Right way to mount/edit dd of a disk?

2008-10-20 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I have a Linux dd file thats an image of the entire
disk. If I use the fdisk-linux and do :

# fdisk -ul some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd
You must set cylinders.
You can do this from the extra functions menu.
Disk some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd: 0 MB, 0 bytes
64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 0 cylinders, total 0 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x
Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd18192 1535999  763904 
   5  Extended
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd4   *  3281914080 
   4  FAT16 32M
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd58224  106495   49136 
   6  FAT16
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd6  106528  204799   49136 
   6  FAT16
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd7  204832  430079  112624 
  fc  Unknown
some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd8  430112 1535999  552944 
   6  FAT16
Partition table entries are not in disk order

It looks like a good filesystem. So then I :

mdconfig -a -t vnode -f some-big-3.5.0_Update_2-103909.i386.dd -u 0
mount -t msdos /dev/md0s5 /mnt

to be able to get the dd5 on /mnt. I then edited the files I wanted,
replaced them, and copied back to /mnt. I did umount /mnt and copied the dd
file back to where it needed to be.

It seems it didn't like it, and I'm trying to find out if editing it the
way I did wasn't quite allowed.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Right way to mount/edit dd of a disk?

2008-10-20 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
  mount -t msdos /dev/md0s5 /mnt
 
  to be able to get the dd5 on /mnt. I then edited the files I wanted,
  replaced them, and copied back to /mnt. I did umount /mnt and copied the 
  dd
  file back to where it needed to be.
 
 did you mdconfig -d before copying image?

Well, turns out the problem I had was elsewhere with something else, 
but I was slowly coming back around to having to deal with this again.
(Apparently FreeBSD's tar can actually create a tar that a Linux system
doesn't like...)

No, I didn't. That would probably have been a good idea no matter what.
Will do so in the future. But otherwise my procedure seemed sane? 

Thanks!
Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Machine locking up

2008-09-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

We had a power failure at the datacenter we colocate at, and all our
servers went down. 

One is acting up ever since. It rebooted but wasn't accessible. I
tried to log in via our KVM and got the login/pass, but when it did the
/etc/motd and rest it locked up. CTRL-C and CTRL-\ didn't do anything. 
The remote KVM could C-A-D and the machine rebooted.

Once it rebooted it seemed ok, but then locked up again while in use.
The odd thing was I remembered to try CTRL-T, and got :

load: 0.00 cmd: login 1188 [sysctl lock] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 176k

on the session I was trying to log in on, and on the session I was
doing a tail, I saw :

load: 0.00  cmd: tail 2013 [proctree] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 0k

I could tab between VTYs, but logins wouldn't accept input, and
I couldn't C-A-D this time around. I could telnet to a special port on it
for monitoring and get a reply, but SSH/sendmail didn't reply.

Its a FreeBSD 5.5 (I can't upgrade it, sorry)

Any clues what to look for?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Machine locking up

2008-09-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Might be on track there. The default background_fsck is on and
the first time I didn't see any of the fsck syslog messages. On the second
reboot, I see them all. Oddly, on the reboot I see the first one done in
12 minutes from the boot, yet the prior boot went over an hour before it
locked up.

I did run into some oddness though. I found it was doing the final
fsck on a 1.1TB filesystem, so I wandered into '/mountpoint/.snap' and did
an ls -lt. It hung. When I did a CTRL-T, it told me it was in a spinlock.
I ran top and found I had 1/2 a dozen processes also in spinlock. I was
patient this time (And had other multiple VTYs logged in) so I waited it
out. All of a sudden all the spinlocks stopped, the processes and ls
completed, but it still was in pass 5 at 95%. It sat there for a while
before finally sending the output to syslog and KNOCK KNOCK things are
doing fair.  I'm letting the system have it easy for a few days before
I put a load back onto it (4 SETI).

The 2nd part to recompile kernel/world... I don't worry too much
doing that. Its the install part that gives me the willies. I've done
that before on a system that was acting up and on reboot it just 
acted dead. I remember I had to hand copy some libraries over 
after remaking AGAIN and things started to pick up. But scary as heck.
The system finally died totally about a month later.

