Re: what is causing this warning in /var/log/messages?
you didn't google too hard because the very first thing I found on google was this http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind/browse_thread/thread/a50b760883ea08c6?pli=1 courtesy of www.hereletmegooglethatforyou.com On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Guys, Thanks to Matthew Seaman, my named.conf is that much closer to being set up correctly that I finally reinstalled dns/bind98; the _but_ is that the following log entry winds up in my messages log. I've googled until my fingers are falling off: no resolution. Yes, named runs and stuff more/less works. Can anybody clue me in on how to get rid of the following? Jul 11 13:00:25 ethic named[40109]: managed-keys-zone ./IN/internal: loading from master file 3bed2cb3a3acf7b6a8ef408420cc682d5520e26976d354254f528c965612054f.mkeys failed: file not found TIA for any help here, gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Long Day's Journey into Bleep
whats this have to do with freebsd questions? You seem to have a bad habit of spamming the mailing list with mundane BS. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: $hit happens! Even with PERFECTLY clean power, things fail. Could take a week or 10 years. That's why enterprise nets have redundant everything - and there are still outages ;) - Original Message - From: Gary Kline [mailto:kl...@thought.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 07:56 PM To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Long Day's Journey into Bleep Well, people, It's been a long, long century. I've been down for 5 days. Couldn't understand _why_ I couldn't ping anywhere [expect the Server itself]. Finally, tho, it became more and more likely that my FreeBSD was fine ... even tho I kept stripping the most likely problem points. My large 16-port LinkSys router was either *it* or it was some kind of bug unknown to geekdom. After a friend bought me a new (and tiny) 8-port switch, yes! I could ping everywhere. I'm still bringing back the dozens of things I removed from ethic. And testing new ideas. But I have a general question: have any of you wizards who run your own domains or otherwise use a switch [or hub] *ever* had it just-quit?! It is solid-state. Yes, the box is within my feet/foot reach. I have accidently kicked it i suppose, but still. After wandering in the wilderness for 5 days, mmph, dunno. gary PS: yes, this is a serious question. 1) I like things-Cisco, and LinkSys. I just bought this switch about 2.5 years ago, so I really am looking for feedback. PPS: Another question to ask about upgrading is next. -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors?
Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@freebsd.orgwrote: The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official response about this. Please have a look at: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html Regards, Giorgos On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov fullblastst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Victor Lyapunov fullblastst...@gmail.com Date: 2010/12/15 Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hi folks, Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the code. As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact of this? Thanks, Victor Lyapunov. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: IPFW and Fail2Ban
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Carmel NY carmel...@hotmail.com wrote: I am having an exceedingly hard time finding documentation on Fail2Ban on FreeBSD. In fact, documentation on Fail2Ban seems rather sparse to begin with. In any case, does Fail2Ban work with the IPFW firewall on FreeBSD? Does it do it natively, or does it require a special configuration? I presently have 'denyhost' up and running. If I get Fail2Ban working correctly, I assume I can remove 'denyhost'. Again, I am assuming that the two program would interact badly with each other. -- Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com |=== |=== |=== |=== | Your fault - core dumped ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Yes it works with freebsd. You need to specify it in jail.conf under the the filter you choose; action=ipfw[localhost xxx.xxx.xxx] configure the ipfw.conf in the action.d directory a little googling and trial and error and you will get it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 8.0 installation doesn't contain X distributions
all I gotta say is I just spent 3 days compiling gnome2 for fbsd..
It shouldn't take that long or be that hard/complicated.
Most of it was stupid crap that I would of thought should of been taken care
of by now.
Applications complaining about which version of python is installed,
complaining about needing newer versions of this or that and stopping the
process. Than off to find the proper port to install (and having to use
FORCE PKG REGISTER) to appease the original install. Back to the gnome
install let it run again until the next application configuration screen.
You can't just do a make config in the meta port for the entire process..
That would be too easy..
Last time I did a Xorg installed I just ended up doing a pkg_add because I
grew tired of the problems I kept having with ports griping about this and
that being outdated or whatever. This time I wanted to see the process
through and figure I might learn a thing or two.
I digress though...
My intention with fbsd wasn't for a desktop though; but why install linux to
get a feel for X(org) when we can do it on fbsd? Yet why should it feel like
I'm a circus poodle trying to make it work?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Manolis Kiagias son...@otenet.gr wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:08 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith
smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 287, Issue 16, Message: 8
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:39:08 +0200 Manolis Kiagias son...@otenet.gr
wrote:
Removing X from the distributions is a right step IMO, these are just
3rd party packages and it seems confusing if they get installed along
with the base system.
I think this is taking base-system-only installation purity to excess.
Imagine the following situation: A user wants to run Linux
applications on FreeBSD. He selects the Linux ABI service
for startup via sysinstall. The corresponding _enable setting
will be added to rc.conf, and - surprise! - a package will
be installed.
The same thing happens when a user installs X. Of course, X
is not part of the base system, but in the same way that
sysinstall (down)loads and installs packages when a specific
service is selected, it should act the same way for X.
I know that X has become a problematic and very complex
thing, not just a few packages (as it was in the past
with XFree86).
X should be installabe in a manner made easy, just like
the Linux ABI.
In the case of X,
you and I, developers and most people here know to hunt for the Xorg
meta-port.
The average user intending to run a desktop system won't
be happy with compiling stuff...
Exactly. Most desktop users want a working system in the minimum of time
(Can't blame them for that).
Even with packages, we cannot beat an image-based distro, esp. since it
will also provide all essential default settings.
But the naive or new installer knows of no such thing, and
could beat around in the huge lists of X software for ages, wondering
what's required and what's not to get a desktop going.
Therefore, I always liked the choice for X in sysinstall: It
basically installed all the components to get X up and running.
No big trouble getting the correct xorg-driver-* packages,
installing and removing them, the xorg-input-* packages with
the same story...
There is an X.org meta-package that installs everything though. It is
just a problem with the beginner not knowing what to select. This can be
tackled in two ways IMO, first is by creating a First time FreeBSD
desktop installer type article, second would be adding a menu choice in
sysinstall Install a standard X desktop {GNOME,KDE}. I must admit I
much prefer the first solution.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: One USB drive boots, the other doesn't...
from what I understand it's widely known there is not a standard for implementing USB bios boot. I can take a flash drive make it bootable with grub4dos and my board will not see it. Take that same drive implement normal grub or syslinux and my board will now boot that flash drive. Take that bootable flash drive put it in another board and that board won't boot it unless you change the boot option to USB floppy... It could just be the board doesn't like the new drive you are using now. I could be wrong on all this but that is how I understand it as of now.. You might be able to make a work around by booting to a dos environment and load USB drivers. That is unfamiliar territory to me and probably not a work around you wish to use. reply to list please reply to is a spam catch. On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Peter Steele pste...@maxiscale.com wrote: Shot in the dark but are they by any chance U3 devices? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U3 There is no indication of that. They mount fine and can be formatted as UFS and have files copied to them. They are just basic 4GB USB flash drives, on sale at our local Frys. HP brand (but I don't know if someone else is the OEM)... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
