port to package amd64 to i386
Hello list I want to build packages from ports on AMD64 for use on i386 since the i386 system is; pid 21629 (cc1plus), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space When building firefox. Added some swap as a file so it's building as I type. Thinking that the AMD system I can access is a wee more powerfull than the i386, I was thinking in the line of; Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package. Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to? This is the i386; FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Feb 18 02:24:46 UTC 2011 r...@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz (2524.94-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf27 Family = f Model = 2 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x400CNXT-ID real memory = 537395200 (512 MB) avail memory = 498135040 (475 MB) This is the amd64; FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jan 12 15:13:06 CET 2012 user@fqdn:/usr/home/user/disk8/obj/usr/home/user/disk8/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor (3013.63-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x100f63 Family = 10 Model = 6 Stepping = 3 Features=0x178bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT Features2=0x802009SSE3,MON,CX16,POPCNT AMD Features=0xee500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM,3DNow!+,3DNow! AMD Features2=0x37ffLAHF,CMP,SVM,ExtAPIC,CR8,ABM,SSE4A,MAS,Prefetch,OSVW,IBS,SKINIT,WDT TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 17179869184 (16384 MB) avail memory = 16523640832 (15758 MB) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port to package amd64 to i386
On 03/05/2012 12:42 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package. Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to? http://filipenf.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/cross-compiling-for-x86-in-freebsd-64-bit/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them a private company. No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project founder and lead developer specifically to work on PC-BSD. Click on the 'Professional PC-BSD Support' link of the PC-BSD menu on the pcbsd.org site, and you will see who it is that provides the paid-for support. Hmmm... actually they might want to look at that, as it returns a 404 page. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on purpose or forgotten ? hardcoded compiler in basesystem-makefiles
a quick search revealed following usages:
FreeBSD abaton.Haakh.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 29
13:49:36 CET 2012 t...@abaton.haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABATON i386
ah@abaton:~$ find /usr/src/ -name Makefile\* -exec egrep
'^[[:blank:]]+[gc+]{2,3}[[:blank:]]+..' {} \; -print
cc -D__dead2= -D__unused= -Darc4random=random
-D__FBSDID=static const char *id= -DDEFSHELLNAME=\sh\ -I. -c *.c
cc *.o -o pmake
/usr/src/usr.bin/make/Makefile.dist
gcc -M $(CFLAGS) $(SRC) Makefile.tmp
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/demos/engines/cluster_labs/Makefile
gcc -M $(CFLAGS) $(SRC) Makefile.tmp
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/demos/engines/zencod/Makefile
gcc -M $(CFLAGS) $(SRC) Makefile.tmp
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/demos/engines/ibmca/Makefile
cc -I../../include divtest.c -o divtest ../../libcrypto.a
cc -g -I../../include bnbug.c -o bnbug ../../libcrypto.a
gcc -I../../include -g2 -ggdb -o exptest exptest.c ../../libcrypto.a
gcc -I.. -g div.c ../../libcrypto.a
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/bn/Makefile
cc -g -I../../include -c test.c
cc -g -I../../include -o test test.o -L../.. -lcrypto
cc -g -I../../include -c pk.c
cc -g -I../../include -o pk pk.o -L../.. -lcrypto
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/Makefile
gcc -o ${.TARGET} ${_f} -lrt
/usr/src/tools/test/dtrace/Makefile
c++ -o $@ $ -lpthread
/usr/src/tools/regression/pthread/unwind/Makefile
gcc -c -o elftls.o ${.CURDIR}/elftls.S
