Re: How to deny getting static ip address via pf ?

2011-07-26 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
2011/7/26 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk

 On 26/07/2011 11:44, Yavuz Maşlak wrote:
  I use pf on freebsd as packet filter.
 
  I have a wireless area. The users get to the internet using automatic ip
  from the dhcp server.
  I wish to deny to assign a static ip address by manual.
 
  How can I do that with pf or ipfw or another thing?

 Interesting problem.  Do you control the DHCP server and is it running
 ISC dhcpd?  If so, you can parse the dhcpd.leases file to find all of
 the addresses the DHCP server has allocated.  Then you could create
 firewall rules that default to blocking the DHCP address range, but are
 overridden to allow the allocated addresses.  The table feature in pf
 would be a good way of implementing something like that.  (I think ipfw
 has an equivalent feature nowadays too.)

 It's not going to be pretty, and you'll need to update the table of
 allowed addresses quite frequently, or legitimate users will find
 themselves locked out of internet access.  Also it won't stop someone
 who has hijacked an IP from someone else's lease.

 Wondering why your users would prefer manually setting addresses rather
 than using DHCP, since using DHCP takes away virtually all the effort
 involved? If it's because almost all the addresses are already assigned
 to leases and it takes ages to get on-line, then two courses of action
 suggest themselves:

   1) Serve a larger address range through DHCP and/or make the lease
  times shorter.  Assuming you're behind a NAT gateway, this
  shouldn't be particularly hard to set up.

   2) Look at the 'adaptive-lease-time-threshold' setting in dhcpd.conf
  -- this says to dynamically shorten lease times once address pool
  usage goes above a threshold percentage.

Cheers,

Matthew

 --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW


Hi,

I would run a perl program as a daemon that would parse the dhcp logs for
given IPs, then I would load those IPs to a PF table, which that way could
contain the trusted hosts, which you would then pass packets from and to.
This could work IMHO. But this aproach to the problem can contain serious
flaws...

Best Regards,

Balazs.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: before i ugrade from 7.3 to 8.x....

2011-07-16 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
On 16 July 2011 11:27, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:

 On 16/07/2011 06:45, Gary Kline wrote:
  i ant to be as sure as possible that my network stuff and mail
  Works!   how can i test my /etc/namedb/*  'stuff'?  pretty sure mail
  works .. AND finally, i'm glad i stuck with FreeBSD and fer all your
  help.

 http://dnscheck.iis.se/ is a good start.  Given that you're posting to
 this list, I'd say mail and DNS is probably working.  Maybe not
 completely perfect, but good enough.  Beyond that, it's usually a matter
 of checking your logs and dealing with any problems as they come up.

Matthew

 --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW


Hello,

If you want to check your zones, you can use dig @localhost DOMAINTOCHECK
AXFR for a local zone transfer from the dns server itself. Or from another
server dig @yourdnsserver domainname. Or from a windows server the command
nslookup, then in the nslookup query add your dns server as source like
this: server yourdnsserver then your can check the domains by just typing
them in.

What exactly you want to check Gary?

Best Regards,

Balazs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Upgrading very old installation

2011-07-15 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
On 15 July 2011 22:46, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0400, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
  I'm running a FreeBSD 6.x server that hasn't been updated in about 1.5
 years.
 
  atlas:~uname -mprs
  FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p8 i386 i386

  I've been using the cvsup/make method of upgrades for years and only
  used freebsd-upgrade once.  I'm not sure if either method can handle a
  6.x to 8.x upgrade.

 They are tested for upgrading to the next major version. Who knows if it
 will
 work across two major versions? Personally I wouldn't want to be the one ot
 try it out. :-)

  I also have a bunch of ports in this server (e.g. apache, postfix,
  etc.)  Once the OS is updated, should I just portupgrade them all?

 Doesn't work reliably across major version updates. When updating to a
 newer
 major version, the best way is to delete all ports (save their config files
 of course), scrub the /usr/local tree clean and then re-install them.

 Matthews advice of re-installing 8.2 on a second harddrive is probably the
 easiest and safest way to go.