Thanks, Tuc

 
 I suggest you reboot in single user mode and fsck -fy the mount points you 
 use.
 If the problem persists - you might recompile the kernel and world.
 
 Regards,
 Ivailo Tanusheff
 
 
 
 
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 24.09.2008 10:56
 
 To
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 cc
 
 Subject
 Machine locking up
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hi,
 
  We had a power failure at the datacenter we colocate at, 
 and all our
 servers went down. 
 
  One is acting up ever since. It rebooted but wasn't 
 accessible. I
 tried to log in via our KVM and got the login/pass, but when it did the
 /etc/motd and rest it locked up. CTRL-C and CTRL-\ didn't do anything. 
 The remote KVM could C-A-D and the machine rebooted.
 
  Once it rebooted it seemed ok, but then locked up again 
 while in use.
 The odd thing was I remembered to try CTRL-T, and got :
 
 load: 0.00 cmd: login 1188 [sysctl lock] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 176k
 
  on the session I was trying to log in on, and on the 
 session I was
 doing a tail, I saw :
 
 load: 0.00  cmd: tail 2013 [proctree] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 0k
 
  I could tab between VTYs, but logins wouldn't accept 
 input, and
 I couldn't C-A-D this time around. I could telnet to a special port on it
 for monitoring and get a reply, but SSH/sendmail didn't reply.
 
  Its a FreeBSD 5.5 (I can't upgrade it, sorry)
 
  Any clues what to look for?
 
  Thanks, Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Port Management on a larger scale

2008-07-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Or you could mount /usr/local from a single NFS server on all others,
 keeping them automatically in sync but that might strain the NFS server
 and make it a single point of failure which is undesirable. Maybe it
 would be better to use the Coda filesystem in this case.=20
 
In theory this sounded great when I first did it, but now, not
so great. 

1) I have to keep all the machines on the same OS release.
2) Taking down or a failure of the NFS server pulls EVERY
other system with it.
3) Working with lockd/statd can be problematic at times.
4) NFS on FreeBSD varies (I'M TOLD) between versions as to
effectiveness, issues, etc.
5) I've run into issues where some programs are just NOT
happy running over NFS (hylafax for me for example. POTENTIALLY a locking
issue, but running a locking tester shows everything fine, but it
just for the life of it won't work over NFS for me atleast).

Since this is a personal system, I put up with it. When
I get the time/energy I'm going to break all the systems apart.

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


bind94 security update (UNOFFICIAL)

2008-07-09 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
frenzy, you can :

1) Update the Makefile :

From : PORTREVISION=   1
To   : PORTREVISION=   2

From : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2
To   : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2-P1

2) Drop this into distinfo :

MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 87b80edd9872cb017053866c81ca9be8
SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 
eeeb8f89fe6d88b250ad85ee21cfde6f8ac6f425c70c6705352b3fa8c4c4ee84
SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 6451654
MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 72310b7045d9806b913835c55ba5388b
SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 
c84b6446416ff1096ec5bfb1c731d31f984b312b45a3d2064a922a6b50b6162d
SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 479


THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL FREEBSD PORTS UPGRADE PATH OR MAINTAINER...
This is a stop gap until MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED] does it officially.
I have not contacted him about it yet admittedly.  I have tested this on a 
4.10, 
5.5, and 7.0 system and it works fine.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: bind94 security update (UNOFFICIAL)

2008-07-09 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
David,

You are very wise to ask

If you look at the changes, there are NO changes to what FTP
site the binary is picked up from, there are NO additional files inserting
patches, etc. I have only changed the PORTREVISION so that portupgrade and
the likes will notice it, and the distinfo since there is a new binary 
and asc. If you check the make, it actually uses the .asc file to verify
the contents.

Had I added any FTP/HTTP sites, additional patches, etc I wouldn't
have even published this. But in my opinion, since I only bump the revision
and give new checksums for files that are taken off a previous distribution
site, I don't feel people are in danger of taking them over.

As dougb says, its just as easy to officially D/L it from the
source site and compile by hand. I was just doing this in the hopes that
people wanted a make;make install or portupgrade ... could have it
quickly.


Tuc
 
 For those like me who don't know any better. How can I confirm your  
 suggestion will not be introducing addition problems or people into  
 the equation?
 
