Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-21 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so >

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-17 Thread Gareth McCaughan
> Can I suggest that if you get no replies on questions@ that you try > hackers@ (you may need to subscribe to post, not sure). > > What's going on here is not normal so even someone with tons of FreeBSD > experience may never have seen something like this. I know I never > have. Most posters

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-17 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so > i

Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-14 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote, inter alia, > About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't > guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears > in the output of "ps" as "[swi4: clock sio]" begins to > use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so > more or less instantaneously. It continues

"swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-13 Thread Gareth McCaughan
ying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a -- dmesg output ends -- I would be grateful for any insight into what's going wrong and how (if at all) it can be fixed or worked around. I'm not subscribed to -questions or to -stable, so would prefer to be cc'ed, but I&#

DES functions, net-snmp, and ethereal

2004-08-10 Thread Gareth McCaughan
the Wrong Thing. (Well, actually, I just tried the latter, and it worked. To get ethereal to actually install, it was also necessary to work around a bit of breakage in the version of "sed" I have, which has presumably been repaired in more recent 4.x releases. Anyw