Re: graphics card
On 22/10/2012 4:56 PM, ajtiM wrote: Hi! I have an old computer but it works good still :). I use KDE and GIMP and I like to use Krita more but a problem is graphics card and it is slow (Gimp is okay). I have ASUS P4P800 mother board and ATI Radeon 9000 AGP graphics card. I look for some Nvidia AGP cards (opengl 2.0) but the problem is because my motherboard AGP supports +1.5V only. Which gr. card would be better than my but I could use on my motherboard, please? Thank in advance, Mitja http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa Maybe the Radeon HD 4670 would be a good card for you to look at. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
NFS Install
What I'm wanting to do is build/installworld from my workstation to a remote machine but both have different /etc/src.conf and kernel configuration files. Is there a way to define seperate files so I can perform this upgrade without any errors? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: make installworld fails
--- On Sun, 8/1/10, Caleb Stein caleb.st...@me.com wrote: From: Caleb Stein caleb.st...@me.com Subject: make installworld fails To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 9:43 PM I am trying to update my FreeBSD 8.0 to FreeBSD 8.1. Here is the order I ran the commands in (all as root): cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel shutdown now make installkernel shutdown -r now adjkerntz -i mount -a -t ufs mergemaster -p cd /usr/src make installworld mergemaster reboot But I didn't get to run the last two. When I run make installworld, I get errors telling me that the filesystem is full. Now, I can assure you it is not. Well, basically, what I am asking is why is the filesystem full after installing the new kernel? You are supposed to make installkernel before rebooting to single user. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote: From: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options To: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:52 PM On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:39:59PM -0500, APseudoUtopia wrote: Hello, I'm working on editing the kernel configuration file for a custom kernel. The system will be running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1. I'm wondering about the use of the COMPAT options in the kernel config. COMPAT_43 Well, COMPAT_43 one isn't even in GENERIC anymore, so I guess it is not that important anymore. COMPAT_43TTY This is still in the GENERIC kernel. I'd keep it in initially. Then build a kernel without it. If that fails to start the system properly, you'll always have a good kernel to fall back on. Have a look at what is written under COMPATIBILITY OPTIONS in /sys/conf/NOTES. COMPAT_FREEBSD[4-7] If you do not have binaries from ealier FreeBSD versions around, you can skip these. FWIW, a FreeBSD 8.0 kernel fails to build without COMPAT_FREEBSD7 so I'd keep that. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote: From: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options To: Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com Cc: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl, FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 10:17 PM On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com wrote: --- On Fri, 12/4/09, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote: From: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options To: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:52 PM On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:39:59PM -0500, APseudoUtopia wrote: Hello, I'm working on editing the kernel configuration file for a custom kernel. The system will be running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1. I'm wondering about the use of the COMPAT options in the kernel config. COMPAT_43 Well, COMPAT_43 one isn't even in GENERIC anymore, so I guess it is not that important anymore. COMPAT_43TTY This is still in the GENERIC kernel. I'd keep it in initially. Then build a kernel without it. If that fails to start the system properly, you'll always have a good kernel to fall back on. Have a look at what is written under COMPATIBILITY OPTIONS in /sys/conf/NOTES. COMPAT_FREEBSD[4-7] If you do not have binaries from ealier FreeBSD versions around, you can skip these. FWIW, a FreeBSD 8.0 kernel fails to build without COMPAT_FREEBSD7 so I'd keep that. It didn't for meI initially compiled with not a single COMPAT option before I sent the mail to this list. I wanted to inquire about it before I installed the kernel. But it did build with no COMPAT options at all Error on my part, sorry for the noise. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: how to boot or access problem file system