 Roland
 --
 R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
 [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
 pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


Hi,

I would try to update the split mirror of the 6.4 to 8.2, I did manage to
update couple of years back from Releng6 to Current 8 :).

Did the usual make kernel / world stuff mergemaster prebuild in the middle
and mergemaster after the update then I rebuilt all the ports.

I recently did a 6.4-STABLE  8.2-RELEASE-p2 migration to another server,
but without using only some initial old config files  from the old system
because I had to build a better environment with other software for the same
role (almost the same thing that Matt recommended you). For me this is a
longer procedure then updating all the software and checking for maybe now
deprecated options and other problems.

So I think its down to your level of knowledge and personal preference (
whether you want to check what is to problem in case something goes wrong- I
like this because I get to know the system and the inner workings in more
detail). I personally don't like freebsd-update, and if your are new to the
build from source way, you should really go with building up from scratch,
then migrate.

In case you want to update have a WORKING backup, and do a test run for the
update (restore your 6.4 on a test machine and try to update it) before you
bring down the productive system.

Good luck!

Regards,

Balazs.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ghghg

2011-07-14 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
On 14 July 2011 23:58, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:

 On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:48:43 -0700
 Gary Kline articulated:

  testing

 What?

 Did you check this URL out:
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test

 --
 Jerry ✌
 jerry+f...@seibercom.net

 Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored.
 Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.

 http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Our patience?

:)))
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Limitting SSH access

2011-05-04 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
On 4 May 2011 13:35, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:

 On 04/05/2011 10:08, Jack Raats wrote:
  I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
 
  Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
  I want t o restrict a user to his own home directory.
  So that if he connects to the server with SSH he only can go to his own
 home dir.
  Also the same for sftp...
 

 I believe you will need to install a version of OpenSSH from ports to
 get that functionality.  It's the CHROOT config option in
 security/openssh-portable

Cheers

Matthew

 --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW


Hello,

It should work with the base openssh on 7.4. Check your version with sshd
-v.
Here, search for chroot(or use google :)):
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sshd_configsektion=5

Regarding ssh login, I usually use rbash from the ports, that restricts
the user from leaving his or her home directory!

Regards,

Balazs Mateffy.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Why are YT vids on FreeBSD all about hacking MSN? (solved)

2010-12-31 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

I don't know about this, but you should definitely check out
bsdconferences.

http://www.youtube.com/bsdconferences

Regards,

MB.

On 31 December 2010 02:13, Xn Nooby xno...@gmail.com wrote:

 I wanted to watch some videos about FreeBSD, so I went to Youtube and
 searched on FreeBSD.  Then I sorted by Date Uploaded, and almost
 all the videos uploaded recently are about hacking MSN.  I went to the
 people's profiles, and they had no videos available.  I am guessing
 that people are creating fake YT accounts to post a video that then
 gets removed by YT.  It makes it impossible to find recent YT videos
 about FreeBSD.

 I just wondering if anyone else noticed this.

 If you do the basic YT search sorted on Relevance, you get really
 old FreeBSD videos.


 SOLVED:  I just noticed you can filter out msn from your results by
 searching for freebsd -msn.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Certification

2010-11-07 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

You can find all the information here:

http://www.bsdcertification.org/


Regards,

MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: automake

2010-09-24 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

Try this:

portmaster -od /usr/ports/devel/automake19/ automake-1.4.6_5

or your automake version, look it up with pkg_info | grep automake

Hope this helps! If needed try to update everything that was depending on
automake!

BR,

Balazs.



On 24 September 2010 23:20, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote:

 Today I tried on my FreeBSD 8.0

 portmaster -ad
 === Gathering distinfo list for installed ports

 === Starting check of installed ports for available updates

 === The devel/automake15 port has been deleted: Outdated, ports migrated
 to
 automake19
 === Aborting update

 Thanks in advance.

 Mitja
 
 http://starikarp.redbubble.com
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: rebuilding world - is chflags -R noschg * necessary?

2010-09-23 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hello!

Anton is right, really the handbook says that it MAY contain, so it's not
necessary that after every build there will be some files with the immutable
flag.

