Re: ipdivert.ko
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 357, Issue 3, Message: 8 On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:58:50 +0930 Sebastian Ramadan s...@geekycode.net wrote: I wish to cause ipdivert.ko to load at boot time. Currently, ipfw.ko loads correctly at boot time with ipfw_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf, but ipdivert.ko does not load at boot time with ipdivert_load=YES. I'm able to load it using kldload, though. dmesg doesn't seem to be giving any clues as to why ipdivert won't load... What am I doing wrong? Regards, Sebastian Ramadan. My uname -a, /boot/loader.conf, kldstat and a successful load of ipdivert using kldload after boot time: domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# uname -a FreeBSD domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011 r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN i386 domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# cat /boot/loader.conf ipfw_load=YES ipdivert_load=YES domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 18 0xc000 4000 kernel 21 0xc2bb3000 1ext2fs.ko 31 0xc2d1f000 11000ipfw.ko 41 0xc2d3 d000 libalias.ko Hmm, I'm a bit curious as to why libalias.ko was loaded. You don't have 'firewall_nat_enable=YES' in rc.conf, do you? Anyway, loader.conf isn't the way to go for loading ipfw or ipdivert (presumably for use by natd?) these days. Instead you want these in /etc/rc.conf: ipfw_enable=YES natd_enable=YES plus any required ipfw_ and natd_ variables (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf) Then /etc/rc.d/ipfw will load ipfw.ko, and if natd_enable is set, will invoke /etc/rc.d/natd, which loads ipdivert.ko at the right time. domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# uname -a FreeBSD domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011 r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN i386 domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldload ipdivert domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 1 10 0xc000 4000 kernel 21 0xc2bb3000 1ext2fs.ko 32 0xc2d1f000 11000ipfw.ko 41 0xc2d3 d000 libalias.ko 51 0xc3cc7000 4000 ipdivert.ko My dmesg: domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011 r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN i386 [..] start_init: trying /sbin/init ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, nat loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging disabled ipfw0: bpf attached There are a number of outstanding PRs regarding module loading by natd and (if used) firewall_nat, and the use of these by /etc/rc.firewall. If enabling natd in rc.conf instead doesn't fix your issue, write to me privately and I'll put you onto some patches - but unless you're also (or instead) using kernel NAT (ipfirewall_nat - which needs to load libalias.ko) then the above settings should do you. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: remaining goal.. .
On 04/05/11 00:39, Gary Kline wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:39:19PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote: simply that i'm looking for somebody who know how to transfer pfsense from a standalone system to this kit. I would suggest using Diagnostics/Backup/restore on the current system to save a copy of the configuration in a .xml file. Done. in fact i have two copies. Then install pfSense on the new machine by whatever means are available -- I think the current two options are bootable CD-R and bootable USB stick, but there may be others for embedded systems -- I'm not familiar with those. That is axactly my problem. This is a tiny 4watt kit type deal, all solid state with with memory that requires some special kind of burner. [I have the latest pfSense tarball and my .xml restore/update file. ... so, software side, i'm all set.] I use pfSense, but my system (based on an Alix 2D3 board) has a compact flash drive, so I simply dd the disk image onto the CF card on my normal FBSD box, and plug it into the Alix, which is the usual way of deploying embedded pfSense. What hardware are you using? Does it have any CF or SD card capability, or maybe a USB port? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
dhcpd in vmware
the dhcpd can't start in vmware :
Here is my /usr/local/etc/hpcdd.conf
option domain-name ikfb.org;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.4.100;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
default-lease-time 3600;
max-lease-time 86400;
ddns-update-style none;
subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.4.129 192.168.4.254;
option routers 192.168.4.1;
}
host ikfb3.org{
hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:1B:E2:82;
fixed-address 192.168.4.128;
}
ifkb3.org ikfb4.org in one vmware team .
