On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12:05AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> What is it that this Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ships in those 7 DVDs?
Please ask that on one of their mailing lists; it's out of scope for
the two mailing lists you posted to.
mcl
___
free
You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small,
and developer time is limited, we've never set it up.
Right now I'd just be happy if I can get all the major ports to work :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:07:18PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> in case it matters, I see
>
> nexus0: type unknown (no driver attached)
>
> nexus0: mem 0x400-0x47 type
> memory-controller (no driver attached)
>
> messages on boot.
I haven't walked throu
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:32:31PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Do you honestly think the probability of Tuomo suing us is higher of,
> say, me suing, well, us?
Yes. That is exactly what I am saying. And I believe reading the entire
thread when this first came up supports my claim.
mcl
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:58:23PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> No need to, if it works fine and there are no objections for it,
> I'll commit it to the tree.
I insist that you not to commit it to the tree. See my other post.
mcl
___
freebsd-questi
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:45:46PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Now it's LGPLv2.1 with the only restriction that this software may not
> be significantly changed while being distributed as ion3.
I hate to replay this whole issue from the beginning, but apparently there
is no other way.
The au
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:05:08PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> I've seen the license change too. I'm working on the port currently.
As a reminder, the last time this software was in the ports tree, the
developer threatened us with a lawsuit. This repeats what he has
previously done to severa
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:51:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I wonder if they work under ia64 linux?
I don't know. A quick check of NetBSD seems to indicate that their ia64
port only runs in emulation mode; OpenBSD doesn't list an ia64 port.
mcl
_
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 02:57:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Ports lang/gcc43, 44 and 45 fail to build on 8.0-beta2 ia64:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959
>
> I know they build fine on 6.4-stable alpha, but what about sparc64?
> amd64? mips?
You can check things like t
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:55:20AM -0700, mdh wrote:
> email the FreeBSD Foundation and find out how much cash it'd take for
> additional hardware to make that a reality, then send them that much cash.
We are actually set up ok on amd64 machines right now (incremental
package builds take just ov
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:02:14PM +0800, joeb wrote:
> How does kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8 or php5-gd or pdflib fit into those
> reasons you gave?
A little research shows:
ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/php5-gd-5.2.6_2.tbz
So, there is a current package for ph
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:42:18AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages
> for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64,
> mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages
> needing to be created at the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> An alternate solution to this problem is to allow users to upload missing
> packages
one word for you: "security".
What you suggest is never, ever, going to be implemented, due to the
total lack of security.
mcl
___
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:48:27PM +0200, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway?
Because no one has done the necessary QA work to factor things out
and make them work.
mcl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
> > * I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
> > configuration but have not yet found the cause.
> It's called "Anti-FreeBSD bias". You won't find anything.
If this is true, please try to explain to me the following:
- ISC hosts 5 Netra 1s that comprise most of our sparc64 p
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:26:20AM -0300, Jason Hills wrote:
> Yeah, Kris mentioned something like that in a private mail, but google
> didnt help me, nor http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/ :(
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461FE03C.8000406
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cg
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Hi Kris,
> >
> > I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
> > the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
> >
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:53:31AM +0300, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote:
> I just don't feel the current bug system is good for the FreeBSD
> growing community
This question has been extensively discussed on various mailing lists
over the past 2 years. The migration problem is not as easy as you
seem
This has already been fixed. Please re-cvsup and try again.
mcl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:04:55PM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
> I believe that one solution to the scalability problem of creating and
> maintaining updated packages, would be to decentralize it more. Each
> time I submit an update for one of the ports I maintain, I've already
> build the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:56:35AM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> I use the last port collection, but there is only 2.3.11 version of pppd
> there. Are there any plans for updating it?
The first place you should always ask about plans to update a port is
the maintainer. If the maintainer is [
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
> of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
> make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
> **
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
> just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
> FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
> just FreeBSD 4.11
23 matches
Mail list logo
