 2 raid 0 and 2 raid 1. Im
   getting a low performance on file trasfers  over network to windows
   clients  i get only about 30MB/s. Looking at gstat i got both disk are
   trasfering 15000kBps each over a gigabit connection(client and
   server). How can improve performance for my data server?
  
  
  i dont know if this will eventually help in your case .

  ... but 

  i noticed a link on www.freebsd.org under 'in the media'

  look for 'squeeze your gigabit nic for top performance' dated 2007-10.

  gl


Yes, i did everything it recomends. Tahnk you

-- 
mmm, interesante.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.x compatible Gigabit network card

2008-02-27 Thread NetOpsCenter

Unga wrote:

Hi all

I want to buy a FreeBSD 7.x compatible wired Gigabit
(10/100/1000Mbps) PCI-based network card. Please let
me know what cards are recommended and work
successfully with FreeBSD 7.x.

Many thanks in advance.

Kind regards
Unga


  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

Aloha Unga,

I have TrendNet PCI TXR Nic cards running on 4 servers and 3 Desktops.  
They are stable on FreeBSD they use  the  Realtek  8169 chip.


Al 


~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + [EMAIL PROTECTED] +
 + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* +
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Performance Issues on 6.3

2008-02-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 18:56:15 Natham wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Lyle Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Natham wrote:
Hi i have a server with four disk atached, 2 raid 0 and 2 raid 1. Im
getting a low performance on file trasfers  over network to windows
clients  i get only about 30MB/s. Looking at gstat i got both disk are
trasfering 15000kBps each over a gigabit connection(client and
server). How can improve performance for my data server?
 
   i dont know if this will eventually help in your case .
 
   ... but 
 
   i noticed a link on www.freebsd.org under 'in the media'
 
   look for 'squeeze your gigabit nic for top performance' dated 2007-10.
 
   gl

 Yes, i did everything it recomends. Tahnk you

How to rule out the raid:
1) create a memory disk, in your case I'd go with 256MB if you can spare the 
memory.
2) Put a file on it, size ~210MB (7 * 30MB/s, should give ample time to let 
the transferrate go up)
3) share it via samba
4) Download it through one of the clients

If the transfer rate is still low, it's not the raid. Install a bandwidth 
monitor then (net/bmon for example) and see if the traffic is actually higher 
then the 30MB/s, eating the rest of your bandwidth, investigate samba issues, 
switches, clients (are they really configured Gbit?).

If the transfer rate is much higher, you're pretty safe to assume it's a disk 
issue.

Manpage to read:
mdconfig(8) - choose swap backed btw.
-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Freebsd quota sendmail

2008-02-27 Thread Ofloo

I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for sendmail, and it
does concern freebsd as well.

My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each user and
this user creates a cronjob, that doesn't forward all data to /dev/null, and
keeps on generating mail, ..

Well after a while the mail file reaches it's quota and sendmail isn't
allowed to write to that file anymore, so it will start and fill the mailq,
.. 

The point is after a while the whole system will just crash what can I do
about it, sorry for rambling.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Freebsd-quota---sendmail-tp15719728p15719728.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Freebsd quota sendmail

2008-02-27 Thread Chuck Swiger

On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Ofloo wrote:
I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for  
sendmail, and it

does concern freebsd as well.


Well, there's comp.mail.sendmail on Usenet.

My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each  
user and
this user creates a cronjob, that doesn't forward all data to /dev/ 
null, and

keeps on generating mail, ..

Well after a while the mail file reaches it's quota and sendmail isn't
allowed to write to that file anymore, so it will start and fill the  
mailq,

..


What you've described seems to be normal system operation.  Solutions  
include people fixing their cron jobs, having people actually read and  
delete their emails before they fill their allocated quota, or  
spending more admin cycles cleaning up when you notice someone getting  
to this problem condition.  I suppose you could also get more disk  
space for /var...