They both connect to lan1 in the team.
when i use /usr/local/etc/isc-dhcpd start
it shows :
Please do not under any circumstances send requests for
failed to start dhcpd
How can i offer the dhcp to the ikfb3.org.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: dhcpd in vmware
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 08:29, xinyou yan yxy@gmail.com wrote:
the dhcpd can't start in vmware :
Here is my /usr/local/etc/hpcdd.conf
Is the file named hpcdd.conf or is that a typo?
subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.4.129 192.168.4.254;
option routers 192.168.4.1;
}
That *should* throw an error due to the netmask. If you're just using
the 192.168.4.129 - 254 addresses I would change it to
subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Otherwise the netmask of 255.255.255.0 will lead dhcpd to think it
should be offering for 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.254.
when i use /usr/local/etc/isc-dhcpd start
it shows :
Please do not under any circumstances send requests for
failed to start dhcpd
Does it give any other errors?
kmw
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Place to install library of shell functions
Dear FreeBSD users, today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/architecture-independent files On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are actually installed under /usr/share. However, the only library of shell functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d. Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''. These shell scripts are: find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh' /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'. So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your opinion on this question. -- Best Regards, Michael ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Michael Grünewald wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/architecture-independent files I would go with /usr/local/lib. jerry On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are actually installed under /usr/share. However, the only library of shell functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d. Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''. These shell scripts are: find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh' /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'. So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your opinion on this question. -- Best Regards, Michael ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:23:47 +0200, Michael Grünewald michaelgrunew...@yahoo.fr wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. Depends. Are you interested in shell functions you install from a port / package, or your own shell functions? I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/architecture-independent files This structure usually serves the purpose of /usr/share, but for software installed by ports or packages, as the /usr/local/ subtree duplicates the system's structures in many cases. On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are actually installed under /usr/share. However, the only library of shell functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d. I guess that's the intention behind this decision. You'll see that many things on FreeBSD are determined by a well- intended thought, rather than an arbitrary Oh, why don't we just put it ... *throw a dice* ... here? Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''. These shell scripts are: find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh' /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'. It depends on where the respective port maintainer want to have them. So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your opinion on this question. Many software is ported from Linux, so their structures, or sometimes the lack of, is applied. For example, I put _my_ stuff that is NOT managed by ports and definitely does NOT belong to the system into an /opt subtree, a Solaris-ism I'm abusing: /opt/bin is in $PATH, so anything system-wide executable is located there, and /opt/share does contain non-executable shell scripts (e. g. those with helper functionalities) or files with settings (that are sourced by something else) - things that usually are not called directly. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
In the last episode (Apr 05), Michael Grünewald said: today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/architecture-independent files On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are actually installed under /usr/share. However, the only library of shell functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d. Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''. These shell scripts are: The zsh port installs all its helper scripts and functions into /usr/local/share/zsh , and the portupgrade and portmaster ports insert their zsh autocompletion functions into /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions. Seems to work great. Ports that install scripts into /usr/local/lib probably either don't have separate script and lib install paths in their makefile (tcl probably), or their scripts aren't meant to be called directly (firefox). -- Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Michael Grünewald wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/architecture-independent files On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are actually installed under /usr/share. However, the only library of shell functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d. Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''. These shell scripts are: find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh' /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'. So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your opinion on this question. -- Best Regards, Michael For the bash library (http://jafdip.com/?p=537) we choose /usr/local/lib. This just seems to be the most logical place for this sort of thing. Regards, Mikel King BSD News Network http://bsdnews.net skype: mikel.king http://twitter.com/mikelking ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Help with pam_abl package
I'm having a problem with the pam_abl package. I've already emailed the programs author, but didn't get a reply back. I'm having trouble setting up a rule to exclude to users. One user is the root user while the other is a local account. I've tried multiple things, but they don't seem to work. The rules seem to only not include the root user. This does exclude the root user, but not the localacct user. #debug user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db user_rule=!root|!localacct:5/60d This next one doesn't seem to work either. #debug user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db user_rule=!root:5/60d !localacct:5/60d Please advise. Phusion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:09:40 -0400 mikel king mikel.k...@olivent.com articulated: For the bash library (http://jafdip.com/?p=537) we choose /usr/local/lib. This just seems to be the most logical place for this sort of thing. Interestingly enough, WOT gives that URL a poor rating. http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/jafdip.com -- Jerry ✌ freebsd.u...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: remaining goal.. .
