RE: Zebra Installation and config

2008-08-25 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farooq Hussain
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:56 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Zebra Installation and config

Hello to all of u,

Can anyone tell me about Zebra router installation and configuration on
FreeBSD.

-- 
Thanks

Farooq Hussain




Port name is quagga. After install just follow the man or search on
google for configuration examples.






Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message (including any 
attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by 
mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and permanently delete this 
message and any attachments from your system. Any form of dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of this message in whole or in part 
is strictly prohibited if you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail. 
Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. STARCOMMS PLC shall not be 
liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained 
in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your 
system. STARCOMMS PLC does not guarantee that the integrity of this 
communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of 
viruses, interceptions or interferences. STARCOMMS PLC reserves the right to 
monitor all e-mail communications, whether related to the business of STARCOMMS 
or not, through its internal or external networks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Controlling read access

2008-08-06 Thread Catalin Miclaus
Original Message-
From: John Almberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:55 PM
To: Catalin Miclaus
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Controlling read access 


On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Catalin Miclaus wrote:

 Hello John,

 If you are providing only FTP services for those users, perhaps you  
 want
 to go for an FTP server that handles virtual users.
 I'm using pure-ftpd and it works great.
 Google will help you find some nice howto's for same.


Hi Catalin... I installed pure--ftpd with TLS/SSL support and am  
having some problems with it...

1. VERY slow to list files the first time. I thought this was a DNS  
problem, so tried the -H flag, but no joy. Still slow.

2. When I try to connect with TLS/SSL, I get a connection, but the  
file list takes so long that the connection times out.

Any ideas? I Googled for this problem, but the only hint I came up  
with was the -H flag...

Thanks: John


Hello John,

There are some things that you can try.

What if you connect from localhost and transfer files, is it still very
slow?
Try to disable TLS/SSL and see if this improve performance.
Increase debug level and check the log for any errors.







Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.


DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message (including any 
attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by 
mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and permanently delete this 
message and any attachments from your system. Any form of dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of this message in whole or in part 
is strictly prohibited if you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail. 
Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. STARCOMMS PLC shall not be 
liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained 
in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your 
system. STARCOMMS PLC does not guarantee that the integrity of this 
communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of 
viruses, interceptions or interferences. STARCOMMS PLC reserves the right to 
monitor all e-mail communications, whether related to the business of STARCOMMS 
or not, through its internal or external networks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Controlling read access

2008-07-31 Thread Catalin Miclaus
Hello John,

If you are providing only FTP services for those users, perhaps you want
to go for an FTP server that handles virtual users.
I'm using pure-ftpd and it works great.
Google will help you find some nice howto's for same.











Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Almberg
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:17 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Controlling read access 

I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I  
do provide a small number of users ftp access.

Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home  
directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log  
in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other  
users home directories.

I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this?  
Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way?

Thanks: John

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message (including any 
attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by 
mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and permanently delete this 
message and any attachments from your system. Any form of dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of this message in whole or in part 
is strictly prohibited if you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail. 
Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. STARCOMMS PLC shall not be 
liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained 
in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your 
system. STARCOMMS PLC does not guarantee that the integrity of this 
communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of 
viruses, interceptions or interferences. STARCOMMS PLC reserves the right to 
monitor all e-mail communications, whether related to the business of STARCOMMS 
or not, through its internal or external networks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [Ports] How to find where a port is located?

2008-06-13 Thread Catalin Miclaus
Gilles skrev:
 Hello
 
 Currently, to find where a software is located under /usr/ports/, I
 rune the find command. Is there a database that I could query
 instead so that it gives out the whole path to that the application?
 
 Thank you.

Try 'whereis portname'.





Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.



