Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update.
I am not sure exactly what your problem is; however, after the Firefox update, printing now takes forever. I use to be able to click on print and have a document print virtually immediately. Now, I click print and have time to eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed before the frigging thing prints out. This is definitely NOT a printer problem since the printer is connected via a network to a Windows machine. Clicking on the same document in IE results in the document being printed immediately. Somehow, somewhere, something got seriously broken in Firefox. I do also get a print if I wait, but it's a one liner saying: Unrecoverable error: rangecheck in setpagedevice Operand stack: true --nostri /Leslie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:36:05 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: I am not sure exactly what your problem is; however, after the Firefox update, printing now takes forever. I use to be able to click on print and have a document print virtually immediately. Now, I click print and have time to eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed before the frigging thing prints out. This is definitely NOT a printer problem since the printer is connected via a network to a Windows machine. Clicking on the same document in IE results in the document being printed immediately. Somehow, somewhere, something got seriously broken in Firefox. I do also get a print if I wait, but it's a one liner saying: Unrecoverable error: rangecheck in setpagedevice Operand stack: true --nostri Do you get better results when printing to a file (PS) and then sending it directly to the printer (via lpr)? Maybe this problem is comparable to my Opera printing problem (where I could identify Opera being the source of invalid PS data). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update.
On windows it delay much longer than usual, yea something change in firefox, affect that Regards -Original Message- From: Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:36:05 To: FreeBSDfreebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Jerryje...@seibercom.net Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. I am not sure exactly what your problem is; however, after the Firefox update, printing now takes forever. I use to be able to click on print and have a document print virtually immediately. Now, I click print and have time to eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed before the frigging thing prints out. This is definitely NOT a printer problem since the printer is connected via a network to a Windows machine. Clicking on the same document in IE results in the document being printed immediately. Somehow, somewhere, something got seriously broken in Firefox. I do also get a print if I wait, but it's a one liner saying: Unrecoverable error: rangecheck in setpagedevice Operand stack: true --nostri /Leslie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: get rel 9.0 iso
I could build one kernel that would support the hardware on both computers, or one kernel for each computer. This would be the USB-stick i386 install. I would also have FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 on the new computer hard drive; would put the system source and ports tree on the hard-drive installation. I might put /home together with root and /usr on the main (USB-stick installation) partition. X Window manager would be IceWM. FreeBSD itself can run comfortably in well under 256 MB RAM. Resource hogs are the big applications: KDE, GNOME, bigger web browsers, multimedia, Adobe Flash Player, printers. Servers, not needing all the fancy stuff, can be set up on old computers as long as they're in good condition. By printers, I mean not only CUPS, but hplip which depends on cups. On BETA1, hplip build failed in cups because of undefined variable, I believe. Other failed port was fuse. On the computer from 2001, FreeBSD 8.1 and 8.2 /var got over 800 MB; I became nervous as /var data grew during the freebsd-update from 8.1 to 8.2. Most iso-downloadable (CD or DVD) Linux distributions now require 512 MB RAM or more; I believe PC-BSD requires at least 512 MB RAM. Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:53:42 +0200 Polytropon articulated: Do you get better results when printing to a file (PS) and then sending it directly to the printer (via lpr)? Maybe this problem is comparable to my Opera printing problem (where I could identify Opera being the source of invalid PS data). Wow, what a waste of time that is. I just use MS Windows when I have to print and avoid all that rigmarole. Firefox use to work correctly; however, it no longer does. At first I thought it was a localized phenomena; however, after checking on several different forums I have concluded that it is far more wide spread than I had originally thought. There have been reports filed against this behavior. If and when they are acted upon is anyone's guess. In the mean time, I just use what is convenient and works reliably without adding an undo burden upon myself. Continual use of broken software effectively makes the end user and enabler; something I have no desire to invest my time in. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+f...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update.
