Re: How to donate code
On 17 July 2012 02:16, Виталий Туровец wrote: > Hello, colleagues! > How would one propose some code to current branch? > I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4 > network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this > change to FreeBSD project. > Also i've created a PR with my patch describing what is done and for > what (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169072&cat=), but > maybe there's some other way to somehow push this code for review by > FreeBSD developers? > Thank you a lot and sorry for noobish question :) The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't get lost. Be aware that the latency for some patches could be longer than you expect. :( FWIW "unified diff" format patches are much preferred. (diff -u) -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Good catch, totally missed it. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727755.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach wrote: > Or vi in place. > > Really, it always surprises me there's > no vi available in single user mode. > There is /rescue/vi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
That's substantial "if", no? But in this case, yes, I should have mounted fs maybe. But really didn't know what to expect. Thanks for help again. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727720.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
-Original Message- From: Jakub Lach Or vi in place. Really, it always surprises me there's no vi available in single user mode. If machine is mostly sane, why not just "mount -a" upon entering single user? -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Or vi in place. Really, it always surprises me there's no vi available in single user mode. vi 352k, ed 54k. And I bet some historical vi could be smaller still. ...but I have nothing against ed, I simply never memorized how to use it properly. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727716.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach wrote: > Initially dropped to single user mode, but when > I saw ED(1) I reconsidered and dusted off trusty > LiveCD :) > > Thanks. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727712.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ed is OK if you have access to another machine with internet access - the wiki article tells how to use it, and it isn't hard when you know how. With single-user mode only, not so easy... A very crude README that gives the basics, that is accessible in single user mode, might be quite useful. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Initially dropped to single user mode, but when I saw ED(1) I reconsidered and dusted off trusty LiveCD :) Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727712.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Apache vs. nginx
Thanks, Chuck. That's very useful input. --On July 17, 2012 10:40:30 AM -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone on this list has switched from Apache to nginx. If you have, what has your experience been like? Was the change relatively easy? (I'm not intimidated by technical details. I've been running FreeBSD on these servers for about 12 years now.) Was the performance better? (We've not been having any problems with Apache to this point.) Is there sufficient support from addon apps to run a site with a php-driven forum? I've compared them; since I know Apache...rather well, switching to nginx didn't strike me as a useful change at any of the sites for which I've setup or managed their webservers. You have to invoke external scripts like a PHP forum via FastCGI (what nginx calls ngx_http_fastcgi_module); using and tuning FastCGI separately from the webserver itself definitely has some advantages, but those same advantages can be obtained in Apache by using mod_fcgi instead of using mod_php directly. Apache is bulkier per process than nginx but has more modules and config options available for it; nginx seems to have been tuned more for server farms hosting a lot of low-volume vanity domains, so it has minimal overhead, implements IP-based and name-based virtual hosting eloquently, implements bandwidth rate controls as a core functionality, etc. I cannot recall encountering a circumstance where the base performance of the webserver itself turned out to be the primary criterion for "website performance"; sites are almost always constrained by bandwidth and/or the performance of the dynamic scripts, database backend, etc-- and not by the webserver's ability to serve static resources. Regards, -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
El día Tuesday, July 17, 2012 a las 07:01:28PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió: > > whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message > > appears > > saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the site is practically > > unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect. > > > i don't think it is freebsd related question. fully agreed; and: what is Twitter at all? matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
If remember correctly, accessing single user mode here requires root password, but will it use login.conf? Killing init is not solution (I think I lack privileges as user anyway, remember I can't su account) because I'm running KMS patches and will not see anything (lacking visible system console output). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727686.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
-Original Message- From: Lowell Gilbert I just saw on the ports list that it has just been fixed. Looks like a typo in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. Sorry for doubting you... No worries, was pretty stumped myself for a while there. Time to subscribe to ports@ too then I reckon. -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
Surely SpinRite is "more clever" than that, i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better You continue to demonsteate that you "don't know what you don't know". are you another sponsored by some "recovery tool" commercial producer? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the site is practically unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect. i don't think it is freebsd related question. anyway - use firefox 10.0.0.5-esr from ports. It just works(R). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
Jakub Lach writes: > 1. Hope I can still log in single user mode and correct > /etc/login.conf? I'm afraid of md5 -> sha512 change. It's not a problem. New passwords will be created with SHA512, but old ones in MD5 (or, for that matter, DES or Bluefish or several other formats listed in crypt(3)) will still work. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