gcc -c -o tls-test.o ${.CURDIR}/tls-test-lib.c
gcc $(CFLAGS) -rdynamic -o ttls3 ${.CURDIR}/tls-test.c
/usr/src/tools/regression/tls/ttls3/Makefile
gcc -Wall -o accf_data_attach accf_data_attach.c
/usr/src/tools/regression/sockets/accf_data_attach/Makefile
gcc $(LDFLAGS) $(DLL_LN_OPTS) ./lib/$*$(DLL_TAG).lib \
gcc $(LDFLAGS) $(DLL_LN_OPTS) ./lib/$*$(DLL_TAG).lib \
/usr/src/contrib/ncurses/Makefile.os2
g++ -c $(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_CPPFLAGS) $ $(OUTPUT_OPTION)
g++ -o $@ paranoia.o real.o $(LIBIBERTY)
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/Makefile.in
gcc -o asyncwatch asyncwatch.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o devinfo devinfo.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o device_list device_list.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o rc_pingpong rc_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o srq_pingpong srq_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o uc_pingpong uc_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o ud_pingpong ud_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
/usr/src/contrib/ofed/libibverbs/examples/Makefile
cc -E $$i |\
/usr/src/contrib/libreadline/examples/rlfe/Makefile.in
cc -o test ${.CURDIR}/test.c -lrpcsvc
/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/Makefile
cc -o test test.c -lrpcsvc
/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.statd/Makefile
gcc -g -DSPARC_XXX ${MUL} -o ${.TARGET}
gcc -g -DSPARC_XXX ${DIVREM} -o ${.TARGET}
/usr/src/lib/libc/quad/TESTS/Makefile
cc ${CFLAGS} -static tst01.o -o tst01 libdisk.a
/usr/src/lib/libdisk/Makefile
gcc -g3 msgring.lex.c msgring.yacc.c -o msgring
/usr/src/sys/mips/rmi/Makefile.msgring
ah@abaton:~$ find /usr/src/ -name Makefile\* -exec egrep
'^[[:blank:]]+cpp[[:blank:]]+..' {} \; -print
cpp -DOVLY_IRQ_SAVE $(srcdir)/emultempl/spu_ovl.S spu_ovl.s
/usr/src/contrib/binutils/ld/Makefile.in
cpp -DOVLY_IRQ_SAVE $(srcdir)/emultempl/spu_ovl.S spu_ovl.s
/usr/src/contrib/binutils/ld/Makefile.am
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 + Matthew Seaman articulated: No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project founder and lead developer specifically to work on PC-BSD. Click on the 'Professional PC-BSD Support' link of the PC-BSD menu on the pcbsd.org site, and you will see who it is that provides the paid-for support. Hmmm... actually they might want to look at that, as it returns a 404 page. Nothing instills confidence in a potential client like a broken Support page with the possible exception of calling a telephone number and finding it has been disconnected. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: on purpose or forgotten ? hardcoded compiler in basesystem-makefiles
On 05/03/2012 10:12, Dr. A. Haakh wrote:
a quick search revealed following usages:
Some of the instances you've found are legitimate, some are in upstream
code in contributed software -- the FreeBSD build process may not even
use the Makefiles concerned. But, yes on the whole, I think you're on
to something that needs fixing here.
FreeBSD abaton.Haakh.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 29
13:49:36 CET 2012 t...@abaton.haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABATON
i386
ah@abaton:~$ find /usr/src/ -name Makefile\* -exec egrep
'^[[:blank:]]+[gc+]{2,3}[[:blank:]]+..' {} \; -print
[...]
/usr/src/usr.bin/make/Makefile.dist
gcc -M $(CFLAGS) $(SRC) Makefile.tmp
Although it doesn't seem to appear in the clang(1) man page, clang
supports the -M flag:
lucid-nonsense:/tmp:# clang -M hello.c
hello.o: hello.c /usr/include/stdio.h /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h \
/usr/include/sys/_null.h /usr/include/sys/_types.h \
/usr/include/machine/_types.h
No need for this sort of construct to be gcc specific.
/usr/src/tools/test/dtrace/Makefile
c++ -o $@ $ -lpthread
Not sure about this -- the intent may be to test the default system
compiler -- as of this last weekend you can install clang(1) as
/usr/bin/cc in stable/9, so this isn't necessarily gcc specific.