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:21:40 -0400, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:53:42 +0200 Polytropon articulated: Do you get better results when printing to a file (PS) and then sending it directly to the printer (via lpr)? Maybe this problem is comparable to my Opera printing problem (where I could identify Opera being the source of invalid PS data). Wow, what a waste of time that is. I just use MS Windows when I have to print and avoid all that rigmarole. Fully agree. I just use a PS printer (networked) and can print directly from any system and any application, no need for any rigmaroles. :-) Firefox use to work correctly; however, it no longer does. At first I thought it was a localized phenomena; however, after checking on several different forums I have concluded that it is far more wide spread than I had originally thought. This seems to be typical for development project that focus on development at any cost, dropping functionality or accidentally losing some. Sadly such behaviour is not limited to Firefox, but also to other programs many users consider essential. There have been reports filed against this behavior. If and when they are acted upon is anyone's guess. In the mean time, I just use what is convenient and works reliably without adding an undo burden upon myself. Well, I always have problems understanding why functionality that has been working perfectly for years stops working, especially when changes that programmers made are in _no_ obvious relation to that functionality... This means: Don't update your software if you want to keep it working. And use a real printer that JUST WORKS. :-) Continual use of broken software effectively makes the end user and enabler; something I have no desire to invest my time in. Also agree. Firefox is not the only web browser available and usable (although it might be the world's favourite one). And finally, it wouldn't be the first product that users abandon due to such lack of... quality? Is this correct? I'd say yes. Coming back on topic: It would be useful to identify Firefox as initiator of the printing problems (if that isn't clear yet), just to make sure that it isn't CUPS (which often is used for its printer filters when using winprinters). That's why involving the Print to file step sounds useful here. In case Firefox produces defective Postscript, that would indicate that it's really a Firefox thing that should be fixed as soon as possible. This step of diagnostics should help to be sure _what_ to fix. By the way, I'm still using Firefox 6.0.1 here and don't have printing problems, even using with CUPS 1.4.6. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
I am thinking of using a TRENDnet 2-Port DVI USB KVM Switch Kit with Audio TK-214i with a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 PC and a Windows 7 machine. I presently have a Samsung 24 digital monitor and a Logitech S510 cordless keyboard mouse combination. The keyboard, mouse and monitor presently work fine on FreeBSD. I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Media streaming software.
Hi All Must be a year or so ago I posted looking for some advice on media streaming software that had a some specific requirements, mainly that it would transcode media on the fly to an MPEG2 stream so the dlna enabled TV could display the stream, I did get some good advice at the time but ultimately nothing quite fitted the bill. That was until someone mentioned serviio to me, so I looked in ports and sure it enough it is there (/usr/ports/net/serviio) it works great happily my TV will now play an MKV file and pretty much anything else I have thrown at it. So if you are looking for something that will work on a headless server to allow you stream media .. I would check this one out. Regards Graeme ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
Carmel writes: I am thinking of using a TRENDnet 2-Port DVI USB KVM Switch Kit with Audio TK-214i with a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 PC and a Windows 7 machine. I presently have a Samsung 24 digital monitor and a Logitech S510 cordless keyboard mouse combination. The keyboard, mouse and monitor presently work fine on FreeBSD. I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. I have not used that particular make/model, but I have used a KVM and it worked. I vaguely remember accounts of people who had problems; a search of the mailing-list archives is advisable. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote: I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. My experience with this is limited, but good. It's been sometime since I've used this setup, but I recall the FreeBSD was actually PCBSD and for it to work correctly I have to have them KVM switched to it when X was starting. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need an audio multicasting solution
