A long time KDE3 user but now thinking of Xfce instead as KDE4 is not
really my way of doing it.
I prefer Fluxbox and have since I found it. Xfce is rather heavy these days,
not surprised you're considering it as a replacement to KDE. But Xfce breaks
rather badly at times, I no longer trust it.
You wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:
NetBSD
Not recommended, sorry to say
Why?
Net has support for less sparc64 platforms than OpenBSD or FreeBSD and
NetBSD reliability has gone downhill. I am sad to say it but I think Net's
best days are behind us. I hope I have to eat
All DBAN does is write {whatever-source-you-choose} to the drive
basically with dd (it's actually a separate wrapper program but it
behaves identically to dd).
Just use dd and avoid the hassle of downloading and burning a cd that does
dd. dban is nice if you have to do a garage full of
is anyone running a Common Lisp port on FreeBSD/sparc64?
I can't remember but I believe I had sbcl on sparc64, just don't remember
what OS...
I'm asking because none of our Common Lisp ports lang/clisp,
lang/ccl, lang/cmucl, lang/sbcl compile on sparc64.
I believe sbcl has binaries for
I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and restarted. Got
much further the next time, however...
There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
things. 'zpool import' lists
1- change /boot.config: add -S*speed
*2- change /boot/loader.conf: add following lines
boot_multicons=YES
boot_serial=YES
comconsole_speed=115200
console=comconsole,vidconsole
3- change /etc/ttys as follows:
ttyu0/usr/libexec/getty std.115200vt100on secure
none of the
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Only those who break laws have a reason to fear them.
That is a catastrophically incorrect view. Ask an attorney how much is spent
by corporations and private citizens defending themselves against both
wrongful lawsuits and wrongful prosecution. It's enough