/usr/src/tools/regression/pthread/unwind/Makefile
gcc -c -o elftls.o ${.CURDIR}/elftls.S
gcc -c -o tls-test.o ${.CURDIR}/tls-test-lib.c
gcc $(CFLAGS) -rdynamic -o ttls3 ${.CURDIR}/tls-test.c
Whereas this looks like an oversight to me.
/usr/src/crypto/openssl/demos/engines/ibmca/Makefile
cc -I../../include divtest.c -o divtest ../../libcrypto.a
cc -g -I../../include bnbug.c -o bnbug ../../libcrypto.a
gcc -I../../include -g2 -ggdb -o exptest exptest.c ../../libcrypto.a
gcc -I.. -g div.c ../../libcrypto.a
/usr/src/crypto holds raw sources imported from upstream; hard-coded
compiler names here is a problem the openssl project should address.
/usr/src/contrib/ncurses/Makefile.os2
g++ -c $(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_CPPFLAGS) $ $(OUTPUT_OPTION)
g++ -o $@ paranoia.o real.o $(LIBIBERTY)
Ditto /usr/src/contrib -- raw upstream sources.
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/Makefile.in
gcc -o asyncwatch asyncwatch.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o devinfo devinfo.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o device_list device_list.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o rc_pingpong rc_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
gcc -o srq_pingpong srq_pingpong.c pingpong.c ${CFLAGS}
... although gcc being hardwired in the gcc sources is probably
intentional and quite legitimate.
I suggest that you repost your question on freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org,
as that will bring it to the attention of the people both interested in
and capable of addressing this sort of problem. Submitting a PR
wouldn't go amiss either.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
On 03/05/12 19:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them a private company. No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project founder and lead developer specifically to work on PC-BSD. Click on the 'Professional PC-BSD Support' link of the PC-BSD menu on the pcbsd.org site, and you will see who it is that provides the paid-for support. Yes, but that is sponsorship. That doesn't make it a company. They don't own it. Unlike Oracle with MySQL, Java, and VBox... Or Citrix and Xen... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.tbz) = 91bc2288130c25704c9f1ac9d2923a6a MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.txz) = a57b6fed2401375562931f3516e1d50b [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh For any x.exe : wine x.exe is generating the following error : err: module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\ ... path ... \\x.exe failed , status c017 where x.exe is in the current directory ( path is correct ) in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 ... GENERIC amd64 Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On 5 March 2012 13:41, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.tbz) = 91bc2288130c25704c9f1ac9d2923a6a MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.txz) = a57b6fed2401375562931f3516e1d50b [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh For any x.exe : wine x.exe is generating the following error : err: module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\ ... path ... \\x.exe failed , status c017 Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. where x.exe is in the current directory ( path is correct ) in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 ... GENERIC amd64 I will try reproduce this when I get $HOME. Regards ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
nsswitch and unavailable backends
Hi. I'm trying to set up LDAP user authentication. I use bet/nss_ldap and security/pam_ldap ports to do this. I'm doing this following the article from the documentation set. Though it's not that complete and misses some very important stuff, I've actually set up the LDAP installations and my users are able to successfully authenticate and log in on my servers. Then I ran into some serious issue. :) When the LDAP server if off/unavailable, users cannot log in - I mean, even the local users. nsswitch.conf: group: files ldap hosts: files dns networks: files passwd: files ldap shells: files services: files protocols: files rpc: files If I remove ldap - all is fine, of course, besides the fact that this breaks the LDAP authentication. I've read the nsswitch manual and saw that I can handle the unavailable LDAP server with some action flags, but the default action is 'continue' already. I also tried the [notfound=return unavail=return tryagain=return] mantra (it's harmless to try since it's the last backup) but this didn't work either. sshd crashes with signal 11, crond does the same. Sad. On a machine running LDAP server the situation is even funnier: the LDAP server, even having a local account to work under, still tries to query himself on start, making the startup impossible. Can this situation be solved ? Right now I remove 'ldap' backend, start the slapd, add ldap backends again and so on. Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 + Matthew Seaman articulated: On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them a private company. No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project founder and lead developer specifically to work on PC-BSD. Click on the 'Professional PC-BSD Support' link of the PC-BSD menu on the pcbsd.org site, and you will see who it is that provides the paid-for support. Hmmm... actually they might want to look at that, as it returns a 404 page. Matthew, is this the URL for iXsystems http://www.ixsystems.com/ that you are referring to? I was examining their company page: http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/about/our-company and they seem quite impressive. Also, the support page URL for PC-BSD: http://www.ixsystems.com/quote-request is now apparently working. Obviously, the above is based on the belief that I am referring to the correct entity to begin with. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On 5 March 2012 13:41, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.tbz) = 91bc2288130c25704c9f1ac9d2923a6a MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6,1.txz) = a57b6fed2401375562931f3516e1d50b [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh For any x.exe : wine x.exe is generating the following error : err: module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\ ... path ... \\x.exe failed , status c017 Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. # pwd /root/APPLY/PROGRAMS # ls -l -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5491200 Feb 17 22:27 x.exe # wine x.exe err : module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\APPLY\\PROGRAMS\\x.exe failed , status c017 -- The whole message is listed above . Desktop environment is KDE4 . Execution is attempted in Konsole Terminal . In GNOME Terminal in KDE4 , the error message is the same . I could not understand the phrase : in a clean wine prefix . - where x.exe is in the current directory ( path is correct ) in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 ... GENERIC amd64 I will try reproduce this when I get $HOME. Regards Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?
On 05/03/2012 12:10, Jerry wrote: Matthew, is this the URL for iXsystems http://www.ixsystems.com/ that you are referring to? Yep. That's the company. I was examining their company page: http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/about/our-company and they seem quite impressive. Also, the support page URL for PC-BSD: http://www.ixsystems.com/quote-request is now apparently working. Ah -- no. The page I was referring to is: http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/pc-bsd-support which is still 404. It's linked to from here: http://www.pcbsd.org/index.php?option=com_zootask=categorycategory_id=85Itemid=62 (bottom of that page) and also also from the PC-PSD pulldown in the menubar at the top of the front page of the site. I did report this through their website, but it's early yet in California, so they won't have had a chance to fix it yet. Obviously, the above is based on the belief that I am referring to the correct entity to begin with. Right company, wrong web page. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
semi OT: correct CIDR block?
With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Correct. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
jcigar@dev ~ % ipcalc 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 deaggregate 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 10.0.0.32/27 (net-mgmt/ipcalc) On 03/05/2012 15:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Robert, Sent to you directly, as I can't get to the fbsd list. Your CIDR is correct. Best, Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On 05/03/2012 14:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff i cheated a bit but looks good http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=10.0.0.32mask1=27mask2= ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546PLEASE NOTE NEW MOBILE e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
Yes. cknipe@amnesiac ~ $ ipcalc 10.0.0.32/27 Address: 10.0.0.321010...001 0 Netmask: 255.255.255.224 = 27 ...111 0 Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 ...000 1 = Network: 10.0.0.32/27 1010...001 0 HostMin: 10.0.0.331010...001 1 HostMax: 10.0.0.621010...001 0 Broadcast: 10.0.0.631010...001 1 Hosts/Net: 30Class A, Private Internet On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Chris Knipe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday, March 05, 2012 at 14:30:01 UTC, roberth...@rcn.com confabulated: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? I use the online IP calculator all the time: http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=10.0.0.32mask1=27mask2= -- If at first you don't succeed... ...so much for skydiving. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Network = 10.0.0.32 Usable IPs = 10.0.0.33 to 10.0.0.62 for 30 Broadcast = 10.0.0.63 Netmask = 255.255.255.224 Wildcard Mask = 0.0.0.31 Looks pretty good to me. Tim Kellers ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port to package amd64 to i386
2012-03-05 10:20, Edward M. skrev: On 03/05/2012 12:42 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package. Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to? http://filipenf.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/cross-compiling-for-x86-in-freebsd-64-bit/ Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of; cd /usr/ports/random port make it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way build it as a package, and all dependencies as packages as well Oh man, man ports. But I do not find the flag -build-for-another-system-cpu-whatever Can the ports system be (ab)used in that way? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port to package amd64 to i386
On 05/03/2012 16:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails
and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of;
cd /usr/ports/random port
make it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way
build it as a package, and all dependencies as packages as well
Oh man, man ports. But I do not find the flag
-build-for-another-system-cpu-whatever
Can the ports system be (ab)used in that way?