OFF: Long long time ago one night when I was playing with jails (to be exact
I was building and making work my first jail by hand) I got to know this
little thing known as immutable, after building a jail, and after #@$ing it
up (sry :)) I could not delete it. It was a funny discovery I remember I was
new to FBSD and unix in general:).
ON:

I think maybe in older releases the build process may have used the
immutable flag at build??, but the test machine I tried, started out as
maybe 5.2, and I never had this issue once. Now I'm at 8.1-REL. After you
make installworld you get some files immutable, check this:

# cd /usr/src/
# make installworld DESTDIR=/usr/home/testworld/
# cd /usr/home/testworld
# find . -xdev -flags +schg -exec ls -la {} \;
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  18584 Sep 23 16:54 ./bin/rcp
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  1150968 Sep 23 16:53 ./lib/libc.so.7
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  32104 Sep 23 16:53 ./lib/libcrypt.so.5
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  76412 Sep 23 16:54 ./lib/libthr.so.3
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  220596 Sep 23 16:54 ./libexec/ld-elf.so.1
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  663616 Sep 23 16:55 ./sbin/init
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/chpass
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/chfn
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/chsh
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/ypchpass
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/ypchfn
-r-sr-xr-x  6 root  wheel  18588 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/ypchsh
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  21836 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/login
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  4792 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/opieinfo
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  11868 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/opiepasswd
-r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  6160 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/passwd
-r-sr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  6160 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/yppasswd
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  11244 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/rlogin
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  8896 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/rsh
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  14500 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/su
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  27044 Sep 23 16:56 ./usr/bin/crontab
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  16604 Sep 23 16:54 ./usr/lib/librt.so.1
total 4
dr-xr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  512 Sep 23 16:53 .
drwxr-xr-x  22 root  wheel  512 Sep 23 16:53 ..

# rm -rf testworld/
rm: testworld/bin/rcp: Operation not permitted
rm: testworld/bin: Directory not empty
rm: testworld/lib/libc.so.7: Operation not permitted
rm: testworld/lib/libcrypt.so.5: Operation not permitted
rm: testworld/lib/libthr.so.3: Operation not permitted
rm: testworld/lib: Directory not empty
rm: testworld/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted
rm: testworld/libexec: Directory not empty
rm: testworld/sbin/init: Operation not permitted
and so on...

Anton if you wanna be sure just do it, or test it with the version you are
using, but I don't think you will find any immutable files in /usr/obj

/usr/obj]# find . -flags +schg -exec ls -la {} \;
/usr/obj]#


Sorry if this was a bit long, but I hope it helpded!

Regards,

Balazs.



On 23 September 2010 16:42, Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:

 On 09/23/10 15:10, Polytropon wrote:

 On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:02:17 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht
 me...@bristol.ac.uk  wrote:

 I've never seen a file under /usr/obj/ with immutable flag set.


 I think it was a directory called empty/ that couldn't be removed
 unless the flag was unset. This makes this step neccessary when
 you rm -rf /usr/obj the object subtree.


 I think you're thinking of /var/empty, not something under /usr/obj. On my
 machine find fails to find anything immutable under /usr/obj.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Correct syntax of supfile to keep ports upgraded?

2010-07-30 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,


If you want to stick with cvsup, or csup, you can use the example port
updating supfile (if you have the example files).

for example:

csup -L 2 -g -h cvsup10.us.freebsd.org/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile

You can check the example file, what csup or cvsup needs in the supfile, and
in what form :).

If You have no ports, a portsnap fetch extract is much much faster,
because its fetching the ports in one file as tar.gz and extracting ig, but
csup and cvsup checks Your port files and downloads only the files that are
outdated.

When getting ports the first time (if you sad no for sysinstall to install
ports), it's recommended to use portsnap to ease the load on the CVS
servers, but noone will knock on Your head if You use cvs anyway :).

Hope this helps!

Regards, MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD 8.0 p#3

2010-06-27 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

Maybe portsnap fetch extract ?

Maybe the tag in your supfile was wrong for the ports.

MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: system is under attack (what can I do more?)

