Re: Secure file transfers
I had a similar, perhaps related question. I'm making backups via tar to a SMB server, but I would rather use sftp/scp for it (the NAS supports both SMB and scp/sftp). I don't have enough disk space to make the backup to a tarchive and then scp that tarchive. Is there a way to make scp/sftp read from a pipe or stdin, rather than specific filenames? The docs haven't mentioned it, but since the subject came up I thought it worth asking... --- Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Danie Du Toit writes: Which packages are available to upload /download large dumpfiles in a secure fashion (e.g. using SSL). The customer should not need any secure client installed on his PC. Anything that is secure will require appropriate software at both ends of the transfer, and thus will require some sort of security-aware client on the customer's PC. SFTP provides secure file transfers. I use SecureFX on my client machine, and the standard SFTP server on the FreeBSD server. -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
umass stability 5.3 versus 4.10
I've written to the list several times in regards to my USB external hard drive. In summary: Under 4.10 it worked fine for 5 months and then mysteriously it quit working. The documentation I found for ehci+umass (albeit 3-year-old docs) implied that ehci was not completely stable, and its omission until 4.10 (and my own experience with it) makes me believe that. My question, though, is: Is ehci+umass considered production quality under 5.3? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10, USB hard drive, weird problems
I have a problem with my external USB 2.0 hard drive. This drive had been working for several months, and then it quit. By quit I mean that the device can be detected, but will not be assigned to a device node and therefore cannot be used. This is FreeBSD 4.10. I cvsup'd the source today and found no changes since I built this kernel. The kernel has uhci, ehci, and ohci drivers. The dmesg output inidicates that our hardware uses UHCI ports, finds 4 of them, and attaches EHCI to them: uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B port 0xff60-0xff7f irq 10 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ukbd0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd1 at ukbd0 uhid0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/0 uhci2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C port 0xff40-0xff5f irq 9 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D port 0xff20-0xff3f irq 11 at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xffa80800-0xffa80bff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb2 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: (0x8086) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered When I plug in the drive, dmesg shows the following: umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) Eventually, this appears: umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT It does not show the usual da0: line which would indicate that the device has been attached and made ready. usbdevs -d -v shows exactly what I expect: (snip) Controller /dev/usb4: addr 1: high speed, self powered, config 1, EHCI root hub(0x), (0x8086)(0x), rev 1.00 uhub4 (snip) Those BBB timeout lines keep appearing any time I do a USB operation, e.g. running usbdevs Any ideas on how I can continue troubleshooting this? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10, USB hard drive, weird problems
I have a problem with my external USB 2.0 hard drive. This drive had been working for several months, and then it quit. By quit I mean that the device can be detected, but will not be assigned to a device node and therefore cannot be used. This is FreeBSD 4.10. I cvsup'd the source today and found no changes since I built this kernel. The kernel has uhci, ehci, and ohci drivers. The dmesg output inidicates that our hardware uses UHCI ports, finds 4 of them, and attaches EHCI to them: uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B port 0xff60-0xff7f irq 10 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ukbd0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd1 at ukbd0 uhid0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/0 uhci2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C port 0xff40-0xff5f irq 9 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D port 0xff20-0xff3f irq 11 at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xffa80800-0xffa80bff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb2 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: (0x8086) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered When I plug in the drive, dmesg shows the following: umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) Eventually, this appears: umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT It does not show the usual da0: line which would indicate that the device has been attached and made ready. usbdevs -d -v shows exactly what I expect: (snip) Controller /dev/usb4: addr 1: high speed, self powered, config 1, EHCI root hub(0x), (0x8086)(0x), rev 1.00 uhub4 (snip) Those BBB timeout lines keep appearing any time I do a USB operation, e.g. running usbdevs Any ideas on how I can continue troubleshooting this? __ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: /usr/local/etc/rc.d vs /etc/rc.conf question
On my 4.10 box, there is a mysql-server script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d and nothing in /etc/rc.conf, yet mysql-server starts up a boot time. Why? (the following is true for 4.x) Check the /etc/defaults/rc.conf file You'll see in there that the default setting for local_startup is /usr/local/etc/rc.d /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d So (as someone else pointed out) if you don't want MySQL to start up, and its script is in one of those default directories, then you'll need to disable that script somehow. Either rename it to not have a .sh extension, or chmod it so it's not executable. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Web Email
This same thread came up only a week or two ago. Check the archive for early January to see it all. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'd like to have access to my spool via web browser. What kind of applications can I use? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
server replication?