In general, no. There may be some ports that you could cross-compile,
but that depends on the upstream software having support for cross
compilation (basically allowing --target foo into the compilation
flags.) Even if you fix that you're going to run into difficulties as
soon as you try and compile a port that depends on shared libraries from
another port. I don't think there's any mechanism for installing 32-bit
shlibs into ${LOCALBASE}/lib32 from packages.
Oh, and making packages is potentially a mine field, as you need to
install the port in order to package it.
About the only way to cross-build ports is to set up a 32-bit jail on a
64-bit host. I believe that is do-able, but I could be delusional.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: port to package amd64 to i386
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:42:58 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. The problem here is that a specific build environment is required. I was thinking more along the line of; cd /usr/ports/random port make it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way build it as a package, and all dependencies as packages as well Again, a problem is that packages can only be generated if the port has been installed, which is the make package task typically following make install, resulting in the desired package in the /usr/ports/packages/ subtree. See man ports regarding the package target. I think that _could_ be overridden by specifying a different, temporary $PREFIX to install to, but I haven't tested this approach. For the dependencies, I think there was a setting to be included in /etc/make.conf... MAKE_DEPENDS=PACKAGE? Something like this will cause all dependencies to be built and archived as a package. Oh man, man ports. But I do not find the flag -build-for-another-system-cpu-whatever Some settings can be transferred to the make environment, usually /etc/make.conf is used. Can the ports system be (ab)used in that way? I don't think it is that easy. :-( -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysinstall
Nikola Pavlović nzp at riseup.net OK, here goes: (in Nelson Muntz's voice) Haha, you clown, that's what you get for believing what documentation says. Use a magnetized needle and a steady hand you buffoon! There. I respect! :) Well played. It's a serious issue for me after 15 years of Windows on the desktop to change environment to FreeBSD. I've reached this point after lengthy deliberation with the intent to change once only. While I consider it disappointing and surprising that man pages are suspect (no doubt most are accurate) the bottom line is the community response which includes man page writers and you and me. Well played there too. Disregarding any hiccups, I'm running FreeBSD on my main machine, I've installed X11 and Gnome and it works better than I could have envisoned - the first video I went to on YouTube played ... roll on HTML5 ... sound works ... Fix my tv card and I'll shut up. :] Best wishes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port to package amd64 to i386
On 05/03/2012 16:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 05/03/2012 16:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of; cd /usr/ports/random port make it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way build it as a package, and all dependencies as packages as well About the only way to cross-build ports is to set up a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host. I believe that is do-able, but I could be delusional. Could you do it in a tinderbox? This thread http://www.marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/2011-June/002177.html discusses it a bit with a possible solution. Things have probably moved on since then which may or may not help. Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. # pwd /root/APPLY/PROGRAMS # wine x.exe err : module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\APPLY\\PROGRAMS\\x.exe failed , status c017 I have tried to reproduce the error on my side but was unable to. The programs that I tested work without error. I was expecting more output from wine... Please see below about using a clean wine prefix. Do you use the nvidia graphics driver? If so please run (as root), and provide the output: # sh /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh If nothing fixes your problem then please submit a bug report at bugs.winehq.org. I could not understand the phrase : in a clean wine prefix . To run a program in a clean wine prefix do: env WINEPREFIX=/tmp/tmp_wine_prefix wine x.exe You may need to use winetricks to install some support programs. Good luck signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. # pwd /root/APPLY/PROGRAMS # wine x.exe err : module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\APPLY\\PROGRAMS\\x.exe failed , status c017 I have tried to reproduce the error on my side but was unable to. The programs that I tested work