 Thanks,
 David
 
 
 Quoting Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  Hi,
 
  For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
  frenzy, you can :
 
  1) Update the Makefile :
 
  From : PORTREVISION=   1
  To   : PORTREVISION=   2
 
  From : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2
  To   : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2-P1
 
  2) Drop this into distinfo :
 
  MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 87b80edd9872cb017053866c81ca9be8
  SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) =   
  eeeb8f89fe6d88b250ad85ee21cfde6f8ac6f425c70c6705352b3fa8c4c4ee84
  SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 6451654
  MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 72310b7045d9806b913835c55ba5388b
  SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) =   
  c84b6446416ff1096ec5bfb1c731d31f984b312b45a3d2064a922a6b50b6162d
  SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 479
 
 
  THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL FREEBSD PORTS UPGRADE PATH OR MAINTAINER...
  This is a stop gap until MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED] does it  
   officially.
  I have not contacted him about it yet admittedly.  I have tested   
  this on a 4.10,
  5.5, and 7.0 system and it works fine.
 
  Tuc
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bind94 security update (UNOFFICIAL)

2008-07-09 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

But Dingo, can YOU be trusted to trust me? ;)


BTW: There are 2 ways to tell if your DNS is vulnerable :

1) I PREFER the command line written by Michael C. Toren :

http://michael.toren.net/code/noclicky/

Though you need per, Net::DNS and LWP.

2) If you can use a GUI browser on the machine you have DNS itself
running on :

http://www.doxpara.com/


NEITHER site is mine.

Tuc
 
 because the source download comes from ISC, he is correct in the proceedure,
 and I trust him :)
 
 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:29 AM, David Alanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  For those like me who don't know any better. How can I confirm your
  suggestion will not be introducing addition problems or people into the
  equation?
 
  Thanks,
  David
 
 
 
  Quoting Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
   Hi,
 
 For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
  frenzy, you can :
 
  1) Update the Makefile :
 
   From : PORTREVISION=   1
 
  To   : PORTREVISION=   2
 
   From : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2
 
  To   : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2-P1
 
  2) Drop this into distinfo :
 
  MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 87b80edd9872cb017053866c81ca9be8
  SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) =
   eeeb8f89fe6d88b250ad85ee21cfde6f8ac6f425c70c6705352b3fa8c4c4ee84
  SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz) = 6451654
  MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 72310b7045d9806b913835c55ba5388b
  SHA256 (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) =
   c84b6446416ff1096ec5bfb1c731d31f984b312b45a3d2064a922a6b50b6162d
  SIZE (bind-9.4.2-P1.tar.gz.asc) = 479
 
 
 THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL FREEBSD PORTS UPGRADE PATH OR
  MAINTAINER...
  This is a stop gap until MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED] does it
   officially.
  I have not contacted him about it yet admittedly.  I have tested  this on
  a 4.10,
  5.5, and 7.0 system and it works fine.
 
 Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: OT: anyone been crazy enough to mirror wikipedia?

2008-07-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
  Actually . . . if things get that bad, you're going to need some
  firepower to protect your garden (and everything else you don't want
  taken from you by force).  To properly protect a garden, you'd need to
  make it a community farm, with community members who have and will use
  firearms to protect it (and your Wikipedia mirror).
 
 And where better to get knowledge on constructing firepower (and
 gardening for that matter) than wikipedia ;)  All part of my
 integrated plan...did I mention we are going to occupy our local
 library as well?

Guys, you seem to be jumping the gun a bit. Theres plenty
of time until 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, January 19, 2038.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem)

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Fixing a RAID

2008-06-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 
  Ryan Coleman wrote:
  Ryan Coleman wrote:
 
  Oh, I completely forgot to ask...
 
  Does the RAID still operate even though one disk is bad?
 
  After all, that is the purpose of RAID-5. stripe, with parity. One
  fails, the other two (or N) keep right on going...
 
  Or, is it a RAID-5 card that you put into operation as a RAID-0 span?
 
  If the latter is the case, good luck ;)
 
 No, I'm not that stupid. :) My old job, we had the big LaCie drives and
 one of the 4 250Gs in it would fail and they were f*ed. I went to replace
 the drive right away so I wouldn't be in that situation.
 
