Hello,
I used netstat -i for the first time and I saw something I cannot
understand:
# netstat -ibh -I em1
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Opkts
em19000 00:0e:0c:5c:32:29 92M 129M
em19000 10.41.170/24 ufo2000 924K 926K
I understand that th
On 2012/12/06 11:28, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/12/06 07:07, Marco Steinbach wrote:
Hi there,
grep(1) does not seem to skip FIFOs when told to.
I think you need a patch to fix it, the bug is in ggrep, it tries to
open a FIFO before checking if it is a FIFO, then blocked.
http://people.freebsd
On 2012/12/06 07:07, Marco Steinbach wrote:
Hi there,
grep(1) does not seem to skip FIFOs when told to.
I think you need a patch to fix it, the bug is in ggrep, it tries to
open a FIFO before checking if it is a FIFO, then blocked.
http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/grep.c.diff
_
--On December 5, 2012 7:01:21 PM -0600 Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
On 12/05/2012 06:35 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
I am working with an institution that tod
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 6 Dec 2012, at 00:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> > sudo chown root:wheel my_naughty_script
> > sudo chmod 700 my_naughty script
> > sudo ./my_naughty_script
> >
> > The sudo log will note that I ran the script, but no
On 12/05/2012 06:35 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
escalation
on their servers via v
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
>>> escalation
>>> on their servers via very specific sudo rul
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
escalation
on their servers via very specific sudo rules. The problem is that the
administrators can do 'sudo su -'.
sudo is m
On 12/05/2012 05:42 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6 Dec 2012, at 00:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
sudo chown root:wheel my_naughty_script
sudo chmod 700 my_naughty script
sudo ./my_naughty_script
The sudo log will note that I ran the script, but not what it did.
wow, way
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
> escalation
> on their servers via very specific sudo rules. The problem is that the
> administrators can do 'sudo su -'.
sudo is misconfigured.
man 5 sudoers and man
On 6 Dec 2012, at 00:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> sudo chown root:wheel my_naughty_script
> sudo chmod 700 my_naughty script
> sudo ./my_naughty_script
>
> The sudo log will note that I ran the script, but not what it did.
>
>
wow, way to complicate matters.
sudo csh
> So
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> This is a little bit outside the strict boundaries of a FreeBSD question,
> but I am hoping someone in this community has solved this problem and
> that I might be able to adapt it for non-FreeBSD systems (AIX and Linux,
> specifically).
>
> P
This is a little bit outside the strict boundaries of a FreeBSD question,
but I am hoping someone in this community has solved this problem and
that I might be able to adapt it for non-FreeBSD systems (AIX and Linux,
specifically).
I am working with an institution that today provides limited priv
Hi there,
grep(1) does not seem to skip FIFOs when told to.
coco@probsd:~
uname -a
FreeBSD probsd.c0c0.intra 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0 r243477: Sat Nov 24
11:07:17 CET 2012 root@x2.c0c0.intra:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GATEKEEPER i386
coco@probsd:~
mkfifo bleh
coco@probsd:~
ls -l ble
Hello freebsd-questions@freebsd.org , Please confirm if you are the owner of
this email. Reply
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questio
On 11/22/12, David Noel wrote:
> On 11/22/12, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> --On November 22, 2012 7:14:35 AM -0600 David Noel
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Updating from 8.2 to 8.3 I'm running into the following:
>>>
>>> ===> include (install)
>>> creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
>>> dirname: not found
>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Dan Lists wrote:
> After upgrading a server from FreeBSD 7.3 to FreeBSD 8.3 I noticed
> this bug. Since upgrading, getpwnam_r is acting inconsistently. If I
> look up a user that does not exist and the name is 16 characters or
> less, getpwnam_r returns 0 and the
Save € 2,000 by switching your Motor, Property and Health Insurance
to Gan Direct All-in-One
http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=953e7a73414b04f0ff6056f55&id=d52abfa867&e=45a40e088c
(http://www.GanDirect.com?utm_source=New+Prospective+Cus
Save € 2,000 by switching your Motor, Property and Health Insurance
to Gan Direct All-in-One
http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=953e7a73414b04f0ff6056f55&id=d52abfa867&e=a8af35d56f
(http://www.GanDirect.com?utm_source=New+Prospective+Cus
On Dec 4, 2012, at 8:17 PM, dweimer wrote:
> On 2012-12-01 03:14, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 30 November 2012 20:44, dweimer wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-29 14:07, dweimer wrote:
On 2012-11-29 12:53, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:43 PM, dweimer wrote:
>
>
Dear list members,
does anyone use sssd 1.8.4? I try to set it up on on FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 but
get no success. First of all, there is no log files under /var/log/sssd, so
that I can not see, what is going wrong. I've edited two config files and
expect to be able to list LDAP(SAMBA4) users but it does
21 matches
Mail list logo