Alejandro Imass wrote: I need a solution to read sound from a soundcard (/dev/dsp) and multicast it into the network, for the multicast audio stream to be played on FreeBSD, Linux and Windows workstations. No sophisticated codecs needed, plain PCM would do. Can you advise something? I know that in theory there are many ways to implement this, but I am especially interested in personal first-hand experience, success stories or good white papers. Please no lmgtfu-type replies. Thanks very much in advance. I doubt people in this list are the lmgtfu type! I use Icecast on FBSD and it works great. Alejandro, correct me if I am wrong but AFAIK Icecast works with mp3 files. Can it really read audio from /dev/dsp? I don't need mp3, I would prefer to multicast simple PCM data. Even 8 bit PCM (64 Kbit/s) would do. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Create official mirror of FreeBSD
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ayaz Baghirov ayaz.bagi...@gmail.com wrote: Good day my dear colleagues! My name is Ayaz Baghirov, I live in Azerbaijan and work in IT sector about 3 years. I got acquainted with open systems and software not a time ago. But liked them immediately. Especially *nix and *BSD systems. It's so exciting to have a deal with a stable systems! So that's why I decided to write you a letter concerning creating an official mirror of FreeBSD server in my country. That all need to know is what procedures should I make? And what demands to server and internet channel is required? At the end I'd like to wish success and good luck to all FreeBSD team! I hope to get detailed answer from you! Looking forward to your response,Yours sincerely Ayaz Baghirov. ___ You may refer to the following document: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/index.html Hope it helps. Regards, Antonio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Robert Huff wrote: Carmel writes: I am thinking of using a TRENDnet 2-Port DVI USB KVM Switch Kit with Audio TK-214i with a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 PC and a Windows 7 machine. I presently have a Samsung 24 digital monitor and a Logitech S510 cordless keyboard mouse combination. The keyboard, mouse and monitor presently work fine on FreeBSD. I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. I have not used that particular make/model, but I have used a KVM and it worked. I vaguely remember accounts of people who had problems; a search of the mailing-list archives is advisable. The problem I have heard of relates to what happens if the machine boots with the KVM switched to another machine? The KVM may need to pretend there is a keyboard connected at that point. You certainly can't tell by looking at the box, but the Trendnet TK-407 I have (which is a 4-port USB KVM from the vendor you mention) works fine with FreeBSD and Windows. We haven't tested the mouse in FreeBSD. Since any USB KVM would be fairly recent, you might just want to take a chance. Solaris Sparc systems had worse problems. Daniel Feenberg Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
9.0 beta2 the new bsdinstaller
Here are some problems that need to be addressed in 9.0. If this list is not the correct list to notify the release team then please post to the correct list. 1. During the transitional phase to using the new installer, the bsdinstaller welcome screen should have option to select to use the old sysinstall instead of continuing with the new bsdinstaller. Selecting the shell option and entering sysinstall on the command line does launch the previous installer but it does not really work. 2. On the select a keyboard language menu screen, there are 9 options for USA and none of them is the 101 keyboard layout. I've been installing FBSD since release 4.0 and have never changed the keyboard from what ever the default was. This keyboard menu should list the first entry in the list as (default and use the keyboard language as used in all previous releases. Also the keymap= statement that is placed in /etc/rc.conf should have a default setting in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. The system hangs if the keymap= statement is missing from /etc/rc.conf on boot. 3.Following the keyboard language menu screen is the set host name screen. It seems that the keyboard language selected in the previous menu is now in effect and if the keys layout does not line up with the keyboard you have, then what ever you enter for the host name is scrambled, (IE. type in home and dwkc is what shows on the screen). There is no option to return to previous keyboard language menu screen to select different keyboard language. Only option is to reboot and start all over again from the beginning of the new bsdinstaller. 4. Distribution selection menu screen. The games ports options are checked with an asterisk meaning these are the defaults. All the options on this menu should be blank so user has to make selection. Default should be no selections. 5. Final configuration screen has the add user option and the OK button highlighted. Hitting keyboard enter key takes you into add user function as the default. The exit option should be first in the list so its highlighted and hitting enter on your keyboard moves you to next menu screen just like all the other bsdinataller screens do. 6. At the Complete screen when the reboot option is selected the cd/dvd drive should automatically open so the install media can be removed just like sysinstall does. If disc1.iso or dvd.iso was installed to memstick and used to boot from to install the system, then a message screen should pop out saying the memstick has to be removed now before the reboot starts. Don't let the reboot occur until the memstick is removed. 7. On the partition editor screen the option finish should be the first in the list (ie; left most side) so if user accepts this config, hitting enter moves to next menu screen instead of having to tab over taking more time and effort. 8. No where in the bsdinstaller is any help available. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.0 beta2 the new bsdinstaller
