Hello,
I have to use SMTP with AUTH to my ISP, and do this with
sendmail+saslauthd as described in the FreeBSD handbook; it works fine
for me in 9-CURRENT and now 10-CURRENT;
while digging for some other problem in the /var/log/maillog I struggled
about the line:
STARTTLS=client,
On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
the certificate
issuer for smtp.lblu.de.
On 18/11/2011 10:00, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
the certificate
On 11/18/11 8:09 AM, Snoop wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network
redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems
with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's
doable.
Thanks in advance, any tip will be
Hello,
Just wondering if anyone is using geom gate and could help me with huge
perf issue I am having.
Right now the set up is such : 3 drives on the same machine A, exported
through geom gate and connected to machine B.
On machine B I format the drives as freebsd-vinum and mount them in
Jerome Herman jher...@dichotomia.fr wrote:
Just wondering if anyone is using geom gate and could help me with huge
perf issue I am having.
Right now the set up is such : 3 drives on the same machine A, exported
through geom gate and connected to machine B.
On machine B I format the drives
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
Mario, I couldn't agree more and it's a very
I am attempting to set below sysctls
/boot/loader.conf
net.isr.direct=1
net.isr.direct_force=1
but after rebut it still
sysctl -a|grep isr
net.isr.direct: 0
net.isr.direct_force: 0
Why it still zero?
OS: FreeBSD-RC1 amd64
___
On Fri, November 18, 2011 10:34 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with
/proc. Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file -
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
/proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving that filesystem. Reading
anything *in* it
On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
I am attempting to set below sysctls
/boot/loader.conf
net.isr.direct=1
net.isr.direct_force=1
but after rebut it still
sysctl -a|grep isr
net.isr.direct: 0
net.isr.direct_force: 0
Why it still zero?
OS: FreeBSD-RC1
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 18 09:36:09 2011
From: Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:34:18 -0600
To: FreeBSD Questions ML freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system?
I use Amanda to make
On 18/11/2011 17:18, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
/proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
mountpoint), so reading it isn't
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
_directory_ with a
Kes,
First, understand that the Realtek (re0) cards have significant
network problems when trying to saturate a network. If you have the
ability try switching to a Intel card (em0) for a lot better
performance, lower interrupts and less CPU usage.
Why interrupts are not handled by more CPUs than
Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local system
accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs /usr/bin/mail on behalf of the
user.
I'd like a simple way to access local system emails without having to forward
them to an actual mailbox
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
I find it quite astonishing that /proc would deliberately behave
differently to *every other* filesystem available. The mountpoint
should belong to the filesystem mounted on it.
I have an idea what you
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Errol Sayre esa...@olemiss.edu wrote:
Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local
system accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs /usr/bin/mail on
behalf of the user.
I'd like a simple way to access local system emails
--- Original message ---
From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
I am attempting to set below sysctls
/boot/loader.conf
--- Original message ---
From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
I am attempting to set below sysctls
/boot/loader.conf
Are you sure SquirrelMail will do this? I was under the impression (from their
requirements page) that it needs an IMAP backend.
On Nov 18, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Errol Sayre esa...@olemiss.edu wrote:
Does anyone know of a webmail product
Size özel bülteni görmek için aşağıdaki linke tıklayınız:
a
href='http://www.setrow.com/system/emailshow.php?mid=c1b7ff86bece24b9cc4b581d1738e27e204a64adc18a67ae3aaid=questi...@freebsd.org'FONT
face='Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif' size=1
color='#999'Tıklayınız/FONT/a
On Fri, November 18, 2011 2:30 pm, Errol Sayre wrote:
Are you sure SquirrelMail will do this? I was under the impression (from
their requirements page) that it needs an IMAP backend.
In which case you'll want an IMAP server that can serve the local system
accounts. Not hard to set up.
Daniel
Hi,
Reference:
From: Errol Sayre esa...@olemiss.edu
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:23:26 +
Message-id: fab6ea27-2c6d-43f0-bddd-ca83b5226...@olemiss.edu
Errol Sayre wrote:
Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access to local system
accounts? Even if it's
Is it not possible/not intended for kernels to be updated via
freebsd-update? If kernels can be updated via freebsd-update
will there be a release of an fix/update that will allow systems
to be patched/updated to -p4 or later?