2010-06-18 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hello,


1, maybe the line with the rule is in a bad place in the conf, but even if
it's working it's possible that it wont be triggered. As far as I can see
there are 30 sec interval pauses between attacks from one host. Your rule is
looking for connections in 30 sec ranges.

2,You should use a program that monitors the logs, and then passes the ips
after 3 unsuccessful logins to the bruteforce table.

See bruteforceblocker, but there are a bunch of other programs for this.

Regards,

MB.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: installworld and sources

2010-06-06 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi!

It's good practice to keep /usr/src (your source) intact and the same
version as your worldkernel is and vica versa.

For the particular installworld step AFAIK /usr/obj is used, where the
system has the compiled world made in the build process.

steps here:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/makeworld.html

however you should always read the actual UPDATING file if something changes
between versions!


Regards,

M.Balázs.


On 6 June 2010 12:55, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:

 Compiling a new kernel from source requires /usr/src to be populated, I
 understand that.

 The buildworld process for sure needs /usr/src. My question is , is
 /usr/src also used in the installworld process?

 Now I have never had to do this type of system RELEASE upgrade before, so I
 just don't know.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: chroot scp only network storage?

2010-05-25 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hello,


Try /usr/ports/shells/scponly .

Look up the features, this way you can assign the restrictive scponly shell
to the users:

http://sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Best Regards:

Balázs Mátéffy



On 26 May 2010 00:05, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 25/05/2010 22:29:57, Matthew Law wrote:
 
  I want to provide some users with secure network attached storage over
  SCP.  The intent is to provide people with a similar thing to, e.g.
  rsync.net but inside of our network only.
 
  Security is obviously a priority so I would like each user to be chrooted
  into their allocated directory and allow them only to execute a small set
  of commands.

 Checkout the security/openssh-portable port which has options to enable
 chroot'ing.  You should be able to configure the account to only be able
 to use scp(1) or sftp(1) by editing sshd_config or by using forced
 commands in the user authorized_keys files.

  I have come across scponly before.  Is this the best way of achieving
 this
  with FreeBSD or is there some other better way?

 Another alternative is WebDAV.  Run it over HTTPS for security, and use
 the standard Apache authn/authz controls to give each user access to
 only their own area.  In principle your users can mount their WebDAV
 areas as networked filesystems on their desktops.  In practice, this
 works fine with MacOS X, is horribly buggy under Windows, needs quite a
 lot of effort to make work on Linux, and I don't think it's actually
 available at all on FreeBSD.  However, commandline clients like cadaver
 will work fine on anything Unixy.

Cheers

Matthew

 - --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAkv8ScYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyLRQCginYWfMA2AJKnxZs9rvXlg7qf
 CnUAnj668eKglbUe8RIfp8actDj13gYe
 =jATZ
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: jails and one dynamic ip address

2010-05-25 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,


Sure there can be a better solution (I think :)):

Use an rfc1918 private address range for your Jail, and use nat, to forward
your external interface IP to the private address of the jail.

This can be done in ipnat, PF, or the other natting, packet filtering tools.

Hope I understood your question :).

Regards,

Balázs M.



On 26 May 2010 01:36, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:

 I get one dynamic ip address from my ISP. This is what I specify on the
 jail for public network access. When the ip address changes on me I have to
 manually change the ip address associated with the jail.

 Is there some method I can code so jail will all ways have public network
 access?
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: where can i dl freebsd?

2010-05-06 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

I smell something fishy here, but whatever, here's a link to the gzipped 8.0
DVD ISO:

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/8.0/8.0-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz

7.3:

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/7.3/FreeBSD-7.3-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.gz



On 7 May 2010 07:15, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:

 On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:44:24AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
  Check the FreeBSD website? There have been DVD releases since
 7.1-RELEASE,
  if my memory serves.


 i'll check again; couldn't find it...



 --
  Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service
 Unix
The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
   http://journey.thought.org  99 44/100% Guaranteed Novel

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: pf suggestions for paced attack

2010-05-03 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hello,

What if you use a perl or whatever script, to look in the logs, and after a
number of bad password attempts you just add that IP to the badboys table?

Some programs out there are capable to do this eg. Daniel Gerzo'
bruteforceblocker (you have to edit it), or bruteblock (if i'm right with
the name).

