Re: reviving games/freebsd-games
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:22:19PM +0100, clemens fischer wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick:
I think the bottom line here is that until someone steps up and
actually volunteers to fix the code, it will remain broken. (I don't
normally tote this attitude, but in this case it's applicable: this is
a volunteer project! :-) )
That's why I want to try my skills on it. I found the emails you cited,
but they didn't help much.
Gdb(1) is no mystery to me, and it told me where larn crashes. Doing
scrollname[i][0]=' ' with char *scrollname[] = {\0something,...}
shouldn't cause a SIGSEGV as far as I know.
regards, clemens
If you do char *p = something, you can't write to that string (it's a
pointer into some stringtable: easy way to look at it :). You have to use
char p[] = something, then it's an array with enough storage to write to :)
maybe try something like char scrollname[NUMSCROLLS][]; ?
greetings,
Jurjen.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vpnc problem: protocol not supported?
Hello, i am trying to connect to the vpn at university from home. I have made a new kernel with what i think (thought) was needed for ipsec from reading the handbook, my kernel file looks like: include GENERIC ident MYCOMPUTER options SMP options IPSEC options IPSEC_ESP The kernel build and installed fine, however if i try to connect using vpnc it gives the following message: socket(PF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_ESP): Protocol not supported At the beginning of booting (top of dmesg) it says this: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I'm not sure what's wrong: am i missing something in the kernel config or is it something else?? I am using 6.2-RELEASE. Greetings! - Jurjen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pdksh vs. mksh info [was: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.]
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:32:38PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
If you're familiar with pdksh, are you also familiar with ksh93, which
is (I believe) Mr. Korn's own shell? If you are, I would be interessted
in your opinion of the two, any comparisons you might give.
I've never used ksh93 so I really can't say. There is a NOTES file
included with pdksh which gives a starter. I created this port a few
years ago because of some random issue I've long since forgotten with
pdksh on my FreeBSD box which didn't happen on my OpenBSD box.
tom
I never used pdksh, but am using ksh93 for quite a while now and have used
bash, too. For some reason i like it better than bash, the vi mode is a bit
better somehow, it feels alot sturdier. It doesn't have those special
variables like $! and !! i believe, but it has alot of neat features like
-^ i ment !$ offcourse :)
basic network programming, lots of parameter expansion stuff and is just a
very nice shell :)
I havre installed it, and played with it a bit, I admit it's nicer than
sh (and I *think*, bash) but the reason I haven't tried using it
regularly is because I can't find a nicely set up .kshrc ... if you have
one, I'd appreciate a copy. Might be nice, if it's not terribly long,
to post it to the list, too.
Basically it's just like any other shell .*rc. It sets some environment
variables for stuff, a bunch of aliases and some functions i find useful
myself, or am too lazy to throw away. Nothing really ksh-specific, except
maybe some of the functions i wrote use ksh-stuff like arrays, but that's
not really ksh-specific as well. You could use google to find any .*rc for
sh-like shells and copy those (or get a copy of unix power tools, it's a
nice book to make you feel at home in a shell)
-jurjen
ps. these functions i probably use the most :)
alias d=do_in_bg dillo
alias x=do_in_bg xpdf
alias ff=do_in_bg firefox
#do a program in the background:
do_in_bg() {
$@ /dev/null 21
}
#open a webpage from disk, like: $cd /usr/share/doc/en htm
#to look at all the (english) freebsd-docs :)
htm() {
set -A stuff $(find -L . -name index.htm* -print)
(for ((i=0; i ${#stuff[*]}; i++)); do print $i \t: ${stuff[i]}; done) |
$PAGER
read x d ${stuff[$x]}
}
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pdksh vs. mksh info [was: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful.]