--
-Chuck

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


port 915resolution - why i386 only

2008-02-27 Thread Steve Franks
I can't see any reason why amd64 can't set the video bios successfully

Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Bruce Cran

Maxim Khitrov wrote:

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote:
  I did some digging and found it on the main ftp server:
  ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/7.0/
 
  Rudi

 People always try to get the jump on the official release announcement,
 but don't consider that until the email arrives in your mailbox saying
 it is released then the ISO images etc are subject to last minute change
 without notice.  Use at your own risk :)

 Kris



Just curious - is there a reason why the generic kernel is still being
built with debug symbols? I thought that was only used during the
pre-release phase.
  


WITNESS and INVARIANTS are enabled before the pre-release phase (i.e 
before -BETA)
- as far as I know debug symbols are always generated by default, and 
are dumped into /boot/kernel
as separate files.  They don't hurt performance (unlike witness and 
invariants) and are useful in a

few situations, one of which is if you ever get a panic.

--
Bruce
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Freebsd quota sendmail

2008-02-27 Thread Derek Ragona

At 12:29 PM 2/27/2008, Ofloo wrote:


I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for sendmail, and it
does concern freebsd as well.

My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each user and
this user creates a cronjob, that doesn't forward all data to /dev/null, and
keeps on generating mail, ..

Well after a while the mail file reaches it's quota and sendmail isn't
allowed to write to that file anymore, so it will start and fill the mailq,
..

The point is after a while the whole system will just crash what can I do
about it, sorry for rambling.


Why are you setting these quotas on /var/mail.  These days with disk so 
cheap, why bother?  If you are trying to better control sendmail, you 
should exercise the control there.  You can adjust sendmail for maximum 
message size, number of messages, etc.  Or if SPAM is the issue use 
mailscanner to control how spam is handled.


Adding disk quotas outside of sendmail as you found is not a good approach 
as it will bring the system down.


-Derek

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: port 915resolution - why i386 only

2008-02-27 Thread Steve Franks
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I can't see any reason why amd64 can't set the video bios successfully

  Steve


Incidentally, if you hack the i386 only line out of the makefile, it
builds and works just fine on my system (7.0RC2/amd64)

Steve

sudo 915resolution -l
Intel 800/900 Series VBIOS Hack : version 0.5.3

Chipset: 945G
BIOS: TYPE 1
Mode Table Offset: $C + $269
Mode Table Entries: 27

Mode 30 : 640x480, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 32 : 800x600, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 34 : 1024x768, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 38 : 1280x1024, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 3a : 1680x1050, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 3c : 1680x1050, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 41 : 640x480, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 43 : 800x600, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 45 : 1024x768, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 49 : 1280x1024, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 4b : 1680x1050, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 4d : 1680x1050, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 50 : 640x480, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 52 : 800x600, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 54 : 1024x768, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 58 : 1280x1024, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 5a : 1680x1050, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 5c : 1680x1050, 32 bits/pixel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Printing in Gnome

2008-02-27 Thread Marco Beishuizen
Hi,

I'm having trouble getting things printed in Gnome. CUPS is installed and 
printing a test from localhost:631 is working fine. In the gnome-cups-
manager the printer is showing.

But when I try to print a test from the gnome-cups-manager I get a message 
that it's printed and the led on the printer flickers, but nothing is 
coming out. Even when the cups logfile is saying the print has succeeded. 
Also It's impossible to print from any application (Gnome or not), the 
printer is not showing, or when trying to print to /usr/local/bin/lpr 
nothing happens.

Has someone an idea what to do next?

Thanks in advance,

Marco

-- 
FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #19

A:  To be or not to be.
Q:  What is the square root of 4b^2?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Printing in Gnome

2008-02-27 Thread Predrag Punosevac

Marco Beishuizen wrote:

Hi,

I'm having trouble getting things printed in Gnome. CUPS is installed and 
printing a test from localhost:631 is working fine. In the gnome-cups-

manager the printer is showing.
But when I try to print a test from the gnome-cups-manager I get a message 
that it's printed and the led on the printer flickers, but nothing is 
coming out.

Because by default it prints to PostScript file not a real printer.
 Even when the cups logfile is saying the print has succeeded. 
Also It's impossible to print from any application (Gnome or not), the 
printer is not showing, or when trying to print to /usr/local/bin/lpr 
nothing happens.


  


You have to adjust the preferences. By  default most applications will 
print to Post Script  file.

