spam?
In the last week I got four emails like this one today: From: a href=mailto:br...@cran.org.uk;br...@cran.org.uk/abr/ To: a href=mailto:per...@pluto.rain.com;per...@pluto.rain.com/abr/ CC: a href=mailto:free...@edvax.de;free...@edvax.de/a, a href=mailto:lum...@gmail.com;lum...@gmail.com/a, a href=mailto:freebsd- questi...@freebsd.orgfreebsd-questions@freebsd.org Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: http://www.xpbargains.net;Click here for our We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards Webmaster Thanks. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: spam?
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 06:49 -0500, ajtiM wrote: In the last week I got four emails like this one today: From: a href=mailto:br...@cran.org.uk;br...@cran.org.uk/abr/ To: a href=mailto:per...@pluto.rain.com;per...@pluto.rain.com/abr/ CC: a href=mailto:free...@edvax.de;free...@edvax.de/a, a href=mailto:lum...@gmail.com;lum...@gmail.com/a, a href=mailto:freebsd- questi...@freebsd.orgfreebsd-questions@freebsd.org That's not from me - it's from a company called ParkLogic who are forging emails. See http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2010-12/msg00591.html for more details. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: post-installation of CDDL files
On Sat Mar 12 11, Rob Farmer wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, my current world does not include any CDDL files, because i had WITHOUT_CDDL in my src.conf. now i'd like to build world with CDDL files (in order to use dtrace). what are the necessary steps for doing so? i've removed the WITHOUT_CDDL part from my src.conf, but targets buildworld and toolchain both fail: make: don't know how to make /usr/lib/libctf.a. Stop cheers. alex -- a13x ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Install it manually. Go to src/cddl/lib/libctf and make obj make depends make make install Then buildworld will work. thanks a lot. that worked. :) -- Rob Farmer -- a13x ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
Hallo, I switched my system over to using a ZFS on root setup in 8.1. I want to upgrade it to 8.2. Is there any changes to the buildworld/buildkernel/installworld/installkernel/mergemaster routine? The only thing I found via google was this: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,178896,179074 And he does a mount -u ./ and a zfs mount -a but it's not clear to me why he's doing that. --Andy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 17:40, Andrew Moran amo...@forsythia.net wrote: Hallo, I switched my system over to using a ZFS on root setup in 8.1. I want to upgrade it to 8.2. Is there any changes to the buildworld/buildkernel/installworld/installkernel/mergemaster routine? The only thing I found via google was this: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,178896,179074 And he does a mount -u ./ and a zfs mount -a but it's not clear to me why he's doing that. --Andy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hello Andy Usually I use zfs mount -a to mount all and zfs set readonly=off zpool/system to take filesystem writable ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
Andrew == Andrew Moran amo...@forsythia.net writes: Andrew I switched my system over to using a ZFS on root setup in 8.1. Andrew I want to upgrade it to 8.2. Andrew Is there any changes to the Andrew buildworld/buildkernel/installworld/installkernel/mergemaster Andrew routine? And for those of us using the binary upgrade, do I need to follow http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 still? Or do nothing? Or do something else? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.comwrote: Andrew == Andrew Moran amo...@forsythia.net writes: Andrew I switched my system over to using a ZFS on root setup in 8.1. Andrew I want to upgrade it to 8.2. Andrew Is there any changes to the Andrew buildworld/buildkernel/installworld/installkernel/mergemaster Andrew routine? And for those of us using the binary upgrade, do I need to follow http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 still? Or do nothing? Or do something else? Well those are his modified upgrade instructions, they seem relatively sound but the extra steps aren't required. The gpart stuff is to update the boot loader which is only necessary if you upgrade the file system or pool eg zfs/zpool upgrade. You should probably run this just to prevent potential severe pain later. And as it's said, the nextboot is there because he's running a custom kernel and wants to boot into GENERIC next time then later rebuilds his custom kernel. The short story is if you are running GENERIC anyway, a standard binary upgrade would work fine, but if you have taken a divergent path you'll have to account for those differences in your upgrade process. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
