David Brodbeck wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G.
> > restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is
> > waiting forever in the runnable state.
>
> I don't have any specific advice here, but if it were me I think my
> next troublesho
"Ronald F. Guilmette" writes:
> I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed
> to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports.
> I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well...
>
> Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY working. T
On 10/21/11 20:29, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed
to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports.
I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well...
Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY work
I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed
to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports.
I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well...
Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY working. The video works great, but for
audio all
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Galati, Michael wrote:
Unfortunately, there's no good way of upgrading packages on FreeBSD
(that I'm aware of, at least). My solution (crude as it may be) has
been to remove all the packages and reinstall.
There's pkg_upgrade from sysutils/bsdadminscripts.
___
Greetings...
I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox
3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and
therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure.
My questions:
1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem?
2) is th
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Open Slate wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Eric Schuele wrote:
>> Gary,
>>
>> Fwiw You might try #e on freenode. :)
>
> Good idea. Thanks. I'm there now on my cell (AndroIRC, recommended)
> and no response. I'll hang out awhile. My handle is gd808m
Not exactly an answer to your question, but I use the batch flag to bypass
configuration menus. If you have one or two ports you do not install with
default settings, you can go back and install manually.
On Oct 20, 2011 9:54 PM, "Paul Macdonald" wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell which ports m
> >Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
> during update, i have some auto update scripts
> > Stop doing this.
> >
> > Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
> > Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
> >
> > What you're doing is irresponsible
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Fwiw You might try #e on freenode. :)
Good idea. Thanks. I'm there now on my cell (AndroIRC, recommended)
and no response. I'll hang out awhile. My handle is gd808mobile in
case anyone wants to hook up.
--
Gary Dunn
Open Sl
Size özel bülteni görmek için aşağıdaki linke tıklayınız:
Tıklayınız
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G.
> restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is
> waiting forever in the runnable state.
I don't have any specific advice here, but if it
To improve on my C and to learn something about systems programming, I
have begun to pick out "bite-size bits" from the bin-PRs. Currently, I
am dispairing about bin/149972, which is about 1) adding error handling
to pw being invoced "pw -u " and 2) trying to get a uid from
the (incorrectly) passed
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Can i programmatically tell if user input is required?
It might require reinventing the logic used by the ports system
Makefiles. Or maybe there's a way to run make config-recursive but get
dialog to immediately cancel any config screens that appea
There are many other compile-with not started with ${NORMAL_C}, your
patch adds
${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} to them too, which could not be suitable for this.
2011/10/19 Ryan Stone :
> I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
> following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to ha
Colleagues,
I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G.
restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is
waiting forever in the runnable state.
What could the problem be? I have always used dump/restore with
success. Does the number 6105 look somewhat suspi
On 2011/10/21 11:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts
On 21/10/2011 10:27, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> After I run
>
> csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile
>
> how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1?
So long as you're confident that you have actually downloaded the
sources from the RELENG_9 branch, then you can be conf
On 10/21/11 11:27 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> After I run
>
> csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile
>
> how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1?
>
> I can't find any such information explicitly anywhere under /usr/src .
>
> This releng9-supfile was made from stab
After I run
csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile
how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1?
I can't find any such information explicitly anywhere under /usr/src .
This releng9-supfile was made from stable-supfile by changing RELENG_8 to
RELENG_9 in the line
*def
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
> during update, i have some auto update scripts
>> Stop doing this.
>>
>> Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
>> Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
>>
>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangero
Good day
Ive got this problem whereby via gnomes nautilus, smb browing is *incredibly
slow*.
For example, if I type and try to connect to smb://foo, it takes quite awhile,
before the shares are available.
Then I can click on the share. I wait a bit more.
I find if I manually mount the smb sh
On 10/21/11 9:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during
> update,
>
> i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
Hi,
Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update,
i have some auto update scripts which when prompted will run through
updates, but occassionally i forget which will require user input and
this leads to dialog running ( often @ 100%) until i notice.
Obviously
25 matches
Mail list logo
