On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a system
snapshot can be quickly restored
2012/7/12 Hasse Hansson ha...@thorshammare.org:
Hello all
Needed an extra box today for some experimental use, and serarched my
storeroom.
Found an old Compaq and fired it up. All I changed was the networksettings,
and there it was.
IPv6 connectivity and all. Amasing, last serving 2003.
Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.com writes:
A question I would like to ask, if no one minds.
Whys is Gluster not available in FreeBSD?
It is that Gluster just cant run on FreeBSD, or no one can port it?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS
___
On 07/12/2012 05:47 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a
Lately I have a problem where the ppp connection goes down.
Watching the log I see the following;
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected!
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
On 7/12/2012 10:18 AM, David Banning wrote:
Lately I have a problem where the ppp connection goes down.
Watching the log I see the following;
Jul 12 09:55:13 3s1 ppp[31115]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial
Jul 12 09:55:13 3s1 ppp[31115]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier
Jul 12
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD
9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
your own local mirror (net/cvsup-mirror) as well.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:01 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is a good idea I was actually thinking about this.
I've never done it so I'd need to google around a bit and do some
testing but it is probably what we would want to do!
Install the port, run the setup
On 12 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Kaya Saman wrote:
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that
Hello.
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
LG you may need to bring them in by offline
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the
Hello,
I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
$ ./a.out ::1
host: ::1
read: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6p1 FreeBSD-2010
$ ./a.out
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org wrote:
Hello.
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG silly security policies won't
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that doesn't exist. As we all know
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not
Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS CVSup would be the best way for us and I'm already looking at this:
KS
KS
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same
Hello.
2012/07/12 14:44:48 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Peter Vereshagin :
LG Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
LG
LG 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG LG URLs as well as FTP.
When attempting to upgrade chromium-19.0.1084.56_1 to
chromium-20.0.1132.57 on FreeBSD9.0 (FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386), one of
the patches failed to apply:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
sorry - possibly i missed something.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels.
Yes, these are the same methods that can be used with MBR
Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not
From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS CVSup would be the best way for us
On 07/12/2012 08:13 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
I do infact work for this company and additionally I am one of the
administrators of the company.
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
It
Hello.
2012/07/12 21:26:22 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
KS A Demo? Am I invited for the show? ;-)
KS Something like a Linux repo server if you will - though I mention the
KS term very loosely.
SHould you try with a ixsystems's pcbsd.org then?
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports,
On 2012-07-12 15:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To
Peter Vereshagin :
KS I will check it out however and see if that method is best,
On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
$ ./a.out ::1
host: ::1
While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
experiments with the profiling library.
I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
is that the profiling library is smaller:
# ls -al lib*a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:31:31PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
experiments with the profiling library.
I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
is that the profiling library is smaller:
# ls
From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:38 -0700
Subject: Re: IPv6 getaddrinfo(3C)
On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jul 12 17:34:12 2012
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:31:31 +0100
From: Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
while it contains more symbols. Why?
While
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:52:18 +0100
From: Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
Subject: Re: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
while it contains more symbols. Why?
Also, the library compiled on amd64 has lots more
symbols than if compiled on ia64.
This is _not_
50 matches
Mail list logo