Adam == Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes: Adam On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Adam mer...@stonehenge.comwrote: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 Adam Well those are his modified upgrade instructions, they seem Adam relatively sound but the extra steps aren't required. The gpart Adam stuff is to update the boot loader which is only necessary if you Adam upgrade the file system or pool eg zfs/zpool upgrade. You should Adam probably run this just to prevent potential severe pain later. No, this was *absolutely* necessary for the 8.1 upgrade, because the binary-installed boot loader was still ZFS ignorant. I'm just asking if it's *still* necessary for 8.2. Does the 8.2 boot loader now know about ZFS if I install it from freebsd-update? Keep in mind, I'm booting straight from ZFS. There are no UFS partitions on my disk. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.comwrote: Adam == Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes: Adam On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Adam mer...@stonehenge.comwrote: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 Adam Well those are his modified upgrade instructions, they seem Adam relatively sound but the extra steps aren't required. The gpart Adam stuff is to update the boot loader which is only necessary if you Adam upgrade the file system or pool eg zfs/zpool upgrade. You should Adam probably run this just to prevent potential severe pain later. No, this was *absolutely* necessary for the 8.1 upgrade, because the binary-installed boot loader was still ZFS ignorant. I'm just asking if it's *still* necessary for 8.2. Does the 8.2 boot loader now know about ZFS if I install it from freebsd-update? Keep in mind, I'm booting straight from ZFS. There are no UFS partitions on my disk. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org You need the new bootloader if you upgrade the zpool and zfs filesystems. You'll get a message to that effect if you do that. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: syslog-ng logging stopped
May it be a permission issue (fs or /dev/kmem or the like)? syslog-ng or syslogd as root doesn't enable log writing. Can you manually start syslog-ng or syslogd with verbose flags enabled? I edited rc.d/syslog-ng script to add -d of course, nothing is logged, so -d doesn't help. Len Man, you really stumbled upon something weird! On 3/12/11, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote: At 03:52 PM 3/12/2011, you wrote: That probably means that it's not syslog-ng causing the problems. right Maybe some firewall rule? I run pf. pfctl -d didn't allow logging to start. trafshow and tshark showed all the traffic hitting port 514, not being blocked. Len ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina Cazenave http://www.twitter.com/ioc32 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
On 13/03/2011 17:37, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Adam == Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes: Adam On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Adam mer...@stonehenge.comwrote: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 Adam Well those are his modified upgrade instructions, they seem Adam relatively sound but the extra steps aren't required. The gpart Adam stuff is to update the boot loader which is only necessary if you Adam upgrade the file system or pool eg zfs/zpool upgrade. You should Adam probably run this just to prevent potential severe pain later. No, this was *absolutely* necessary for the 8.1 upgrade, because the binary-installed boot loader was still ZFS ignorant. I'm just asking if it's *still* necessary for 8.2. Does the 8.2 boot loader now know about ZFS if I install it from freebsd-update? Keep in mind, I'm booting straight from ZFS. There are no UFS partitions on my disk. A system update via freebsd-update or otherwise won't touch whatever bootblocks you have installed. So if you have already installed gptzfsboot and your system already boots ZFS v12 then it will continue to boot ZFS v12 without your touching anything to do with boot blocks. However, with the 8.1 - 8.2 upgrade, you get (inter-alia) ZFS v13 support (I think it's v13 -- all my personal kit is running the stable/8 v28 patchset...) plus equivalent zpool version bump. The 8.1 bootblocks don't understand ZFS v13. If you wish to update the on-disk formats of your ZFS stuff: 'zpool upgrade -a' or 'zfs upgrade -a' then you *will* need to reinstall the gptzfsboot boot-blocks. You don't have to update the ZFS formats, but you'll miss out on various performance and bug-fixes if you don't. Given that the gptzfsboot boot blocks are backwards compatible to older ZFS versions, highly recommended to update the boot blocks even if you aren't intending to upgrade the ZFS bits just yet. Just as an anti-foot-shooting measure. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
Daniel == Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net writes: Daniel Nothing in the release notes appears to mention the bootloader and zfs Daniel together, so I'd take the safe approach and assume it is still Daniel necessary. OK, so I'll appeal to the rest of freebsd-questions, since you can't answer with authority: can you upgrade from 8.1 to 8.2 using freebsd-update booting from ZFS as described at http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/, without having to go through the chicanry described at http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=94557postcount=19 - or is there an updated version of that post, or should that post be literally followed? SOMEONE here knows. Please help. Otherwise, I have to build a VM system again with 8.1, just like I did with 8.0, to figure out that 8.1 would NOT upgrade cleanly, and required that extra step. Please save me the trouble for 8.1 to 8.2. I have four VPSs that need to move from 8.1 to 8.2 remotely. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading FreeBSd when using a zfs-only installation?