After looking into the matter a bit more, my employer has decided that we don't need a true zero-downtime situation, that simply a warm spare server would be sufficient. Does anyone know of any packages, or have any scripts or other references, for doing this sort of thing? I guess the basic components would be: a network backup (scp as root?), and a script to ping the real server and change the rc.conf over to a second copy and reboot with the new one if the pings fail. I could write these myself, but I'm guessing someone wiser than myself has already done it... __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Memory Question
Is there something I can do in order to optimize - which in this case paradoxically would seem to mean reduce the amount of free memory? The simple answer is: Use it! Exactly how depends on what you're running. Basically, check the docs for all the stuff your server is running and see what you can do to throw more memory at it. A lot of software has docs about performance tuning, and its memory usage (and performance) can usually be cranked up. If you're using a database server, check the DB's config file (postgresql.conf or my.cnf) and allocate a bunch of memory to buffers. If you're running Apache, you can increase the spare servers; if your Apache runs Perl CGI programs, you could consider using mod_perl. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
server replication?
My employer is looking for solutions to achieve zero-downtime in the event of a hardware failure. I've been doing sysadmin for some time, but this is out of my league, and I wanted to ask the list for any advice, hints, etc. For starters, how does such a solution work conceptually? The possibility of load-balancing appliances has been suggested; how does this work with user databases and uploaded files? Our services are primarily web-based and do involve a significant amount of users uploading files, and database (postgres) work. __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EHCI without UHCI?
Under 4.10, if I want USB2 but don't need USB1, can the ehci driver be used in the kernel without the uhci driver? What are uhci's dependencies? On a similar note, if I commented out some kernel option that was required by another kernel option, would the build process fail, or would it build a broken kernel? The reason I ask: I hafta run usbd with -f /dev/usb4 because my USB external harddrive insists on being detected on usb4 instead of usb0-3. The dmesg indicates that usb0-3 are uhci and usb4 is ehci, and it'd be nice to force then all ehci, since they are all USB2 ports. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.
Three companies I know of use Squirrel: my work, my friend's colo, and the last ISP where I worked. They're all very fond of it, as am I. It does require IMAP, but so does IMP. At my friend's colo he also tried IMP but decided against it because installation was more complicated than Squirrel. I wasn't part of that project, so I can't say what his issues were. --- Rene C. Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't know what to choose. __ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10 USB problems
I've been using 4.10 and the EHCI driver, for an external hard drive, for several months and just recently a USB-related problem has started. When the drive is plugged in it is properly recognized by umass, etc. However, attempting to mount the drive results in /kernel: umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT being logged to dmesg, and mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured Someone suggested that perhaps the problem is having both ehci and uhci in the kernel. This seemed unlikely, since they've both been there all along and it worked. But I was wondering about the need for both the UHCI driver and the EHCI driver. (see dmesg output below) On my system, the startup shows usb0 through usb3 as being uhci, and usb4 as uhci. I think it also shows usb0-3 being grabbed be EHCI, am I reading that right? Still, I have had to run usbd with -f /dev/usb4 for it to notice the hard drives when they're attached. FWIW, The usbd.conf is the standard-issue one. Is it possible that some USB ports are being grabbed by UHCI and some are being grabbed by EHCI? Would rebuilding the kernel without UHCI cause all of the ports to be EHCI? The ports and harddrives are all USB2 anyway, so USB1 compatibility is not necessary. uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B port 0xff60-0xff7f irq 10 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C port 0xff40-0xff5f irq 9 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D port 0xff20-0xff3f irq 11 at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-D on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xffa80800-0xffa80bff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb2 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: EHCI (generic) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: (0x8086) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered __ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.8 - / out of space
--- David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another goof is for root to write to an unmounted filesystem. Later when the filesystem is mounted the written files are hidden yet still consume space on the fs containing the mount point (usually /). Could you explain how this happens (or point me to a doc)? Do you mean something like tar cvf /dev/ad0s1a? Does that cause fs corruption? Would fsck reclaim that space? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10, USB problems
For several months I've been using an external USB hard drive, under 4.10 and the EHCI driver. It's worked perfectly for months. As of a month ago, when I swapped the drive for another one, the drive has not worked properly. A few days ago, my employer went on-site (the server is colocated) to swap the drive. The new drive had the same problem, and rebooting the server did not correct the problem. It was also reported that the last time he unplugged the drive (the fs on the drive was not mounted) the system crashed; he has since not plugged in the drive. Now the details... dmesg shows that it found a mass storage device and properly identifies it, and usbdevs also reports the drive; however, attempting to mount the drive causes mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured and the message umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT appears in the dmesg. The external drive uses device usb4, since usb0 through usb3 are reported as USB1. It was suggested that having both the USB1 (uhci) and USB2 (ehci) driver may be causing confusion in the kernel. I find this unlikely, though, since it's been working for months. Any thoughts or troubleshooting tips? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smbfs module + securelevel