"Reko Turja" writes: > Ghost in the machine? :D I just saw on the ports list that it has just been fixed. Looks like a typo in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. Sorry for doubting you... Good luck. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Nasty reference loop in login.conf
-Original Message- From: Jakub Lach Moreover I'm afraid to power down machine, as currently I'm logged as wheel group user, and I'm not sure if change from :passwd_format=md5:\ to :passwd_format=sha512:\ didn't complicate it further... Currently all my solutions would require to power down machine, which I'm afraid to do frankly. 1. Hope I can still log in single user mode and correct /etc/login.conf? I'm afraid of md5 -> sha512 change. 2. Use some LiveCD and correct login.conf, then run /usr/bin/cap_mkdb . Killing init - means that you drop to singleuser mode kill -TERM 1 End result may depend on whether or not your singleuser mode is password protected. -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Nasty reference loop in login.conf
It's my fault. I'm running 9-STABLE. During mergemaster run, I forgot to add localised settings to login.conf. No problem I thought, then I edited login.conf by hand before running /usr/bin/cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf. By sloppy paste, I accidentally created :tc=default: loop in default:\. Now, of course I cannot login as anybody nor use sudo. e.g. login_getclass: 'tc=' reference loop 'root' su: pam_acct_mgmt: error in service module sudo: login_getclass: 'tc=' reference loop 'default' Moreover I'm afraid to power down machine, as currently I'm logged as wheel group user, and I'm not sure if change from :passwd_format=md5:\ to :passwd_format=sha512:\ didn't complicate it further... Currently all my solutions would require to power down machine, which I'm afraid to do frankly. 1. Hope I can still log in single user mode and correct /etc/login.conf? I'm afraid of md5 -> sha512 change. 2. Use some LiveCD and correct login.conf, then run /usr/bin/cap_mkdb . Has anybody have other ideas? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
From: Fernando Apesteguía Did you see a message like "Found saved configuration for $port"? On perl, which I configured manually, but on others please see later in the message. Did you try to see what happens if you run "make rmconfig" on those ports? ===> No user-specified options configured for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 From: Lowell Gilbert Strange indeed. What does "make config" do on this system? Opens dialog & saves config as intended Maybe you have something in your environment? Environment seems to be vanilla. Seems like building skips config step altogether, or not echoing about it at least: ---> Reinstalling 'ruby-1.8.7.370,1' (lang/ruby18) ---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/ruby18' ===> Cleaning for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 ===> Extracting for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.7-p370.tar.bz2. /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/dl/h2rb /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/bin/ ===> Patching for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/Win32API /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/win32ole /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/gdbm /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/iconv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/ext/tk /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ ===> ruby-1.8.7.370,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake-1.12 - found ===> ruby-1.8.7.370,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 - found ===> Configuring for ruby-1.8.7.370,1 /usr/bin/touch /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.7-p370/configure checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd9 portupgrade -afc skips config step as well portupgrade -afC gives the dialogs Ghost in the machine? :D -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
"Reko Turja" writes: > -Original Message- > From: Lowell Gilbert > >> The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. >> Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether >> /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports. > > That's the strange thing... Virgin system, just updated ports tree and > index & started building. No knobs in make.conf and /var/db/ports is > empty... Strange indeed. What does "make config" do on this system? Maybe you have something in your environment? > I wonder if there's some kind of hickup going on at cvsup.se.freebsd.org... I can't think of anything along those lines which would explain these symptoms. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
Hello Greg! I ran into this problem with FF13 on OS X over the weekend, and I fixed it with a suggestion I found somewhere online: Open the about:config preference pane in FF. Change the http.keep-alive property to "true", and you should be all set. Thanks for the suggestion. I actually saw this recommendation while searching for solution, but in my case network.http.keep-alive was already set to true. Another suggestion was to set 'network.http.spdy.enabled' to 'false', which I did, but this also didn't help. -- Toomas Aas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Reko Turja wrote: > -Original Message- From: Lowell Gilbert > > >> The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. >> Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether >> /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports. > > > That's the strange thing... Virgin system, just updated ports tree and index > & started building. No knobs in make.conf and /var/db/ports is empty... Strange really... Did you see a message like "Found saved configuration for $port"? Did you try to see what happens if you run "make rmconfig" on those ports? > > I wonder if there's some kind of hickup going on at cvsup.se.freebsd.org... > > -Reko > > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
-Original Message- From: Lowell Gilbert The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports. That's the strange thing... Virgin system, just updated ports tree and index & started building. No knobs in make.conf and /var/db/ports is empty... I wonder if there's some kind of hickup going on at cvsup.se.freebsd.org... -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
"Reko Turja" writes: > I just installed new 9.0 machine from scratch, cvsupped ports, fetched > index and started building portupgrade. Both perl and ruby built with > default options, without running config. No changes in port building > steps nor workaround for this POLA violation anywhere in the UPDATING > etc. as far as I could see. > > Is there workarounds or information how to get ports building the old > way with asking options? The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ports building automatically with default options?