On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: Here are some problems that need to be addressed in 9.0. If this list is not the correct list to notify the release team then please post to the correct list. I suggest you find the right list and do that yourself. :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:28:42 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Feenberg articulated: The problem I have heard of relates to what happens if the machine boots with the KVM switched to another machine? The KVM may need to pretend there is a keyboard connected at that point. You certainly can't tell by looking at the box, but the Trendnet TK-407 I have (which is a 4-port USB KVM from the vendor you mention) works fine with FreeBSD and Windows. We haven't tested the mouse in FreeBSD. Since any USB KVM would be fairly recent, you might just want to take a chance. There is a Windows configuration utility that can be used to setup the switch. The way I figure it, if I cannot get it to work satisfactory, I can always return it. Does your switch work when X is not loaded? I have not been able to get a satisfactory answer regarding that. Someone mentioned that X has to be loaded first. That would definitely be a deal breaker. Thanks for your feedback. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote: Does your switch work when X is not loaded? I have not been able to get a satisfactory answer regarding that. Someone mentioned that X has to be loaded first. That would definitely be a deal breaker. What I said is that the KVM, in my case, had to be set to the FreeBSD system when X was started for the KVM/FreeBSD system interaction to be correct. That's a much different circumstance that X has to be loaded first which is something I did not say. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Carmel wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:28:42 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Feenberg articulated: The problem I have heard of relates to what happens if the machine boots with the KVM switched to another machine? The KVM may need to pretend there is a keyboard connected at that point. You certainly can't tell by looking at the box, but the Trendnet TK-407 I have (which is a 4-port USB KVM from the vendor you mention) works fine with FreeBSD and Windows. We haven't tested the mouse in FreeBSD. Since any USB KVM would be fairly recent, you might just want to take a chance. There is a Windows configuration utility that can be used to setup the switch. The way I figure it, if I cannot get it to work satisfactory, I can always return it. Does your switch work when X is not loaded? I have not been able to get a satisfactory answer regarding that. Someone mentioned that X has to be loaded first. That would definitely be a deal breaker. If you are asking, Is there a FreeBSD command to cause the KVM switch to move to the next system? then the answer is I don't know and it would amaze me if there were. If the question is Does the switch care what the OS is? then the answer is, you can press the physical button on the switch to change the system connected. The OS doesn't know it doesn't have the screen and keyboard, and is in no way affected by the KVM switch, just as the KVM doesn't know or care what the OS is. I just looked at the manual for the 207K online, and it indeed comes with a utility that runs under windows. That won't work with FreeBSD but the switch has actual buttons on it, and they will work fine. Daniel Feenberg Thanks for your feedback. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Daniel Feenberg wrote: If you are asking, Is there a FreeBSD command to cause the KVM switch to move to the next system? then the answer is I don't know and it would amaze me if there were. There's often a key sequence to advance to the next port or a specific port. If the question is Does the switch care what the OS is? then the answer is, you can press the physical button on the switch to change the system connected. The OS doesn't know it doesn't have the screen and keyboard, and is in no way affected by the KVM switch, just as the KVM doesn't know or care what the OS is. Well... there's monitor detection by the video card. That can cause problems. Also, going through the KVM can reduce video quality with VGA and high resolutions. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
traffic shaping freebsd
can someone provide a real (working) live example of traffic shaping with ipfw i just can't get mine to work no matter what... -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
How to check where space is LOST