 When I went to rebuild in the BIOS it failed at 2%, no matter what 250G
 drive I put in to fill the spot.

I had that happen on a 4 disk (36G each) raid-5 (I forget the
controller). No matter what disk I put in to replace a failed one, it
wouldn't take. 3 drives, exact model, different production dates...
None took. 

I futzed and futzed and finally decided to declare the cage
bad and think of backout procedures. About 2 hours after I had set
another machine up to take its place, it started giving spurious
errors and fell over.

I pulled the machine out of the datacenter, cleared out
the raid config, and went to rebuild with just the 3 drives. Wouldn't
build a fresh raid-5 from just the 3 disks. After the Which one of
these things is not like the other, I found that apparently one of
the disks still was working, but causing heck if I put another disk
in the slot next to it. 

A year later, and I finally decided to buy a few more disks
off ebay to see if my final theory is right. I win (hopefully) the
auction in 5 days... If the cage really is bad, I previously sourced
a new case/cage, and decided even though its a 4G Dual Xenon system
I probably could get a new system cheaper thats faster.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: External USB disk won't mount

2008-05-28 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Chuck Robey wrote:
  I saw a mail yesterday about something nearly like this, from nej, except 
  with
  him, the umass device wasn't reporting anything at all, no device when he
  plugged it in.  I sent him a little piece of usb driver code that resets 
  his usb
  buss, just to experiment and see if that got his devices correctly 
  detected, but
  he didn't yet reply, I don't know if it worked for him.  I don't have 
  something
  like that to experiment with.
  
  With yours, you obviously have a da2 ... that only means you have a
  direct-access disk devide #2 being detected.  The next step is to figure 
  oout
  what kind of formatting you have.  Hopefully, it's been fdisk'ed to where 
  it has
  partitions, so do this (as root): /sbin/fdisk /dev/da2, and in fdisk, 
  give the
  'p' command, this will print out the formatting for any partitions.  Likely 
  it's
  either one of the various Microsoft things, or a Linux one, or even a 
  FreeBSD
  one.  Depending on what you see, you either directly give a mount command 
  next,
  to the right partition, or maybe you use bsdlable to find out what the
  disk-labelling is (if it's a FreeBSD disk).
  
 
 Hi Chuck,
 
 The next line in my post after where you snipped was:
 
 (The disk is from another FreeBSD system so is UFS2 and da2s1f is /usr
 on the other system)
 
 It contains a running FBSD 7.0 system - it's out of a spare box I was 
 using for testing and it mounts/reads/writes fine using the other USB 
 enclosure I borrowed. There's just something screwy about the enclosure 
 I've bought (typical eh?)
 
Sounds like issues I had with a USB stick that I had from a 5.4
system and tried to put onto a 7.0 system. (Posted in freebsd-current early
April.)I had data integrity issues, couldn't re-format it on the new system, 
would mount but as soon as I used it the kernel would panic, etc.

Bring it back to the 5.4 system, things were peachy.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] PHP crashing on FBSD-6.3

2008-05-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 I am continuing to have a problem with PHP crashing. It will not even
 print out its version number without a dump. This is an example of the
 crash:
 
 ~ $ php -v
 PHP 5.2.6 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: May 24 2008 13:55:49)
 Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group
 Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies
 Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)
 
 
Try to rebuild with debug and then run under gdb maybe?

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Quick+easy port redirect

2008-04-10 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 In the last episode (Mar 28), Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET said:
  Is there a quick/easy (cookbook?) way to do port redirects.
  Basically I want that anything that leaves a specific interface to
  any ip on port 80 go to 192.168.0.1 port 87.
 
  I'm using ipfw for some other things so it has to work and play
  well with that.
 
 Make sure options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD is in your kernel config:
 
   ipfw add 500 forward 192.168.0.1 tcp from any to any 80 
  
 Note that this is a routing-style forward.  The source and destination
 addresses are unchanged, so you will likely need another ipfw fwd rule
 at the destination machine to capture the traffic and force-forward it
 to 127.0.0.1:87 (or wherever you want it to go).  If you're planning on
 passing the traffic to squid, there's a big FAQ section with some
 alternate methods: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy
 
Hi,

I tried that (Well, 192.168.0.1,87) and it seem to have any
effect, as you said that its a routing style forward. It hits my router
and that ignores it and keeps on processing normally. I really am looking
for a NAT type situation here.

