Sorry top post, not so smartphone.
Do this on your c3750, in privileged mode:
Show ether 1 sum
On 7 Mar 2012, at 05:41, bo wang wowo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
Recently I want to do Link Aggregation for increasing the
speed. I use a Cisco 3750 Switche and two IBM Server R with
On 07/03/2012 01:39, Da Rock wrote:
On 03/07/12 04:13, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se
wrote:
Again, a problem is that packages can only be generated
if the port has been installed
Why is that. I hope you can educate me on that.
Good morning,
Have just sent to freebsd-hackers mailing list the way of doing this.
I say this because perhaps could be useful for someone...
Best regards.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works fine.
Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built into a
dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls modules in that library,
everything works just fine on i386 and AMD64. However, the
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works fine.
Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built into a
dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls modules in that library,
everything works just fine on i386 and
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if
Hello,
Intel AMT Serial over LAN does not work in FreeBSD.
PCI Serial Port device - no driver attached - ttyuX not added to system.
# pciconf
Current:
none1@pci0:0:3:3: class=0x070002 card=0x10048086 chip=0x2e178086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
But should be:
uart0@pci0:0:3:3: class=0x070002
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
...
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if
Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
on an EFI Mac?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 3/6/12 12:30 PM, krad wrote:
apart from a major bump in the version of pf.
Still the old syntax though, what I'm eager for is 10.0 with the upgrade
to 4.8 openbsd PF.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and another
process to vr0:1.
Thanks
Brent
___
On 07/03/2012 14:39, Brent Clark wrote:
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about
ip aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
Yes, you can have alias addresses very easily:
On 03/07/2012 03:39 PM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
What do you want to accomplish?
Processes
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 13:33 +0100, J B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
...
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about
ip aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
Thanks
Brent
Brent,
You can rename an
On 03/07/2012 04:24 PM, Mikel King wrote:
On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
I still have yet to find a resolution to the problems I have had with
binary packages and upgrades on FreeBSD. Binary upgrading is broken with
every tool I have tried.
There is no real reason why FreeBSD should not provide a facility for users
to be able to binary upgrade to the most recent
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:50 AM, tho...@sanbe-farma.com wrote:
Hmm what is the problem ? Is there a log or something that you can share ?
Usually portsnap, freebsd-update, pkg_add -r or portupgrade that do binary
update should be enough
Ive tried them all. I will work on getting some logs to
David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
options and the most commonly used settings into the binary packages, for
the standard i386 CPU.
I think this can develop into
Hmm what is the problem ? Is there a log or something that you can share ?
Usually portsnap, freebsd-update, pkg_add -r or portupgrade that do binary
update should be enough
Regards
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Sinyal Bagus XL, Nyambung Teruuusss...!
-Original Message-
From:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 03/07/2012 04:24 PM, Mikel King wrote:
On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to
Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
implemented in some form long ago. For example, updated applications
are compiled and available online. You can use pkg_add -r to
install the newest binary package that is available, or you can update
your an installed application
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:28 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
I still have yet to find a resolution to the problems I have had with
binary packages and upgrades on FreeBSD. Binary upgrading is broken with
every tool I have tried.
There is no real reason why FreeBSD should not
Carsten Mattner writes:
Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
on an EFI Mac?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by a single boot system.
I have Mac Pro that runs Mac OS on on disk (actually a pair in a
software RAID) and FreeBSD from another pair (gmirror RAID).
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
options and the most commonly used settings into the
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:42 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:
Especially on systems low on resources, compiling from
source is _the_ way to squeeze every required (!) bit
of performance out of code. Even if compiling may require
some time (due to optimization flags), the
I ran into problems with pkg-upgrade when I upgraded from
8.2p6-9.0-RELEASE, and part of the problem ended up being a tool
pkg_upgrade used (uma). That was the reason portupgrade didn't work as
well. I ended up hacking the support tool and pkg_upgrade to do what I
needed, but they are both
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Rob li...@midsummerdream.org wrote:
I ran into problems with pkg-upgrade when I upgraded from
8.2p6-9.0-RELEASE, and part of the problem ended up being a tool
pkg_upgrade used (uma). That was the reason portupgrade didn't work as
well. I ended up hacking the
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
As for compile options, the solution is simple,
This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
users are system administrators, developers or other types of geeks.