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote: On 04/05/11 00:39, Gary Kline wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:39:19PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gary Klinekl...@thought.org wrote: simply that i'm looking for somebody who know how to transfer pfsense from a standalone system to this kit. I would suggest using Diagnostics/Backup/restore on the current system to save a copy of the configuration in a .xml file. Done. in fact i have two copies. Then install pfSense on the new machine by whatever means are available -- I think the current two options are bootable CD-R and bootable USB stick, but there may be others for embedded systems -- I'm not familiar with those. That is axactly my problem. This is a tiny 4watt kit type deal, all solid state with with memory that requires some special kind of burner. [I have the latest pfSense tarball and my .xml restore/update file. ... so, software side, i'm all set.] I use pfSense, but my system (based on an Alix 2D3 board) has a compact flash drive, so I simply dd the disk image onto the CF card on my normal FBSD box, and plug it into the Alix, which is the usual way of deploying embedded pfSense. What hardware are you using? Does it have any CF or SD card capability, or maybe a USB port? It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash. But according to my hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind. I'm sure the kit has the right ports and I have the right sized pfSense image for me , it's messing with plugging things together and figuring out which cables go where. That's where i'm in the dark. ...be nice if i could do without theis burner... -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Place to install library of shell functions
2011/4/5 Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu: On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Michael Grünewald wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions. I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be somewhere under `/usr/local/share': share/ architecture-independent files I would go with /usr/local/lib. I'd rather agree with the OP; shell functions are arch-independent, and are DATADIR suited IMO. Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Fuse 2.7.4?
Hello, What is the status of the fusefs-libs port? I'd like to try the newer s3fs builds with FUSE, but they require 2.8.4 or higher. I was unable to get FUSE 2.8.5 to build with the current patches included in the port. Are these patches still necessary? -- Joe Auty, NetMusician NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks. www.netmusician.org http://www.netmusician.org j...@netmusician.org mailto:j...@netmusician.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RaLink RT2760 + RT2720
Hello, I have purchased this wireless card: http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=105cp_id=10501cs_id=1050103p_id=5338seq=1format=3#specification It seems that it is not being detected by 8.2-RELEASE. I have tried the RT2870 and RT2860 drivers with the card from: http://repo.or.cz/w/ralink_drivers.git This has resulted in little success. Here is a snippet of pciconf -lvcb: none2@pci0:3:1:0: class=0x028000 card=0x30621814 chip=0x30621814 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Ralink Technology, Corp.' class = network bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe200, size 65536, enabled cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 If anyone could be of assistance it would be greatly appreciated. My ultimate goal is to use this as an AP. Thanks, Dan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Help with pam_abl package
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 12:22:54 pm Phusion wrote: I'm having a problem with the pam_abl package. I've already emailed the programs author, but didn't get a reply back. I'm having trouble setting up a rule to exclude to users. One user is the root user while the other is a local account. I've tried multiple things, but they don't seem to work. The rules seem to only not include the root user. This does exclude the root user, but not the localacct user. #debug user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db user_rule=!root|!localacct:5/60d This next one doesn't seem to work either. #debug user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db user_rule=!root:5/60d !localacct:5/60d Please advise. Phusion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb sd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org You might want to try the following (from the pam_abl documentation): Multiple rules can be provided separated by spaces like this *:10/1h root:5/1h,10/1d in which case all rules that match a particular user and service will be checked. The user or host will be blocked if any of the rule triggers matches. The sense of the user matching can be inverted by placing a '!' in front of the rule so that !root:20/1d is a rule which would match for all users apart from root. It is important to treat root as a special case in the user_rule otherwise excessive attempts to authenticate as root will result in the root account being locked out even for valid holders of root credentials. HTH. Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Mentioning of geom in the handbook's RAID chapter.
Hi, I recently searched google for FreeBSD software raid because i wanted to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page (18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum. I know there is a whole chapter about geom but why is there no mentioning about that in the Storage.RAID part of the Handbook ? Sincerly, Leon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Mentioning of geom in the handbook's RAID chapter.