I already use the InterceptionProxy wiki to get it to pass it
to Squid, thats been running great. My problem is when my primary Wireless
Broadband goes down, it needs to take satellite. When it takes satellite,
to get a Web acceleration thing going, I need to force it to the satellite
modem port 80.

SO, as clunky as it is, I used a rule that anything outbound
on tun1 (OpenVPN over the satellite) goes to 127.0.0.1,87, which rinetd
outta ports sends it to 192.168.0.1,87. 

Thanks, Tuc

I ended up 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Quick+easy port redirect

2008-03-28 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Is there a quick/easy (cookbook?) way to do port
redirects. Basically I want that anything that leaves 
a specific interface to any ip on port 80 go to 
192.168.0.1 port 87.

I'm using ipfw for some other things so it has to
work and play well with that.

Thanks, Tuc


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cant get system to 0% idle

2008-03-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I have 2 systems, Dual Xenon's, both bought at the same time (1
serial number away from each other). At one time both ran 5.3, and both
could get 0% idle ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 4 processes). I've upgraded one to 5.5,
and now find ever since then I can't get the system below about 19% idle.
(I've even used benchmarks/ubench). 

Short of the typical Upgrade to 7 which I can't do (And for 
those jokers out there, can't go to 6 either) Any ideas why this is
happening?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Unable to compile anything from ports

2008-02-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 This clearly points at a compiler bug, with the VIA cpu, but since 
 world/kernel build cleanly and anything else bugs out quite early, I would 
 suspect an optimization bug.

This may have nothing to do with it, but little story...

We used to buy whiteboxed machines, and as a test we would build
world and compile perl. One time world was fine, perl failed, and would always
seem to fail in the same spot. The company replaced every part and narrowed it 
down to the power supply. Once they changed that out, perl compiled fine. The 
next box had the same problems, perl stopped compiling in the same place, 
and found out they re-used the power supply. Changed it out, perl compiled.
We convinced them to throw away the power supply (I'm sure someone else ended
up with it).

May be nothing of the sort, but just wanted to relay a weird 
experience we ran into.

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Any experience using cellphone as a modem on FreeBSD?

2007-12-03 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 I have Motorola cellphone with data package on it and FreeBSD laptop.
 It would be very nice to have internet everywhere.
 Anybody uses/used cellphone this way?
 
 I know internet connectivity can go through the special cable and maybe 
 through
 Bluetooth.
 
 I guess from FreeBSD side it should look like USB modem.
 
I did this with a Motorola StarTAC , a Treo 600, and a Treo 650.

The StarTAC cable was serial only, so I just used it as a normal modem.
Loved it.

The 600 I used both serial and USB, and serial while slower was more
reliable. The 650 I did USB and it seemed ok.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: who wrote this

2007-11-28 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Randomly found this :

http://xkcd.com/261/

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Website

2007-11-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:34:56 +
 Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:41:51AM -0600, Chris wrote:
  
   ... seems to be going bonkers?!
   
   -- 
   Best regards,
   Chris
  
  
  Your post is a little short of information.
  
  http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
  
  HTH
  
 
 Not at all. I assume most on this list are intelligent enough to click
 on a browser and head to the FBSD site to see it's not functioning.
 
 Now as to the cause - who knows.
 
In the mean time you might be able to get to what you want
from wwwfe.freebsd.org

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Want to upgrade sendmail in next OS release

2007-10-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  I can afford the time to start/stop sendmail here and there, but I
  have to schedule the maintenance window to upgrade this particular
  machine.
 
 I see.  I'd still go for the maintenance window option, unless there is
 a _very_ pressing need to upgrade Sendmail *today* because of a security
 update, but you have a point :)

Absolutely going to do the proper bring to the next level on it
as soon as I can schedule a good maintenance window. 
 
 % The following files make up the sendmail build/install/runtime
 % infrastructure in FreeBSD:
 %
 % Makefile.inc1
 % bin/Makefile
 % bin/rmail/Makefile
 % contrib/sendmail/
 % [...]