without error. This means that there are additional parts in your system which they do not exist here . Such parts are not added by pkg_add wine-fbsd64 ... . I do not have any idea about which parts may be missing . I was expecting more output from wine... Please see below about using a clean wine prefix. Do you use the nvidia graphics driver? If so please run (as root), and provide the output: # sh /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh There is NO nvidia grphics driver . It is Intel DG965WH main board with its integrated graphics driver . If nothing fixes your problem then please submit a bug report at bugs.winehq.org. I could not understand the phrase : in a clean wine prefix . To run a program in a clean wine prefix do: env WINEPREFIX=/tmp/tmp_wine_prefix wine x.exe This is NOT changing the error message . Only drive become Z: . You may need to use winetricks to install some support programs. Good luck winetricks could NOT be found . I tried wine which is added by pkg_add -r wine from packages in FreeBSD 9.0 RELEASE i386 as it is installed . On the same programs , the message is the same with amd64 message . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Part-time Positions Available
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY SEEKS FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN TAIWAN Part-time Positions Available. The job is based on administrative/customer service support. Immediate need for customer service representative seeking fun working environment, opportunity for advancement and hands on training provided. Will be responsible for supporting sales team, and resolving customer related issues for consumer product/services company. Great benefits. No money required (we are serious company located in United Kingdom,we will never ask our representatives any money in prior). Salary: - 6000 USD monthly income/part-time job Benefits: - No relocation required - Comprehensive life insurance - Professional, fun and highly motivated work environment - Outstanding benefits/compensation for full-time, permanent associates - Competitive base pay - TAX refund and all travel fees are repaid Please, contact our HR department at benrollan...@hotmail.co.uk if you are interested. With best regards, Ben Rolland. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: sysinstall
On 03/06/12 05:23, David Walker wrote: Nikola Pavlović nzp at riseup.net OK, here goes: (in Nelson Muntz's voice) Haha, you clown, that's what you get for believing what documentation says. Use a magnetized needle and a steady hand you buffoon! There. I respect! :) Well played. It's a serious issue for me after 15 years of Windows on the desktop to change environment to FreeBSD. I've reached this point after lengthy deliberation with the intent to change once only. While I consider it disappointing and surprising that man pages are suspect (no doubt most are accurate) the bottom line is the community response which includes man page writers and you and me. Well played there too. Disregarding any hiccups, I'm running FreeBSD on my main machine, I've installed X11 and Gnome and it works better than I could have envisoned - the first video I went to on YouTube played ... roll on HTML5 ... sound works ... Fix my tv card and I'll shut up. :] What tv card? Mine work fine ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Equine Vaccines offered by Santa Cruz
Are you having trouble viewing this e-mail? [1]Click here to view it from our website. To ensure that you continue receiving emails from us, please add [2]santacruzbiotechnol...@scbt.com to your e-mail address book. [3][USEMAP:email.jpg] Copyright © 2012 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and the Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. logo are registered trademarks of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All content contained in this website is property of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and may be used only with the expressed written permission of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All rights reserved. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. is located at 2145 Delaware Avenue, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA Email: [4]webmas...@scbt.com If you desire to not receive our e-mail bulletins at freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, simply [5]unsubscribe or forward this email message to webmas...@scbt.com. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. References 1. http://www.scbt.com/emails/redirect.php?lang=enpromo=vaccines_20120305date=03/05/2012url=ah_promo.html 2. mailto:santacruzbiotechnol...@scbt.com 3. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmpLBxZQ2.html#cattle 4. mailto:webmas...@scbt.com 5. http://www.scbt.com/email_bulletin.php?eid=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision (mic problem SOLVED)
I just managed to get the mic working built into the camera.
