Joomla 1.0.12 from ports master sites is corrupted!!
Today.. My task is to install Joomla on my FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE box... previously it runs Joomla 1.5.x, installed thry source tarballs ( manually ) and my boss wat to change it to 1.0.12.. then i update ports, start to install 1.0.12.. but something weird happens.. # make install clean === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for joomla-1.0.12 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for joomla/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2. === Refetch for 1 more times files: joomla/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/joomla. = Attempting to fetch from http://forge.joomla.org/sf/frs/do/downloadFile/projects.joomla/frs.joomla_1_0.1_0_12/frs8162?dl=1/. fetch: http://forge.joomla.org/sf/frs/do/downloadFile/projects.joomla/frs.joomla_1_0.1_0_12/frs8162?dl=1/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2: size unknown fetch: http://forge.joomla.org/sf/frs/do/downloadFile/projects.joomla/frs.joomla_1_0.1_0_12/frs8162?dl=1/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2: size of remote file is not known Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 7559 B 24 kBps === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = MD5 Checksum mismatch for joomla/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2. === Giving up on fetching files: joomla/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/www/joomla/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/joomla. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/joomla. I test it on my other web/server ( I have 9 FreeBSD servers ) and the result is the same.. I've deleted Joomla source from distfiles, refetch again thru ports, still the same.. and suddenly ( after one whole day ).. I try to download it manually from joomla sites itself, I reveal something.. the filesize is much more bigger!! MD5 Checksum also shown that the files is corrupted... Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 7559 B 24 kBps previous then i download it from: http://joomlacode.org/gf/download/frsrelease/111/264/Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1.6M Apr 15 19:09 Joomla_1.0.12-Stable-Full_Package.tar.bz2 in my distfiles after i download it manually after that seems all my installation process runs smoothly.. no hiccup at all.. anyone also face the same thing? Seems some of the developers ( ports etc ) need to inform the masters sites about this... TQ Arafat System and Network Engineer ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Best OS
to some people.. it'll be religious OS flames.. erm for me, the best os is Os that make u feel most confortable and happy.. all of them is good.. give it a chance and decide.. p/s: I'm wondering why NetBSD is not listed :) - Original Message - From: Jerry McAllister To: Susanth K Subject: Re: The Best OS Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:13:49 -0400 On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 10:03:38AM +0530, Susanth K wrote: Dear Friends, Am a beginner to *BSD OS. Am interested in setting up intel / AMD based Free and Open Source Server ( No GUI required ) Prime area is Webserver With PHP/MySQL Support and Ruby On Rails. + PostgreSQL Which os Will be the BEST ? A) Debian Linux B) OpenBSD C) FreeBSD Which project has good Support and Active Development ? Well, gee, someone has to say - of course, the best one is FreeBSD. As others have said, any of them can work. FreeBSD is well supported and has all the extra software available that you might need for that but is still lean and not bloated up with junk you don't need. So, it makes a good choice. The fact that it just works is in its favor too. jerry Please help me to choose THANKS IN ADVANCE SUSANTH K ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the right gcc CPUTYPE optimization for the server?
just my simple opinion.. maybe u can use: nocona pentium4 i686 mine is pentium4 freebsd# less /etc/make.conf # added by use.perl 2006-08-22 09:40:06 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math NO_PROFILE=true CPUTYPE?=pentium4 - Original Message - From: Abdullah Al-Marrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: What is the right gcc CPUTYPE optimization for the server? Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:35:45 +0300 Hello Guys, I'm own some servers, with different cpus. Dual Xeon EMT64 aka nocona P4 Celeron These servers run only internet apps, like apache, mysql, php, ..etc. What is the best cputype for these apps with these different cpus in make.conf? No X11 in the servers at all, so mmx, sse ..etc, aren't needed. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Search for products and services at: http://search.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buildworld upgrading advise please.
