Hi,
I run bind on a LAN, with some LAN-only (sub)domains. On the LAN is also
a DSL modem/router that advertises ipv6 addresses. So far so good.
However, since I upgraded the server from 8-STABLE to 9.1-PRERELEASE,
the /etc/resolv.conf gets overwritten by the resolvconf script, with an
ipv6
9.1 RC3 (started out as 9.0 RELEASE)
Over time, as ports have been upgraded, I seem to have accumulated a
number of obsolete shared libraries - a recent example being /usr/local/
lib/libpcre.so.1, which appears no longer to be linked in by anything,
having been replaced by libpcre.so.3.
Is
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:40:39 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
9.1 RC3 (started out as 9.0 RELEASE)
Over time, as ports have been upgraded, I seem to have accumulated a
number of obsolete shared libraries - a recent example being /usr/local/
lib/libpcre.so.1, which
On 12/18/12 00:13, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
wasn't the same question here a few days ago?
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:16:36 -0500
Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Ever since 8.X (my system is now 9.1-RC3 [done via csup]) been using
i386 with the following main ports:
Let me
You'll of course need to boot from another medium to do this.
That's my main question - can a larger disk be detected *without* a
reboot. On FreeBSD instances running within VMWare I have been able to
add new disks without a reboot but, as I described below, have not
found a way to get the
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Luke Bakken wrote:
You'll of course need to boot from another medium to do this.
That's my main question - can a larger disk be detected *without* a
reboot. On FreeBSD instances running within VMWare I have been able to
add new disks without a reboot but, as I described
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Luke Bakken wrote:
You'll of course need to boot from another medium to do this.
That's my main question - can a larger disk be detected *without* a
reboot. On FreeBSD instances running within VMWare I have been able to
add new disks without a reboot but, as
Hi all,
For anyone interested, I posted a blog with regards to how sysinstall
is run from mfsroot. URL is
http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2012/12/18/mfsroot-starts-sysinstall-how/
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 18 December 2012 15:27, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Luke Bakken wrote:
Live resize (without reboot even) is something being worked on for the future
10.x series.
Looking forward to this, we can't offer cloud instances with FreeBSD
until this
When running portmaster -d -w -r pcre because of the upgrade from
pcre-8.31 to pcre-8.32 I encountered the following inconveniences:
Upgrade to hal-0.5.14_20 failed with the message it needs intltool
0.40 which was installed at the time. First upgrading to intltool-0.41.1
solved this.
When
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
^^^8.3
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until now :D, but if
IIUC I need = 9.0.
It would probably be
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:57 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:54:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
^^^8.3
including the driver or something similar to get the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Demelier
demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope it will be removed soon, it pollutes the uname -a output.
I don't hope so. It helps us keep track of the exact revision
numbers of deployed servers here. Please don't remove it,
or at least, provide an
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:16:26 -0800
Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Jack Mc Lauren wrote:
Hi guys
How can I read a file which contains a number and assign that
number to a variable via awk programming? By the way, I want to use
this awk program in a shell script.
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk? Security through obscurity? Really? In this
day and age?
Or am I missing something?
On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk? Security through obscurity? Really? In this
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk? Security through obscurity?
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Security through obscurity? Really? In this
day and age?
My password is obscured from you. I consider that more secure regardless
of what any other opinion is.
--
Adam Vande More
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk? Security through obscurity?
On 12/18/12 22:32, RW wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk?
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:32:50 +, RW wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it a security risk? Security through
On 12/18/12 23:04, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
2012/12/15 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
Anders N. wic...@baot.se writes:
Hi. I've noticed in my uname -a on 9.1-RELEASE there is r243826.
This is on a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:53:29 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:32:50 +, RW wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your
On 12/18/12 23:44, RW wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:53:29 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:32:50 +, RW wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:01:33 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all
On 12/18/12 23:04, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
$ sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
WARNING
Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames
on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk.
$
Why is it
which C function is best to check for the existence of a
*directory*? say that I am want to make postitve that /tmp/foo/
exists.
ALso: which will make sure that the directory AND ffile
tmp/foo/filename12345 exists and that I have read access to it?
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:26:10 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
which C function is best to check for the existence of a
*directory*? say that I am want to make postitve that /tmp/foo/
exists.
That can be done with the opendir() function; its manpage
lists other interesting
Tim Daneliuk wrote at 17:48 -0600 on Dec 5, 2012:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
escalation
on their servers via very specific
On 12/18/2012 06:53 PM, John Hein wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote at 17:48 -0600 on Dec 5, 2012:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
wrote:
I am working with an institution that today provides limited privilege
On 12/18/2012 07:09 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:53 PM, John Hein wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote at 17:48 -0600 on Dec 5, 2012:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
wrote:
I am working with an institution
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:09 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:53 PM, John Hein wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote at 17:48 -0600 on Dec 5, 2012:
On 12/05/2012 05:44 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tim Daneliuk
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One further question, if I may. If I do this:
sudo su -
Will log_input record everything I do once I've been promoted to
root? I ask because my initial experiments seem to show that all
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One further question, if I may. If I do this:
sudo su -
Will log_input record everything I do once I've been promoted to
root? I
On 12/18/2012 08:03 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One further question, if I may. If I do this:
sudo su -
Will log_input record everything I do
On 12/18/2012 08:20 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 08:03 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One further question, if I may. If I do this:
sudo
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:26:10 -0800,
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org said:
G which C function is best to check for the existence of a *directory*?
G say that I am want to make postitve that /tmp/foo/ exists. ALso:
G which will make sure that the directory AND file
G tmp/foo/filename12345 exists
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 08:03 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One further question, if I may. If I do
On 12/18/2012 10:10 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 08:03 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
One
Hello!
We have a small server running FreeBSD 8.3 amd64 with Intel Pentium D
945 CPU. As the motherboard/CPU combo is getting rather old, we are
considering an upgrade to new motherboard with Xeon E3-1230 CPU. We
currently have these CPU settings
in /etc/make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=nocona
in
Cross-posting reply to amd64@ for relevance and to get answers from
those smart gents.
On 12/18/12 23:17, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
We have a small server running FreeBSD 8.3 amd64 with Intel Pentium D
945 CPU. As the motherboard/CPU combo is getting rather old, we are
considering an upgrade
44 matches
Mail list logo