I followed the Sound steps below that are included in pkg-message and
that did the trick.
Hopefully these notes will help others having mic problems with the
Logitech camera.
NOTE: Just before I followed the below steps I did recompile my kernel
to include snd_hda support.
After I finished that task I did try Skype and it did not work.
I mention this just in case if someone is troubleshooting such a problem
and snd_hda might be needed.
Thanks to all the helped,
Sean
2. Sound
Since the OSS interface was removed, Skype now uses linux-alsa compat
packages.
By default you get one device corresponding to your default OSS dsp
device (so
Skype will use it for ringing, incoming voice and mic). If that doesn't suit
needs, you can map the other dsp devices for example by editing
/compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf. You need to (re)start Skype
after you
edit this file in order to get Skype pick up the changes.
Adding the following to the stock file, and then starting Skype and choosing
in Options--Sound Devices: Speakers: oss1
will let you use the second dsp (usually the front panel connectors for your
headphones, while still hearing the call ringing and other notification
on the
first dsp device (presumably the one you connect your speakers to).
pcm.oss1 {
type oss
device /dev/dsp1
hint {
description Open Sound System
}
}
ctl.oss1 {
type oss
device /dev/mixer1
hint {
description Open Sound System
}
}
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision (mic problem SOLVED)
On 03/06/12 11:46, sean wrote:
I just managed to get the mic working built into the camera.
I followed the Sound steps below that are included in pkg-message and
that did the trick.
Hopefully these notes will help others having mic problems with the
Logitech camera.
NOTE: Just before I followed the below steps I did recompile my kernel
to include snd_hda support.
After I finished that task I did try Skype and it did not work.
I mention this just in case if someone is troubleshooting such a
problem and snd_hda might be needed.
Thanks to all the helped,
Sean
2. Sound
Since the OSS interface was removed, Skype now uses linux-alsa compat
packages.
By default you get one device corresponding to your default OSS dsp
device (so
Skype will use it for ringing, incoming voice and mic). If that
doesn't suit
needs, you can map the other dsp devices for example by editing
/compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf. You need to (re)start Skype
after you
edit this file in order to get Skype pick up the changes.
Adding the following to the stock file, and then starting Skype and
choosing
in Options--Sound Devices: Speakers: oss1
will let you use the second dsp (usually the front panel connectors
for your
headphones, while still hearing the call ringing and other
notification on the
first dsp device (presumably the one you connect your speakers to).
pcm.oss1 {
type oss
device /dev/dsp1
hint {
description Open Sound System
}
}
ctl.oss1 {
type oss
device /dev/mixer1
hint {
description Open Sound System
}
}
Alsa was the death of me in linux - a real PITA. That and selinux...
Such a hack to get anything with alsa to work; I thought even linux had
given up on it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [spam] Equine Vaccines offered by Santa Cruz
Anyone offended by this spam to the mailing-list is strongly encouraged to call the company to complain -- TOLL FREE numbers are: U.S.A. 1-800-457-3801 (headquarters) Europe +00800 4573 8000(Germany) Asia (010) 800.40402026 (Japan) Asia 00798.1.1.002.0297 (S. Korea) In North America, using a pay phone costs the toll-free owner over $0.35 when they answer the call. Keep this in mind if you have to call back because of a dropped connection, or other communication problem., There is no doubt the company actually sent the spam. The 'smoking gun' is that their website recognized the email address for an 'unsubscribe' from their mailings. The people that 'need to know' about the 'error of their ways' are the include: John R Stephenson President CEO Ada Popkey Finance director And their Head of Marketing Head of Public Relations or Corporate Communications. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
ipsc, from packages or ports, is very useful. ipsc -gch 10.0.0.32/27 Network class:A Network mask: 255.0.0.0 Network mask (hex): FF00 Network address: 10.0.0.32 Subnet bits: 19 Max subnets: 524288 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Full subnet mask (hex): FFE0 Host bits:5 Hosts per subnet: 32 Bit map: ...sssh IP address: 10.0.0.32 Hexadecimal IP address: A20 Address allocation range: 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Subnet mask: 0.255.255.224 Subnet ID:0.0.0.32 Network ID: 10.0.0.0 Host ID: 0.0.0.32 Cisco Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 CIDR notation:10.0.0.0 /27 Route/Mask: 10.0.0.0 / 255.255.255.224 Hexadecimal route/mask: A00/ FFE0 Supernet max: 0 On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tim Kellers wall...@smsdesign.org wrote: On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Network = 10.0.0.32 Usable IPs = 10.0.0.33 to 10.0.0.62 for 30 Broadcast = 10.0.0.63 Netmask = 255.255.255.224 Wildcard Mask = 0.0.0.31 Looks pretty good to me. Tim Kellers __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Needs GSOC project idea guide.
