Hello,
I'm trying to use selenium in ruby (ruby-1.9.2.290_2,1) script, but
get an error like this:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9/gems/selenium-webdriver-2.8.0/lib/selenium/webdriver/common/socket_poller.rb:63:in
`connect_nonblock': Invalid argument - connect(2) (Errno::EINVAL)
from
Hi
On 7/19/11, Konrad Heuer kheu...@gwdg.de wrote:
To my mind we'll have to face a rapid
change within the next years, and operating systems of the future might be
Android or IOS or Windows Mobile or something similar which my base on
Linux or BSD but are something different.
For 2020 year
Hi
All of us know that in many cases BSD do not concede technically
Linux. However is the fact. The quantity of the companies using
FreeBSD catastrophically decreases! In what a problem? As I see one of
popularization's problems - there is no information on innovations
(DTRACE, ccTCP, VIMAGE,
Hi
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ - i see only February
here. Monthly builds is broken?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without
it is so difficult ;)
___
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
WITH_OPTIONS=yes
Hi
http://wiki.freebsd.org on the same page ( http://wiki.freebsd.org/Developers,
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RecentChanges ...)
return:
---
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 93399885
Varnish
---
___
Hi maillist.
After applying non kernel-level patch set via freebsd-update my system after
rebooting show FreeBSD 8.0 version, not 8.0-p1. New instance of freebsd-update
check system again by checksum and show that system is already patched as -p1.
With updating i see changing of file
Hello maillist,
Whether there is a way for booting GENERIC kernel with
ipfw_load=YES
and
65535 allow ip from any to any
rules without recompile kernel with options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT ?
This is single options who force me customize my own kernel with freebsd-
update.
Thanks!
Hello
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:39:08 Michael Powell wrote:
subbsd wrote:
Hello maillist,
Whether there is a way for booting GENERIC kernel with
ipfw_load=YES
and
65535 allow ip from any to any
rules without recompile kernel with options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
Hello
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:37:08 membrana wrote:
subbsd wrote:
Hello maillist,
Whether there is a way for booting GENERIC kernel with
ipfw_load=YES
and
65535 allow ip from any to any
rules without recompile kernel with options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
On Monday 15 June 2009 13:16:56 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 6/15/09, subbsd sub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:37:08 membrana wrote:
subbsd wrote:
Hello maillist,
Whether there is a way for booting GENERIC kernel with
ipfw_load=YES
and
65535 allow
12 matches
Mail list logo