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:34:50PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 22:26 -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: Tom McLaughlin wrote: Now that you mention pdksh, have you tried mksh (in Ports too)? I've installed it and successfully run moderately large ksh scripts (like the webrev(1) utility of OpenSolaris), and it is about an order of magnitude smaller than pdksh here: % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ls -ld mksh bash ksh % -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 684699 Dec 9 19:51 bash % -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 2390645 Aug 31 17:07 ksh % -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 236202 Dec 9 18:34 mksh % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ ldd mksh bash ksh % mksh: % libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280ae000) % bash: % libncurses.so.7 = /lib/libncurses.so.7 (0x28101000) % libintl.so.8 = /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x28144000) % libiconv.so.3 = /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x28156000) % libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2824b000) % ldd: ksh: not a dynamic executable % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin$ I've maintained a port of OpenBSD's pdksh for some time but I've never committed it. Think of pdksh but still actively maintained. http://people.freebsd.org/~tmclaugh/files/openksh/openksh-4.2.shar [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ ls -al /usr/local/bin/ksh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 192032 Dec 16 18:22 /usr/local/bin/ksh* If you're familiar with pdksh, are you also familiar with ksh93, which is (I believe) Mr. Korn's own shell? If you are, I would be interessted in your opinion of the two, any comparisons you might give. I've never used ksh93 so I really can't say. There is a NOTES file included with pdksh which gives a starter. I created this port a few years ago because of some random issue I've long since forgotten with pdksh on my FreeBSD box which didn't happen on my OpenBSD box. tom I never used pdksh, but am using ksh93 for quite a while now and have used bash, too. For some reason i like it better than bash, the vi mode is a bit better somehow, it feels alot sturdier. It doesn't have those special variables like $! and !! i believe, but it has alot of neat features like basic network programming, lots of parameter expansion stuff and is just a very nice shell :) -jurjen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux /proc on FreeBSD
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:32:37AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote: On Sunday 02 December 2007, Lennart Koopmann wrote: Hey everyone, i am going to port a server that i am currently working on to FreeBSD. I don't have much experience with FreeBSD yet. The only real big thing i have to change is the way some data is fetched. In the Linux version i read in data like the hostname, the domainname, the kernel version etc from /proc. Sysctls kern.hostname and kern.version. Is there a central point to look for those values in FreeBSD? Yes, the sysctl MIB tree. If not, where do i get those values? I _don't_ want to use external binaries like sysctl etc... man 3 sysctl :) Why not use (more portable (?)) functions instead of linux-isms or freebsd-isms? (e.g. uname, gethostname and friends vs. /proc and sysctl). -jurjen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (off topic?) Best desktop
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:03:14AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Well I pretty much went this way: abrwm (evilwm) (tinywm didn't have vwindows), fbpanel, xv, idesk, transset-dt, I have not selected a fm yet... For the most part I really like it (lean and mean) but one feature that several my apps support is transparent windows but seems abrwm for what ever reason doesn't support this and will completely ignore any windows with it... so I am looking for the next smallest wm that can do virtual windows and transparency... I know openbox, ion, xfwm all can do it but want something even lighter. Hello! i used ion for a while and it was pretty fast/easy to use. I recently tried out wmii and wmii is really nice. It's a bit less featureful (sp?) than ion, but it's smaller and easier to use. It's also very cool that its main (event) loop is a 200 line shell script. I don't know about transparency, but wmii doesn't have virtual windows (?). But it does have a very neat tagging system where each window has (a set of) tags. You can select tags to view and you will only have the windows with that tag on the screen. i like it very much! =) it's also not as strict about the tiling as ion, which is a plus as well in my opinion. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 7.0
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:43:24PM -0800, kasthurirangan balaji wrote: Hi, I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go through the sun website to understand the advantages of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a BTree/B+Tree(replicating c++ multimaps, but file based) by default on ZFS which i guess should be very useful for persons like me who do not want a full fledged database with all SQL features. I am aware of the existence of dbm/ndbm/gdbm, but i guess all support hash. If my thoughts are wrong, pls correct me. I also hope that i have sent to the correct mailing list. Thanks, Balaji. Hello! i don't know about the filesystem things, but if you want a data base to program with, you can have a look at dbopen(3) :) - jurjen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems using gdb on threaded programs
Ok let me try again (more explanation/question below).
Also sorry that i screwed up the script output by having a copy of the text
in it... not sure how that happened!
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:53:09PM +, Jurjen Middendorp wrote:
Hello, when i try to debug a program with threads (with gdb) gdb complains
about not being able to find thread start point and kind of hangs (see
below). It is quite likely i misconfigured something, but i have no idea
what that something would be (maybe forgot to put stuff in kernel?).
I tried installing a newer version of gdb (6.6) but that fails in a
different way, it can't get the thread info (breakpoints seem to work
better though :) I also tried to recompile libpthread in /usr/src/lib with
debug flag, but no potato.
What else can i try now? i'm kind of stumped.
- jurjen
PS. Below is an output of the errors of gdb and a small program that fails.