Gardner Bell --- On Fri, 7/31/09, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: From: PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca Subject: Re: how to boot or access problem file system To: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Friday, July 31, 2009, 8:44 PM PJ wrote: Roland Smith wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:42:43PM -0400, PJ wrote: Basically, the news is not good. The directories files are not what I had to begin with. ls /dev/ad0s1 or any disk/slice merely gets: Permission denied. Now that is certainly weird. :-) I've never come across something like that. What do 'mount' and 'ls -ld /dev' return? Maybe /dev is mounted with incorrect permissions. You are logged in as root, I presume? Now, how could I be logged in? from livefs? On bootup, I see ar0 boot error or something like that... ls /dev ... shows ad0, ad10, ad12, ad4 and ar0 ad0 only has ad0s1 (I assume this to be ntfs ad10 also has s1, s1a, s1b, c, d, e, e, suffixes ad4 has s1, s1a, s1b, no c, but d, e, f suffixes The stench from Denmark is getting to me... ;-) Insulting much with your remark about Denmark? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance'
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote: From: John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com Subject: Re: Compact Freebsd 'appliance' To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 10:54 PM There was a discussion on this a few days ago. I happen to have one of these Atom based systems, a Shuttle X27D: CPU: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz (1596.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x106c2 Stepping = 2 Features=0xbfe9fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x40e31dSSE3,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,b22 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Cores per package: 2 Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 2137915392 (2038 MB) avail memory = 2086662144 (1989 MB) ACPI APIC Table: Shuttl Shuttle FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP/HT): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP/HT): APIC ID: 3 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 This works nicely with FreeBSD (needs only a sysctl setting to hush some messages on absurd temperature measurements - all onboard devices work). One disappointing thing about it: the one and only fan in the system failed about after a week of continuous operation. I can't find the discussion you mentioned, but this Shuttle looks pretty nice. You can't beat the price of these little boards. Thanks. The discussion of appliance machines took place on the stable mailing list. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-June/thread.html --- John ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: no serial port: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs
--- Jack Stone wrote:
--- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:15:57PM -0500, Peter wrote:
I cannot get FreeBSD 6.0 to recognize my serial port. I am
using
the
ASUS K8V-X SE motherboard[1]. It only has serial port but
dmesg
suggests there are two:
sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0: port may not be enabled
sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags
0x10 on
acpi0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio1: port may not be enabled
It looks like FreeBSD found one serial port (si0) and looked for
another
(sio1) but didn't find it (which is not surprising if it is not
there).
In the end I have no port:
$ ls -lh /dev/cua*
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 42 Mar 13 03:59 /dev/cuad0
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 43 Mar 13 03:59
/dev/cuad0.init
crw-rw 1 uucp dialer0, 44 Mar 13 03:59
/dev/cuad0.lock
And one port (the one detected as sio0) appears in /dev also
according to
the above.
There is one serial port and FreeBSD finds it.
I don't see the problem.
Ok thank you. My conclusion was based on the combination of the
error-like messages (port may not be enabled) and my experience
with
FreeBSD (that it assigns /dev/cuaa{0,1} to its serial devices).
I'm having the same problem with new SATA Abit MBs. No matter what I
do to
tweak the BIOS, I get your identical message. There is no active
serial
port, even though I added a serial port card.
Really need it too as my APC UPSes need that serial port.
I've seen this problem posted before and wonder if anyone finally
found a
solution?
Regards,
Jack
I ran into this message the other day after recompiling my kernel
without device atpic. Try adding that to your kernel configuration
file to see if it solves your problems.