You have to put something like lpr or to change default printer.

Try to print a PostScript file from the shell with

$lpr -Pprintername filename.ps



Has someone an idea what to do next?

Thanks in advance,

Marco

  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problem rebooting FreeBSD 7

2008-02-27 Thread Bostjan Fele
Hi,
 
I have problem with rebooting a FreeBSD. Most of the times it hangs up waiting 
on CPUs to stop.
Feb 27 19:49:40 ceiling reboot: rebooted by x
Feb 27 19:49:40 ceiling syslogd: exiting on signal 15
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...1 0 1 0 0 done
All buffers synced.
Uptime: 11h51m4s
Rebooting...
cpu_reset: Stopping other CPUs
 
 
Tried with hw.acpi.disable_on_reboot and hw.acpi.handle_reboot but did not 
help. But I can power down PC.
 
Regards,
Bostjan
 
 
Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project.Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 
1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994The Regents of the University 
of California. All rights reserved.FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The 
FreeBSD Foundation.FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #9: Tue Feb 26 20:21:27 CET 
2008Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 
Quad CPUQ6600  @ 2.40GHz (2400.02-MHz K8-class CPU)  Origin = 
GenuineIntel  Id = 0x6fb  Stepping = 11  
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
  Features2=0xe3bdSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM  AMD 
Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF  Cores per package: 
4usable memory = 4277628928 (4079 MB)avail memory  = 4116414464 (3925 MB)ACPI 
APIC Table: GBTGBTUACPIFreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 
CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2 cpu3 
(AP): APIC ID:  3ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 
on motherboardacpi0: GBT GBTUACPI on motherboardacpi0: [ITHREAD]acpi0: Power 
Button (fixed)acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failedacpi0: reservation of 
10, cf4e (3) failedTimecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 
1000acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x408-0x40b on 
acpi0acpi_hpet0: High Precision Event Timer iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on 
acpi0Timecounter HPET frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900cpu0: ACPI CPU on 
acpi0acpi_perf0: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu0p4tcc0: CPU Frequency 
Thermal Control on cpu0cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0est1: Enhanced SpeedStep 
Frequency Control on cpu1est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not 
recognized.est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 920092006000920device_attach: est1 
attach returned 6p4tcc1: CPU Frequency Thermal Control on cpu1cpu2: ACPI 
CPU on acpi0est2: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control on cpu2est: CPU 
supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.est: cpu_vendor 
GenuineIntel, msr 920092006000920device_attach: est2 attach returned 6p4tcc2: 
CPU Frequency Thermal Control on cpu2cpu3: ACPI CPU on acpi0est3: Enhanced 
SpeedStep Frequency Control on cpu3est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but 
is not recognized.est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 
920092006000920device_attach: est3 attach returned 6p4tcc3: CPU Frequency 
Thermal Control on cpu3acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0pcib0: ACPI 
Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0vgapci0: 
VGA-compatible display port 0xe200-0xe207 mem 
0xf320-0xf327,0xe000-0xefff,0xf300-0xf30f irq 16 at 
device 2.0 on pci0pci0: serial bus, USB at device 26.0 (no driver 
attached)pci0: serial bus, USB at device 26.1 (no driver attached)pci0: 
serial bus, USB at device 26.2 (no driver attached)pci0: serial bus, USB at 
device 26.7 (no driver attached)pci0: multimedia at device 27.0 (no driver 
attached)pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0pci1: ACPI 
PCI bus on pcib1pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 28.4 on 
pci0pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2atapci0: JMicron JMB368 UDMA133 controller 
port 0xc000-0xc007,0xc100-0xc103,0xc200-0xc207,0xc300-0xc303,0xc400-0xc40f irq 
16 at device 0.0 on pci2atapci0: [ITHREAD]ata2: ATA channel 0 on atapci0ata2: 
[ITHREAD]pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 17 at device 28.5 on pci0pci3: ACPI 
PCI bus on pcib3re0: RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet port 
0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xf200-0xf2000fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3re0: Using 
2 MSI messagesmiibus0: MII bus on re0rgephy0: RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media 
interface PHY 1 on miibus0rgephy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 
100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, autore0: Ethernet address: 
00:1a:4d:58:3c:d5re0: [FILTER]re0: [FILTER]pci0: serial bus, USB at device 
29.0 (no driver attached)pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.1 (no driver 
attached)pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.2 (no driver attached)pci0: 
serial bus, USB at device 29.7 (no driver attached)pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI 
bridge at device 30.0 on pci0pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4pci4: serial bus, 
FireWire at device 7.0 (no driver attached)isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 
31.0 on pci0isa0: ISA bus on isab0atapci1: Intel ICH9 SATA300 