- Original Message - From: Marwan Sultan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: buildworld upgrading advise please. Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01 + Hello Gurus Im on FreeBSD 6.1-R decided to upgrade the src tree and for security reasons only so i did the following cvsup srcall and ports (RELENG_6_1) changed /etc/make.conf to CFLAGS= -O -pipe NO_PROFILE= cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel # reboot the following steps not from single user, just root, it refused to run from single user # mergemaster -p # make installworld # mergemaster # reboot Till here no errors and everything seems allright! the output of uname -a is FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Fri Sep 29 01:37:30 AST 2006 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Is this enough ? Some websites has only these steps, but in the handbook asking to update /etc, recomiple the base system and many others.. Can someone comment about my steps and advice if anything more is needed. pluse, why all was okay from root user not single user mode, and why it didnot work from single user mode. Thank you. Just sharing the same opinion.. i think yr step is fair and good enuff since u're also go thru mergemaster steps.. mine also do the same step since 4.x and it works fine for me with no errors or anything weird.. my make.conf: # added by use.perl 2006-08-22 09:40:06 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe NO_PROFILE=true CPUTYPE?=pentium4 in your /etc/make.conf u just stated NO_PROFILE= with blank statements.. can we consider is as false? -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux recovery tool
- Original Message - From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux recovery tool Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:03:45 -0700 Robin Becker wrote: Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: ... One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? -- Robin Becker Yes, it does .. thanks That is if the kernel has UFS and BSD labels support compiled into the kernel. Be aware that UFS support isn't really 100% stable yet, so they marked UFS writing as dangerous in the Linux kernel file systems config section. However, UFS fs reading is stable. -Garrett Mr garrett TQ for highlighting it.. referring to your statement there.. izzit the same like NTFS mount on linux? read-only and not stable/supported on writing? TQ -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE?
- Original Message - From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Downgrade from 6.2 PR to 6.1 RELEASE? Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:46:42 -0700 I felt I should ask this question before taking a drastic action. I built this new production system complete with jail (which I can recreate very quickly) and all was running perfectly under 6.2 PRERELEASE. I was planning taking a chance and going production (against common wisdom of running 6.2 PRERELEASE in production). Yesterday I decided to cvsup and rebuild one more time and discovered a glaring problem on this AMD64 Tyan s4882. It can't reboot with the reboot command or shutdown -r about 75% of the time, it hangs between the uptime output and where it states Rebooting, then requires a manual reset to get going again. This tells me I have to fall back or will create a nightmare for production use. Presuming I can live with certain driver issues on 6.1 RELEASE P6, are there any serious dangers or unique procedures in going backward, to RELENG_6_1 from RELENG_6 that suggest it would be better to just start from scratch? I've not fallen back from CURRENT to a RELEASE, this will be my first time. maybe u can give it a try, why not? same like my case, and it's weird.. when i upgraded my box to 6.2-PRERELEASE, something weird happens.. i can't login to my KDE ( my KDE is up and running ) using my user+pass, surprisingly i add one more user+pass and it's can logged in! so I've decided to revert back to 6.1-RELEASE-p7 and it's back to normal! Maybe u should give it a try :) correct me if i'm wrong.. -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux recovery tool
- Original Message - From: Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: linux recovery tool Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:04 + One of my hosters says they provide a ram based linux recovery tool, but I'm actually using freebsd on the hardware so am wondering if linux knows how to mount UFS partitions? -- Robin Becker Yes, it does -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting FreeBSD from floppy or CD