Hi. I notice that some times /var is overfull # df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a496M239M217M52%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad1s1e124M 40K114M 0%/tmp /dev/ad1s1f1.8G1.1G596M65%/usr /dev/ad1s1d989M349M561M38%/var devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/var/named/dev # cd /var/ # du -h -d 1 2.0K./.snap 2.0K./account 6.0K./at 2.0K./audit 12K./backups 4.0K./crash 4.0K./cron 2.0K./empty 2.0K./heimdal 79M./log 19M./mail 4.0K./msgs 159K./named 2.0K./preserve 60K./run 2.0K./rwho 70K./spool 14K./tmp 24K./yp 2.0K./games 2.0K./agentx 22K./net-snmp 4.0K./lost+found 98M. If I just #reboot system. I get that on /var is only 98M used. # df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a496M239M217M52%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad1s1e124M 40K114M 0%/tmp /dev/ad1s1f1.8G1.1G596M65%/usr /dev/ad1s1d989M 98M891M12%/var devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/var/named/dev How to obtain what take space on /var -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
Здравствуйте, alexus. Вы писали 12 сентября 2011 г., 1:18:10: a can someone provide a real (working) live example of traffic shaping with ipfw a i just can't get mine to work no matter what... you can try this http://translate.google.com.ua/translate?hl=rusl=rutl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fkes.net.ua%2Fsoftdev%2Fadvanced_firewall.html -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
--As of September 11, 2011 9:03:17 AM -0400, Carmel is alleged to have said: I am thinking of using a TRENDnet 2-Port DVI USB KVM Switch Kit with Audio TK-214i with a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 PC and a Windows 7 machine. I presently have a Samsung 24 digital monitor and a Logitech S510 cordless keyboard mouse combination. The keyboard, mouse and monitor presently work fine on FreeBSD. I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. --As for the rest, it is mine. In my experience, the OS isn't all that relevant. The main question is if the hardware works well together. Many KVMs don't do a great job of emulating a connection if the computer isn't the currently active one, and this can cause problems when something wants to see if a monitor is present (and wants to check what it's specs are), but that's not a FreeBSD problem per se: It's just a problem with the hardware. I'm sorry I don't have any good, cheap, KVM recommendations at this time. Enterprize-grade hardware usually doesn't have this problem (although it might), and I haven't needed to use a small KVM for a while. Daniel T. Staal --- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
thanks, but did u actually tried it? i'd prefer an example from a live system if possible its just its not working for me, so maybe i'm doing something off, so thats why i wanted to see a working example from someone's system 2011/9/11 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru: Здравствуйте, alexus. Вы писали 12 сентября 2011 г., 1:18:10: a can someone provide a real (working) live example of traffic shaping with ipfw a i just can't get mine to work no matter what... you can try this http://translate.google.com.ua/translate?hl=rusl=rutl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fkes.net.ua%2Fsoftdev%2Fadvanced_firewall.html -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re[2]: traffic shaping freebsd
Здравствуйте, alexus. That is my article. I have wrote it when I configure my VPN server to shape home users. If questions - ask. Вы писали 12 сентября 2011 г., 1:38:30: a thanks, but did u actually tried it? i'd prefer an example from a live a system if possible a its just its not working for me, so maybe i'm doing something off, so a thats why i wanted to see a working example from someone's system a 2011/9/11 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru: Здравствуйте, alexus. Вы писали 12 сентября 2011 г., 1:18:10: a can someone provide a real (working) live example of traffic shaping with ipfw a i just can't get mine to work no matter what... you can try this http://translate.google.com.ua/translate?hl=rusl=rutl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fkes.net.ua%2Fsoftdev%2Fadvanced_firewall.html -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to check where space is LOST
2011/9/11 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru: Hi. I notice that some times /var is overfull # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a 496M 239M 217M 52% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ad1s1e 124M 40K 114M 0% /tmp /dev/ad1s1f 1.8G 1.1G 596M 65% /usr /dev/ad1s1d 989M 349M 561M 38% /var devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /var/named/dev # cd /var/ # du -h -d 1 2.0K ./.snap 2.0K ./account 6.0K ./at 2.0K ./audit 12K ./backups 4.0K ./crash 4.0K ./cron 2.0K ./empty 2.0K ./heimdal 79M ./log 19M ./mail 4.0K ./msgs 159K ./named 2.0K ./preserve 60K ./run 2.0K ./rwho 70K ./spool 14K ./tmp 24K ./yp 2.0K ./games 2.0K ./agentx 22K ./net-snmp 4.0K ./lost+found 98M . If I just #reboot system. I get that on /var is only 98M used. # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a 496M 239M 217M 52% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ad1s1e 124M 40K 114M 0% /tmp /dev/ad1s1f 1.8G 1.1G 596M 65% /usr /dev/ad1s1d 989M 98M 891M 12% /var devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /var/named/dev How to obtain what take space on /var You probably have a process that is holding a file open that has been rotated or deleted. Probably a log file. sysutils/lsof can help. Also, once you track down which process is holding open files, you should try to find out why (/etc/syslog.conf is a