I just installed new 9.0 machine from scratch, cvsupped ports, fetched index and started building portupgrade. Both perl and ruby built with default options, without running config. No changes in port building steps nor workaround for this POLA violation anywhere in the UPDATING etc. as far as I could see. Is there workarounds or information how to get ports building the old way with asking options? -Reko ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
On 07/17/12 14:48, Greg Larkin wrote: On 7/17/12 7:56 AM, Toomas Aas wrote: I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running 8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the site is practically unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect. Various support sites say that this may be a problem with Firefox extensions or plugins, or some difficult-to-find problem which may be worked around by clearing cache and cookies, or trying with a new Firefox profile. For testing, I have disabled all extensions and plugins. I have also tried moving my ~/.mozilla directory out of the way so that new empty profile is created. None of this has helped. The fact that this is happening on two totally different machines is leading me to think that maybe this is some peculiarity in a way that Firefox is compiled on FreeBSD, so I decided to ask if anyone else is seeing this. When updating Firefox to 13.0.1, I didn't change any port configuration options from what I was using previously: cat /var/db/ports/firefox/options # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for firefox-13.0.1,1 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=DBUS PGO DEBUG LOGGING OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DBUS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PGO OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DEBUG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LOGGING OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS Hi Toomas, I ran into this problem with FF13 on OS X over the weekend, and I fixed it with a suggestion I found somewhere online: Open the about:config preference pane in FF. Change the http.keep-alive property to "true", and you should be all set. Hope that helps, My FF 13.0.1 shows true as the default state for network.http.keep_alive ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Jails on FreeBSD 9.0
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > With pf: > > I see the packets going out/coming in on fxp0 but somehow the jail > does not "see" them. Running 'nc 173.194.35.177 80" 'pfctl -ss' shows: all tcp xx.xxx.xx.xxx:54724 (192.168.1.1:30177) -> 173.194.35.177:80 ESTABLISHED:SYN_SENT tcpdump on pflog0 shows : 16:32:28.489495 rule 11..16777216/0(match): pass out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 13114581 ecr 0], length 0 16:32:28.499804 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463073042 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:28.893420 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463073436 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:29.494073 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463074036 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:30.695744 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463075237 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:31.489462 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 13117581 ecr 0], length 0 16:32:31.500226 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463076040 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:33.098531 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463077639 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:34.689460 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 13120781 ecr 0], length 0 16:32:34.699834 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463079239 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:37.889462 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0 16:32:37.899648 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463082437 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:37.906102 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463082444 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:41.089474 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0 16:32:41.100282 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463085636 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 16:32:44.289462 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat out on fxp0: xx.xxx.xx.xxx.54724 > 173.194.35.177.80: Flags [S], seq 3219071188, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0 16:32:44.300060 rule 0..16777216/0(match): nat in on fxp0: 173.194.35.177.80 > 192.168.1.1.30177: Flags [S.], seq 3667423105, ack 3219071189, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1463088834 ecr 13114581,nop,wscale 6], length 0 What's wrong? In the meantime I've found kern/164271. Regards, Herbert ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Apache vs. nginx
I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone on this list has switched from Apache to nginx. If you have, what has your experience been like? Was the change relatively easy? (I'm not intimidated by technical details. I've been running FreeBSD on these servers for about 12 years now.) Was the performance better? (We've not been having any problems with Apache to this point.) Is there sufficient support from addon apps to run a site with a php-driven forum? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/17/12 7:56 AM, Toomas Aas wrote: > Hello! > > I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running > 8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox > from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in > but after that a message appears saying that "Twitter.com is > loading slowly", and the site is practically unusable - clicking on > any of the links has no effect. > > Various support sites say that this may be a problem with Firefox > extensions or plugins, or some difficult-to-find problem which may > be worked around by clearing cache and cookies, or trying with a > new Firefox profile. > > For testing, I have disabled all extensions and plugins. I have > also tried moving my ~/.mozilla directory out of the way so that > new empty profile is created. None of this has helped. The fact > that this is happening on two totally different machines is leading > me to think that maybe this is some peculiarity in a way that > Firefox is compiled on FreeBSD, so I decided to ask if anyone else > is seeing this. > > When updating Firefox to 13.0.1, I didn't change any port > configuration options from what I was using previously: cat > /var/db/ports/firefox/options # This file is auto-generated by > 'make config'. # Options for firefox-13.0.1,1 > _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=DBUS PGO DEBUG LOGGING > OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DBUS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PGO > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DEBUG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LOGGING > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS > Hi Toomas, I ran into this problem with FF13 on OS X over the weekend, and I fixed it with a suggestion I found somewhere online: Open the about:config preference pane in FF. Change the http.keep-alive property to "true", and you should be all set. Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAFbSwACgkQ0sRouByUApCeEACfbPTah7xWhOUs/KaVp+1Ro409 ryQAoJSPTTfYdrL7UV7NtxvL+egZXnqF =BAb3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: KVM attach drive to FreeBSD guest
On 17/07/2012 13:58, Brent Clark wrote: virsh: attach-disk freenas /space/morespace.img vdb Hiya After much googling, I found the following on libvirt mailinglist (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-November/msg00796.html) So the command is virsh: attach-disk freenas /space/morespace.img sdb (as opposed to vdb) HTH Regards Brent Clark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Toomas Aas wrote: Hello! I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running 8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the site is practically unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect. If you do not know that there is something in firefox (now 13ish) which you must have, deinstall it and install firefox-esr (now 10ish). Apparently firefox is bleeding-edge and might better be called firefox-devel. The stable version is in firefox-esr. I haven't found anything that is mission-critical to me that is missing from esr. Everything works, except the linux-flash on flowplayer sites using js, but that is a 12ish linux-flash bug, not firefox. Sites using flowplayer without js work fine. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
KVM attach drive to FreeBSD guest
Hiya Im running FreeNas on a KVM guest. I need to add (attach) a virtual drive. I run: qemu-img create -f qcow2 morespace.img 10G virsh: attach-disk freenas /space/morespace.img vdb I restart the FreeNas guest, but the spare drive is not shown on 'gpart list or show' To make extra sure, I did the same steps for a Debian guest. The attached drive is available. So I can only assume this is a FreeBSD issue. Anyone know how to attach a drive to a FreeBsD KVM guest? Kind Regards Brent Clark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
"Twitter.com is loading slowly" after updating to Firefox 13.0.1
Hello! I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running 8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears saying that "Twitter.com is loading slowly", and the site is practically unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect. Various support sites say that this may be a problem with Firefox extensions or plugins, or some difficult-to-find problem which may be worked around by clearing cache and cookies, or trying with a new Firefox profile. For testing, I have disabled all extensions and plugins. I have also tried moving my ~/.mozilla directory out of the way so that new empty profile is created. None of this has helped. The fact that this is happening on two totally different machines is leading me to think that maybe this is some peculiarity in a way that Firefox is compiled on FreeBSD, so I decided to ask if anyone else is seeing this. When updating Firefox to 13.0.1, I didn't change any port configuration options from what I was using previously: cat /var/db/ports/firefox/options # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for firefox-13.0.1,1 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=DBUS PGO DEBUG LOGGING OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DBUS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PGO OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DEBUG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LOGGING OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS -- Toomas Aas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Jul 16 01:17:33 2012 > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:13 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar > To: Polytropon > Cc: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem? > > > read attempts. In worst case, there will be "gaps" in the > > result. > > > >Surely SpinRite is "more clever" than that, > i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better You continue to demonsteate that you "don't know what you don't know". ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > >> It appears I was mistaken. > > > > Care to elaborate? Most people on this list seem to speak highly of > > SpinRite. > > first - it is off topic. > second - because all commercial software like that are designed for > uneducated user, mostly try to automatically do everything. Which is > a danger not help. I love reading your posts first thing in the morning Wojciech. After having read them I have assured myself that I cannot possible read anything more asinine for the rest of the day. Your replies are as sour as verjuice and of even less usefulness. To call you an incorrigible malcontent would be to simply state the obvious. Your spiel is abstruse, rarely on topic and totally self serving. You continue to cast aspersions and heap maledictions upon any who dare to disagree with you. Quite frankly, your postings are about as useful as "tits on a bull". It is with great pleasure that I am creating a kill filter to bounce anymore such mail from you that I should be so unfortunate as to receive. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
On 07/17/2012 11:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: It appears I was mistaken. Care to elaborate? Most people on this list seem to speak highly of SpinRite. first - it is off topic. second - because all commercial software like that are designed for uneducated user, mostly try to automatically do everything. Which is a danger not help. Hi This is an old story. You can look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpinRite and the talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ASpinRite http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/steve-gibson-is-a-fraud/ I have never used this "tool" because dd has always sufficed. Even with an almost end of hardware life (takketaketakke noise generating) disk I have been able to create an image (even with hitting the disk case because heads got stuck) and rescue data from it with plain dd. This has been more then 8 years ago, since then I make sure to always have multiple good back-ups Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Jails on FreeBSD 9.0
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Kalle Møller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, joris dedieu >> wrote: >>> 2012/7/12 Herbert J. Skuhra : On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Hi, > > although I've followed the instructions in jail(8) and jail.conf(5) I > cannot manage to setup jails on FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE (r238334). > > The symptons: > > * ssh'ing to jail works, but it takes about 20 seconds until password > prompt appears >>> >>> Does it still the same with UseDNS=no in /etc/ssh/sshd_config ? >> >> No, I can login instantly. >> > * netstat -r in the jail takes about 150 seconds to finish >>> >>> Does netstat -rn does the same ? >> >> No, the output appears immediately. >> > * connections to the internet time out; with tcpdump I see that > packets leave and enter the public interface on the host, but never > reach the jail > > I use lo1 interface and ip address 192.168.1.1/24 for the jail. Public > interface is fxp0 with both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address assigned. > Of course, nat is enable via pf on the public interface. >>> >>> Can you post your PF configuration ? After switching to ipfw/natd networking in the jail works. Could this be a bug? >>> >>> I think you had an issue with firewall that block name resolution and >>> makes everything goes slow. At least you need one single line on your >>> pf.conf : >>> >>> nat on $public_interface form $jail_ip to any -> ($public_interface) >> >> Even when loading only the nat rule it doesn't work: >> >> nat on fxp0 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any -> $ext_addr >> >> Thanks. >> Herbert > > > As Mark Felder wrote > > You don't have anything in /etc/resolv.conf, in the jail do you? :-) I have two nameservers listed! If I boot a kernel with ipfirewall/ipdivert and run natd the network in the jail works! With pf: I see the packets going out/coming in on fxp0 but somehow the jail does not "see" them. A 'dig www.google.com' in the jail fails with "connection timed out; no servers could be reached", but 11:39:45.30 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.64452 > google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain: 10794+ A? www.google.com. (32) 11:39:45.694045 IP google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain > xxx.yyy.zzz.64452: 10794 6/0/0 CNAME www.l.google.com., A 173.194.35.177, A 173.194.35.176, A 173.194.35.179, A 173.194.35.180, A 173.194.35.178 (132) 11:39:50.667799 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.64452 > google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain: 10794+ A? www.google.com. (32) 11:39:50.687083 IP google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain > xxx.yyy.zzz.64452: 10794 6/0/0 CNAME www.l.google.com., A 173.194.35.177, A 173.194.35.178, A 173.194.35.179, A 173.194.35.180, A 173.194.35.176 (132) 11:39:55.668783 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.64452 > google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain: 10794+ A? www.google.com. (32) 11:39:55.675917 IP google-public-dns-a.google.com.domain > xxx.yyy.zzz.64452: 10794 6/0/0 CNAME www.l.google.com., A 173.194.35.180, A 173.194.35.177, A 173.194.35.179, A 173.194.35.176, A 173.194.35.178 (132) And 'nc 173.194.35.177 80': 11:41:52.176904 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445658553 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:41:53.382320 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445659753 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:41:54.088585 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.56936 > muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http: Flags [S], seq 2143442670, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 8596173 ecr 0], length 0 11:41:54.098838 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445660466 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:41:55.796638 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445662155 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:41:57.288596 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.56936 > muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http: Flags [S], seq 2143442670, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 8599373 ecr 0], length 0 11:41:57.299125 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445663650 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:42:00.488595 IP xxx.yyy.zzz.56936 > muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http: Flags [S], seq 2143442670, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0 11:42:00.498606 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 2143442671, win 14180, options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 1445666834 ecr 8593173,nop,wscale 6], length 0 11:42:00.621724 IP muc03s02-in-f17.1e100.net.http > xxx.yyy.zzz.56936: Flags [S.], seq 1156402837, ack 214
Re: How to donate code
Le Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:16:12 +0300, Виталий Туровец a écrit : Hello, > Hello, colleagues! > How would one propose some code to current branch? > I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4 > network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this > change to FreeBSD project. > Also i've created a PR with my patch describing what is done and for > what (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169072&cat=), but > maybe there's some other way to somehow push this code for review by > FreeBSD developers? You may post to freebsd-current@ or freebsd-hacker@ mailing lists. A PR is always a good thing for the record. Regards. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
It appears I was mistaken. Care to elaborate? Most people on this list seem to speak highly of SpinRite. first - it is off topic. second - because all commercial software like that are designed for uneducated user, mostly try to automatically do everything. Which is a danger not help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
How to donate code
Hello, colleagues! How would one propose some code to current branch? I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4 network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this change to FreeBSD project. Also i've created a PR with my patch describing what is done and for what (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169072&cat=), but maybe there's some other way to somehow push this code for review by FreeBSD developers? Thank you a lot and sorry for noobish question :) -- ~~~ WBR, Vitaliy Turovets Systems Administrator Corebug.Net +38(093)265-70-55 VITU-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Jails on FreeBSD 9.0
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, joris dedieu wrote: >> 2012/7/12 Herbert J. Skuhra : >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra >>> wrote: Hi, although I've followed the instructions in jail(8) and jail.conf(5) I cannot manage to setup jails on FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE (r238334). The symptons: * ssh'ing to jail works, but it takes about 20 seconds until password prompt appears >> >> Does it still the same with UseDNS=no in /etc/ssh/sshd_config ? > > No, I can login instantly. > * netstat -r in the jail takes about 150 seconds to finish >> >> Does netstat -rn does the same ? > > No, the output appears immediately. > * connections to the internet time out; with tcpdump I see that packets leave and enter the public interface on the host, but never reach the jail I use lo1 interface and ip address 192.168.1.1/24 for the jail. Public interface is fxp0 with both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address assigned. Of course, nat is enable via pf on the public interface. >> >> Can you post your PF configuration ? >>> >>> After switching to ipfw/natd networking in the jail works. >>> Could this be a bug? >> >> I think you had an issue with firewall that block name resolution and >> makes everything goes slow. At least you need one single line on your >> pf.conf : >> >> nat on $public_interface form $jail_ip to any -> ($public_interface) > > Even when loading only the nat rule it doesn't work: > > nat on fxp0 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any -> $ext_addr > > Thanks. > Herbert > ___ > freebsd-j...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" As Mark Felder wrote You don't have anything in /etc/resolv.conf, in the jail do you? :-) -- Med Venlig Hilsen Kalle R. Møller ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
