Re: Input method doesn't work with QT applications. Anyone able to type Chinese into QT apps?
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008, Yuri wrote: Hi Jyun-Yi, With these environment variables prompt window pops up from QT apps but editboxes don't get selected word. Also all GTK applications begin to speak Chinese. How about, unset LC_ALL unset LANG export LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Input method doesn't work with QT applications. Anyone able to type Chinese into QT apps?
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008, Yuri wrote: Edward G.J. Lee wrote: unset LC_ALL unset LANG export LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 Thank you Edward, Now gcin menu is shown from QT app and all apps still speak English. But the problem is that selected Chinese character doesn't appear in the editbox in QT applications. Your qt app and gcin must start via zh_TW.UTF-8 environment. We don't have qt immodule in gcin ports yet. Edward ps. You need XIM when you use qt app. In ~/.bash_profile, export QT_IM_MODULE=xim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vi+urxvt8.9+oxim for traditional chinese, HOW??
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: some are displayed correctly, but some are wrong, still looks like \XX\XX, feel like not all the characters are not well represented Maybe there have some characters not in Big-5 range. Can you send me the file personally? Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vi+urxvt8.9+oxim for traditional chinese, HOW??
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: Hi, I use rxvt-unicode8.9+oxim, want to vi a text document in tradictional chinese. I have locale set as LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UT-8. I first have my input looks like xx/xx/. Then I set LC_CTYPE to en_US.ISO8859-1, I got nothing. How should I get this done?? thank you!! Try, env LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 vi or if you are using sh/bash LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 vi Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Texvc
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, John Andrewartha wrote: Hi and thanks for your time, I would like to install on FreeBSD 6.2 Stable texvc which, is needed to use the mathematical features of mediawiki. My current installed version of TeX is TeX (Web2C 7.2) 3.14159 kpathsea version 3.2 straight out of the ports tree. Unfortunately it does not include texvc and texvc is not a port. texvc is part of mediawiki, you can install it from ports, www/mediawiki(you will need ocaml to compile texvc). Or another choice, mimetex, www/mimetex(standalone cgi need not TeX system). Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portversion vs. pkg_version
Thanks, Sherry, On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, Sherry Zhang wrote: Mr. Lee: imho, portversion(uses the INDEX file to look up port versions) is like the desktop search(searh an index file), and the pkg_version( queries the port versions directly) is like the find command(search the entire disk);) But pkg_version -I use INDEX file too. use portversion instead, it's efficient cause it use port database. however, it will take a long time using portsdb to update the database file (the INDEX file) when you want to use portversion. If I run `pkg_version -v -I -L=', will fast then `portversion -v -L='. ps,i like your essays on GNU/Linux, LaTex, etc. and I gain a lot from them Thanks, I hope you like it.:) Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portversion vs. pkg_version
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006, RW wrote: Personally, I don't like to get version information from the INDEX file, I'd rather get an accurate answer, than a fast one. Another reason I don't like portversion is that it's forever asking me to run pkgdb. Aside from being a pain, it makes portversion unsuitable for use in scripts. You are right. INDEX file will not allways up to date. Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portversion vs. pkg_version
Hi all, What's the difference between `portversion' and `pkg_version -I'? Thanks. Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pdf editor
How about PDFEdit? http://pdfedit.petricek.net/pdfedit.index_e Edward ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