Script started on Sat Nov 10 16:51:32 2007
/home/jurjen/C
$cat threadthingy.c
#include stdio.h
#include pthread.h
void *
start(void* blah)
{
printf(hello from a thread!\n);
return NULL;
}
int
main(void)
{
pthread_t tid;
pthread_create(tid, NULL, start, NULL);
pthread_join(tid, NULL);
printf(done!\n);
return 0;
}
/home/jurjen/C
$gdb66 threadthingy
GNU gdb 6.6 [GDB v6.6 for FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-portbld-freebsd6.2...
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x804860c: file threadthingy.c, line 11.
(gdb) b start
Breakpoint 2 at 0x80485d6: file threadthingy.c, line 5.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /stuff/backup/C/threadthingy
Breakpoint 1, main () at threadthingy.c:11
11 pthread_create(tid, NULL, start, NULL);
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, start (blah=0x0) at threadthingy.c:5
5 printf(hello from a thread!\n);
(gdb) info threads
(gdb) info thread
(gdb) help info threads
IDs of currently known threads.
(gdb) thread 1
Thread ID 1 not known.
(gdb) thread 0
Thread ID 0 not known.
(gdb) thread
[Current thread is 0 (process 53031)]
(gdb) thread next
No symbol next in current context.
(gdb) thread 0
Thread ID 0 not known.
(gdb) info thread
(gdb) c
Continuing.
The problem is here i think, why can't gdb display the thread-info? (Or
find thread creation points (?) using an older version of gdb).
Do i need to use another library/compiler flags if i want to debug threaded
programs?
- jurjen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems using gdb on threaded programs
Hello, when i try to debug a program with threads (with gdb) gdb complains
about not being able to find thread start point and kind of hangs (see
below). It is quite likely i misconfigured something, but i have no idea
what that something would be (maybe forgot to put stuff in kernel?).
I tried installing a newer version of gdb (6.6) but that fails in a
different way, it can't get the thread info (breakpoints seem to work
better though :) I also tried to recompile libpthread in /usr/src/lib with
debug flag, but no potato.
What else can i try now? i'm kind of stumped.
- jurjen
PS. Below is an output of the errors of gdb and a small program that fails.
Script started on Sat Nov 10 16:51:32 2007
/home/jurjen/C
$cat threadthingy.c
#include stdio.h
#include pthread.h
void *
start(void* blah)
{
printf(hello from a thread!\n);
return NULL;
}
int
main(void)
{
pthread_t tid;
pthread_create(tid, NULL, start, NULL);
pthread_join(tid, NULL);
printf(done!\n);
return 0;
}
/home/jurjen/C
$gdb -v
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-marcel-freebsd.
/home/jurjen/C
$gdb threadthingy
(gdb) break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x804860c: file threadthingy.c, line 11.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /stuff/backup/C/threadthingy
warning: Unable to get location for thread creation breakpoint: generic error
[New LWP 100143]
^C^C^Chelp, gdb hang and now i have to kill it!!^C^C^C^CKilled
/home/jurjen/C
$gdb66 threadthingy
GNU gdb 6.6 [GDB v6.6 for FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-portbld-freebsd6.2...
Hello, when i try to debug a program with threads (with gdb) gdb complains
about not being able to find thread start point and kind of hangs (see
below). It is quite likely i misconfigured something, but i have no idea
what that something would be (maybe forgot to put stuff in kernel?).
I tried installing a newer version of gdb (6.6) but that fails in a
different way, it can't get the thread info (breakpoints seem to work
better though :) I also tried to recompile libpthread in /usr/src/lib with
debug flag, but no potato.
What else can i try now? i'm kind of stumped.
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x804860c: file threadthingy.c, line 11.
(gdb) b start
Breakpoint 2 at 0x80485d6: file threadthingy.c, line 5.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /stuff/backup/C/threadthingy
Breakpoint 1, main () at threadthingy.c:11
11 pthread_create(tid, NULL, start, NULL);
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, start (blah=0x0) at threadthingy.c:5
5 printf(hello from a thread!\n);
(gdb) info threads
(gdb) info thread
(gdb) help info threads
IDs of currently known threads.
(gdb) thread 1
Thread ID 1 not known.
(gdb) thread 0
Thread ID 0 not known.
(gdb) thread
[Current thread is 0 (process 53031)]
(gdb) thread next
No symbol next in current context.