- Original Message - From: Mike Jeays [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Booting FreeBSD from floppy or CD Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:49:27 -0400 On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 10:49 -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:52:07AM -0700, Stanley Wright wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to boot FreeBSD from a floppy disk or a CD. I dont want the other users to know the OS is on the computer. Wow, stealth FreeBSD. I haven't done it, but I think you can make a live CD and boot and run from that. But what about disk space to use - you will want to leave some stuff there somewhere to work on. Just getting it booted is not very exciting or fulfulling. Of course, if the other system on the machine is MS, and you squeeze it down to make room for some FreeBSD work space, it won't show up in MS. So, maybe no-one will notice the space shrinkage. You could go ahead and make it FreeBSD bootable too, but then they would see the FreeBSD boot select menu. You could put everything there, but replace the MBR with the MS one and then use the CD to start the boot and then select the FreeBSD slice from its menu and then just run from the disk. Then the CD is only needed for its MBR. I think that would work. Anyway, check the FreeBSD handbook on making a live CD and maybe someone else will also dip in their oar. So, what's so scarey about someone else knowing FreeBSD is on the machine? jerry Thanks Stan - freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] A live CD such as Freesbie and a USB memory stick for personal storage should give you all you need. You can format the USB memory with the FreeBSD UFS filesystem, or leave is as a DOS FAT for compatibility with other operating systems. You won't need to change a single byte on the hard disk, and no one will know once you go away. If you are thwarting company or school policy, watch out! It might be much cheaper in the long run to buy another machine of your own. A used computer can be had for very little, and an older one will run FreeBSD just fine. yerps.. I've tried Freesbie and also NetBSD live cd.. it rocks!.. or maybe u can try normal installation without bootloader writing to /mbr.. maybe u can use GRUB on floppy or any other bootloader like SBM (SmartBootmanager) on floppy and point it to your FreeBSD slice.. gud luck! p/s: pls correct me if I'm wrong TQ -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to apply a patch set
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:48:32 +0200 Matthew Seaman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to apply a patch set to FreeBSD 5.5 (this letter 'p' followed by a number, after the version in 'uname -a') - but somehow it did not work. I cvsup-ed the src using the standard 'stable-supfile' with '*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_5' - then I rebuild world. Now 'uname -a' reports 'FreeBSD 5.5 STABLE #0'. Before it was 'FreeBSD 5.5 RELEASE #0'. So instead of applying patch set I have moved to 'STABLE'. Could somebody tell me what have I done wrong? Actually - what is the difference between the 'pX' and the '#X' after the version? You've shifted your self onto the RELENG_5 code branch rather than the RELENG_5_5 branch. Yes... but how did it happen after I instructed the supfile to get 'RELENG_5_5'? Actually in the examples/cvsup I did not find any example how to do 'release'. Thank you for the other answers! Iv. i think I've read abt this long time ago.. but not pretty sure ( someone correct me if I'm wrong ).. u can try: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_5_RELEASE anyway i never tried this! and i never encounter the prob u'va said since 4.x --- 6.1 ( and I'm normally/mostly using -pX than STABLE for my prod server ). Seems your method/tag tag=RELENG_5_5 is correct way to patch to -pX, i can't find any reason why your system patched into STABLE... could u please copy+paste here your stable-supfile config? TQ -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rebooting into single user mode on a remote server
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel Gerzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rebooting into single user mode on a remote server Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:49:34 +0200 Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello pobox, Saturday, September 16, 2006, 8:47:04 PM, you wrote: Hello, could somebody help me to understand the best way to enter into a single user mode on a remote server. I need it for the moment, during rebuilding world, when I have to reboot into single user mode before 'mergemaster -p'. I don't want to persuade you to something that is not officially supported, but I have never booted into single user mode while upgrading my FreeBSD boxes and I have never experienced any problems because of this. Just try to skip the reboot step and go ahead. It works(tm) for me this way. If you are paranoid, try to stop all running services except the ssh deamon. Phew... I hear this again and again. Only I am not sure I have the level of boldness to do this on a production machine. Isn't the following sequence of steps similar - 'shutdown -r now' (reboots in multi-user mode), and then immediately 'shutdown now' (drops to single user mode)? Iv. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] dudes, I never tried it, and not dare to try it.. because it's a remote server and single mode maybe ( I'm not sure dude ) cut off all network connections from inside and outside.. anyway for remote servers, i'm prefer make installwold in normal mode.. it's safer TQ -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail on FBSD server wont connect to remote user.
