Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600
> Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > ... The caveat is that very few systems have a BIOS that can
> > boot from a GPT labeled drive. So regardless of your OS, you
> > may still have issues.
> That's why we have the Protective MBR that allows a 'legacy'
2010/11/8 Boris Samorodov :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:52:55 +0200 David DEMELIER wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to put on my USB mass storage device a GPT scheme
>> partitions. But gpart still add them as slices :
>
>> To be sure to remove the MBR before I dd'ed it
>
>> $ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/de
On Fri 03 Dec 2010 at 19:29:52 PST Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST), Warren Block
wrote:
The last time I used parallel on FreeBSD, it was slow...well, slower
than expected. Haven't really tested USB printers for speed.
Ethernet is superior in many ways.
The speed is
>> Network is the way to go. USB *may* be okay. Parallel is not
>> living anymore - allthough I'm still using it that way, but
>> my home setting is a life support system for obsolete
>> technology anyway. :-)
My printer is a sturdy old Lexmark Optra T610. CUPS has a driver,
which does duplex, N-
Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such
message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like this:
kern.maxproc: 6164
kern.maxprocperuid: 5547
What may be causing such condition?
Yuri
--- sample log from portupgrade ---
mv -f .deps/regex.Tpo .deps/regex
I am running FreeBSD release 8.1. I normally run a Linux Firefox
(currently version 3.5.15) because I need the flash plugin
(/usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10). I also need to print web pages
on occasion but the Linux Firefox does not recognize the printers attached
to my system. It writes
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0700 (MST), Warren Block
wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > I'm using a HP Laserjet 4000 duplex for more than 5 years now
> > at home, I'm happy with it, allthough it's a _huge_ printer
> > with all the accessories, but I don't care for that.
>
> I
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Polytropon wrote:
I'm using a HP Laserjet 4000 duplex for more than 5 years now
at home, I'm happy with it, allthough it's a _huge_ printer
with all the accessories, but I don't care for that.
It's only huge in comparison to smaller, lesser printers. A LaserJet
8000 makes
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Josh Suid wrote:
> # ssh u...@host ssh u...@host2
> Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
> Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive).
>
> Is there a way to build this tunnel with a single command ? (an ssh
> command,
> run
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:12:58 -0600
Josh Paetzel wrote:
> Sure. FreeBSD supports installing to and booting from GPT labeled
> disks that don't suffer from the 2TB size limitation that fdisk
> imposes. The caveat is that very few systems have a BIOS that can
> boot from a GPT labeled drive. So re
I connect to some systems via a series of ssh "jumps" - something like:
# ssh u...@host
Password:
host~/ # ssh u...@host2
Password:
host2~/ # ssh u...@host3
Password:
host3~/ # (do some work)
This is working well for me and does what I want it to. However, there are
some things I'd like to d
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 13:26, JB wrote:
> The other *BSD are developed sequentially, that is, there is one
> branch and each major/minor release cycle follows the previous one
> (at no time there is a parallel major/minor branch development).
>
> In case of FreeBSD, it seems (visually) that there
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:02:43 + (UTC)
JB wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:26:33 +, RW wrote:
> > Broadly n-STABLE branch-off from CURRENT and release security
> > branches branch-off from a STABLE branch. Release candidates are
> > usually points on a Stable Branch, and releases are point
On Friday, December 03, 2010 06:00:29 am Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard
> drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive
> firmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can
> handle up to 2
J B writes:
> [...]
> 8.1-RELEASE -> 8.2-CURRENT -> 8.2-STABLE -> 8.2-RCn -> 8.2-RELEASE
> and the cycle repeats ?
So do I.
--
소여물 황병희(黃炳熙) | .. 출항 15분전..
"I want you to eat well, to rest and sleep."
-- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 39
pgp1h9fL2X6L2.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:42:09PM +0100, J B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have:
> $ uname -r
> 8.1-RELEASE
> installed.
>
> I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time),
> and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT.
> But I have difficulty placin
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 21:26:23 + (UTC), JB wrote:
> In case of FreeBSD, it seems (visually) that there is some mainline
> CURRENT branch repository since FreeBSD 1.0 time, from which major
> branches are started in parallel (right now there are 8.2-CURRENT
> and 9.0-CURRENT developed, if I am cor
Polytropon edvax.de> writes:
> ...
> See the text file /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree for
> details.
>
Hi,
thanks for your response.
I looked at that diagram of UNIX and *BSD history.
When I go to the bottom of it (CURRENT state) I see a difference
in how FreeBSD and other *BSD are developed.
03.12.2010 04:03, Weihang Wang wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the guest OS does not have network
access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST
III) has no IP address. I have configure
On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:29 AM, John D McDonnell wrote:
> Received: from exchange.pcam.local (unknown [68.234.51.1]) <-- Note 1
> by godfather.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CE91B006A
> for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:20 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from exchange.pcam.local ([10.10.0.13]) by
> -Original Message-
> On Behalf Of David Brodbeck
>
> You might also try sending a message from the exchange server to
> another email account of yours, so you can examine the headers on the
> outgoing message for anything strange.