(gdb) thread 0
Thread ID 0 not known.
(gdb) info thread
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, start (blah=0x0) at threadthingy.c:5
5 printf(hello from a thread!\n);
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, start (blah=0x0) at threadthingy.c:5
5 printf(hello from a thread!\n);
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, start (blah=0x0) at threadthingy.c:5
5 printf(hello from a thread!\n);
(gdb) n
0x2809373e in ?? () from /lib/libpthread.so.2
(gdb) d b
Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y
(gdb) c
Continuing.
hello from a thread!
done!
Program exited normally.
(gdb) quit
Script done on Sat Nov 10 16:53:31 2007
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM T60 laptop?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:40:37PM +1100, fbsd wrote: Hi All, I am looking for a good laptop to put FreeBSD (PCBSD) on. The general consensus seems to be that IBM make good units and that the T60 is a good choice. But when I look at the three components that seem to cause most trouble in laptops 1. Graphics cards, 2. high definition audio and 3. wireless cards, the T60 doesn't look so good. The T60 is being made by lenovo i believe. Ok, I know that some people are having success with a driver for the Intel 3945abg wireless, but it is still in development and not yet in the base system yet. In the short term, a wireless card can be used so this area can be overcome. I'm not sure if my laptop also has the intel 3945abg card (i got it through university and they were a bit fuzzy about what was what :) but i can use mine with the atheros driver... Maybe you can contact lenovo/ your laptop dealer to change the default wireless card? I don't know what is happening on the high definition audio front. I think a driver is being worked on but there is no work around until it becomes available. So for the moment there is no sound. Yes there is :) Just make a search with keywords like: hdac freebsd thinkpad, and you'll find it! if you can't find it i can send what i have, it works for what i have (device = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio'). All the T60 models have either Intel or ATI graphic cards which don't have good support in FreeBSD (so I hear). In fact, a lot of people say always go for nVidia cards. This does not seem likely to change. True, but vesa mode for X works fine, which is probably enough to display your desktop and stuff. There's also a driver out there (fglrx or something) that supports ATI cards (only 2d stuff) but i couldn't get that to work so maybe that's just a big scam! :) So the T60 seems to strike out in all three areas. In fact most modern laptops have the same problems. So is my assessment correct? Or is there hope yet for the T60. In my opinion the T60 is a really great laptop (it's also the only laptop i ever used, so... , but i like it). It's fast, most things work, and the keys aren't annoyingly small to type with which i expected, it being a laptop and all. It also looks very nice and feels sturdy. So if you can change the wireless card and don't want to use your graphics card for stuff like playing games i can really recommend it! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How did i destroy my fpc compiler + compiled binaries?
Hello, i have a very weird problem and am not sure what is wrong. I have deinstalled my fpc compiler a while ago, but i wanted to install it again today, but make-ing the port failed with some errors... not sure where to send it to or what those errors mean, so i'll put them at the end of the e-mail. If anyone knows what's wrong i'd like to hear it! I have a slightly weirder problem though, all of the programs i compiled with the freepascal compiler are failing mysteriously! I haven't run any of them in awhile but all of them fail with the following message: Bad system call: 12 (core dumped). I'm not very sure what's wrong. If i try to add the freepascal compiler as a binary (with pkg-add -r fpc) it gives the same message, so maybe it's an fpc problem. On the other hand those binaries used to work, so maybe i screwed something up :) I upgraded to stable a while ago and decided to remove some stuff from my kernel config in the process, i think that maybe i removed a litle too much? If anyone knows what is wrong or what i can do to get more information on this problem please let me know! Maybe the problem is that i commented out the compat-4 and compat-5 freebsd options? i thought i didn't needed them, but maybe freepascal is a litle old? Most of the stuff i changed was removing things i didn't have on my computer anyway, so that is the only thing i can think of that could have broken fpc. greetings, jurjen. Here is the error i get from building the lang/fpc port. My kernel config is below there :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a FreeBSD jurjen 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #8: Sat Feb 3 16:30:58 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JURJEN i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/lang/fpc]# make === Building for fpc-2.0.4_1 gmake tempclean ppc3.exe gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' /bin/rm -f ppcross ppc ppc1.exe ppc2.exe ppc3.exe ./msg2inc.exe gmake 'OLDFPC=' next gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' gmake rtlclean rtl gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' gmake -C clean gmake: Entering an unknown directory gmake: *** clean: No such file or directory. Stop. gmake: Leaving an unknown directory gmake[3]: *** [rtlclean] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' gmake[2]: *** [next] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' gmake[1]: *** [ppc1.exe] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/fpc/work/fpcbuild_2.0.4_exp/fpcsrc/compiler' gmake: *** [cycle] Error 2 *** Error code 2 here is my kernel config file: machine i386 cpu I686_CPU options SMP ident JURJEN # To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints GENERIC.hints # Default places to look for devices. options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET# InterNETworking #optionsINET6 # IPv6 communications protocols option IPSEC options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories #optionsMD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS# Pseudo-filesystem framework #optionsGEOM_GPT# GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] #optionsCOMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 #optionsCOMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 #optionsSCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions #optionsKBD_INSTALL_CDEV# install a CDEV entry in /dev options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. device apic# I/O APIC device npx #floating point support #Pseudo devices device mem
Re: How did i destroy my fpc compiler + compiled binaries?