Regards,

MB.

On 3 May 2010 18:39, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:

 On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  On 03/05/2010 15:41:10, John wrote:
   The script kiddies have apparently figured out that we use some
   time-window sensitivity in our adaptive filtering.  From sshd, I've
   been seeing reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo ... failed and
   from ftpd (when I have the port open at all, which is rare), I am
   seeing probes at about 27 second intervals.  This stays well below
   the 3/30 (three connections in 30 seconds) sensitivity that I had
   been using.  It took them nearly two and a half hours to make 154
   attemps, but computers are very patient.
  
   I have now changed the timing window sensivity, but it's to the
   point now where there's a significant probability that someone could
   lock themselves out (temporarily, at least, I do clear these tables
   periodically) if they are having a bit of a fat-finger moment with
   their password.
  
   Anybody got any superior suggestions?
 
  Heh.  If the attackers are forced to slow down the probe rate so
  drastically, then their chances of breaking in would be greatly reduced
  /even/ if you were using guessable passwords.  Which I shall assume you
  aren't: key based auth is what you need, or maybe OTP.  You certainly
  should not be relying on rate-adaptive blocking alone to secure your
  system -- it's more a way of preventing your log files from being
  flooded with crap -- and you've limited that quite effectively by
  forcing the attackers to slow down.  I'd not feel any necessity to
  modify the rate settings on your PF rule.
 
  Anyhow, there is certainly a potential to lock yourself out using
  adaptive blacklisting.  If you know where your friends are going to be
  logging in from, then I'd set up a whitelist.  Something like this:
 
  (replace with a list of the addresses / ranges you want to allow)
 
  table ssh-whitelist const { \
  192.0.2.0/24  \
  } persist
  table ssh-bruteforce persist
 
  set skip on lo0
 
  scrub in
  pass all
 
  antispoof log quick for lo0
  block drop in log quick from ssh-bruteforce
 
  pass in proto tcp from !ssh-whitelist to port ssh \
   flags S/SA keep state  \
   (max-src-conn-rate 3/30, overload ssh-bruteforce flush global)
  pass in proto tcp from ssh-whitelist to port ssh  \
   flags S/SA keep state
 
Cheers,
 
Matthew
 
  - --
  Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
  PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW

 Hi, Matthew.  Indeed, yes, you may not recall, but my rules are
 based on a set that I originally got from you, and I do, in fact,
 have a white list, which I should have mentioned, but some of my
 users are road warriors and could be coming from virtually anywhere.
 You're right, though - it's time to look into alternatives to
 password-based authenticaion.  I think I've taken password-based
 protection and rate adaptive rules to their logical limit.

  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
  Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
  iEYEARECAAYFAkve+eQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzpTwCgg/NpuZjR1mnfkcBX169LB5Ih
  ykYAnjQLprMKxMtKW2IfgWNEB5bTt33Q
  =12Jn
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 --

 John Lind
 j...@starfire.mn.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: pf suggestions for paced attack

2010-05-03 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

I'm interested, by the way, is there a max size limit to a pf table? Mine
always stops working at 2megs...


On 3 May 2010 18:48, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:39 AM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:

  Hi, Matthew.  Indeed, yes, you may not recall, but my rules are
  based on a set that I originally got from you, and I do, in fact,
  have a white list, which I should have mentioned, but some of my
  users are road warriors and could be coming from virtually anywhere.
  You're right, though - it's time to look into alternatives to
  password-based authenticaion.  I think I've taken password-based
  protection and rate adaptive rules to their logical limit.
 
 
 What's wrong with denyhosts?  Key-based authentication has it's own set
 pitfalls.  I'm far more likely to lose my usb stick than my password.  I
 imagine there are other like me.

 --
 Adam Vande More
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Gaming

2010-04-29 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hi,

I lolled on the comment from David Kelly :D.
By the way some time in the past I managed to use Counter-Stike 1.6 on wine
with approx 20fps, and without sound :).

On linux there is cedega, but cedega won't be ported to FreeBSD there was an
old abandoned project to do it, but it died ;\.