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeBSD Users Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Sendmail on FBSD server wont connect to remote user. Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:57:27 -1000 Aloha Questions list, I have been trying to setup Sendmail on a server box. FreeBSD 6.1 HP Pentium II 300 CPU 686 After many attempts I am down to this one error. Error: Sending of password did not succeed. Mail server mahalo.internetohana.org responded: Password supplied for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is incorrect. I have 2 user accounts for test on this swever. I can ping and telnet into ports 25 and 110 and I get the proper responses from these users. The 2 user accounts are rejected as per the error when I try to connect from a mail agent (Mozilla or Thunderbird) from another box on a different inet. (Also FreeBSD 4.11 running for several years.) The server is setup with send mail SMTP and qpopper for Pop3. There is nothing else on this box. Do I have to create a password file other than the FreeBSD /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd to get this to work. My previous attempts with Postfix and Dovecot did not get this far. Thanks for any help. Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Admin -- http://hawaiidakine.com -- http://hdk5.com -- -- http://internetohana.org -- http://freeBSDinfo.org -- + Supporting open source computing - FreeBSD 6.* + I'm leaving sendmail long ago since I'm migrated to Postfix.. but however as i still remember, default sendmail installation is just listening to localhost. so u need to alter the *.cf file ( in /etc/mail/ ).. # SMTP client options O ClientPortOptions=Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0 by default this line will be commented out ( with # or dnl ) or just listen to localhost previously I faced this prob with old RedHat 7.x.. anyone who know this, maybe can correct me if I'm wrong TQ -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to apply a patch set
- Original Message - From: backyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ahmad Arafat Abdullah [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:00:24 -0700 (PDT) --- Ahmad Arafat Abdullah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:48:32 +0200 Matthew Seaman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to apply a patch set to FreeBSD 5.5 (this letter 'p' followed by a number, after the version in 'uname -a') - but somehow it did not work. I cvsup-ed the src using the standard 'stable-supfile' with '*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_5' - then I rebuild world. Now 'uname -a' reports 'FreeBSD 5.5 STABLE #0'. Before it was 'FreeBSD 5.5 RELEASE #0'. So instead of applying patch set I have moved to 'STABLE'. Could somebody tell me what have I done wrong? Actually - what is the difference between the 'pX' and the '#X' after the version? You've shifted your self onto the RELENG_5 code branch rather than the RELENG_5_5 branch. Yes... but how did it happen after I instructed the supfile to get 'RELENG_5_5'? Actually in the examples/cvsup I did not find any example how to do 'release'. Thank you for the other answers! Iv. i think I've read abt this long time ago.. but not pretty sure ( someone correct me if I'm wrong ).. u can try: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_5_RELEASE anyway i never tried this! and i never encounter the prob u'va said since 4.x --- 6.1 ( and I'm normally/mostly using -pX than STABLE for my prod server ). Seems your method/tag tag=RELENG_5_5 is correct way to patch to -pX, i can't find any reason why your system patched into STABLE... could u please copy+paste here your stable-supfile config? TQ STABLE is the latest set of patches to the system. It will change the tag from RELEASE from the install to the STABLE set of patches versus the CURRENT set. STABLE is the major ones you want. CURRENT is all of them to date. If you cvsup to RELEASE you will downgrade and end up with what you started with when you installed from CD or whatever was available when the RELEASE cd was created for whatever system your getting. -brian ermm.. for me ( and as far as i know ) STABLE is a development patch and it will end up with the next RELEASE version.. such as 5.4-STABLE will be patch gradually until it became 5.5-RELEASE. Anyway 5.4-RELEASE-pX is a security fixes ( and possibly bugfix ) but it still remains as RELEASE and not migrating_into_the_next_version/release. some of the people ( like me ) just prefer to -pX rather than -STABLE. So far i'm not needed -CURRENT yet even RELEASE -pX is powerful enough and suits my needs for my prod servers.. for this case ( back to the topics ), I think this guy do the right method for cvsup-ed to 5.5-RELEASE-pX but it end up with 5.5-STABLE. So i think we better help him and solve it since he maybe not need -STABLE like u said TQ p/s: Correct me if I'm wrong anyone! -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please Help with my kernel
- Original Message - From: [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ExTaZyTi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please Help with my kernel Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:41:45 +0200 ExTaZyTi wrote: Hi, I'm new in FreeBSD, I want to conf and re-build my kernel but the directory /usr/src is empty. I'm with FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE, PLEASE HELP :( If you use 6.1 Release you can use sysinstall to install the sources from CD. If you really use 6.1-STABLE you should know what you're doing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wondering how u upgrade into -STABLE without compiling yr src and kernel? -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd, Suse Linux dual booting