Putting the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and 5 options back in the kernel config solved the problem for not being able to use the binaries (the ones i had compiled with fpc and the fpc i get with pkg_add itself) so all is good now. Is it just a Bad Idea to put them out of the kernel or is freepascal a litle out of date with freebsd6? Everything else seems to be working fine. regards, jurjen. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: external touchpad for Thinkpad T23? (fwd)
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:49:48AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: I originally posted this to -mobile three months ago, but got no nibbles. The T23 is is running 6.1-RELEASE presently. Anyone? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 05:18:23 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: external touchpad for Thinkpad T23? I've just bought a Thinkpad T23, and I'm loving it .. but I'm not sure I'll ever be able to love its TrackPoint, being spoilt by the touchpad on my old Compaq Armada 1500c, with which I can be quite productive .. The only one I've been able to google up that looks nearly small enough to work with below the keyboard is the Adesso/Cirque EasyCat PS/2 or USB pad .. any chance these will (some value of) work with FreeBSD 6? moused(8) only mentions the older (serial, and way too chunky) ALPS Glidepoint, and the Interlink Versapad which looks more the right sort of size, but appears to be no longer available? I'd appreciate any clues. Cheers, Ian Moused(8) doesn't mention the ALPS glidpoint nor the Interlink VersaPad. It mentions the protocols those things use, so you could use all touchpad things that use that protocol. But i can't say that i have ever used one, so you might want to wait and see if there is someone that has actually used them. Maybe you can find a computer shop where you can try it? Anyway, if you buy the ps/2 touchpad specify the ps/2 proto... which is actually described 15 lines below the ALPS gildepoint and 11 lines below versapad ;P And the adesso usb touchpad is plug-and-play so i think that that one will work if you set moused to 'auto' (don't forget usb-mice kernel options?). You might also want to have a look at the ion window-manager. Especially on laptops it's a real pleasure to work with because it decreases the need to use a mouse for things, so you don't have to carry a lot of stuff - besides your laptop. And for simple stuff like clicking links in a browser you can use the trackpoint! :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipfw denies everything and i can open websites?
Hello,
i have configured my firewall, but after i do ipfw -q flush i am still
able to visit websites, download my e-mail, etc. I thought the default action of
ipfw was to deny everything and ipfw show confirms that... Why am i able to go
on the internet? Is this weird behaviour or is there something i don't
understand about ipfw/firewalls??
I am behind a router (NAT) and get my ip with dhcp.
Here is a litle log from what happens if i try to open a random website
(blah.org) after i disable my firewall.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jurjen]# fw_uit
65535 2 616 deny ip from any to any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jurjen]# tcpdump
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on ath0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
20:41:44.919465 IP jurjen.lan.55071 SpeedTouch.lan.domain: 4879+ A?
blah.org. (26)
20:41:45.062650 IP SpeedTouch.lan.domain jurjen.lan.55071: 4879 1/0/0 A
205.150.150.140 (42)
20:41:45.062889 IP jurjen.lan.53038 SpeedTouch.lan.domain: 4880+ ?