Re: Printing in Gnome

2008-02-27 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm having trouble getting things printed in Gnome. CUPS is installed and 
 printing a test from localhost:631 is working fine. In the gnome-cups-
 manager the printer is showing.
 
 But when I try to print a test from the gnome-cups-manager I get a message 
 that it's printed and the led on the printer flickers, but nothing is 
 coming out. Even when the cups logfile is saying the print has succeeded. 
 Also It's impossible to print from any application (Gnome or not), the 
 printer is not showing, or when trying to print to /usr/local/bin/lpr 
 nothing happens.
 
 Has someone an idea what to do next?

Make sure that you remove or disable the standard lp* programs.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgp3l0xU4qG4g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Bruce Cran wrote:


Just curious - is there a reason why the generic kernel is still being
built with debug symbols? I thought that was only used during the
pre-release phase.
  


WITNESS and INVARIANTS are enabled before the pre-release phase (i.e 
before -BETA)
- as far as I know debug symbols are always generated by default, and 
are dumped into /boot/kernel
as separate files.  They don't hurt performance (unlike witness and 
invariants) and are useful in a

few situations, one of which is if you ever get a panic.


Just so.  If there are no debug symbols present then users who manage to 
cause a panic cannot obtain the backtrace that is required to analyse 
the bug report.  Before we made debugging symbols installed by default 
we had to toss out a lot of otherwise valuable bug reports because 
sufficient information could not be obtained after the fact.


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: port 915resolution - why i386 only

2008-02-27 Thread Pietro Cerutti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Steve Franks wrote:
 Incidentally, if you hack the i386 only line out of the makefile, it
 builds and works just fine on my system (7.0RC2/amd64)

mind to send in a PR?

Thank you!

 
 Steve



- --
Pietro Cerutti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD)

iEYEAREKAAYFAkfFuQ4ACgkQwMJqmJVx947mwQCfZLDbwft/Jr8E/0Zz+aPHU7fd
14oAoKPiGAcca4oaw4sPVxkV6M3HCzGl
=T5t3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: port 915resolution - why i386 only

2008-02-27 Thread Steve Franks
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA512


  Steve Franks wrote:
   Incidentally, if you hack the i386 only line out of the makefile, it
   builds and works just fine on my system (7.0RC2/amd64)

  mind to send in a PR?

Done!

Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Printing in Gnome

2008-02-27 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On 27-Feb-2008 20:29:43, Predrag Punosevac wrote:

 You have to adjust the preferences. By  default most applications will 
 print to Post Script  file.
 You have to put something like lpr or to change default printer.
 
 Try to print a PostScript file from the shell with
 
 $lpr -Pprintername filename.ps

Yes, this works for most applications. Thanks!
Except for OpenOffice, but that's another problem I guess.

Marco
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Doug Poland

Ghirai wrote:

Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.


not sure if it's still being made but HP 6122 works nicely

--
Regards,
Doug
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Printing in Gnome

2008-02-27 Thread Predrag Punosevac

Marco Beishuizen wrote:

On 27-Feb-2008 20:29:43, Predrag Punosevac wrote:

  
You have to adjust the preferences. By  default most applications will 
print to Post Script  file.

You have to put something like lpr or to change default printer.

Try to print a PostScript file from the shell with

$lpr -Pprintername filename.ps



Yes, this works for most applications. Thanks!
Except for OpenOffice, but that's another problem I guess.

Marco
 
  
I do not use Open Office so I do not know from the top of my head how to 
fix it.


However if you print now from OpenOffice it should print into the 
PostScript file. That file is printable with lpr. You can make a small 
script that you will put into the .openoffice or something like that 
which will execute these

commands simultaneously.