Leon Meßner wrote: Hi, I recently searched google for FreeBSD software raid because i wanted to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page (18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum. I know there is a whole chapter about geom but why is there no mentioning about that in the Storage.RAID part of the Handbook ? This is mostly pure conjecture on my part, but I think it is most likely a separation between old and new. The Handbook is maintained and contributed to in an ad-hoc manner over long periods of time by ever changing volunteers and I think there is a conservative approach to reorganizing or changing something someone else had contributed previously. The volunteer who wrote the GEOM chapter simply may not wish to alter what someone else contributed. Although not perfect, I still think the Handbook is one of the best examples of documentation around. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: remaining goal.. .
--As of April 5, 2011 11:05:19 AM -0700, Gary Kline is alleged to have said: It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash. But according to my hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind. --As for the rest, it is mine. I'm going to assume you mean the Alix 6e1, which is the closest I can find in their numbering system. It's got a standard CF adaptor. (*All* the Alix's do.) If there's a card in it, pull it off and insert into any CF reader, and it should work fine. (USB-based ones typically sell for $20, including SD, XD, MMC, Memorystick, and probably a few others as well. Check Best Buy, or your local computer hardware store, or possibly a camera store.) Then follow Arthur's advice. The CF card may be a little awkward to pull off. If the card that's in there is some special card that needs some exotic burner... When you are at the computer store spend another $5 or so and get yourself a new card. Daniel T. Staal --- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
f77 in FreeBSD 8.2
Hello, FreeBSD gurus, I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable, now it's in the obsolete software list. Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile How can I install that compiler? The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in the sources. Thanks in advace, Eduardo. PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to the list. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx wrote: Hello, FreeBSD gurus, I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable, now it's in the obsolete software list. Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile How can I install that compiler? The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in the sources. Thanks in advace, Eduardo. PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to the list. My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me . I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD ) in Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very good code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on run time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with a list of called subroutines chain . Since the G95 is generated from the same sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform related compilers . Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful about cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of errors because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free line format based . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2
On Tue, April 5, 2011 7:44 pm, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx wrote: Hello, FreeBSD gurus, I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable, now it's in the obsolete software list. Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile How can I install that compiler? The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in the sources. Thanks in advace, Eduardo. PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to the list. My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me . I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD ) in Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very good code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on run time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with a list of called subroutines chain . Since the G95 is generated from the same sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform related compilers . Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful about cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of errors because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free line format based . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Thanks Mehmet. I'd better start promoting the use of g95. Some people in the list say that f77 users must move on in their lives and leave f77 behind. Something curious is happening, g95 does not seem to find its library libg95. I have to write explicitly: g95 foo.for -o foo -L/usr/local/lib to compile the program foo. /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart does not fix the problem. Any ideas? Thanks for answering, Eduardo. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: remaining goal.. .
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:21:13PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote: --As of April 5, 2011 11:05:19 AM -0700, Gary Kline is alleged to have said: It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash. But according to my hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind. --As for the rest, it is mine. I'm going to assume you mean the Alix 6e1, which is the closest I can find in their numbering system. 6E1, yes. Sorry; it was last December. My friend was going to drop by , but cancelled and was back in school before he remembered. It's got a standard CF adaptor. (*All* the Alix's do.) If there's a card in it, pull it off and insert into any CF reader, and it should work fine. (USB-based ones typically sell for $20, including SD, XD, MMC, Memorystick, and probably a few others as well. Check Best Buy, or your local computer hardware store, or possibly a camera store.) Then follow Arthur's advice. The CF card may be a little awkward to pull off. If the card that's in there is some special card that needs some exotic burner... When you are at the computer store spend another $5 or so and get yourself a new card. I asked the pfSense forum if I had enough memory and they said yes. Wghat I've got should be fine assuming that everything is put together correctly. My physical disabilities limit what i can do myself--that's the catch; it is why I have to ask favors. I'll save your mail just in case my friend gets off-track for some reason. Shouldn't. It is how he is putting himself thru college this time. ---What I want is to be drawing as few watts as _possible_. Especially since I have two tower cases going 24*7. Plus the firewall Beast. :: be nice to get down to some min footprint and get that much further into the green-zone! -g Daniel T. Staal --- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --- -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Thunderbird segfaults if UID 0
Hello,
I've had trouble since upgrading mail/thunderbird from 2.X
to 3.1.9 --- as a non-root user, it segfaults.