suspect, obviously). -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: thanks, but did u actually tried it? If what you're asking is, does traffic shaping work? the answer is yes. There are some provisos - you must create an outbound pipe and an inbound pipe that accurately reflect the observed network performance (not what your ISP told you). This is because when you create queues of different weights, the weights are only imposed when one or more queues are full. See http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/dummynet/ The place to start is to find out what kind of upload and download throughput you get, then create pipes that are 95% of those observed values (one up, one down), then instantiate queues with different weights on each pipe, then create rules that match packets according to which pipe they should go in. Also consider that the sysctl variable, net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass, might need to be 0 and not 1, depending on whether queued packets need further processing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to check where space is LOST
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:23:32 +0300 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi. I notice that some times /var is overfull # df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a496M239M217M52%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad1s1e124M 40K114M 0%/tmp /dev/ad1s1f1.8G1.1G596M65%/usr /dev/ad1s1d989M349M561M38%/var devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/var/named/dev # cd /var/ # du -h -d 1 2.0K./.snap 2.0K./account 6.0K./at 2.0K./audit 12K./backups 4.0K./crash 4.0K./cron 2.0K./empty 2.0K./heimdal 79M./log 19M./mail 4.0K./msgs 159K./named 2.0K./preserve 60K./run 2.0K./rwho 70K./spool 14K./tmp 24K./yp 2.0K./games 2.0K./agentx 22K./net-snmp 4.0K./lost+found 98M. If I just #reboot system. I get that on /var is only 98M used. # df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a496M239M217M52%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad1s1e124M 40K114M 0%/tmp /dev/ad1s1f1.8G1.1G596M65%/usr /dev/ad1s1d989M 98M891M12%/var devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/var/named/dev How to obtain what take space on /var -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org http://www.freebsddiary.org/file-system-full.php It really depends IMHO what you use your computer for (server ore workstation...). I'd bet on /var/tmp somehow . -- Rares Aioanei ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:20:19 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote: I am wondering if anyone has any personal experience with using KVM switches with FreeBSD and what that experience might be. I would really like to integrate these two PC into using just one common monitor, etcetera mostly due to space considerations. My experience with this is limited, but good. It's been sometime since I've used this setup, but I recall the FreeBSD was actually PCBSD and for it to work correctly I have to have them KVM switched to it when X was starting. I have ben using a similar approach in the past, but in order to get rid of the requirement when X is started, console must be attached I had hardcoded the neccessary screen settings in xorg.conf so X would start even if nothing would have been connected. Sadly I can't remember the particular model that I had, but it had buttons to select one of the 8 console channels on its front. I found this was better than using something that required some weird keyboard shortcut as those are traditionally handled by the OS or by X. A LED indicator next to the buttons on the device's front indicated which system the console was connected to and if the system was online. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KVM switch with FreeBSD-8.2
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:10:48 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Daniel Feenberg wrote: If you are asking, Is there a FreeBSD command to cause the KVM switch to move to the next system? then the answer is I don't know and it would amaze me if there were. There's often a key sequence to advance to the next port or a specific port. That can _sometimes_ be a problem when the KVM switch doesn't properly detect this sequence - or maybe the user has already defined that sequence for some action in X, so X catches the sequence and acts properly. My preferred solution was to get a switch that was _fully_ independent from keyboard in regards of its main functionality, i. e. switching. Another advantage of that particular one was that you could DIRECTLY switch from system #1 to system #8 without visiting systems #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7, :-) If the question is Does the switch care what the OS is? then the answer is, you can press the physical button on the switch to change the system connected. The OS doesn't know it doesn't have the screen and keyboard, and is in no way affected by the KVM switch, just as the KVM doesn't know or care what the OS is. Well... there's monitor detection by the video card. That can cause problems. I'm not sure in how far this sill applies to modern hardware. Absence of a video card vs. present video card with no monitor attached _could_ prevent a system from booting. The next step, starting X which obtains display information by querying the monitor (through the card), can easily be dealt with by putting the proper settings into xorg.conf. This will make X start even if no monitor is attached to the card. Also, going through the KVM can reduce video quality with VGA and high resolutions. I've seen that with some cheap cabling on analog VGA. However, when using DVI this problem should not be present, and it's common practice today to use DVI to attach digital displays (means: flatscreens). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