Gardner Bell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola owerstack
Hello, I just acquired a rather old Motorola powerstack from one of my friends and am curious if it will be able to run freebsd. I'm unsure of the exact model # of the machine. This is some of the information I see when I boot it up. PPC1 Debugger/Diagnostics BIOS V1.9, it is running AIX4.2. Any help is appreciated. Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make test fails
Hello, While running make test in /lang/perl5.8 it fails on the following two tests. Failed test 9 #../lib/Net/Ping/t/450_service.t at line 84 #../lib/Net/Ping/t/450_service.t line 84 is: ok $p - ping(127.0.0.1); Failed test2 #../lib/Net/Ping/t/510_ping_udp.t at line 22 #../lib/Net/Ping/t/510_ping_udp.t line 22 is: ok $p-ping(127.0.0.1); Failed two test scripts out of 886, 99.77% okay. Any ideas at why make test would be failing within these modules? Thanks Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with pf.conf
Hello all, I'm trying to reconfigure a more restrictive packet filtering firewall for my home network but am running into some trouble. When I run dhclient dc0 at an attempt to obtain an IP address from my ISP I receive the normal: DHCPREQUEST on dc0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPDISCOVER on dc0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPDISCOVER eventually fails after the fourth or fifth try. When I run tcpdump at the same time as dhclient dc0 I receive the following arp requests. The 70.xxx.xxx.x is my gateway I'm trying to communicate with. 14:59 arp who-has 7.x.xxx.xxx tell 70.xxx.xxx.x ... I see about 3-400 of these. Here is a partial excerpt of my pf.conf with what I believe to be the most relevant sections needed to obtain an ISP on the WAN nic. pass out on $ext_if proto tcp from any to x.x.x.x port 53 keep state pass out on $ext_if proto udp from any to x.x.x.x port 53 keep state The above lines are duplicated as I have two nameservers that I am able to use. To contact my ISPs DHCP I use the following pass out on $ext_if proto udp from any to x.x.x.x port 68 keep state pass in on $ext_if from x.x.x.x to any port 68 keep state I also seem to be having a problem with the same NAT directive I've used on less restrictive firewalls. nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) Any help is greatly appreciated Reagrds, Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improving System Security
I normally run in securelevel 1 and according to the securelevel manual page not even root can change system immutable file flags. What I would like to do is set the schg and sappnd flags on as many system binaries as possible to improve security somewhat should my firewall get hacked. Question is, will I still be able to rebuild world in securelevel 1 without running into all sorts of errors due to schg being set? Is there an easier and more efficient way of improving the security of a firewall or is this about my best bet. I've read the sections on MAC in the FreeBSD handbook but I'm afraid I'd end up locking myself out if I were to go this route as I don't understand enough about MAC as of yet. Thanks Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Keep compile options through upgrade
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:34:13AM +0100 Olivier Certner wrote: Hello all, Is there an easy way to keep/retrieve the options last used to compile a given port? This could be used with portupgrade to upgrade to a newer version while retaining the previous build-time configuration (of course this won't work if the options available change). You can use the MAKE_ARGS option in pkgtools.conf. It allows you to use multiple arguments for each port that you wish to build. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Who generates the daily, weekly, monthly reports on FreeBSD?
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:01:47PM +0100 Anthony Atkielski wrote: albi writes: a check the /etc/periodic/ dir I've seen it. But where does it run from? Supposedly you're not supposed to modify crontab files directly, but where do these jobs belong if crontab -l from root won't list them. Is there some sort of system crontab in addition to those for root and other users, or how does it work? The files from /etc/periodic run from /etc/crontab. Refer to lines 20-22 Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I do not understand kernel modules
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:55:32AM +0100 Ramiro Aceves wrote: Jorn Argelo wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:38:54 +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote Hello friends. I am a FreeBSD newbie, I am going to ask you a question that I have not been able to solve reading the manual. I am using 5.3 release. I have compiled a custom kernel in my old pentium 75 MHz machine to include the driver for my sound card. I added the following lines to the kernel config file device sound device snd_es137x and compiled the kernel perfectly. (long time ;-) ) But there is something that I do not understand well. When I look at the contents of /boot/kernel/ directory, I found that there are kernel sound modules *.ko for every sound card the kernel supports. Should not there be my sound card module alone? Does It mean that you have to compile all the stuff, even if you are going to use only one kind of sound card? Am I missing something? Your sound card has been build into the kernel itself (which is /boot/kernel/ kernel AFAIK). The *.ko are kernel modules, which you can load using the kldload command. So in case you get a new sound card, find out what driver it supports and you can use kldload yourdriver.ko to get support for your sound card without recompiling your kernel. Yes, I understand now. The problem is that my old pentium machine takes very long time to compile all the modules even if I am not going to use them. I would like to compile only the modules I use, to reduce compiling time. Is that possible? Refer to the option MODULES_OVERRIDE in man make.conf(5) if you wish to only compile certain modules. Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thread Scheduling