I am trying to mount a SMB share in the usual fashion: mount -t smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt And in response I get this: smbfs: vfsload(smbfs): Operation not permitted I am running at securelevel 1, so it would make sense if that were why I'm not allowed to load the module. My question is: How do I have this module loaded during the boot process, before the securelevel is set? Is there a rc.conf variable to set? Or is mentioning this smbfs share in the fstab sufficient? __ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: smbfs module + securelevel
Viel danke, Stefan! --- Stefan Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 02.01.2005 um 20:04 schrieb Gregor Mosheh: I am trying to mount a SMB share in the usual fashion: mount -t smbfs //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt And in response I get this: smbfs: vfsload(smbfs): Operation not permitted I am running at securelevel 1, so it would make sense if that were why I'm not allowed to load the module. My question is: How do I have this module loaded during the boot process, before the securelevel is set? Is there a rc.conf variable to set? Or is mentioning this smbfs share in the fstab sufficient? To make sure a module is loaded, add a line to /boot/loader.conf: smbfs_load=YES I believe that you also might need to load libiconf.ko, if it isn't pulled in automatically when loading smbfs: libiconf_load=YES HTH, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fon +49 170 346 0140 __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10, USB driver problems
For several months I've been using an external USB hard drive, under 4.10 and the EHCI driver. It's worked perfectly for months. As of a month ago, when I swapped the drive for another one, the drive has not worked properly. A few days ago, my employer went on-site (the server is colocated) to swap the drive. The new drive had the same problem, and rebooting the server did not correct the problem. It was also reported that the last time he unplugged the drive (the fs on the drive was not mounted) the system crashed; he has since not plugged in the drive. Now the details... dmesg shows that it found a mass storage device and properly identifies it, and usbdevs also reports the drive; however, attempting to mount the drive causes mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured and the message umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT appears in the dmesg. The external drive uses device usb4, since usb0 through usb3 are reported as USB1. It was suggested that having both the USB1 (uhci) and USB2 (ehci) driver may be causing confusion in the kernel. I find this unlikely, though, since it's been working for months. Any thoughts or troubleshooting tips? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10, USB driver problems
For several months I've been using an external USB hard drive, under 4.10 and the EHCI driver. It's worked perfectly for months. As of a month ago, when I swapped the drive for another one, the drive has not worked properly. A few days ago, my employer went on-site (the server is colocated) to swap the drive. The new drive had the same problem, and rebooting the server did not correct the problem. It was also reported that the last time he unplugged the drive (the fs on the drive was not mounted) the system crashed; he has since not plugged in the drive. Now the details... dmesg shows that it found a mass storage device and properly identifies it, and usbdevs also reports the drive; however, attempting to mount the drive causes mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured and the message umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT appears in the dmesg. The external drive uses device usb4, since usb0 through usb3 are reported as USB1. It was suggested that having both the USB1 (uhci) and USB2 (ehci) driver may be causing confusion in the kernel. I find this unlikely, though, since it's been working for months. Any thoughts or troubleshooting tips? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot find libs in /usr//local/lib
Try using the LDFLAGS environment variable to specify -L options, e.g.: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib make FYI, a similiar trick can be done for missing include files with CFLAGS: CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include make __ Do you Yahoo!? Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATAng for BSD 4.10?
Are there any plans for backporting the ATAng code to FreeBSD 4.10? I'd really like SMART monitoring, but not enough to make the jump to 5 yet. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please educate me on memory usage
I was looking at my top output and was surprised to see that the bulk of my 512 MB of memory was in use, since the server really has fairly little running. It's not a problem, but I was wanting some clarification on where this memory was being used, for my own education. The original goal was that I had figured that a lot of memory would be unused since so little is running, and perhaps I could allocate some more to Postgres. Apparently nowt, but I don't quite understand all the intricacies of what *is* using my memory. 35 processes: 1 running, 34 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle Mem: 158M Active, 207M Inact, 80M Wired, 20M Cache, 60M Buf, 33M Free Swap: 2000M Total, 6848K Used, 1994M Free So, 158 MB of memory in use. Does that include anything other than process' memory, e.g. shared memory, kernel memory, some of the fs buffer? If I add up the VSZ column from 'ps aux' I get 110 MB. The server's only processes of interest are MySQL, Postgres, and Apache httpd. There are cron, sendmail, etc. but these are all 1M usage according to both top and ps. MySQL has VSZ 38 MB and RSS 4 MB. Postgres (incl stats collectors) has VSZ 25 MB and RSS 1 MB. There's also the shared memory: ipcs agrees with my postgresql.conf settings: 2 MB of shared memory buffers. Apache 1.3 has 15 processes, each using 3.6 MB VSZ and 1.5 MB RSS. I was of the impression that the bulk of this memory was shared with the parent process, no? So where's the rest of the memory going? The 80M Wired is interesting, since I don't know where it's going. I presume that PG's 2 MB of shared buffers are wired (though I saw an email today that implied otherwise), but how could I track down the rest of it? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