blah.org. (26)
20:41:45.173416 IP SpeedTouch.lan.domain jurjen.lan.53038: 4880 0/1/0 (98)
20:41:45.173790 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: S
1223552665:1223552665(0) win 65535 mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,timestamp
21149548 0,sackOK,eol
20:41:45.288590 IP 205.150.150.140.http jurjen.lan.56029: S
3294004362:3294004362(0) ack 1223552666 win 16384 mss 1460,nop,wscale
0,nop,nop,timestamp 0 0,nop,nop,sackOK
20:41:45.288662 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: . ack 1 win 33304
nop,nop,timestamp 211496620
20:41:45.288924 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: P 1:395(394) ack 1
win 33304 nop,nop,timestamp 21149663 0
20:41:45.441225 IP 205.150.150.140.http jurjen.lan.56029: . 1:1449(1448) ack
395 win 65141 nop,nop,timestamp 1951517 21149548
20:41:45.442758 IP 205.150.150.140.http jurjen.lan.56029: P 1449:2533(1084)
ack 395 win 65141 nop,nop,timestamp 1951517 21149548
20:41:45.442812 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: . ack 2533 win
32762 nop,nop,timestamp 21149817 1951517
20:41:45.591472 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: P 395:720(325) ack
2533 win 33304 nop,nop,timestamp 21149965 1951517
20:41:45.760525 IP 205.150.150.140.http jurjen.lan.56029: P 3981:4328(347)
ack 720 win 64816 nop,nop,timestamp 1951520 21149965
20:41:45.760603 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: . ack 2533 win
33304 nop,nop,timestamp 21150134 1951517,nop,nop,sack 1 {3981:4328}
20:41:45.763003 IP 205.150.150.140.http jurjen.lan.56029: . 2533:3981(1448)
ack 720 win 64816 nop,nop,timestamp 1951520 21149965
20:41:45.763045 IP jurjen.lan.56029 205.150.150.140.http: . ack 4328 win
32406 nop,nop,timestamp 21150137 1951520
20:41:46.021900 IP jurjen.lan.62273 SpeedTouch.lan.domain: 23988+ PTR?
140.150.150.205.in-addr.arpa. (46)
20:41:46.255700 IP SpeedTouch.lan.domain jurjen.lan.62273: 23988 NXDomain
0/1/0 (117)
20:42:02.361174 IP sys00.lan.netbios-dgm 10.0.0.255.netbios-dgm: NBT UDP
PACKET(138)
And the website has loaded... how is this possible??
greets, jurjen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw denies everything and i can open websites?
I'm sorry, (don't laugh too hard) i had a litle startup script that read: ipfw disable firewall, i put that there before i had actually made my firewall rules... Once i removed it it turned out my rules weren't as decent as i thought, but now they work! And i was being so happy that i had made such a nice firewall :( I really thought my firewall was on because it loaded the rules and so... thanks anyway :) -jurjen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems compiling Maildrop
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-September/035268.html maybe this works? haven't tried it myself though, because make-ing the port worked without problems... On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:55:16AM -0500, Joe Auty wrote: On Dec 29, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Joe Auty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it just me having problems with this port? I'd really appreciate if somebody could confirm whether or not they are getting this error so I know whether or not to bug the port maintainer. It seems to build in a clean environment: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest-logs/ maildrop-2.0.2.log Hmmm... Any ideas what be happening for me then? I've duplicated this problem on another machine of mine running FBSD 5.4. Here is the error in question: Compiling maildirkwtest.c Linking maildirkwtest Compiling maildirkw.c Linking maildirkw /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x31): In function `FAMOpen2': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x4f): In function `FAMOpen2': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x81): In function `FAMOpen2': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x12e): In function `FAMClose': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x225): In function `FAMMonitor (FAMConnection*, char const*, FAMRequest*, void*, int)': : undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x243): In function `FAMMonitor (FAMConnection*, char const*, FAMRequest*, void*, int)': : undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x414): In function `FAMMonitorCollection': : undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x433): In function `FAMMonitorCollection': : undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x5d3): In function `GroupStuff::GroupStuff()': : undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.text+0x60b): In function `GroupStuff::GroupStuff()': : undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(fam.o)(.eh_frame+0x12): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xb92): In function `Client::storeUserData(int, void*)': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xbab): In function `Client::storeUserData(int, void*)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xc17): In function `Client::storeEndExist(int)': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xc2f): In function `Client::storeEndExist(int)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xeca): In