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 09:48:59PM -0800 stheg olloydson wrote: it was said: snip My question is, will I notice any performance improvement by using the new scheduler opposed to the 4.4BSD scheduler on an SMP system and can the new scheduler be utilized on a single processor system? The intended use of the SMP system is for MySQL databases only. snip Hello, I asked about the new scheduler on the performance list. Below is (posted on list) reply: FWIW, one of the reasons that there hasn't been as much interest in SCHED_ULE lately is likely that several of the features previously only present in SCHED_ULE are now also present in SCHED_4BSD -- for example, making more effective uses of IPIs in reducing latency during inter-process communication across processors. While SCHED_ULE does contain a number of interesting things not present in SCHED_4BSD, the 4BSD scheduler has hardly gone un-improved in that time. However, Jeff Robserson does seem to have picked up recently on both VFS SMP locking and ULE. The scheduler tracing and visualization tools he committed a couple of weeks ago are really quite neat tools. Robert N M Watson So we'll just have to wait until ULE is fully baked to see which scheduler is best for a given application. For a more definitive answer, you may want to ask directly on the performance list. Thanks for your reply, I do have more questions regarding this so I'll ask away on the performance list. Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I do not understand kernel modules
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:57:35PM +0100 Colin J. Raven wrote: On Jan 21 at 08:42, Gardner Bell wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:55:32AM +0100 Ramiro Aceves wrote: Jorn Argelo wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:38:54 +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote Yes, I understand now. The problem is that my old pentium machine takes very long time to compile all the modules even if I am not going to use them. I would like to compile only the modules I use, to reduce compiling time. Is that possible? Refer to the option MODULES_OVERRIDE in man make.conf(5) if you wish to only compile certain modules. Thanks for this! I'm approaching a critical rite of passage today conincidentally, by recompiling my kernel and getting rid of stuff I don't need. Doing what you suggest sounds eminently sensible, yet I have to ask a followup question... How do you specify a particular make.conf that should *only* be used for recompiling kernels? I'm not too sure if one can specify another make.conf file or not. What are your reasons for wanting to do so? Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: location of kernel modules
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:02:57PM +0100 Colin J. Raven wrote: Can anyone please tell me where the kernel modules are located, and where are they described? I ask this so that I can figure out which to include/exclude in OPTIONS_OVERRIDE in /whatever/make.conf (separate post). I'd hate to *guess* at what to include/exclude, that sounds sort of risky..and I'm assuming there must be some method for doing this for someone of my (thus far) hopelessly limited experience. The kernel modules are located in the /usr/src/sys/modules directory. I have determined what to use and not use by both reviewing the dmesg output and doing a whatis on each module. Running whatis on each module seems to take forever but it is how I did it. Maybe someone else knows of a quicker way. Here is the list of modules I have included in the MODULES_OVERRIDE directive. accf_data accf_http acpi agp aio amd aout bios cam cd9660 cd9660_iconv cp crypto cryptodev dc dcons dcons_crom fdc fdescfs geom i2c io libiconv linux lpt mac_biba mac_bsdextended mac_ifoff mac_lomac mac_mls mac_none mac_partition mac_portacl mac_seeotheruids mac_stub mac_test mem mii netgraph pccard ppbus ppi pps random rc rc4 re rndtest safe sem sound speaker splash syscons sysvipc ubsa ufs ugen uhid unionfs usb vesa vinum zlib I've probably included more modules than I will ever use, but I think it gives you an idea. You will *definitely* want to modify the modules to your specific hardware. Regards Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thread Scheduling
While reading The Design and Implementation of FreeBSD I came across the section on thread scheduling. At the present time I am only testing FreeBSD on a single processor system, but will be moving to an SMP once I complete building it. Now it says that since FreeBSD 5.0 the /sys/kern/sched_ule.c along with the historic 4.4BSD scheduler is available to be used at the time the kernel is built. My question is, will I notice any performance improvement by using the new scheduler opposed to the 4.4BSD scheduler on an SMP system and can the new scheduler be utilized on a single processor system? The intended use of the SMP system is for MySQL databases only. Note: I'm far from a C or kernel guru so if anyone replies please respond in a manner a noobie to C would understand. Regards Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chmod: Operation not permitted