I have successfully upgraded form FreeBSD 8.1 to FreeBSD 8.2. Here were my steps: cvsup /root/stable-supfile cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel shutdown -r now *select single user mode* mount -u / zfs mount -a mergemaster -p make installworld mergemaster gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad4 gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad5 zpool upgrade -a zfs upgrade -a shutdown -r now NOTE 1: the gpart commands are specific to my setup - I'm using a ZFS mirror on ad4 and ad5.Your system may be different. NOTE 2: my zfs upgrade -a ran out of swap space and died. I ran zfs upgrade to see what filesystems were left un-upgraded and did those manually. Thanks Scott Ballantyne and everyone else who responded. Cheers! --Andy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Shell script termination with exit function in backquotes
Hello everyone,
I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
#!/bin/sh
exit_prog()
{
echo -n 'before'
exit 0
echo -n 'after'
}
echo line 1: `exit_prog`
echo line 2:
echo line 3: `exit 1`
echo line 4:
The reason I expect to see no output is because 'exit 0' should be
called before any of the echo lines are allowed to execute. Instead,
what I get on FreeBSD 7 8 is:
line 1: before
line 2:
I don't understand this because 'exit 0' seems to terminate the call
to 'exit_prog', but the execution of the script continues. However,
when 'exit 1' is called, the script terminates before printing out the
last 2 lines.
It seems that 'exit' inside a function doesn't work when that function
is called with backquotes. I assume it has something to do with the
fact that commands in backquotes are executed in a sub-shell, but the
behavior is inconsistent.
When I run the same script on RHEL using bash, all 4 lines are printed:
line 1: before
line 2:
line 3:
line 4:
What's going on here?
- Max
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Setting up Novatel Mifi 2200 on 8.2-REL
Are you up to a challenge? I have my Virgin Mobile MIFI 2200 connected to my new remote server via USB (8.2-RELEASE) that I just set up and it's not seeing the modem, but it does see the virtual drive on it. dmesg output: ugen3.2: Novatel Wireless Inc. at usbus3 ugen3.2: Novatel Wireless Inc. at usbus3 (disconnected) umass0: Novatel Wireless Inc. Novatel Wireless CDMA, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.00, addr 5 on usbus0 [root@camserve /usr/home/ryan]# more /var/log/messages | grep -i nova Mar 13 18:39:05 camserve kernel: ugen3.2: Novatel Wireless Inc. at usbus3 Mar 13 18:39:05 camserve kernel: umass0: Novatel Wireless Inc. Novatel Wireless CDMA, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.00, addr 2 on usbus3 Mar 13 18:39:07 camserve kernel: cd0: Novatel Mass Storage 1.00 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device also [more /var/log/messages | grep -i unknown]: Mar 13 18:39:05 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x5020 bus uhub3 Mar 13 18:53:06 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x6000 bus uhub3 Mar 13 19:07:10 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x6000 bus uhub3 Mar 13 19:07:10 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x6000 bus uhub3 Mar 13 19:37:09 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x5020 bus uhub0 Mar 13 19:47:10 camserve root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1410 product 0x6000 bus uhub0 I have uhso installed but without the indentifcation of 1410:5020 but I cannot use it [yet] to connect to the net. Any thoughts? -- Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Shell script termination with exit function in backquotes
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Scott Ballantyne boyva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
#!/bin/sh
exit_prog()
{
echo -n 'before'
exit 0
echo -n 'after'
}
echo line 1: `exit_prog`
echo line 2:
echo line 3: `exit 1`
echo line 4:
The reason I expect to see no output is because 'exit 0' should be
called before any of the echo lines are allowed to execute. Instead,
what I get on FreeBSD 7 8 is:
line 1: before
line 2:
I don't understand this because 'exit 0' seems to terminate the call
to 'exit_prog', but the execution of the script continues. However,
when 'exit 1' is called, the script terminates before printing out the
last 2 lines.