Hello, I, Punit Tiwari, pursing final year BE(IT) student. Final year project Game Engine: Project Description: Platform Java Application Framework Javafx 2.0 Database DB2 Game Type 2D RPG Game User Any (knows to use computer) Prsently, this game engine build 2d games like mario, countra, for the user who doesn't knows programming language. Please, suggest is this project can be given for GSOC, if not plz suggest me some project idea. Thank you, Punit Tiwari ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 00:01:48 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. # pwd /root/APPLY/PROGRAMS # wine x.exe err : module : LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for LF:\\APPLY\\PROGRAMS\\x.exe failed , status c017 I have tried to reproduce the error on my side but was unable to. The programs that I tested work without error. This means that there are additional parts in your system which they do not exist here . Such parts are not added by pkg_add wine-fbsd64 ... . I do not have any idea about which parts may be missing . It could also mean there are extra components on your computer that are interfering however using a clean wine prefix (as mentioned below) has ruled that out. I was expecting more output from wine... Please see below about using a clean wine prefix. Do you use the nvidia graphics driver? If so please run (as root), and provide the output: # sh /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh There is NO nvidia grphics driver . It is Intel DG965WH main board with its integrated graphics driver . That eliminates my only other idea. If nothing fixes your problem then please submit a bug report at bugs.winehq.org. I could not understand the phrase : in a clean wine prefix . To run a program in a clean wine prefix do: env WINEPREFIX=/tmp/tmp_wine_prefix wine x.exe This is NOT changing the error message . Only drive become Z: . As mentioned above, eliminates possible extra components causing interference. You may need to use winetricks to install some support programs. Good luck winetricks could NOT be found . Please see http://wiki.winehq.org/winetricks for details about winetricks. I tried wine which is added by pkg_add -r wine from packages in FreeBSD 9.0 RELEASE i386 as it is installed . On the same programs , the message is the same with amd64 message . To clarify: you tried running the program under an i386 installation of FreeBSD and wine gave you the same problem? Also, has a previous version of wine ever worked for your program? Could you try installing an older version of wine (the mediafire page contains wine releases going back to 1.3.16). Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?
On 2/28/2012 3:03 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE. I don't think it's a good idea to let what you see on a mailing list be your end all be all of what you use... This isn't an insult or anything, but I've seen some pretty damn stupid people who try to install stuff into Swap And that isn't even close to the stupidest thing I've ever seen on a list. Trust me, the best way to figure out of you personally would benefit from upgrading, is doing it yourself. I use and read these lists, and I admit, sometimes, it's for entertainment value, but again, I've also received more than my share of help from people who DO know WTF they're doing. It doesn't cost you more than a CD or DVD, so why not just download 9 and try it out? I have every version of FreeBSD I've ever downloaded, or paid for, starting with 4.0 back in 2000 or so, and I am now running 9.0 on my main FreeBSD machine, and PC-BSD 8.2 on a Desktop, and PC-BSD 9 on my Laptop. I've had NO issues with any of them. So for whatever it's worth to you; I am using FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE, and I like it. -Allen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