Your best bet is wine, but don't expect sky high fps rates, and fireworks,
FreeBSD is not for gaming...ATM :D.

Regards,

MB.




On 29 April 2010 19:58, pete wright nomadlo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, pete wright nomadlo...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Joe's Morgue joes_mor...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  Looking thru your manuals, I have not seen anything about gaming on a
 FreeBSD machine.
 
  Are there drivers for higher end graphic cards available?
 
 
 
  nvidia provides a binary blob of their Unix driver for FreeBSD:
  http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_1.0-4365.html
 

 arg!  wrong URL!

 http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd-195.36.24.html

 -pete



 --
 pete wright
 www.nycbug.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2010-04-24 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
I almost forgot!

And if you find out the reason for shortage you can tweak it with the
appropiate sysctl value.

At the moment I'm not sure which value you should tweak, but if you search
for this issue, maybe you can find the appropiate net. values.

Regards,

MB.

On 24 April 2010 22:35, Balázs Mátéffy repcs...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I had a similar problem sometimes on one or two of my machines, look up
 netstat -m, usually if you run out of buffer space you have to tweak the
 mbuf memory size.

 You can see the memory usage current / cache / total, if the current or
 cache is the same value as the total, you have memory shortage.

 You can search for it, there are plenty of mail list archives about issue
 like this.

 Hope this helps!

 Best Regards,

 MB.


 On 24 April 2010 13:06, Erik Norgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote:

 Hi!

 I'm running FreeBSD 8.0. Some times my network just go down without
 leaving any errors behind, now this morning it went down but didn't cut my
 ssh connection to the box and I got this error:

 ping: sendto: No buffer space available

 From what I have found this relates to protocols like udp and icmp, I
 assume this can occur with p2p but also vpn protocols like l2tp.

 Is there some way that I can set limits on these protocols such that they
 will not use up all available buffer space? Or some way to increase buffer?

 Or is the problem something completely different? I've got two vr
 interfaces on a VIA Nehemiah ITX.

 Thanks, Erik
 --
 Erik Nørgaard
 Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157  http://www.locolomo.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2010-04-24 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Hello,

I had a similar problem sometimes on one or two of my machines, look up
netstat -m, usually if you run out of buffer space you have to tweak the
mbuf memory size.

You can see the memory usage current / cache / total, if the current or
cache is the same value as the total, you have memory shortage.

You can search for it, there are plenty of mail list archives about issue
like this.

Hope this helps!

Best Regards,

MB.

On 24 April 2010 13:06, Erik Norgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote:

 Hi!

 I'm running FreeBSD 8.0. Some times my network just go down without leaving
 any errors behind, now this morning it went down but didn't cut my ssh
 connection to the box and I got this error:

 ping: sendto: No buffer space available

 From what I have found this relates to protocols like udp and icmp, I
 assume this can occur with p2p but also vpn protocols like l2tp.

 Is there some way that I can set limits on these protocols such that they
 will not use up all available buffer space? Or some way to increase buffer?

 Or is the problem something completely different? I've got two vr
 interfaces on a VIA Nehemiah ITX.

 Thanks, Erik
 --
 Erik Nørgaard
 Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157  http://www.locolomo.org
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Online school for FreeBSD

2010-04-10 Thread Balázs Mátéffy
Sorry David for the mail before, I've got the wrong address!

+1 :)

I like the books of M.W.Lucas, easy to read, funny and on the other hand
they have the needed details about the subject.

On 11 April 2010 01:14, David Newman dnew...@networktest.com wrote:

 On 4/10/10 3:08 PM, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
  Roland Smith wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 09:34:59PM -0800, jt wrote:
 
  I've been doing searches for online schools that teach FreeBSD. I've
  been
  trying to learn on an off for years but when it starts getting
  complicated,
  I get stuck. The handbook don't do allot of good.
 
  You can download the book The Complete FreeBSD from
  http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/
 
  There is also Absolute FreeBSD
  http://www.absolutefreebsd.com/
  Only available for purchase though.

 +1

 I've found this and other books by Mr. Lucas to be informative,
 accessible and even entertaining, well worth their price.

 dn

 
  Chris
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org