It seems that 'exit' inside a function doesn't work when that function
is called with backquotes. I assume it has something to do with the
fact that commands in backquotes are executed in a sub-shell, but the
behavior is inconsistent.
When I run the same script on RHEL using bash, all 4 lines are printed:
line 1: before
line 2:
line 3:
line 4:
What's going on here?
- Max
Backquotes run the process in a sub process, that exits. and the original
process continues.
Yes, my original expectation of having no output is incorrect, but
`exit 1` terminates the parent shell in FreeBSD. That's the source of
my confusion.
- Max
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
logging to dmesg from userland
I am looking for a way to write into the kernel message buffer -- the one that dmesg prints out -- from a userland program, to help in relating kernel printf messages to the userland operations which provoked them. (Yes, I am aware of the potential DoS implications: the capability should be restricted to root, or at least to the operator group. I expect to use it only in single-user mode.) Is there a program, or a system call, which can do this? logger(1) seemed a likely prospect, but either it doesn't have this capability or I haven't found the formula. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Shell script termination with exit function in backquotes
On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
#!/bin/sh
exit_prog()
{
echo -n 'before'
exit 0
echo -n 'after'
}
echo line 1: `exit_prog`
echo line 2:
echo line 3: `exit 1`
Replace with:
echo line 3: `( exit 1 )`
This executes the command within a sub-shell (preventing the exit call from
effecting the current shell -- achieving what you desire).
echo line 4:
The reason I expect to see no output is because 'exit 0' should be
called before any of the echo lines are allowed to execute. Instead,
what I get on FreeBSD 7 8 is:
line 1: before
line 2:
I don't understand this because 'exit 0' seems to terminate the call
to 'exit_prog',
The function call is performed in a sub-shell (internally).
but the execution of the script continues. However,
when 'exit 1' is called, the script terminates before printing out the
last 2 lines.
It seems that 'exit' inside a function doesn't work when that function
is called with backquotes. I assume it has something to do with the
fact that commands in backquotes are executed in a sub-shell
That is incorrect. Here is a unit-test (to be performed on FreeBSD):
dteske@localhost ~ $ cat EOF | /bin/sh -
echo PS1=$PS1; : `unset PS1`; echo PS1=$PS1
EOF
PS1=\[\e[32;1m\]\u@\H \[\e[34m\]\W \$\[\e[0m\]
PS1=
The above scriptlet does three things:
1. echo's the contents of the PS1 environment variable.
2. Executes unset PS1 within back-ticks.
3. re-echo's the contents of the PS1 environment variable.
Upon execution, we see that despite being executed within back-ticks, the PS1
variable was wiped-out. If commands on FreeBSD under /bin/sh were executed
within a sub-shell, said sub-shell would have a separate environment that
wouldn't effect its parent. Contrast this behavior with the following scriptlet:
dteske@localhost ~ $ cat EOF | /bin/sh -
echo PS1=$PS1; : `(unset PS1)`; echo PS1=$PS1
EOF
PS1=\[\e[32;1m\]\u@\H \[\e[34m\]\W \$\[\e[0m\]
PS1=\[\e[32;1m\]\u@\H \[\e[34m\]\W \$\[\e[0m\]
In the above, we've re-executed the same script but with one minor change --
we've placed the unset PS1 command within parentheses, which under FreeBSD's
/bin/sh causes the creation of a sub-shell with separate environment and exit
code, etc.
