om HEAD to your box.)
> >
>
> You got to help me a little bit here. How do I achieve this? Btw I am
> running FreeBSD 7.1 BETA. Doesn't that mean the fix is already applied?
>
It seems that msk(4) in HEAD does not build correctly on RELENG_7.
Try attached patch.
Save att
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 03:21:48PM +0200, Aniruddha wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 08:56 +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > It seems that msk(4) in HEAD does not build correctly on RELENG_7.
> > Try attached patch.
> >
> > Save attached patch to /path/to/patch
&
an put it up on freebsd.org somewhere and let folks test it,
> assuming it will/does work with the Asus Eee.
>
I've sent CFT to CURRENT ML and waiting for feedbacks from users.
http://marc.info/?t=12253398883&r=1&w=2
(For unknown reason archiving service of CURRENT ML does'nt seem to
work. :-( )
I'm not subscribed to questions@ so please CC to me.
--
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
rom the OS of it's vlan table event (add,
> remove). I can't find such ioctl.
FreeBSD doesn't use ioctl to manipulate VLAN HW table.
> second is to have a direct access from the driver to the OS vlan table. I'm
> not familiar with the interface or if it's po
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:10:03PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Andrew Moran wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > After banging my head against this for a few hours, I've decided to ask for
> > help. ? ? ?I installed FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 on a Shuttle J1 4100 system (te
r but the PHY model name. These PHY are supported by
rlphy(4) since they are not gigabit PHY(e.g. Fast Ethernet).
> code is shared. Pyun YongHyeon, who has been working on the re(4) and
> rl(4) drivers in -CURRENT and -STABLE recently, could probably tell
> you more (I've cc'
___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:34:19PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In if_re.c, rev 1.46.2.18 wpaul@ fixed a long standing checksum
> >offload issue by padding. Does re(4) work when you disable only Tx
> >chec
was in how the kernel was talking to the device itself--the
> device would get confused when it was brought down and back up.
>
> My recollection is that the Linux driver just stops I/O to the card,
> but leaves it in its online state, effectively disconnecting it
with nfe(4) hardwares so it's
hard to fix ATM. Would you try nfe(4) on 7.0-RELEASE or HEAD?
If you still see watchdog timeout errors on 7.0-RELEASE or HEAD
please let me know.
--
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:29:17PM -0400, James Tanis wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> >In response to James Tanis :
> >
> >
> >
> >><.. snip ..>
> >>Attempting to force 1000baseTX via:
> >>
> >>ifconfig em1 media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
> >>
> >>gets me:
> >>
> >>status: no carrier
> >>
> >>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:54:00AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to James Tanis :
>
> > I have a FreeBSD v7.0 box it has two Intel Pro/1000 NICs, the one in
> > question is:
> >
> > em1: port
> > 0x2020-0x203f mem 0xd806-0xd807,0xd804-0xd805 irq 19 at
> > device 0.1 o
12 matches
Mail list logo
