Re: ipfw2 NAT/forwarding config for bittorrent
Kenneth W Cochran wrote: How do I configure ipfw2 for properly forwarding the bittorrent ports (6881-6889) to the destination machine? Log_in_vain is natd(8) -redirect_port ipfw will just forward the packet where as natd will rewrite it ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic accounting per username with ipfw in 5.4 ? (more)
I notice that the traffic accounting per uid only applies to traffic initiated by that user, and initiated from the local machine. If I scp a I've looked a bit into this, and it appears that sshd changes uid in FreeBSD 6.0 (I use 6.0RC1) .. I bet upgrading the system would be a lot easier than constructing a complex traffic-accounting system.. I'd think so at least.. sshd_config(5) UsePrivilegeSeparation cd /usr/ports make search key=accounting ... Port: ipacctd-1.46_1 Path: /usr/ports/net-mgmt/ipacctd Info: IP accounting using divert socket Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... among others ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: diskless FreeBSD with grub
Daniel Hepper wrote: Hi, I want to boot diskless into FreeBSD-5.4 with grub. snip title bsd-nfsroot kernel (nd)/kernel/kernel ip=dhcp root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=141.2.71.253:/dta/fBSD_diskless boot /snip It loads the kernel, but does not boot. My guess is that it doesn't find the root partition. if you look carefully, it's telling you where it thinks the root partition is. if that looks right, then check your nfs server log. you have seen the diskless booting howto on freebsd.org (among others) and recompiled your kernel for diskless booting? IIRC the kernel goes through a second round of querying dhcp for info. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to sort find results
David Fleck wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: But when I try: # ./date_sort / I get: use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory usual suspect is Carriage Return/Line Feed line term instead of just Line Feed. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to sort find results
Jeffrey Ellis wrote: Hi, Richard -- Do you mean in David's script (I have heard of that happening before with copy and paste)? How can I tell if that's the case? And how would I go about fixing it? that's right, in the script that's trying to run. usually with the default vi, you should see ^M at the end of every line. from vi :%s/^M$//g where ^M is CTRL-V-M, amomg others ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Root powerless?
Brooke Landers wrote: srv-0021# w 2:33AM up 1:57, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT root p0 192.168.36.2 2:33AM - w as root: id [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 5(operator) you should have uid=0 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iSCSI support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 3 datacentres connected by 12 core gig fibre (only using one pair at the moment, but the fibre is there for future use) each connected directly to the others. I want a system that I can start off with one disk server in one datacentre, and then step it up to have mirrored disk servers in each of the other datacentre's which are kept up to date in real time and can take over instantaneously if one of the others fails. It must also be scalable (non destructive resizing of the system) and support both linux and FreeBSD. I am willing to wait for this, but can anyone point me in the right direction. iSCSI seems to be it, but I'm not sure. all, don't get network attached storage confused with network attached filesystem confused with clustered filesystem. if you go for fibre channel network attached storage, it dosen't matter if the host and storage array are in the same cabinet, across the room or in different data centers. if your requirement is only to have one host up at any time then it can raid1 3way mirror over the sites. of course it gets really messy when one of the links goes down and you have to decide if it really has and not just the way your testing, who becomes master and enforce it so there's no corruption (if the down host continues writing). you mention multiple cores and the datacenters connectected in a ring, which means you can multipath in both directions of the loop. don't know of any fc multipathing for freebsd. doing this in iscsi will be a lot cheaper. switches will be gigE with fibre uplinks to connect the sites. targets and initiators can be regular boxes with more/less/none directly attached disks, all connected via gig nics. multipathing/link failures are handled by routing daemons/protocols which already exist. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpd and sessions
gahn wrote: Hi: I am using mpd for my vpn service. It works fine and I have no compalints. But is anyway I can monitor that how many sessions are being used? integrate it with something like freeradius to keep accounting (at least). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using KVM switch /dev/psm0 is missing
Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote: I have a no name 2 port KVM switch and a Logitech marble mouse USB with a ps/2 adapter. my cheapo noname kvm presents it's ps2 keyboard and mouse ports as usb devices. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using KVM switch /dev/psm0 is missing
Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote: On 22/03/2006, at 8:40 PM, Richard Burakowski wrote: Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote: I have a no name 2 port KVM switch and a Logitech marble mouse USB with a ps/2 adapter. my cheapo noname kvm presents it's ps2 keyboard and mouse ports as usb devices. Does yours have USB cabling to match or does it have ps2 cables? malcolm it takes two ps2 (key+mouse) and three usb in - then one usb (2 total) out to each box. then there's the video of course. when the kvm switches, the usb devices are detached and then attached to the new target, which means there's a discernable lag (couple seconds) before they become active. also requires moused under x11 as the /dev/ums entry comes and goes - dosen't have the same issue with the keyboard. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade log
eoghan writes: Im wondering if there is a log file generated by portupgrade and where i would find it? see PORTUPGRADE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrading only certain ports
Steve P. wrote: I am trying to avoid upgrading two ports: kde and X. HOLD_PKGS in pkgtools.conf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade -s and NFS /usr/ports?