You can read more on FreeBSD by searching sh(1) for Grouping Commands
Together.
, but the
behavior is inconsistent.
When I run the same script on RHEL using bash, all 4 lines are printed:
If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent execution.
The reason you're having inconsistent behavior is because Linux has /bin/sh
symbolically linked to /bin/bash while FreeBSD has a more traditional shell
(we'll call it bourne shell plus).
line 1: before
line 2:
line 3:
line 4:
What's going on here?
- Max
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Cheers,
Devin Teske
- LEGAL DISCLAIMER -
This message contains confidential and proprietary information
of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it
is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any
other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately,
and delete the original message without making a copy.
- FUN STUFF -
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version 3.12
GAT/CS/B/CC/E/IT/MC/M/MU/P/S/TW d+(++) s: a- C+++@$ UB$ P@$ L$ E-
W+++ N? o? K? w@ O M++$ V- PS+++ PE@ Y+ PGP- t(+) 5? X(+) R(-) tv+ b+++ DI+
D+(++) G++ e h r+++ z+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
http://www.geekcode.com/
- END TRANSMISSION -
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: spam?
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 353, Issue 11, Message: 4 On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:57:03 + Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 06:49 -0500, ajtiM wrote: In the last week I got four emails like this one today: From: a href=mailto:br...@cran.org.uk;br...@cran.org.uk/abr/ To: a href=mailto:per...@pluto.rain.com;per...@pluto.rain.com/abr/ CC: a href=mailto:free...@edvax.de;free...@edvax.de/a, a href=mailto:lum...@gmail.com;lum...@gmail.com/a, a href=mailto:freebsd- questi...@freebsd.orgfreebsd-questions@freebsd.org [I guess it's a gmail option whether to quote messages with addresses shown as HTML urls? Other people seem to be able to avoid doing that] That's not from me - it's from a company called ParkLogic who are forging emails. See http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2010-12/msg00591.html for more details. G'day Bruce, unfortunately trying to follow that through by 'next in thread' on derkeiler.com lands at a message that they've censored, declaring: Error 410: The page you requested has been removed The page you requested has been removed due to inappropriate content. From there, they leave you no way to finish the thread, in particular to my detailed wannabe FAQ - in reply to you, as it happened - on how folks might solve this issue at: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-December/225226.html That report may or may not help gmail users, as Chris Brennan reported gmail provides no way to filter on message headers such as Message-ID, still at least it shows how to determine that these messages are indeed forgeries. Maybe by now parklogic realise that targetting gmail users will cause the most mischief? Evil doesn't necessarily mean stupid .. As for derkeiler.com's apparently arbitrary censorship, you can see the message they removed, two messages before mine by thread, here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-December/225236.html Apart from charging Svein Skogen with 'signature too long' :) I can't imagine why they or their robot might have taken offense. At least at lists.freebsd.org only something pretty extreme may provoke our esteemed postmaster into removing a message, and there's less obfuscation there of email addresses (like parklogic.com) .. for better or worse. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
openldap 2.4.23 exited on signal 6
Hi all, I am experiencing the same problem below. Do you have a solution for this? I am running on FreeBSD 8.1. - Hi list, I'm experiencing some problems with and LDAP box which used to run 2.4.21 and has been upgraded to 2.4.22 The box act as a pam_ldap/nsswitch login server for a bunch of boxes, let's say 20, and serve the mail server and web proxy server as a user base. The box has 2G of RAM and has an average load very low, let's say top/systat shows 0.40. The issue is that it happens from time to time every 2/4 days that the slapd daemon exits on signal 6: May 12 01:00:00 polido kernel: pid 27153 (slapd), uid 389: exited on signal 6 Then i restart the process everything looks fine and no corruption seems to happen in the DB. The box is a FreeBSD 8 Any clue is really appreciated. Regards, Alyd ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