Serving these needs is a major part of what FreeBSD does. That's why
we have the long standing motto: FreeBSD - The power to serve.
People who don't want
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
users are system administrators, developers or other types of geeks.
Serving these needs is a major part of what FreeBSD does. That's why
we have
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, George Hartzell hartz...@alerce.com wrote:
Carsten Mattner writes:
Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
on an EFI Mac?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by a single boot system.
I have Mac Pro that runs Mac OS on on disk
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
trouble of compiling will get our binaries. Everyone gets what they
want and is happy, it seems.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
users are system administrators, developers or other types of
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar b...@robotoloco.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
trouble of compiling will
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar b...@robotoloco.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
and
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar b...@robotoloco.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
trouble of compiling
On 7 March 2012, at 01:40, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works
fine. Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built
into a dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls modules
Has there been any movement toward getting BSD Unix systems running on
the Raspberry Pi platform? I've been searching for information along
those lines, but so far have seen nothing.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
One faulty argument I heard was that it is often not a good idea to
upgrade to new software release.
This is an argument that you appear to have completely misunderstood.
The point of suggesting that you use release package is that it's a
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:20:19PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
I think that your statement here is fundamentally flawed and wrong, because
you have assumed that it is impossible for the OS to be able to be user
friendly and geek friendly at the same time. This is wrong. In fact, I have
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote:
You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about 99%
of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less about
compiling source and messing with compiler options.
Maybe FreeBSD
People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet.
The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that
were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due
to the binary blob.
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:35:47PM -0500, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet.
The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that
were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due
to
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:42:52 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com
wrote:
You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about
99%
of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:53:13AM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
All this works just fine on i386. However, when I compile everything on
AMD64 I get an error message that says the lower level library needs to be
compiled with fPIC. If I add that to the Makefile for the lower level
library and
On 07/03/2012 18:56, David Jackson wrote:
You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about 99%
of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less about
compiling source and messing with compiler options.
You're forgetting that one size does *not* fit
---
LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
IfModule mod_fastcgi.c
AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/php -socket
/var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
/IfModule
---
this works for my apache for default virtualhost, yet if i
I see in the tar(1) man-page on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE two options that I would
like to use:
--uid #
--gid #
Naturally, these are used to override the on-disk credentials while creating (or
extracting) an archive.
Problem?
They don't seem to be supported.
% tar cf some_archive.tar --gid 0 --uid
On 04/03/2012 17:37, jb wrote:
Hi,
I find it annoying having same items listed in multiple menus, e.g.
- Accessories - Bulk Rename
Orage Globaltime
Terminal
Thunar File Manager
Help
- Office - Orage Globaltime
- System - Bulk
bo wang wrote:
Thank your for reply.
First,I think the Link Aggregation can't support too much ports
aggregation.So I change the configure, just get together two
ports.Below are configuration information of c3750:
??? Switch#show eth 1 sum Check your eth discriptor this is for Linux
is
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
implemented in some form long ago. For example, updated applications
are compiled and available
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:04:35 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
implemented in some form long ago. For
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:04:35PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
implemented in some form long ago.
On 3/6/12 11:41 PM, bo wang wrote:
Hello:
Recently I want to do Link Aggregation for increasing the
speed. I use a Cisco 3750 Switche and two IBM Server R with BSD
9.0 .I do link aggregation According to this page.
On 03/08/12 12:41, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 04/03/2012 17:37, jb wrote:
Hi,
I find it annoying having same items listed in multiple menus, e.g.
- Accessories - Bulk Rename
Orage Globaltime
Terminal
Thunar File Manager
Help
-
Da Rock freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au writes:
...
What I found is you start by right clicking on the application menu
and show properties where you can change from default to custom file
menu - ~/.config/menus/xfce-applications.menu matches the default and
is an xml
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:04:35PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
implemented in some form long ago.
60 matches
Mail list logo