As for the merging myself CRINGE. I was just hoping I
could cvsup , rebuild what was necessary as if it was a 
sendmail security alert, and go. I didn't realize everything
that went into the point to get it to that point, and what could
be missed/broken/etc.
 
 Interesting bits of that list are:
 
 lib/libmilter/Makefile
 lib/libsm/Makefile
 lib/libsmdb/Makefile
 lib/libsmutil/Makefile
 libexec/mail.local/Makefile
 libexec/smrsh/Makefile
 usr.bin/vacation/Makefile
 usr.sbin/editmap/Makefile
 usr.sbin/mailstats/Makefile
 usr.sbin/makemap/Makefile
 usr.sbin/praliases/Makefile
 usr.sbin/sendmail/Makefile
 usr.sbin/mailwrapper/Makefile

I did recompile sm/smutil . We currently aren't
actively using milters (Wrote one previously, but not
using it anymore), and the libsmdb is possibly something
that could have bitten me. As for the rest of the
stuff, not parts that either I needed, or felt were
critical enough to the process. But something to be
very aware of next time, even for another program.
 
 For future upgrades of Sendmail, it would probably be a good idea to
 upgrade the libraries *first* and only when you are done building the
 new libraries to install everything.

The libsm and libsmutil appeared not to by dynamic but static
libs, so compiling them first brought me to be able to compile
sendmail itself. I did a test to see if it would compile without it,
it wouldn't. My instructions DID have me build them first though.
 
 It may be possible to build everything with MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX='/usr/obj',
 and install in one go when you are done with everything, but that's
 something you should probably experiment a bit with -- preferrably in a
 test machine, before you do the same on a live system.

Isn't /usr/obj where things go anyway? I'm confused as to why
your telling me. If your trying to get to that I should have done a
buildworld, but then just a make install in certain directories..
Then yes, it was probably bad form, but I couldn't see making tar to
be able to compile sendmail. :)
 
  In the mean time, I got bored, so I did just that. Seems to be working
  fine, has processed about 15K emails since.
 
 Neat :)
 
Still didn't solve my issue.. Turns out to be an issue with
/dev/console and the kernel. I tried to post here about it, but
no replies... So took it to arch where I found alot of discussion of
it via Google.

Thanks for all the insight,

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Want to upgrade sendmail in next OS release

2007-10-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  I'd like to upgrade my sendmail version in advance of
  upgrading to the next release of the OS. I was wondering if I
   .
  I don't want to build out of ports because it is set up not to
  override the base install.
 
 I ran into the same problem years ago, with sendmail from ports 
 installing into the /usr/local path, and creating two different versions 
 on the same system, and generally making a Big Mess of itself.

What I was afraid of. And I'll admit there is a bunch of 
ASSUME factor here. When I get on a machine running a certain OS,
I have certain expectations of whats base install, and what other
has been installed. If I want sendmail, I'd go to /etc/mail . If it
was /usr/local/etc/mail, I'd probably sit there for a few edits of
the sendmail.cf in there or something until I realized .. OH, on
THIS machine its in /usr/local/etc/mail. I hate wasting time. :)
 
 But from some posts here a couple months ago, and reading the Makefile, 
 I ~THINK~ it [the port] is now set up to replace the stock sendmail and 
 install into the regular system paths.
 
 I'm only like 90% on this, but hopefully someone else will confirm:  I 
 think the port will do what you want.
 
From the Makefile :

.if exists(${DESTDIR}/etc/mail/mailer.conf)  ${PREFIX} == /usr
pre-everything::
@${ECHO_CMD} #
@${ECHO_CMD} # You can't override the base sendmail this way.
@${ECHO_CMD} # your version FreeBSD use mailwrapper.
@${ECHO_CMD} #
@${ECHO_CMD} # Please install with normal PREFIX
@${ECHO_CMD} # and activate the port version with
@${ECHO_CMD} # cd ${PORTSDIR}/mail/sendmail  make mailer.conf
@${ECHO_CMD} #
@${FALSE}
.endif


So atleast for /usr/ports/mail/sendmail, the answer is No.
(Unless, I'm reading it wrong, then its either YES, or DEFINITE
MAYBE.)

Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to upgrade sendmail in next OS release

2007-10-21 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'd like to upgrade my sendmail version in advance of
upgrading to the next release of the OS. I was wondering if I
cvsup the version of the OS I want, then do :

# cd /usr/src/lib/libsm
# make obj  make depend  make
# cd /usr/src/lib/libsmutil
# make obj  make depend  make
# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
# make obj  make depend  make  make install

if that would be enough? Later on, when I can
afford to reboot the machine, I'll go through the :

# 1.  `cd /usr/src'   (or to the directory containing your source tree).
# 2.  `make buildworld'
# 3.  `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC).
# 4.  `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE'   (default is GENERIC).
# 5.  `reboot'(in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt).
# 6.  `mergemaster -p'
# 7.  `make installworld'
# 8.  `mergemaster'
# 9.  `reboot'

Procedure.

I don't want to build out of ports because it is set up not to
override the base install.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/dev/console and syslog

2007-10-21 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm having an issue where if I have syslog output something to
/dev/console, it comes back to syslog again as a kernel: message. 
I've verified that this is definitely something with /dev/console, since
even if I do :

valhalla# echo STRAIGHT TO CONSOLE  /dev/console

I can :

valhalla# grep STRAIGHT TO CONSOLE /var/log/spool
Oct 21 16:12:07 valhalla kernel: STRAIGHT TO CONSOLE

Is there a way from syslog to write to the console but
NOT have it come back to syslog as a kernel: ?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: syslog marking sendmail output as kernel:

2007-10-21 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 So something IS sending it twice, once at pri 22, no flags, then once
 at 166 flags 17. (Unless by some configuration flukeyness its reprocessing
 the line). So IMHO its not getting something improperly terminated. Its
 getting the line twice at different pri/flags causing it to prepend the
 Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: to the already formatted 
 Oct 16 21:29:00 valhalla sm-mta[31804]: l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): 
 collect: 
 I/O error on connection from [61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   The question is is it because of some weird syslog config, or
 is it sendmail (8.13.1)?
 

I found the answer, now I just need to know if there is something
I can do about. I found out through trail/error/LOTS of Googling that it
ISN'T sendmail thats the problem. AND its not syslogd... Its apparently
the kernel.

On the ARCH list, about a year+1/2 ago, they were talking about
things, and PHK made the following comment :

Spitting things out on /dev/console today will more likely than
not, print stuff on a syscons or serial port which nobody looks at.
For that reason, we added a hack to the kernel to make all stuff
that went to /dev/console be sent to syslogd(8)

So, its the kernel forwarding things BACK to syslogd.

Anyone know how to write to the console WITHOUT this
happening, or without syslog repeating it?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Want to upgrade sendmail in next OS release

2007-10-21 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On 2007-10-21 11:28, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'd like to upgrade my sendmail version in advance of upgrading to the
  next release of the OS.
 
 Why?

I can afford the time to start/stop sendmail here and there, but
I have to schedule the maintenance window to upgrade this particular
machine.
 
  # cd /usr/src/lib/libsm
  # make obj  make depend  make
  # cd /usr/src/lib/libsmutil
  # make obj  make depend  make
  # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
  # make obj  make depend  make  make install
 
 This can be done only if you manage to upgrade Sendmail sources and
 their build-glue manually, by following *exactly* the same process that
 Gregory Shapiro (our native Sendmail maintainer) uses to do it.

So where do I find that? I took those instructions from previous
FreeBSD Security announcements against sendmail.
 
 You are also missing some parts of Sendmail above, like:
 
   /usr/src/bin/rmail
   /usr/src/usr.bin/vacation
   /usr/src/etc/sendmail

rmail - 99% of delivery is procmail, but good point.
vacation - Not used
etc/sendmail - I don't use default mc's, and don't mind
running older cf's on a newer version. The
change between 8.13 and 8.14 wasn't enough for
us to need to.
 
 The upgrade process used by Gregory Shapiro and the normal 'buildworld'
 cycle takes care of all that and more.
 
 Why would you want to circumvent it, and risk breaking Sendmail?
 
See above... 