-Tom Carpenter
On 11/14/2011 05:25 AM, Evalyn wrote:
It touches
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate
Здравствуйте, Виталий.
Вы писали 18 ноября 2011 г., 21:30:38:
ВВ --- Original message ---
ВВ From: Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd
ВВ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
ВВ Date: 18 November 2011, 19:22:36
ВВ Subject: Re: net.isr.direct?
ВВ
On 11/18/11 5:22 PM, Виталий Владимирович wrote:
On 18/11/2011 20:12, Tom Carpenter wrote:
Is it not possible/not intended for kernels to be updated via
freebsd-update? If kernels can be updated via freebsd-update
will there be a release of an fix/update that will allow systems
to be patched/updated to -p4 or later?
freebsd-update will
CO Kes,
CO First, understand that the Realtek (re0) cards have significant
CO network problems when trying to saturate a network. If you have the
CO ability try switching to a Intel card (em0) for a lot better
CO performance, lower interrupts and less CPU usage.
I know that problems with
On Nov 18, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Did you try /usr/ports/mail/openwebmail ? (Needs apache) Runs OK here.
I didn't, but I think Webmin's Read Mail module will do all that I need, plus
it has some other niceties.
Thanks everyone!___
So, I've run freebsd-update fetch/install a few times since I
posed my original question, but my system remains at
8.2-RELEASE-p3. Have I done all that I should to get word to
those that would be able to correct the problem? Is there
communication channel I should use to report this?
On
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted
filesystems on your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate
Errol Sayre esa...@olemiss.edu wrote:
Does anyone know of a webmail product that can provide access
to local system accounts? Even if it's just a script that runs
/usr/bin/mail on behalf of the user.
I'd like a simple way to access local system emails without
having to forward them to an
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Staal
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 18:00
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-
system?
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This process gave me an error, but I'm not sure in which forum
to discuss this problem/error. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
web...
--
William Bulley Email:
Hi!
I had a problem with memory on y computer with 8.2 and there are some mess. I
like to install fresh FreeBSD 9.0. Is it safe to install RC-2 or is better
to wait to the final release, please?
Thanks in advance.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
On Friday 18 November 2011 13:13:33 C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about
this and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This process gave me an error, but I'm not sure in which forum
to discuss this problem/error. Thanks in advance.
freesd-questions@
On 18/11/2011 22:24, ajtiM wrote:
I had a problem with memory on y computer with 8.2 and there are some mess. I
like to install fresh FreeBSD 9.0. Is it safe to install RC-2 or is better
to wait to the final release, please?
9.0-RC2 is (probably) going to be very similar indeed to the
According to Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk on Fri, 11/18/11
at 17:41:
On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This process gave me an error, but I'm
On 11/18/11 15:00, William Bulley wrote:
According to Matthew Seamanm.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk on Fri, 11/18/11
at 17:41:
On 18/11/2011 21:27, William Bulley wrote:
I tried to install 9.0RC2 from the DVD ISO today. This defaults
to using bsdinstall instead of the 8.x sysinstall.
This
According to Edward Martinez eam1edw...@gmail.com on Fri, 11/18/11 at 19:53:
Have you tried installing with ACPI disabled.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdinstall-install-trouble.html#Q3.10.2.1.
this also may be of some help:
Snoop wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure lagg for network
redundancy on a FreeBSD server containing jails? I'm having problems
with that. I couldn't found much around therefore I'm not even sure it's
doable.
Thanks in advance, any tip will be appreciated.
--
Caselle
William Bulley wrote:
According to Edward Martinez eam1edw...@gmail.com on Fri, 11/18/11 at 19:53:
Have you tried installing with ACPI disabled.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/bsdinstall-install-trouble.html#Q3.10.2.1.
this also may be of some help:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 192.168.3.1
bound to 192.168.3.41 -- renewal in 1800 seconds.
'ifconfig em0' output is
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
New to me. Does the machine have any unusual settings, like a non-default
securelevel?
No. There are no unusual security settings.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Xihong Yin wrote:
I set the adapter up.
Here is the output of 'dhclient em0'
DHCPREQUEST on
According to Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com on Fri, 11/18/11 at 21:02:
I think you have under sized /usr and the uncompress ran out of space
during the install. Start over again, wipe the disk clean (ie: delete
all slices)and re-allocate your slices with larger space allocations.
Thanks.
49 matches
Mail list logo