su-4.2# grep pipe /etc/ipfw.rules pipe flush pipe 1 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port www pipe 2 config bw 1Mbit/s mask src-port www pipe 3 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port 3128 add 3128 pipe 3 tcp from any to any src-port 3128 uid root add 8381 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port www uid daemon add 8382 pipe 2 tcp from any to any src-port www uid daemon su-4.2# su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11190815447 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14394 16926849 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011190 815447 00 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14394 16926849 00 10 su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11218817225 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14434 16979213 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011218 817225 00 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14434 16979213 00 10 su-4.2# as you see ipfw rules matches as count is increasing, yet pipe i'm not seeing any difference at all, its like it matched first time and that's it... yet pipe shows different output su-4.2# ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 37483 71276160 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/105616 2383 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/1032 8 9398 00 0 32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/20964143167 00 0 48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/56 2 7074 00 0 su-4.2# !! ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 39285 74616912 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10561920651 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10643641781 00 0 32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10724353920 00 0 48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/2104 3 595 00 0 su-4.2# why is it seeing source ip/port as 0/0 and dest 0/? i dont understand that at all On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: thanks, but did u actually tried it? If what you're asking is, does traffic shaping work? the answer is yes. There are some provisos - you must create an outbound pipe and an inbound pipe that accurately reflect the observed network performance (not what your ISP told you). This is because when you create queues of different weights, the weights are only imposed when one or more queues are full. See http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/dummynet/ The place to start is to find out what kind of upload and download throughput you get, then create pipes that are 95% of those observed values (one up, one down), then instantiate queues with different weights on each pipe, then create rules that match packets according to which pipe they should go in. Also consider that the sysctl variable, net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass, might need to be 0 and not 1, depending on whether queued packets need further processing. -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to check where space is LOST
2011/9/11 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru If I just #reboot system. I get that on /var is only 98M used. # df -h Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad1s1a496M239M217M52%/ devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad1s1e124M 40K114M 0%/tmp /dev/ad1s1f1.8G1.1G596M65%/usr /dev/ad1s1d989M 98M891M12%/var devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/var/named/dev How to obtain what take space on /var fstat -f /var -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
You don't seem to have any rules that match packets. This won't work. On Sunday, September 11, 2011, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: su-4.2# grep pipe /etc/ipfw.rules pipe flush pipe 1 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port www pipe 2 config bw 1Mbit/s mask src-port www pipe 3 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port 3128 add 3128 pipe 3 tcp from any to any src-port 3128 uid root add 8381 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port www uid daemon add 8382 pipe 2 tcp from any to any src-port www uid daemon su-4.2# su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11190815447 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14394 16926849 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011190 815447 00 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14394 16926849 00 10 su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11218817225 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14434 16979213 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011218 817225 00 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14434 16979213 00 10 su-4.2# as you see ipfw rules matches as count is increasing, yet pipe i'm not seeing any difference at all, its like it matched first time and that's it... yet pipe shows different output su-4.2# ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 37483 71276160 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/105616 2383 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/1032 8 9398 00 0 32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/20964143167 00 0 48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/56 2 7074 00 0 su-4.2# !! ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 39285 74616912 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10561920651 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10643641781 00 0 32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10724353920 00 0 48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/2104 3 595 00 0 su-4.2# why is it seeing source ip/port as 0/0 and dest 0/? i dont understand that at all On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: thanks, but did u actually tried it? If what you're asking is, does traffic shaping work? the answer is yes. There are some provisos - you must create an outbound pipe and an inbound pipe that accurately reflect the observed network performance (not what your ISP told you). This is because when you create queues of different weights, the weights are only imposed when one or more queues are full. See http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/dummynet/ The place to start is to find out what kind of upload and download throughput you get, then create pipes that are 95% of those observed values (one up, one down), then instantiate queues with different weights on each pipe, then create rules that match packets according to which pipe they should go in. Also consider that the sysctl variable, net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass, might need to be 0 and not 1, depending on whether queued packets need further processing. -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: traffic shaping freebsd
amending my remark... UID matching is problematic. Why are you trying to classify packets based on that? On Sunday, September 11, 2011, Michael Sierchio ku...@tenebras.com wrote: You don't seem to have any rules that match packets. This won't work. On Sunday, September 11, 2011, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: su-4.2# grep pipe /etc/ipfw.rules pipe flush pipe 1 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port www pipe 2 config bw 1Mbit/s mask src-port www pipe 3 config bw 1Mbit/s mask dst-port 3128 add 3128 pipe 3 tcp from any to any src-port 3128 uid root add 8381 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port www uid daemon add 8382 pipe 2 tcp from any to any src-port www uid daemon su-4.2# su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11190815447 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14394 16926849 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011190 815447 0 0 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14394 16926849 0 0 10 su-4.2# ipfw show | grep -E 'pipe 1|pipe 2' ipfw pipe show 1 ; ipfw pipe show 2 08381 11218817225 pipe 1 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 uid daemon 08382 14434 16979213 pipe 2 tcp from any 80 to any uid daemon 1: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 64.237.55.83/64730 69.10.58.25/8011218 817225 0 0 0 2: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 tcp 69.10.58.25/80 64.237.55.83/64730 14434 16979213 0 0 10 su-4.2# as you see ipfw rules matches as count is increasing, yet pipe i'm not seeing any difference at all, its like it matched first time and that's it... yet pipe shows different output su-4.2# ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 37483 71276160 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/105616 2383 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/1032 8 9398 0 0 0 32 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/20964143167 0 0 0 48 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/56 2 7074 0 0 0 su-4.2# !! ipfw show | grep 'pipe 3' ipfw pipe show 3 03128 39285 74616912 pipe 3 tcp from any 3128 to any uid root 3: 1.000 Mbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 4 queues (64 buckets) droptail mask: 0x00 0x/0x - 0x/0x0c38 BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10561920651 00 0 16 ip 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/10643641781 0 0 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need an audio multicasting solution
Alejandro Imass wrote: I need a solution to read sound from a soundcard (/dev/dsp) and multicast it into the network, for the multicast audio stream to be played on FreeBSD, Linux and Windows workstations. No sophisticated codecs needed, plain PCM would do. Can you advise something? I know that in theory there are many ways to implement this, but I am especially interested in personal first-hand experience, success stories or good white papers. Please no lmgtfu-type replies. Thanks very much in advance. I doubt people in this list are the lmgtfu type! I use Icecast on FBSD and it works great. A quick look at Icecast showed that it does not support multicast either. It this true? If so, Icecast is completely useless for my scenario. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