- Original Message - From: Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Bikle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Freebsd, Suse Linux dual booting Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:59:36 +0100 On 17/09/06, Dan Bikle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People, this is great info; thanks for taking time to type it up. I'm now convinced that Grub is good. On my FreeBSD box I see this: bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 3 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 3 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 3 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 3 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 3 $ cat /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad8s3b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/ad8s3a / ufs rw 1 1 ##/dev/ad8s4a /u1 ufs rw 1 1 /dev/acd0 /dvd1 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 /dev/acd1 /dvd2 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ df bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ df bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ df bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 4 $ df Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad8s3a 91913630 37443012 4711752844%/ devfs 110 100%/dev linprocfs 440 100%/usr/compat/linux/proc bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 5 $ bash moibsd maco /usr/home/maco 5 $ Comparing that with the information in the mail list and this page: http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-apr2006.html#21 suggests to me, that this Grub entry would be appropriate: title FreeBSD 5.5 root (hd8,2,a) kernel /boot/loader Dang, I always mix up XP and FBSD syntax. Yes, that looks fine. Good luck! Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For me, booting BSDa and other OS is easier with grub: mine: FreeBSD 6.1 rootnoverify (hd0,0) chainloader +1 NetBSD 3.0.1 rootnoverify (hd0,2) chainloader +1 gud luck! -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD as a gaming server platform
Yes it is.. as far as i know, u can play around with sysctl.conf for lots of tweaks.. This is my close friends game server: http://kapra.mine.nu http://kpro.mine.nu running for Ragnarok Online game using Freya engine on FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12 u can contact the admin named maui for more info, tq.. - Original Message - From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD as a gaming server platform Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:07:52 -0500 Are there any kernel tunables that you would recommend setting to increase performance on FreeBSD 6.x for running gaming servers (e.g. Quake 4, CS:S, etc)? It appears that the default settings are not performing nearly as well on FreeBSD as they are on Linux on similar hardware, and it seems to be something network related. I did some searching for settings that could increase max packet rates and such, but to no avail. Thank you, Matt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libm.so.3 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
- Original Message - From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libm.so.3 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:46:20 -0400 On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:23:46PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote: cvsuping to -p6 wil not fix the problem. i had the exact same issue (except it was a list of 6 different .so files) getting the NetBackup 5.1 agent for UNIX to run on freebsd. my solution was as simple as: ln -s /lib/libm.so.4 /lib/libm.so.2 (NetBackup agent was looking for so.2) so in your case, just symlink the existing .4 to a .3, and you should be good to go. backwards compatibility should not be an issue. That's a bogus hack; the libraries are not compatible or they'd have the same version! Just install the relevant compat package (compat4x/compat5x). Kris 2.dat anyway dude, in my case compat 4.x and 5.x already installed and run in my kernel, but still i cant run it properly because of the library issue.. and i'm doing this symlink and it's solved.. :) -- ___ Now you can search for products and services http://search.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libm.so.3 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Hye everyone.. For my customer i need to install Kaspersky antivirus for mailserver and for this case I'm using pkg build for version 5x.. ( no pkg for 6x yet ) the problem is, installation seems like successfull but when i want to key in the key ( for antivirus verification ), then this msg appears.. freebsdmail# /usr/local/share/kav/5.5/kav4mailservers/bin/licensemanager /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.3 not found, required by licensemanager I've checked with google and also this link: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-August/025330.html freebsdmail# uname -a FreeBSD freebsdmail.mine.nu 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 my plan is to cvsup to -p6 and see if the problem already solved or not.. but during this time, can anyone give me clue what am i missing here? TQ Arafat System Engineer -- ___ Now you can search for products and services http://search.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libm.so.3 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
- Original Message - From: Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libm.so.3 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:23:46 -0500 On Tuesday 12 September 2006 21:01, Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: Hye everyone.. For my customer i need to install Kaspersky antivirus for mailserver and for this case I'm using pkg build for version 5x.. ( no pkg for 6x yet ) the problem is, installation seems like successfull but when i want to key in the key ( for antivirus verification ), then this msg appears.. freebsdmail# /usr/local/share/kav/5.5/kav4mailservers/bin/licensemanager /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.3 not found, required by licensemanager I've checked with google and also this link: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-August/025330.html freebsdmail# uname -a FreeBSD freebsdmail.mine.nu 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 my plan is to cvsup to -p6 and see if the problem already solved or not.. but during this time, can anyone give me clue what am i missing here? TQ Arafat System Engineer cvsuping to -p6 wil not fix the problem. i had the exact same issue (except it was a list of 6 different .so files) getting the NetBackup 5.1 agent for UNIX to run on freebsd. my solution was as simple as: ln -s /lib/libm.so.4 /lib/libm.so.2 (NetBackup agent was looking for so.2) so in your case, just symlink the existing .4 to a .3, and you should be good to go. backwards compatibility should not be an issue. hth, jonathan TQ so much Jonathan.. I've do link the libm.so and libc.so. freebsdmail# /usr/local/share/kav/5.5/kav4mailservers/bin/licensemanager -a /home/trunasuci/ /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.3 not found, required by licensemanager freebsdmail# cd /lib freebsdmail# ln -s libm.so.4 libm.so.3 freebsdmail# ls -l total 3096 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 5 20:37 geom -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48260 May 7 11:56 libalias.