As root, I have no issues.
I've tried:
1. Googling
2. mv .mozilla .mozilla-old thunderbird
3. sudo chmod 777 /dev/null thunderbird
(and similar stuff with /dev/fd/* and
the symlinks stdin, stdout and stderr.
I'm kind of stumped at this point. Here's the
last part of a ktrace:
54137 sh RET read 872/0x368
54137 sh CALL stat(0x283034d0,0xbfbfe638)
54137 sh NAMI /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
54137 sh STRU struct stat {dev=87, ino=6053072, mode=-rwxrwxrwx
, nlink=1, uid=0, gid=0, rdev=24241760, atime=1302052597,
stime=1301719584, ctime=1302044479, birthtime=1301719584, size=10461,
blksize=4096, blocks=24, flags=0x0 }
54137 sh RET stat 0
54137 sh CALL eaccess(0x283034d0,X_OK)
54137 sh NAMI /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
54137 sh RET eaccess 0
54137 sh CALL geteuid
54137 sh RET geteuid 1001/0x3e9
54137 sh CALL fork
54137 sh RET fork 54141/0xd37d
54137 sh CALL getpgrp
54137 sh RET getpgrp 54137/0xd379
54137 sh CALL wait4(0x,0xbfbfe778,WUNTRACED,0)
54137 sh RET wait4 54141/0xd37d
54137 sh CALL exit(0x8b)
Anyone got a clue what I've done?
Thanks,
Kevin Kinsey
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx wrote: On Tue, April 5, 2011 7:44 pm, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx wrote: Hello, FreeBSD gurus, I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable, now it's in the obsolete software list. Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources: /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile How can I install that compiler? The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in the sources. Thanks in advace, Eduardo. PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to the list. My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me . I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD ) in Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very good code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on run time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with a list of called subroutines chain . Since the G95 is generated from the same sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform related compilers . Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful about cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of errors because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free line format based . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Thanks Mehmet. I'd better start promoting the use of g95. Some people in the list say that f77 users must move on in their lives and leave f77 behind. Something curious is happening, g95 does not seem to find its library libg95. I have to write explicitly: g95 foo.for -o foo -L/usr/local/lib to compile the program foo. /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart does not fix the problem. Any ideas? Thanks for answering, Eduardo. The command line is important for g95 . Therefore , please write a complete command line for compilation . Since these are multi-platform software AND different platforms are NOT equivalent in their directory structure , I think , these facts are not very important points . My approach is to use a batch file in Windows and a shell script in Linux to compile programs : For example : g95-cte.sh ( cte : compile to executable , there is another cts : compile to syntax ) g95 -ftrace=full -o $1 $1.FOR ( -ftrace=full means , generate code to produce call chain trace on run-time error . ) To compile a program , use it as follows ( use your extension as it is : .for or .FOR , FreeBSD is case-sensitive ) : g95-cte.sh hello Move g95-cte.sh after making it executable into a directory which it is in the $PATH , then it will be possible to use g95-cte.sh from any directory . For specially required directories , add their names into its command line with suitable prefixes . In the following page , http://www.g95.org/downloads.shtml there are binaries for FreeBSD . Since they are specific to platforms , they MAY NOT require specification of libraries , but , again , these are NOT important , specify them in shell script command line only one time , then use it continuously . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
how to tune the system for the heavy traffic?
hi all: my freebsd is 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD. i fount it lose packages slightly, ping test: 23 packets transmitted, 22 packets received, 4.3% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.073/0.521/1.952/0.521 ms netstat 1: there is a lot of input error in netstat 1 result: % netstat 1 input(Total) output packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls 27839 33361807953 31722 06226471 0 29596 21221903013 34289 06729220 0 24747 22511600582 17843 03094079 0 15358 01004995 15942 03810051 0 4743 0 337459 11260 02147868 0 9534 0 629656 3890 0 411055 0 15024 01019820 22629 09454034 0 25099 1911654160 22364 05319211 0 13175 358 874315 18197 06062716 0 25506 17851651455 33867 0 10503736 0 33319 30292137120 31391 06423544 0 29830 5971915300 33235 06198883 0 My question is how to tune the system for the heave traffic? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