function `__static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)': : undefined reference to `std::ios_base::Init::Init()' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o)(.text+0xef8): In function `__tcf_0': : undefined reference to `std::ios_base::Init::~Init()' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6removeERKi+0xfc): In function `BTreeint, void*::remove(int const)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertERKiRKS0_+0x5a): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertERKiRKS0_+0x87): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertEPNS1_4NodeERKiRKS0_+0xde): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(BTreeint, void*::Node*, int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertEPNS1_4NodeERKiRKS0_+0xfb): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(BTreeint, void*::Node*, int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertEPNS1_4NodeERKiRKS0_+0x191): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(BTreeint, void*::Node*, int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertEPNS1_4NodeERKiRKS0_+0x1ae): In function `BTreeint, void*::insert(BTreeint, void*::Node*, int const, void* const)': : undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' /usr/local/lib/libfam.a(Client.o) (.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5BTreeIiPvE6insertEPNS1_4NodeERKiRKS0_+0x237): In function `BTreeint,
Re: ipfw rules
Ok, i changed my original rules. I'm going to use both the ruleset you recommended and these ones (not at the same time though :). And see which one gives me the least trouble. greetings, jurjen. #!/bin/sh ipfw -q flush cmd=ipfw -q add ks=keep-state oif=ath0 #sort in en out packets $cmd 1 skipto 15 ip from any to any in recv $oif $cmd 2 skipto 100 ip from any to any out xmit $oif #setup the loopback $cmd 011 allow all from any to any via lo0 $cmd 012 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $cmd 013 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any $cmd 014 allow icmp from any to any # Outgoing (15) #check state of incoming packets $cmd 015 check-state #internet sites: $cmd 020 allow tcp from me to any 80 out via $oif setup $ks #allow dns queries $cmd 025 allow udp from me to any 53 out via $oif $ks #to stack $cmd 030 allow all from me to 131.155.0.0/16 via $oif $ks #e-mail pop $cmd 040 allow tcp from me to any 110 out via $oif setup $ks #imap #$cmd 041 allow tcp from me to any 143 out via $oif setup $ks #allow ssh $cmd 050 allow all from me to any 22 out via $oif setup $ks #https $cmd 054 allow tcp from me to any 443 out via $oif setup $ks #gopher $cmd 055 allow tcp from me to any 70 out via $oif setup $ks #root can do anything $cmd 070 allow log all from me to any out via $oif setup $ks uid root # Incoming (100) #log ACK packets that did'nt match the dynamic ruleset $cmd 100 deny log all from any to any established in via $oif #default: deny ip from any to any ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw rules
Cool! thanks for the reply + suggestions! I haven't had any trouble with my firewall blocking too much yet (also didn't connect to the internet much yet :), but i'll think about just allowing all out... on the other hand i like the idea of just letting through out that i need (which isn't very much) and denying all else. I don't use the file shares on the network, so i figured if i got a packet from one of those addresses it would be a mistake so i let them drop. Anyway, i'll try to build some rules based on the suggestions you made and then i can try them both and then decide which one gives me the least trouble :) greetings, jurjen. On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:29:06AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-12-16 18:01, Jurjen Middendorp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried making a firewall for my laptop..but i'm not sure if i forgot anything. And things can always be done better :) #to stack (student computer thing... e-mail, irc, ssh stuff) $cmd 020 allow all from me to 131.155.140.141/16 via $oif $ks #allow ssh $cmd 021 allow all from me to any 22 out via $oif setup $ks #internet sites: $cmd 032 allow tcp from me to any 80 out via $oif setup $ks #https $cmd 033 allow tcp from me to any 443 out via $oif setup $ks #gopher $cmd 034 allow tcp from me to any 70 out via $oif setup $ks #other e-mail #pop $cmd 040 allow tcp from me to any 110 out via $oif setup $ks #imap $cmd 041 allow tcp from me to any 143 out via $oif setup $ks #allow dns queries $cmd 050 allow udp from me to any 53 out via $oif $ks #allow ntp (?) queries $cmd 051 allow udp from me to any 123 out via $oif $ks #i can send icmp myself $cmd 060 allow icmp from me to any out via $oif $ks #but others can't $cmd 061 deny icmp from any to me # #root can do anything $cmd 070 allow tcp from me to any out via $oif setup $ks uid root #log other outgoing packets $cmd 071 deny log all from any to any out via $oif # Incoming #The default is that all other connections will be blocked anyway, but # the more stuff i put in here, the less stuff will get logged #deny incoming to private networks $cmd 100 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif#RFC 1918 $cmd 101 deny all from 172.16.