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 10720 May 7 11:56 libatm.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel8388 May 7 11:56 libbegemot.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 114524 May 7 11:56 libbsdxml.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48472 May 7 11:56 libbsnmp.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 882116 May 7 11:56 libc.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 56276 May 7 11:56 libcam.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 28680 May 7 11:55 libcrypt.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 995056 May 7 11:57 libcrypto.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 18548 May 7 11:56 libdevstat.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 84248 May 7 11:56 libedit.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 12952 May 7 11:56 libgeom.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel7604 May 7 11:56 libgpib.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 22728 May 7 11:56 libipsec.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel5700 May 7 11:56 libipx.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel8304 May 7 11:56 libkiconv.so.2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 21936 May 7 11:55 libkvm.so.3 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Sep 13 10:42 libm.so.3 - libm.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 98120 May 7 11:55 libm.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 55160 May 7 11:55 libmd.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 256684 May 7 11:55 libncurses.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 179196 May 7 11:56 libreadline.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel5556 May 7 11:55 libsbuf.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel8928 May 7 11:56 libufs.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 43576 May 7 11:56 libutil.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 60672 May 7 11:56 libz.so.3 freebsdmail# /usr/local/share/kav/5.5/kav4mailservers/bin/licensemanager -a /home/trunasuci/ /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found, required by licensemanager freebsdmail# ln -s libc.so.6 libc.so.5 freebsdmail# /usr/local/share/kav/5.5/kav4mailservers/bin/licensemanager -a /home/trunasuci/.key Kaspersky license manager for FreeBSD 5.x. Version 5.5.10/RELEASE #11 Copyright (C) Kaspersky Lab, 1997-2005. Portions Copyright (C) Lan Crypto Key file /home/trunasuci/.key has been successfully registered yesss.. it's done.. now i'll proceed with some setup/tweaking.. TQ again :) Arafat System Engineer -- ___ Now you can search for products and services http://search.mail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about network setup
Well I assume your pc/apache is connected using private IP.. so that's why it can't be accessed directly.. anyway u can configure it on your router, to forward the request ( or port-forward ) to your pc/apache on port 80 TQ.. - Original Message - From: Nazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: question about network setup Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:13:48 -0500 Alright guys. This is probably the complete newbie question, but I just cant fight a straight answer on google. The questions usually I found, werent answered. Anyways, to the point. I'm behind router. Cable modem - Router - pc's. Basic home setup. I set up apache and want to figure out how is it possible for me to use external ip to connect to my server? I can access the server via internal ip people can access it via my external, but for me doesnt show up. I know this configuration has to do with my network, rather than apache, or at least main configuration of my network and probably some tweaking with apacheWell, if possible, some replies would be appreciated. Maybe at least point me at the right direction. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Various package/ports problems
Gosh.. I'm still enjoying my 4.11 prod box ( most of it ).. well time to think abt migration? - Original Message - From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Various package/ports problems Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:01:33 -0400 In response to Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Version 4.x is no longer supported by FreeBSD at all. I suggest either reinstalling FreeBSD 5.4 or just install 6.1. That's a bit of an exaggeration. http://security.freebsd.org/#adv FreeBSD 4.11 and 4-STABLE are officially supported until Jan 2007. although 4.8 hasn't been supported in quite a while. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fine tuning conditional compilation of 'make buildworld'
freebsd# less /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf mine just make it simple: PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe NO_PROFILE=true CPUTYPE?=pentium4 other thing, i'm set it up on my kernel config :) freebsd# uname -a FreeBSD freebsd.avp.org 6.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p4 #2: Mon Aug 28 12:26:03 MYT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AVP i386 freebsd# - Original Message - From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fine tuning conditional compilation of 'make buildworld' Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:28:03 -0700 Hi, Just wondering if there was a more comprehensive list of variables that can be used when specifying what should and shouldn't be built other than what is specified in man make.conf for make buildworld. I am configuring two 6.1 systems and want to trim down the junk as much as possible. Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