Scott Mitchell wrote: performance reasons. However, I want downloaded distfiles and built packages to go in /usr/ports where other machines can see them, but there i don't save packages but i do have clients downloading into distifiles as req'd by having /usr/ports and /usr/ports/distfiles as seperate filessystems. /usr/ports is then mounted readonly and /usr/ports/distfiles readwrite with maproot etc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parallel shell scripts.
nicky wrote: The whole idea is this. I have to extract two different databases to csv files. One takes about an 1 hour, the other 1.5 hours. The problem is my time window, which is 2 hours. So extracting one after the other is not an option. After both extractions are complete, it should load the csv files into a target database. sounds just like a Makefile. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup multiple RELENGs?
Joel Hatton wrote: Hi, Situation - I have a machine that I use to build the base system for others. I'd like to be able to have multiple copies of /usr/src for different releases - in particular, RELENG_5_3 and RELENG_5_4. Rather than just changing my RELENG in the supfile and blowing away the tree each time I thought I could maintain multiple source trees. One trivial way that came to mind would be to copy /usr/src to /usr/RELENG_5_3 and /usr/RELENG_5_4 and replace /usr/src with a symlink that points to the one I'm using at the time - I don't know if this makes perfect sense, it's just an idea :) from my supfile src-all tag=RELENG_5_4 prefix=/usr/releases/RELENG_5_4 and you can repeat that line for each release you want to follow. wouldn't suprise me if /usr/src isn't actually hardcoded into the build and it'll work with the src tree somewhere else, though i've always soft linked from /usr/src. otherwise, i'm not sure how wise it is to build different releases with a different base system and different kernel. might want to take a look at /usr/src/release. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD routing
Bob Hepple wrote: I won't expect that this will work at all, even not with Linux, because the IP 192.168.254.245 and 192.168.2.214 are of different subnets. Either you use 192.168.254.0/24 or 192.168.2.0/24 in the 10baseT net, but not both. I don't know if Linux makes it possible to do this; I haven't tried it yet. At least I can reproduce your error message with a similar setup. Just assign the IP 192.168.2.245 to rl0 for example; then it should work without problems. Regards Björn The reason I'm doing it this way is that I have machines at work on the 192.168.2.0/24 network that I access from home over openvpn. So I can't grab 192.168.2 at home. But I always bring home one of many different machines - they're already configured to 192.168.2.214. It's so convenient to be able to access all of 192.168.2 over openvpn _except_ for the one machine 192.168.2.214. It's just a bit of a fag to re-configure each machine for home use - particularly as it could be freebsd, linux (x 4 distros), Solaris, AIX, SCO OS5, SCO UW7, HPUX etc etc and they all configure in different ways. Bob I'm having a hard time imagining how the packets are finding their way back during your linux testing. How does 2.214 know what to do with the reply when it recieves the echo request from 254.245? Was openvpn up during you linux testing and down during your freebsd testing? Can we see your linux routing tables during the various stages? Is it possible to preconfigure the servers to your home subnet instead of 192.168.2.214? or additionally? it shouldn't cause any dramas if your home subnet dosen't appear at work. Richard ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD routing
Bob Hepple wrote: Well, it has to be taught ... eg with a FreeBSD 2.214 I can do this: route delete default route add -net 192.168.254.0 -interface xl0 # !!! route add default 192.168.254.245 cp /etc/resolv.conf.home /etc/resolv.conf well, my turn ... from the man page: If the destination is directly reachable via an interface requiring no intermediary system to act as a gateway, the -interface modifier should be specified; the gateway given is the address of this host on the common network, indicating the interface to be used for transmission. what i've now come to understand hinges on the phrase address of this host on the common network, indicating the interface to be used for transmission.. note this is not *the* interface. for ethernet, it's the local interface and the destination's mac address. the format of this address is partly described in link_addr(3). route add 192.168.2.214/32 -link -interface rl0:x:x:x:x:x:x if you want the kernel to use arp to find the mac address, you specifically have to tell it to: route add 192.168.2.214/32 -interface rl0 -cloning a giveaway should have been the duplicate mac addresses in your routing tables which we all missed. cheers, richard ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