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #RFC 1918 $cmd 105 deny all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in via $oif#DHCP auto $cmd 106 deny all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in via $oif #reserved $cmd 108 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif#D E class # multicast #block smb stuff $cmd 120 deny tcp from any to me 137 in via $oif $cmd 121 deny tcp from any to me 138 in via $oif $cmd 122 deny tcp from any to me 139 in via $oif #log ACK packets that did'nt match the dynamic ruleset $cmd 130 deny log all from any to any established in via $oif #Now log some stuff in case i did something wrong $cmd 999 deny log any to me rule 999 had a syntax error and now it reads ...log all from... that works a bit better :) It's a fairly complex ruleset, but it seems mostly ok. There are a few things I'd change, mostly resulting from my own personal preferences: * I don't like hard-coding rule numbers in IPFW rulesets. * I like using 127.0.0.1/32 instead of any for loopback interfaces. * In general, I prefer much simpler rulesets. * I try to avoid a lot of variables/macros, like your $ks, since they don't really keep things a lot shorter, and when they do they try to abstract away too much of ipfw's syntax. * I don't aggressively filter out ICMP packets. They are useful for a lot of things, they are rate-limited by the kernel, and it is usually silly to block them without a fair amount of knowledge and a very good reason. * I don't deny packets for 'private' networks,like 192.168.0.0/26 because the networks I use with my laptop *ARE* private a lot of the time. Having the firewall block too much and cause me problems is rarely a good way of spending my time. I would probably start with something like: recommendation for ipfw ruleset ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipfw rules
I posted this to the freebsd-security list, but i believe that is not the right list to this question (sorry! this is my first message to the freebsd mailing-lists). I hope this is the right list! :) anyway: I tried making a firewall for my laptop..but i'm not sure if i forgot anything. And things can always be done better :) I'm not sure what i should've put under incoming connections... what i have put there now is pretty useless because the default is to deny, but should i accept any incoming connections that don't match the dynamic rules? I just want to be able to surf the internet without too much trouble and send e-mail and pretty much deny everything else. If someone would have the time to have a quick look at this to see if there's anything wrong with it i would really appreciate it! Bye, jurjen. ps. here is my ruleset: #!/bin/sh ipfw -q flush cmd=ipfw -q add ks=keep-state oif=ath0 #setup the loopback $cmd 001 allow all from any to any via lo0 $cmd 002 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $cmd 003 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any #check state of incoming packets $cmd 010 check-state # Outgoing #allow outgoing connections to internetsites, ssh sites # webservers and stack. (keep-state) #to stack (student computer thing... e-mail, irc, ssh stuff) $cmd 020 allow all from me to 131.155.140.141/16 via $oif $ks #allow ssh $cmd 021 allow all from me to any 22 out via $oif setup $ks #internet sites: $cmd 032 allow tcp from me to any 80 out via $oif setup $ks #https $cmd 033 allow tcp from me to any 443 out via $oif setup $ks #gopher $cmd 034 allow tcp from me to any 70 out via $oif setup $ks #other e-mail #pop $cmd 040 allow tcp from me to any 110 out via $oif setup $ks #imap $cmd 041 allow tcp from me to any 143 out via $oif setup $ks #allow dns queries $cmd 050 allow udp from me to any 53 out via $oif $ks #allow ntp (?) queries $cmd 051 allow udp from me to any 123 out via $oif $ks #i can send icmp myself $cmd 060 allow icmp from me to any out via $oif $ks #but others can't $cmd 061 deny icmp from any to me # #root can do anything $cmd 070 allow tcp from me to any out via $oif setup $ks uid root #log other outgoing packets $cmd 071 deny log all from any to any out via $oif # Incoming #The default is that all other connections will be blocked anyway, but # the more stuff i put in here, the less stuff will get logged #deny incoming to private networks $cmd 100 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #RFC 1918 $cmd 101 deny all from 172.16.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #RFC 1918 $cmd 105 deny all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #DHCP auto $cmd 106 deny all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in via $oif #reserved $cmd 108 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $oif #D E class # multicast #block smb stuff $cmd 120 deny tcp from any to me 137 in via $oif $cmd 121 deny tcp from any to me 138 in via $oif $cmd 122 deny tcp from any to me 139 in via $oif #log ACK packets that did'nt match the dynamic ruleset $cmd 130 deny log all from any to any established in via $oif #Now log some stuff in case i did something wrong $cmd 999 deny log any to me ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
