RE: Receiver (To/CC envelope fields) addresses verification against LDAP/Active Directory in sendmail

2007-04-07 Thread Christopher Martin
> -Original Message- > From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, 7 April 2007 12:44 AM > > You don't seem to mention using greylisting-- that will return a 4xx temp > failure for all initial connections (except from sites which have been > whitelisted). Only if the se

RE: Receiver (To/CC envelope fields) addresses verification against LDAP/Active Directory in sendmail

2007-04-07 Thread Christopher Martin
> -Original Message- > From: Mikhail Goriachev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, 7 April 2007 3:23 PM > > > You could use /usr/ports/mail/mimedefang (www.mimedefang.org) miltered > into your sendmail. Sorta like py-milter but in perl. The simplest, > quickest and dirtiest solut

Receiver (To/CC envelope fields) addresses verification against LDAP/Active Directory in sendmail

2007-04-06 Thread Christopher Martin
Spam with randomly generated recipient addresses is draining our mail system's life away, and it seems the easiest way would be to verify the receiving party's/parties' address against Active Directory and then TEMPFAIL any mails that don't have any valid internal mails (rejects would allow directo

RE: Sun Ultra 25

2006-08-15 Thread Christopher Martin
Actually, I think this is one of the AMD64 units, which should have great BSD driver support. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of stan > Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2006 10:47 AM > To: Free BSD Questions list > Subject: Sun Ultra 25 > > > Doe

RE: Sun Ultra 25

2006-08-15 Thread Christopher Martin
It runs very well on most middle-age and vintage Sun gear, including the Ultra 10 and Ultra 30, and it's probably worth a go on the 25. Check out the USparc ports page at: http://www.au.freebsd.org/platforms/sparc.html There is also a Sparc mailing list, so if you want to ask there someone may h

RE: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21

2006-08-13 Thread Christopher Martin
Firewall settings? You need to give more detail. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of rithy4u- CEO > Sent: Monday, 14 August 2006 1:14 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 146, Issue 21 > Import

RE: FreeBSD as a VPN Server/Router

2006-08-09 Thread Christopher Martin
L PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher > Martin > Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2006 8:42 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List (E-mail) > Subject: RE: FreeBSD as a VPN Server/Router > > > > > > > The FreeBSD Handbook has a chapter on this: > > > > http

RE: FreeBSD as a VPN Server/Router

2006-08-09 Thread Christopher Martin
> > The FreeBSD Handbook has a chapter on this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html > > HTH. > The only problem with IPSec is you need static IP addresses for the tunnelling mode (unless somebody knows something I don't, at which point I'd really like t

Filtering mail based on header contents

2006-08-08 Thread Christopher Martin
I have a mail system on which I have recently implemented spamassassin with Pyzor, DCC and Razor. I am really happy with the tagging accuracy and am ready to start filtering mail. I know spamassassin can be configured to drop all mail with a score over a certain amount, but I am concerned about dro

Cluster File System

2006-06-23 Thread Christopher Martin
Is there, or are there any plans for, a cluster file system for FreeBSD? Does anyone know of an open-source one that could be ported? Would be great to have two servers dishing out MySQL, ftp, etc from a single chunk of RAID rather than having to muck about replicating between the two boxen. C Ma

RE: mounting UFS under Linux

2005-09-18 Thread Christopher Martin
Sort of the wrong forum for you question. If you are looking for information about a Gentoo you are better off asking in a Gentoo forum, but I will try and help, none the less. http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+FreeBSD-5.html seems to suggest that you must recompile the Kernel, however like a lot o