I sent a test e-mail to another account of mine to get
While trying to compile audio/tagtool on a FreeBSD7.3 (x86) machine
devel/gobject-introspection decides to throw up and I got this: (the install
was via portmaster -d)
checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 version... 2.6
checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 platform... freebsd7
checking for /usr
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100, J B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have:
> $ uname -r
> 8.1-RELEASE
> installed.
>
> I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time),
> and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT.
> But I have difficulty placing them
Chris Rees gmail.com> writes:
>
> Glad you solved it.
>
> Are you aware that packages and ports are identical once installed?
> ...
> > ...
> > There are packages, no ports on my system.
> >
Yes, I am.
I made a statement that looks incomprehensible -:)
JB
__
Glad you solved it.
Are you aware that packages and ports are identical once installed?
Chris
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do
threading.
On 3 Dec 2010 11:35, "JB" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this happens both in console and gnome xterm.
> No problem when c
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:05 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> My old HP Laserjet 4+ is broken and I'm thinking about buying a new
> printer.
In case you have been happy with your 4+, consider getting
a used HP office-class laser printer. I can recommend the
HP LaserJet 4000 (maybe including a duple
2010/12/3 Dmitry Postolov :
> Hi to All!
>
> Sorry for my bad English...
>
> On my notebook HP ProBook 4510s (Bios Compaq F17 (latest)) the
> problem of times in some weeks is observed at loading FreeBSD 8.1.
>
> ---
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid=0; apic id=00
> fault
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:26:33 +, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100
> J B wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have:
>> $ uname -r
>> 8.1-RELEASE
>> installed.
>>
>> I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in
>> time), and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:42:09 +0100
J B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have:
> $ uname -r
> 8.1-RELEASE
> installed.
>
> I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in
> time), and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch
> followed CURRENT. But I have difficulty placing them
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:13:56 -0500
Chris Brennan wrote:
> I don't believe their is one that isn't green. Even Tigerdirect lists
> the 3TB model as green. It also lists every model >1.5TB to be green
> as well
According to http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=100 there
are Caviar B
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Thomas Mueller
> wrote:
> > Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard
> drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive
> firmware can make sector size
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Weihang Wang wrote:
> Hi Martes,
>
> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
> FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel
> PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now
> Thank you so much, you d
Hi,
I have:
$ uname -r
8.1-RELEASE
installed.
I understand the concept of software dev, and RELEASE (a snapshot in time),
and CURRENT as a dev branch, and STABLE as a dev branch followed CURRENT.
But I have difficulty placing them in a dev and respository tree.
For example, in my case, can I des
Hi,
I searched BSD docs and Google for answers, but none of them works.
By "working properly" I mean for Del key to delete char under the cursor
and not the previous one.
It works in gnome xterm, but not in console.
It works in sh with config hint from FreeBSD handbook:
bind ^? ed-delete-next-
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:36:02PM +0800, kan wrote:
>
> Hi Support,
>
> I have a FreeBSD server for mailing, I must make backup and check the which
> bit (32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD,
> so can you provide the command for me?
>
> Regards,
> Kan
Not too sure I'm clear what you're asking.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Brian McCann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Brian McCann wrote:
>
>>
>> This isn't a Dell PoweEdge, but at least this is two platforms it's
>> happening on now. Strangely, my VMWare virtual machines that use the
>> em driver do not have this problem.
>
kan wrote:
> Hi Support,
>
> I have a FreeBSD server for mailing,
> I must make backup and check the which
> bit (32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD,
> so can you provide the command for me?
>
> Regards,
> Kan
What output does:
$ uname -m
produce?
Kevin Kinsey
___
my .bashrc had some bind commands and that probably had something to do with it.
I relogged in and all is OK.
JB
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard
> drive > 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive
> firmware can make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can handle
> up to 2 TB;
Can FreeBSD be successfully installed, and run, on all or part of a hard drive
> 2 TB? Sector size would be 4 KB, though I think the hard-drive firmware can
make sector size look like 512 bytes. I know fdisk can handle up to 2 TB; this
limit is not just for BSD but Linux too.
Western Digital
Hi Support,
I have a FreeBSD server for mailing, I must make backup and check the which bit
(32bit/64bit) is now use in FreeBSD,
so can you provide the command for me?
Regards,
Kan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hi,
this happens both in console and gnome xterm.
No problem when change from bash prompt to sh subshell.
There are packages, no ports on my system.
$ uname -r
8.1-RELEASE
$ env |grep -i shell
SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
$ ls /var/db/pkg/bash-4.1.7/
No readline lib present.
JB
__
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
> Hi Martes,
>
> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
> FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel
> PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now
> Thank you so m
43 matches
Mail list logo