Or

http://www.se.freebsd.org/ports/index.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernel crash coredump help

2008-06-08 Thread Catalin Miclaus
 0x80574e2b in ip_input (m=0xff0036190500) at
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:417
#20 0x8052dee1 in ether_demux (ifp=0xff000128d800,
m=0xff0036190500) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:834
#21 0x8052e181 in ether_input (ifp=0xff000128d800,
m=0xff0036190500) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:692
#22 0x802d77ac in em_rxeof (adapter=0xff000122f000,
count=119) at /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:4542
#23 0x802d84d7 in em_poll (ifp=0xff000128d800, cmd=Variable
cmd is not available.) at /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1433
#24 0x8048dd8d in netisr_poll () at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c:432
#25 0x80537e8a in swi_net (dummy=Variable dummy is not
available.) at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:254
#26 0x8047b5a0 in ithread_loop (arg=0xff00010d9b80) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1036
#27 0x80478673 in fork_exit (callout=0x8047b430
ithread_loop, arg=0xff00010d9b80, frame=0xac3e0c80) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:781
#28 0x80701aae in fork_trampoline () at
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:415
#29 0x in ?? ()
#30 0x in ?? ()
#31 0x0001 in ?? ()
#32 0x in ?? ()
#33 0x in ?? ()
#34 0x in ?? ()
#35 0x in ?? ()
#36 0x in ?? ()
#37 0x in ?? ()
#38 0x in ?? ()
#39 0x in ?? ()
#40 0x in ?? ()
#41 0x in ?? ()
#42 0x in ?? ()
#43 0x in ?? ()
#44 0x in ?? ()
#45 0x in ?? ()
#46 0x in ?? ()
#47 0x in ?? ()
#48 0x in ?? ()
#49 0x in ?? ()
#50 0x in ?? ()
#51 0x in ?? ()
#52 0x in ?? ()
#53 0x00c9c000 in ?? ()
#54 0xff00010e0340 in ?? ()
#55 0x0001 in ?? ()
#56 0xff00010f3468 in ?? ()
#57 0xff00010e0680 in ?? ()
#58 0xff00010e0340 in ?? ()
#59 0xac3e0b58 in ?? ()
#60 0xff00010e0340 in ?? ()
#61 0x804b5b69 in sched_switch (td=0xff00010d9b80,
newtd=0x8047b430, flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:905
#62 0x in ?? ()
#63 0x in ?? ()
#64 0x in ?? ()
#65 0x in ?? ()
#66 0x in ?? ()
#67 0x in ?? ()
#68 0x in ?? ()
#69 0x in ?? ()
#70 0x in ?? ()
#71 0x in ?? ()
#72 0x in ?? ()
#73 0x in ?? ()
#74 0x in ?? ()
#75 0x in ?? ()
#76 0x in ?? ()
#77 0x in ?? ()
#78 0x in ?? ()
#79 0x in ?? ()
#80 0x in ?? ()
#81 0x in ?? ()
#82 0x in ?? ()
#83 0x in ?? ()
#84 0x in ?? ()
#85 0x in ?? ()
#86 0x in ?? ()
#87 0x in ?? ()
#88 0x in ?? ()
#89 0x in ?? ()
#90 0x in ?? ()
#91 0x in ?? ()
#92 0x in ?? ()
#93 0x in ?? ()
#94 0x in ?? ()
#95 0x in ?? ()
#96 0x in ?? ()
#97 0x in ?? ()
#98 0x in ?? ()
#99 0x in ?? ()
#100 0x in ?? ()
#101 0x in ?? ()
#102 0x in ?? ()
#103 0x in ?? ()
#104 0x in ?? ()
#105 0x in ?? ()
#106 0x in ?? ()
#107 0x in ?? ()
#108 0x in ?? ()
#109 0x in ?? ()
#110 0x in ?? ()
#111 0x in ?? ()
#112 0x in ?? ()
#113 0x in ?? ()
#114 0x in ?? ()
#115 0x in ?? ()
#116 0x in ?? ()
#117 0x in ?? ()
#118 0x in ?? ()
#119 0x in ?? ()
#120 0x in ?? ()
#121 0x in ?? ()
#122 0x in ?? ()
#123 0x in ?? ()
#124 0x in ?? ()
#125 0x in ?? ()
#126 0x in ?? ()
#127 0x in ?? ()
#128 0x in ?? ()
#129 0x in ?? ()
#130 0x in ?? ()
#131 0x in ?? ()
#132 0x in ?? ()
#133 0x in ?? ()
Cannot access memory at address 0xac3e1000
(kgdb)

Appreciate your help in identifying if this is a hardware failure or we
just step on a bug.







Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions

RE: New Kernel with Dell PE2950

2008-06-04 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VeeJay
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:04 PM
To: FreeBSD-Questions; VeeJay
Subject: New Kernel with Dell PE2950

Hi guys

I am going to install a Web Server (apache+mysql+php) at my work place.
To
boost performance, I am just thinking that should I configure and
rebuild
FreeBSD KERNEL for this hardware? And if so, what paramters I should
follow?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Server's hardware configuration is as follow:
 2  x  Quad Core Xeon E5450 3.0GHz,2x6MB,1333FSB
16GB (8x2GB Dual Rank DIMMs) 667MHz FBD
 6  x  450GB SAS 15k 3.5 HD Hot Plug
 PERC 6/i, Integrated Controller Card x6 backplane
 PE2950 III C5 MSS R10 Add-in PERC 5/i / 6/i 1 S
 TCP/IP Offload Engine 2P
 Broadcom TCP/IP Offload Engine functionality (TOE) Not Enabled

Thank you guys.
VJ

BR / vj



You should start by using some sort of benchmark or traffic generator
and trying to overload the server by reproducing your environment.
This way you will see exactly what parameters needs tuning.

Bottleneck can come from many thingsIO, NIC, database and so on.
It is not like you will apply some universal tuning that it will solve
all future issues.

BTWbce/bge drivers has known issues that leads to 'watchdog timeout'
NIC reset.
I have same some 6-8 servers with your hardware configuration and we
have ordered them with Intel Gigabit cards especially to avoid above
issue.
Use bce/bge NICs for low traffic interfaces if possible.

Is there any reason why GENERIC/SMP kernel does not suits you well?
What is your traffic expectation for the server?






Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: New Kernel with Dell PE2950

2008-06-04 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: D Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:06 PM
To: Catalin Miclaus
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions
Subject: RE: New Kernel with Dell PE2950

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 at 18:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:

 BTWbce/bge drivers has known issues that leads to 'watchdog
timeout'
 NIC reset.
 I have same some 6-8 servers with your hardware configuration and we
 have ordered them with Intel Gigabit cards especially to avoid above
 issue.
 Use bce/bge NICs for low traffic interfaces if possible.

How can I see what you are referring to with the bge interfaces? We have
a 
PE6850 that has two bge interfaces. The server's roll is a spam filter 
server and processes close to 6.5 million messages per day.

However, I don't have the watchdog daemon running.




I don't remember exactly at which bandwidth consumption level the
watchdog timeout error starts appearing. Somewhere below 100Mbps.

You can see it if you enable the server to e-mail you the default daily
security report or from /var/log/messages file.

Jan  4 08:46:00 lb1 kernel: bge1: watchdog timeout -- resetting
Jan  4 08:46:00 lb1 kernel: bge1: link state changed to DOWN
Jan  4 08:46:02 lb1 kernel: bge1: link state changed to UP

BTWwatchdog is a kernel facility and it is enabled by default.
You can run a separate process if you want to control it (man watchdog).






Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: NFS drops with em0 driver

2008-06-01 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Subhro
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 7:06 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: NFS drops with em0 driver

Hello,

I am facing a strange problem on my systems. I am running
FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p12. My network interface uses the em driver. I am
facing a lot of issues where the NFS connections are dying randomly.
Is there any known bug with the em driver? I am using the SCHED_ULE
scheduler.

Thanks
Subhro



Check this:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/Commonly_reported_issues





Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Need to build a new mail server

2008-05-30 Thread Catalin Miclaus

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Procacci
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:21 PM
To: Bob Johnson
Cc: DAve; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server

Bob Johnson wrote:
 On 5/30/08, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Eric Zimmerman wrote:
 
 Foo JH wrote:
   
 I like Qmail. It's not overly difficult to configure, and it's
 extensible.

 
 and requires 400 patches to do basic things =(
   
~Paul



http://shearer.org/MTA_Comparison

Which MTA you will chose is only your choice.
I will vote for Postfix.





Best Regards,
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: freebsd-update question

2008-05-16 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RJ45
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:29 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: freebsd-update question



hello, I have updated qith command freebsd-update
and hte command

freebsd-update fetch

shows me I have already hte latest patch level  7.0-RELEASE-p1

anyway uname -a shows me always 7.0-RELEASE #0

how can I do to have uname to show me the correct patch level ?

thanks

Rick


I've noticed this was solved after recompiling the kernel.
Maybe it's also another method available, but since I'm using a custom
kernel I did not looked for it.








Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.







___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: chmod operation on directories / files

2008-05-07 Thread Catalin Miclaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zbigniew
Szalbot
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:57 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: chmod operation on directories / files

Hello,

How do I chmod separately files and directories?

If I use chmod -R 644 then it will go through all the subdirectories 
assigning everything 644 permissions, directories including.

Many thanks!

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot
www.lc-words.com




find /test -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;

Replace /test with full path to your directory.
For directories use '-type d'.




Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus
Network/Security ISP-Data
Starcomms Ltd.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: rsync as root for mail servers?

2008-05-05 Thread Catalin Miclaus
You can use the SSH key then change it for security reasons.
For directories is working fine, I never tried on the e-mail spool thou.









Best Regards
Catalin Miclaus


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Maness
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 5:31 AM
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: rsync as root for mail servers?

I plan on cutting over a server to new hardware, and I was wondering if 
I can add cert based login for root (how do I do this)?  This is so that

I can use rsync as root to sync the mail spool and home directories.  
Will this work?  I am using sendmail and wu-imapd.

Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Where to rent the best dedicated servers?

2008-03-24 Thread Catalin Miclaus
I have several FreeBSD machines rented from NTT Verio in London.
I'm accessing them remotely with SSH and there is also a control-panel option 
available.
Check if this is suitable for you.








BR,
 
Catalin Miclaus
Senior Network/Security Administrator
Starcomms Ltd.
www.starcomms.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Beech Rintoul
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Kyrre Nygård
Subject: Re: Where to rent the best dedicated servers?

On Monday 24 March 2008, Kyrre Nygård said:
 Sorry, I really don't know where else to ask.

 I've been using Staminus for a while now and I've had it with the
 downtime.

 Basically I want a place to host my Ruby on Rails / Git projects,
 an IRC server as well as an internet radio channel.

 Simple website / control panel design is ofcourse a plus. None of
 that cpanel bullshit though, I prefer to meddle around with simple
 text files the way it's meant to be done.

 So, layeredtech.com? rackspace.com?

 And is there a place that reviews dedicated server providers?

 Thanks,
 Kyrre

Check out www.rootbsd.net, they support the FreeBSD project and use 
FreeBSD servers.

Beech


-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | http://www.freebsd.org
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \  - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: limit Xorg to one ip address

2008-03-19 Thread Catalin Miclaus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Moellering
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:41 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: limit Xorg to one ip address

I want to set up the jail server but the information I have indicates that I 
cannot have a daemon binding to all IP addresses.  How do i limit Xorg from 
binding to all IP addresses?  Is this still necesary?

All help is appreciated.

Thanks

Mark

Do you want to run Xorg on the host or inside the jail?


Catalin Miclaus




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Right way to build package from non-port software

2008-03-10 Thread Catalin Miclaus
Hello guys,

 

What is the right way of building packages for non-ports applications?

AFAIK 'make package' and ' pkg_create -b name' are based on ports
installed packages.

Is there any way of using same commands or additional scripts to achieve
similar results?

If it matters I'm trying to create packages from net-snmp-5.4.1 sources
(needed for 64-bits counters feature) since ports version is based on
5.3.2.

Suggestions are welcome.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BR,

 

Catalin Miclaus

Senior Network/Security Administrator

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]