Look for the solution on the net. You are not the first guy who is 
trying to print from the OpenOffice running FreeBSD.


Cheers,
Predrag
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Joe

I'm currently running Solaris 10 Update 4 on x86 hardware at home.

I'm excited that ZFS is coming in FreeBSD 7.0.

I've found that I don't really like Solaris that much (no ports!). I  
find it so different from other OS's and I don't want to learn another  
OS just to have a decent fileserver.


So I'm looking forward to migrating to FreeBSD 7.0 from Solaris 10  
Update 4.


Since ZFS was ported from Solaris, at version of Solaris 10 or  
OpenSolaris Nevada is FreeBSD 7.0 support similar to?


In other words, will a lose some features, fixes, and enhancements in  
ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0 or will I gain?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus

http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/OpenPrinting
http://openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi
they are the same place, anyway, with the gutenprint , cups built-in drivers 
any Linux(xBSD) capable printers will work in xBSD.
-the only caveat I would highly recommend is , at this point, look at HP 
printers(Laser/DeskJet), they generally will work with the best of any 
Unix-like OS(Solaris/xBSD/Linux) WHY? , 
because they are big enough NOT to be afraid of Microsoft (yet).
:) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:30:18 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] CC:  Subject: Recommended jet printer  Hello list,  Can anyone 
recommend a jet color printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD, somewhere in 
the low - mid range.  Thanks. --  Regards, Ghirai. 
___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 
mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To 
unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD support this hardware?

2008-02-27 Thread Robe
Hi there,

I need to create a program using this hardware from iCOP technology
VSX-6115

It has 128MB of RAM.

I know there's available at least one Linux kernel configuration for this
hardware, but I want to do it using FreeBSD.

Here's the link to the Board page
http://www.icop.com.tw/products_detail.asp?ProductID=276

And here's the link to the CPU page http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/Vortex86SX/

Can anybody tell me if FreeBSD support this hardware?

Thanks,


-- 
Robe.

El optimista siempre tiene un proyecto. El pesimista siempre tiene una
excusa.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus

http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/OpenPrintinghttp://openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi
in other words HP.
 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:43:39 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] CC:  Subject: Recommended jet printer  Hello list,  Can 
 anyone recommend a jet color printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD, 
 somewhere in the low - mid range.  Thanks. --  Regards, Ghirai. 
 ___ 
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, 
 send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai
Hello list,

Can anyone recommend a jet color
printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,
somewhere in the low - mid range.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus

yup, HP, check your proposed printer against the openprinting.org database of 
supported printers and you'll be ok.
 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:24:56 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recommended jet printer  
 Ghirai wrote:  Hello list,Can anyone recommend a jet color  
 printer that works with CUPS on FreeBSD,  somewhere in the low - mid 
 range.Thanks.  not sure if it's still being made but HP 6122 works 
 nicely  --  Regards, Doug 
 ___ 
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, 
 send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus

ZFS is but one of many things Sun has given the world over the years, need I 
mention NFS,?
ZFS is fairly new all around, and Apple is now attempting to use it in 
OSX-Leopard.
zfs will work best on Sun/Sparc/Solaris right now, but whose to say now that 
they(Sun Microsystems) have pretty well relesed 'da source, it will only get 
better depending on Developer input from the xBSDS, and Linux distro's...
-but ya ZFS is the file system defacto(128-bit wide capable FS, and therefore 
infinite) that will replace all other FS's -ya all others!!!
just like nfs,..., zfs will be the one all OS's should incorporate except of 
course M$, cause they're balless, godless Addholes, who hate being outdone and 
outgunned as usual.
 it is different, but just remeber, Sun/Solaris is historically based on 
BSD/Unix -the real UNIX of course so you're not far from the truth.
make install RealBSD
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Feb 
 2008 12:37:49 -0800 Subject: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0  I'm currently 
 running Solaris 10 Update 4 on x86 hardware at home.  I'm excited that ZFS 
 is coming in FreeBSD 7.0.  I've found that I don't really like Solaris that 
 much (no ports!). I  find it so different from other OS's and I don't want 
 to learn another  OS just to have a decent fileserver.  So I'm looking 
 forward to migrating to FreeBSD 7.0 from Solaris 10  Update 4.  Since ZFS 
 was ported from Solaris, at version of Solaris 10 or  OpenSolaris Nevada is 
 FreeBSD 7.0 support similar to?  In other words, will a lose some features, 
 fixes, and enhancements in  ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0 or will I gain? 
 ___ 
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, 
 send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Recommended jet printer

