Re: cvsup
eoghan wrote: Hi Trying to cvsup my ports and server is saying: Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded, try again later So im using cvsup.FreeBSD.org but have tried cvsup1.FreeBSD.org, cvsup2.FreeBSD.org and cvsup3.FreeBSD.org and get the same message... is there something wrong? Thanks Eoghan Hello, try cvsup.countrycode.freebsd.org. E.g. cvsup.de.freebsd.org for Germany, cvsup.hu.freebsd.org, etc. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is OpenNTPD better than the included NTPD?
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Rob wrote: I don't plan on allowing anyone to connect to my machine or use it as a NTPD server. I see that OpenNTPD (OpenBSD's version) by default doesn't listen on any IP/port and seems a little more secure. Is this a good one to use over the included one in FreeBSD, or is there something better? How are you going to run an NTP server that doesn't listen on any IP/port? Kris He might want to use it only for syncing, but ntpd also has such sort of function irrc. Anyway, OpenNTPD can do privilege separation, that ntpd can't, I don't know about another difference in the functionality. Personally, I use OpenNTPD from ports and I'm satisfied with it. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrading amavisd-new port fails
jan gestre wrote: On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jan gestre wrote: hi guys, i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and portupgrade, both methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i fix it :( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port? TIA Hi, could you concretize a bit, please? What kind of error do you get? Could you attach the output? this is the error during portupgrade: Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.80571.23 env PORT_UPGRADE=yes make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! security/amavisd-new (amavisd-new-2.4.3,1)(checksum mismatch) --- Packages processed: 0 done, 23 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed The checksum mismatch reflect that your ports tree is outdated. The distfile was rerolled, and the PORTREVISION bumped. Please update your ports tree and try again. The current working amavisd-new version in the ports tree is 2.4.3_1,1. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrading amavisd-new port fails
jan gestre wrote: hi guys, i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and portupgrade, both methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i fix it :( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port? TIA Hi, could you concretize a bit, please? What kind of error do you get? Could you attach the output? -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/java/jdk15
B. Cook wrote: Hello All, Trying to build java 1.5.0 and it looks like it's needs linux java 1.4.2? is this right? === linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.12 You must manually fetch the J2SE SDK self-extracting file for the Linux platform (j2sdk-1_4_2_12-linux-i586.bin) from http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=22PartDetailId=j2sdk-1.4.2_12-oth-JPRSiteId=JSCTransactionId=noreg, place it in /usr/ports/distfiles and then run make again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. Yes, it uses linux-jdk to build a native one from the sources. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS
Martin Schweizer wrote: Hello Which ports does I need for a cvs system (client and server)? I searched against cvs in ports but it gets a lot of links. Any hints are welcome. Hi, cvs is part of the base system. You can just start using it, no need to install everything. See cvs(1) for the details how you can init a repository. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache 2.2 http accept filter
Ian Lord wrote: Hi, When I start apache2.2, I get the following error: [Sat Aug 19 11:26:50 2006] [warn] (2)No such file or directory: Failed to enable the 'httpready' Accept Filter [Sat Aug 19 11:26:50 2006] [warn] (2)No such file or directory: Failed to enable the 'httpready' Accept Filter [Sat Aug 19 11:26:50 2006] [warn] (2)No such file or directory: Failed to enable the 'httpready' Accept Filter Here is my config In /etc/rc.conf: apache22_enable=YES apache22 ssl_enable=YES apache22_http_accept_enable=YES In /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: AcceptFilter http httpready AcceptFilter https dataready Is there anything I am missing in the kernel or somewhere ? Also, is it better to run with or without httpready ? I read it was better performance wide to use it Thanks a lot Yes, you have to put these two lines into your kernel config: options ACCEPT_FILTER_HTTP options ACCEPT_FILTER_DATA Alternatively, you can load the appropriate kernel modules as well. I think it's better to use these, you might gain a bit in the performance as you wrote. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache 2.2 http accept filter
Ian Lord wrote: well, the apache22_http_accept_enable=YES should do this for him, but it seems like the problems stands elsewhere. Ian, are you sure that these modules are present under the /boot/modules directory? Hi, I just checked and the /boot/modules directory is empty so I guess the problem is there... Do I need to build a port or something to have them ? You might have option NO_MODULES in your kernel config file. If so, remove it and rebuild your kernel as described in the FreeBSD Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: update info on ports
dick hoogendijk wrote: Normally I upgrade my ports if I see new versions. But now I have a question: I saw a new apache22 version (apache-2.2.2_1) but on the apache site I could not find anything related to security bugs or whatever. I *did* find a version 2.2.3 though (not yet in ports!) So now I wonder, what is the difference of port apache-2.2.2 and the latest one apache-2.2.2_1 Imho it should be nice to have some kind of info file in the port telling the reasons to upgrade. Does anyone know? Or should I just wait for apache-2.2.3 (can't be that long). You can check the cvs commit logs, to determine what has changed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/apache22/Makefile As you can see, the mod_rewrite vulnerability is already fixed in 2.2.2_1, but it's still 2.2.2. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FFS or reiserfs ?
RJ45 wrote: Hello, I do not know if it is better to use reiserfs or the standard rReeBSD filesystem with soft updates enabled for a cyrus spool and db partition. Users have a lot of files on those partition. Anyone can suggest me if it is better to use reiserfs or FFS ? I am using FreeBSD 6.1 thanks Rick Reiserfs is read only, so you can only use FFS yet. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD = Free Software?
Dylan Rogers wrote: I only use free software. I was considering installing a BSD derivative on one of my machines. Does FreeBSD contain only free software? Yes, the base system only contains BSDL-ed and GPL-ed code (afaik only these two). From ports you can use some commercial software as well if you have the distfile. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD = Free Software?
albi wrote: On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:32:00 -0500 Dylan Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only use free software. I was considering installing a BSD derivative on one of my machines. Does FreeBSD contain only free software? read the GPL-license, read the BSD-license, draw your own conclusions on what you prefer to use or not use if you really only want to use Free Software, have fun with GNU-Hurd ;-) Hurd is purely GPL-ed, while FreeBSD is mostly BSDL-ed. BSDL has almost no restrictions, so I'd rather say FreeBSD is really free, not Hurd. -- Cheers, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP crashing on message move
Jaime wrote: When trying to move a message from my INBOX folder to another folder, I usually (4 out of 5?) find that the imapd process has crashed. SquirrelMail is nice enough to tell me this: ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: COPY 18238,18255 mail/Trash Looking in /var/log/messages, I find lines like this: Jul 11 21:28:47 atlas kernel: pid 81702 (imapd), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 This is using FreeBSD 6.1-Stable built from sources a few days ago and the ports for imap-uw, cclient, squirrelmail, php5-imap, etc. built from ports updated yesterday afternoon. I've seen the above error in /var/log/messages for a few other UIDs, too. So I know its not just me. This is a new server. The old server was working OK with these same files in /home (I moved the data over using a tar czpf archive.tar.gz -C /home . command.) and FreeBSD 5.x and imap-uw, et. al. built from ports as well. The most significant change that I can find is the move from php4 to php5, but that shouldn't cause the imapd process to fail, right? Any thoughts, tips, advice, etc. is greatly appreciated. Jaime Are you using any CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf? Signal 11 is SIGSEGV aka segmentation violation, which is often caused by unsupported optimization flags. Btw, do you use the stock compiler or something from ports? I suggest you to rebuild everything related with stock compiler and without any CFLAGS set. You can do this comfortably with portupgrade -f. Regards, Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMAP crashing on message move
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Jaime wrote: Looking in /var/log/messages, I find lines like this: Jul 11 21:28:47 atlas kernel: pid 81702 (imapd), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 Are you using any CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf? I don't remember changing anything in there. Checking, I find this: atlas:~more /etc/make.conf # added by use.perl 2006-06-28 12:34:45 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 atlas:~more /etc/defaults/make.conf /etc/defaults/make.conf: No such file or directory Doesn't look like it to me. Did I miss anything? Btw, do you use the stock compiler or something from ports? I used whatever was in FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE early last week. I generally don't like to screw around with optional stuff when I don't have to. :) I suggest you to rebuild everything related with stock compiler and without any CFLAGS set. You can do this comfortably with portupgrade -f. Based on the above, do you still think that I need to do this? Thanks, Jaime I'd give it a try at all. It can't hurt if you build the affected ports from scratch. If your ports tree isn't up-to-date run cvsup/csup first. Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