After rebuilding world last night I can no longer chmod some system binaries that I don't need. When attemtping to do so I get a permission denied. [EMAIL PROTECTED] chmod 000 /bin/rcp chmod: /bin/rcp: Operation not permitted. [EMAIL PROTECTED] chmod 000 /bin/rlogin chmod: /bin/rlogin: Operation not permitted The only binaries this seems to be happening with are the ones used for remote operations. Ie: rcp, rlogin, rsh, opieinfo, etc. I followed the complete instructions in the handbook when rebuilding world so I don't think that could be the problem. But I did run the following after the system booted correctly. # cd /usr/obj # chflags -R noschg * # rm -rf * Could this be the problem? The output of uname is 5.3-RELEASE-p5 and I am running in kernel.securelevel=1. [EMAIL PROTECTED] id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 5(operator) These are the flags I used in make.conf to build world. CPUTYPE=i686 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe MAKESHELL?=sh NO_DYNAMICROOT=true NOPROFILE=true NO_BIND=true If any further information is needed let me know. Thanks for your help. Regards Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chmod: Operation not permitted
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:20:45PM +0100 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: # ls -lo /bin/rcp -r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel schg 18388 Jan 10 22:49 /bin/rcp notice schg up here Check chlags(1) manpage for more information. Oh, btw. which rlogin gives me /usr/bin/rlogin on 5.3-RELEASE. Is that a typo in your message? I see that now, and /bin/rlogin was indeed a typo on my part. Reading man chflags now. Thanks Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
httperf warning
Hi, I've been benchmarking Apache13 the past few days with httperf and always see the following warning. Open file limit FD_SETSIZE; limiting max. # of open files to FD_SETSIZE. Can I safely increase FD_SETSIZE without buggering anything up or is this something that shouldn't be touched? If it is safe to change is this an option that one would compile into the kernel itself or is there another way of doing so? I'm thinking that it would be options FD_SETSIZE=2088, the 2088 being equivalent kern.maxfiles? I'm probbaly wrong with this assumption so hopefully someone out there can help me out. Thanks Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: startx problem
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 03:58:24PM + Emon wrote: Hello everyone I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am trying to get X started. But after typing Xorg -configure (I learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error ** Fatal server error: xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O *** Do you have a secure kernel level set in /etc/rc.conf? If so I think you will have to lower it. I tried running X once with securelevel 1 and got the same error. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Procmail Lockfile
Hi, I'm trying to setup procmail to deliver my mail but I continuously receive the following errors in my log file. procmail: Locking ~/Mail/Lists/FreeBSD-Questions.lock procmail: Error while writing to ~/Mail/Lists/_YmHxxx.gardnerbell.ca I do receive my mail but it always ends up in the default location that I have specified. In my .procmailrc file I have the following environment variables: MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail DEFAULT=$HOME/Mail/received PMDIR=$HOME/.procmailrc LISTFOLDER=$HOME/Mail/Lists SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail This is the recipe that fails to acquire a lock :0: * ^(From|To).*freebsd.org ~/Mail/Lists/FreeBSD-Questions The permissions on my Mail and Lists directory are set to drwx-- Any help to resolve this is appreciated. TIA Gardner Bell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Procmail Lockfile
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:08:52PM -0800 Joshua Tinnin wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 01:27 pm, Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Gardner Bell wrote: Hi, I'm trying to setup procmail to deliver my mail but I continuously receive the following errors in my log file. procmail: Locking ~/Mail/Lists/FreeBSD-Questions.lock procmail: Error while writing to ~/Mail/Lists/_YmHxxx.gardnerbell.ca I do receive my mail but it always ends up in the default location that I have specified. In my .procmailrc file I have the following environment variables: MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail DEFAULT=$HOME/Mail/received PMDIR=$HOME/.procmailrc LISTFOLDER=$HOME/Mail/Lists SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail This is the recipe that fails to acquire a lock :0: * ^(From|To).*freebsd.org ~/Mail/Lists/FreeBSD-Questions You want the receipe to store emails in /home/you/Mail/Lists/FreeBSD-Questions? So the receipe has to be: :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lists/FreeBSD-Questions I use: * ^List-Id:.*freebsd-questions.freebsd.org so that mail from other fbsd lists aren't mixed up in the wrong folders, and so I can separate CC responses. - jt Both recipies have worked for me, thanks for the help Gardner ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