2008-02-27 Thread Ghirai

Thanks for the suggestions :)

Sorry for the spam, my mail wasn't getting through
because i didn't have a PTR record for my domain.
Seems like once that got sorted all my attempts got delivered.

-- 
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 27), Joe said:
 I'm currently running Solaris 10 Update 4 on x86 hardware at home.
 
 I'm excited that ZFS is coming in FreeBSD 7.0.
 
 I've found that I don't really like Solaris that much (no ports!). I
 find it so different from other OS's and I don't want to learn
 another OS just to have a decent fileserver.
 
 So I'm looking forward to migrating to FreeBSD 7.0 from Solaris 10
 Update 4.
 
 Since ZFS was ported from Solaris, at version of Solaris 10 or
 OpenSolaris Nevada is FreeBSD 7.0 support similar to?
 
 In other words, will a lose some features, fixes, and enhancements in
 ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0 or will I gain?

Going from S10U4 (zfs pool version 4) to FreeBSD 7 (v6) you will
actually gain gzip compression support.  Opensolaris is up to v10.

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cups not working

2008-02-27 Thread Paul Schmehl
When I got to http://localhost:631/ I see the text (source) of the webpage 
rather than the page.  (Cupsd is running.)  I see this in 
/var/log/cups/access_log:

localhost - - [27/Feb/2008:15:58:21 -0600] GET / HTTP/1.1 304 0 - -
localhost - - [27/Feb/2008:15:58:45 -0600] GET / HTTP/1.1 304 0 - -
localhost - - [27/Feb/2008:15:59:08 -0600] GET / HTTP/1.1 304 0 - -

What am I missing?

--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mirroring / Cloning FreeBSD System

2008-02-27 Thread FreeBSD-Utah
I have a question on how to mirror a FreeBSD
installation / system.

This environment will have two identical / separate
systems referred to as “System A” and “System B”

-   I want to install FreeBSD on to “System A”
-   Once that installation is complete with selected
ports and custom applications, I want to make an exact
duplicate of “System A” on “System B”

I don’t want to do this with drives in the same
system, rather I would like to “clone” “System A”

Also, it would be nice to be able to do this as a
“mirroring” solution to keep a clone over time of the
system in the case of failure of either “System A” or
“System B”

Is this possible to do? If so, any direction on how I
would do this would be welcome.

Is there a port / application that enables this?

Thank you in advance!



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar

will replace all other FS's -ya all others!!!

how sure you are?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus

unless something else comes along thats better ?  -then I guess I'm not sure.
 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:13:47 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 
 RE: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0   will replace all other FS's -ya all 
 others!!! how sure you are? 
_

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mirroring / Cloning FreeBSD System

2008-02-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 22:43:31 FreeBSD-Utah wrote:
 I have a question on how to mirror a FreeBSD
 installation / system.

 This environment will have two identical / separate
 systems referred to as “System A” and “System B”

 - I want to install FreeBSD on to “System A”
 - Once that installation is complete with selected
 ports and custom applications, I want to make an exact
 duplicate of “System A” on “System B”

 I don’t want to do this with drives in the same
 system, rather I would like to “clone” “System A”

 Also, it would be nice to be able to do this as a
 “mirroring” solution to keep a clone over time of the
 system in the case of failure of either “System A” or
 “System B”

 Is this possible to do? If so, any direction on how I
 would do this would be welcome.

Install A, then B very minimal and rsync them (port: net/rsync). This assumes 
a network between the two with different ip addresses :)

 Is there a port / application that enables this?

Pending your needs, you could try sysutils/heartbeat. But for periodical 
syncs, rsync should do fine. The tricky part will be /etc/rc.conf, since 
you'll need to differentiate the IP's.

-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >