long at rule.lv writes:
Dear all,
I stumbled upon a problem where multiple pipe redirection occasionally get
stuck when trying to get sha256 sum of a stream.
You can try to reproduce the problem if you have /usr/ports/shells/bash
installed (output redirection used in this command is
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
Carlos Griffith
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:28 AM, ksg k...@teleguam.net wrote:
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
Carlos Griffith
Yes it will.
You'll want the amd64 version, likely.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:28:58 +1000, ksg wrote:
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
There's basically nothing that would speak against it.
You could use amd64 for this one (as it is a 64 Bit CPU),
and you probably have more than enough RAM to justify. :-)
I came across the wiki doc for ipfwNG (http://wiki.freebsd.org/IpfwNg)
and wondered if any of the concepts of this project are currently
being developed for FreeBSD and when we might start seeing those
concepts included in releng/ code.
--
Take care
Rick Miller
Hi All,
Does anyone have any experience booting FreeBSD via gPXE and have
pointers to relevant documentation and/or blog posts?
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone have any experience booting FreeBSD via gPXE and have
pointers to relevant documentation and/or blog posts?
In the last paragraph of our description of PXE booting FreeBSD:
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/FreeBSD-diskless.html
Hey Rick,
I've managed to setup an gPXE boot where a
diskless client booted OpenSUSE over AoE
from a FreeBSD server. Not exactly what you
want, yet the setup is mostly the same for all
OS's...
My main source of info came from this site:
http://etherboot.org/wiki/howtos
greets
Arno Beekman
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone have any experience booting FreeBSD via gPXE and have
pointers to relevant documentation and/or blog posts?
In the last paragraph of our
On 2012-12-01 03:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 30 November 2012 20:44, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
On 2012-11-29 14:07, dweimer wrote:
On 2012-11-29 12:53, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:43 PM, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
I was trying to setup a test of CARP on
About 20 years ago, I saw some code in which you
verified whether or not a process was running by giving it a
kill -0 command. If the process was running, nothing happened to
it but your kill -0 command exited with a 0 status. If there was
no process with that PID, the kill command exited
Subject: Safe Way to Tell if Process is Running
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:39:41 -0600
From: Martin McCormick mar...@dc.cis.okstate.edu
About 20 years ago, I saw some code in which you
verified whether or not a process was running by giving it a
kill -0 command. If the process was
On 03/12/2012 22:10, Walter Hurry wrote:
I think there's a problem with 'pkg info' irrespective of how the package
is built.
$ pkg info -s -F gcc-4.6.4.20121123.txz
gcc-4.6.4.20121123 flat size is: 0 B
gcc-4.6.4.20121123 package size is: 0 B
$ pkg query -F gcc-4.6.4.20121123.txz %sh
567
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Rick Miller wrote:
Does anyone have any experience booting FreeBSD via gPXE and have
pointers to relevant documentation and/or blog posts?
gpxelinux.0 is what I've used in my PXE article. The latest version I
tried was from SYSLINUX 4.04. gPXE is loaded as a secondary
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the
next release. Was already fixed in master.
Thanks!
Does that fix 'pkg info' reporting zero size, or the 'pkg update'
misreporting of size difference, or both?
On 04/12/2012 20:42, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the
next release. Was already fixed in master.
Thanks!
Does that fix 'pkg info' reporting zero size, or the 'pkg update'
Robert Bonomi writes:
'man 2 kill' tells all.
I believe that is the first or second time I have used
Section 2. I appreciate the reminder. It looks like ps -p ###
/dev/null appears to do what I need without producing output
ps -p 54321 /dev/null date ran the date command if there was
Robert Bonomi writes:
'man 2 kill' tells all.
I believe that is the first or second time I have used
Section 2. I appreciate the reminder. It looks like ps -p ###
/dev/null appears to do what I need without producing output
ps -p 54321 /dev/null date ran the date command if there was
I have another minor issue with pkgng:
Say package foo-1.0 depends on bar-1.0. Then bar-1.0 is upgraded to
version 1.1.
So a new package bar-1.1 is built (from the port), and replaces bar-1.0
in the repository. The repository database is then updated using 'pkg
repo'.
Now the repository
Rick Miller wrote:
Does anyone have any experience booting FreeBSD via gPXE and have
pointers to relevant documentation and/or blog posts?
I use mfsBSD (http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/) and pxelinux.
DEFAULT boot/menu.c32
PROMPT 0
TIMEOUT 0
MENU TITLE network boot menu - FreeBSD
LABEL ^1 - mfsBSD 8.2
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:50:38 -0600
Martin McCormick mar...@x.it.okstate.edu wrote:
Robert Bonomi writes:
'man 2 kill' tells all.
I believe that is the first or second time I have used
Section 2. I appreciate the reminder. It looks like ps -p ###
/dev/null appears to do what I need
On 04/12/2012 20:48, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/12/2012 20:42, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the
next release. Was already fixed in master.
Thanks!
Does that fix 'pkg info'
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:10:41 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/12/2012 20:48, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/12/2012 20:42, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the
next release. Was
On 04/12/2012 20:52, Walter Hurry wrote:
I have another minor issue with pkgng:
Say package foo-1.0 depends on bar-1.0. Then bar-1.0 is upgraded to
version 1.1.
So a new package bar-1.1 is built (from the port), and replaces bar-1.0
in the repository. The repository database is then
Hi all,
I remember one time seeing a site that explained why soft-updates was
not enabled for the root filesystem. I tried looking for it earlier,
but failed to locate it. Is there someone who knows where it is?
--
Rick
--
Sent from my mobile device
Take care
Rick Miller
On 12/04/12 22:50, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi all,
I remember one time seeing a site that explained why soft-updates was
not enabled for the root filesystem. I tried looking for it earlier,
but failed to locate it. Is there someone who knows where it is?
--
Rick
Hi Rick
Maybe in the FAQ?
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:50:42 -0500
Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
Hi all,
I remember one time seeing a site that explained why soft-updates was
not enabled for the root filesystem. I tried looking for it earlier,
but failed to locate it. Is there someone who knows where it is?
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:32:19 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This is a flaw in your package repository maintenance process.
Helpful and detailed response snipped for brevity
Thanks. Noted. I shall rethink the process accordingly.
___
On 03/12/2012 07:42, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:16 AM, John free...@growveg.net wrote:
Hello list,
At the moment, I get sources via a line like this:
svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/ /usr/src
That one should give you 9.1-RELEASE.
thanks for
On 12/04/12 20:47, John wrote:
On 03/12/2012 07:42, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:16 AM, John free...@growveg.net wrote:
Hello list,
At the moment, I get sources via a line like this:
svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/ /usr/src
That one should give
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Reed Loefgren rloefg...@forethought.net wrote:
I re-built my home and work machines to 9.1-RELEASE today and tonight a
lap top is next, all using the same URL for svn. They all have a
different revision number: Home machine is r243863M, work machine is
r243864M
31 matches
Mail list logo