In the mean time, I got bored, so I did just that. Seems
to be working fine, has processed about 15K emails since. Turns out
it didn't fix my problem I originally thought it might, but in
the time since also I've learned what the problem was. (Kernel hack
to output /dev/console to syslog.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: syslog marking sendmail output as kernel:

2007-10-17 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:01 PM, Matt Emmerton wrote:
  There must be somewhere in the kernel where we're writing to the  
  syslog with an empty error string.  The syslog routines expect a  
  newline-terminated character string, so the lack of a newline  
  causes the next entry to be on the same line as the (non-existant)  
  kernel message.
 
 Actually, syslog should be just fine without getting a trailing  
 newline; from the manpage:
 
 The message is identical to a printf(3) format string, except  
 that `%m'
   is replaced by the current error message.  (As denoted by the  
 global
   variable errno; see strerror(3).)  A trailing newline is added  
 if none is
   present.
 
Hi Chuck,

I'm still not convinced thats the issue. I did a -d on syslog
and came up with. With a syslog.conf of :

*.err;kern.debug;auth.notice;mail.crit  /dev/console
*.emerg *
*.debug /var/log/spool


the syslog is seeing :

logmsg: pri 22, flags 0, from valhalla, msg Oct 16 21:29:00 sm-mta[31804]: 
l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from 
[61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Logging to CONSOLE /dev/console^M
Logging to FILE /var/log/spool^M
logmsg: pri 166, flags 17, from valhalla, msg Oct 16 21:29:00 valhalla 
sm-mta[31804]: l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection 
from [61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Logging to FILE /var/log/spool^M


So something IS sending it twice, once at pri 22, no flags, then once
at 166 flags 17. (Unless by some configuration flukeyness its reprocessing
the line). So IMHO its not getting something improperly terminated. Its
getting the line twice at different pri/flags causing it to prepend the
Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: to the already formatted 
Oct 16 21:29:00 valhalla sm-mta[31804]: l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: 
I/O error on connection from [61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The question is is it because of some weird syslog config, or
is it sendmail (8.13.1)?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


syslog marking sendmail output as kernel:

2007-10-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm seeing in the logs :

Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf5069206: SYSERR(root): collect: I
/O error on connection from bd0614db.virtua.com.br, from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf
5069206: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from bd0614db.virtua.com
.br, from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I understand there isn't a problem with the first one, but then its 
logging
the second as a kernel: entry. My syslog.conf is :

*.err;kern.debug;auth.notice;mail.crit  /dev/console
*.emerg *
*.debug /var/log/spool

Is there a way to stop that second entry? It keeps tripping my syslog
monitoring program.

Thanks, Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: syslog marking sendmail output as kernel:

2007-10-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  I understand there isn't a problem with the first one, but then its 
  logging
  the second as a kernel: entry. My syslog.conf is :
 
  *.err;kern.debug;auth.notice;mail.crit  /dev/console
  *.emerg *
  *.debug /var/log/spool
 
  Is there a way to stop that second entry? It keeps tripping my syslog
  monitoring program.
 
 What release are you running?  (Show the output of uname -a)

Its a 5.3 system
 
 It's just a formatting issue.
 
  Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf5069206: SYSERR(root): 
  snip
  Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: added newline
  Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf5069206: SYSERR(root): 
  snip
 
 There must be somewhere in the kernel where we're writing to the syslog with 
 an empty error string.  The syslog routines expect a newline-terminated 
 character string, so the lack of a newline causes the next entry to be on 
 the same line as the (non-existant) kernel message.
 
 The trouble will be tracking this down.
 
But look at it again...

Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla sm-mta[69570]: l9G42RKM069570: SYSERR(root): collect: 
I/O error on connection from dsl-189-133-2-240.prod-infinitum.com.mx, 
from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla kernel: Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla sm-mta[69570]: 
l9G42RKM069570: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from 
dsl-189-133-2-240.prod-infinitum.com.mx, from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I didn't wrap the lines this time. 

Its the SAME message. Once normal, ONCE logged as kernel. I would 
believe
something is KNOWINGLY outputting it twice. If it was 2 DIFFERENT messages, I
could see it was completely a lack of new line issue. But why would it log
the sm-mta output, then *something* part log a kernel message, THEN re-log
out the sm-mta message?

I tried to tcpdump port 514 to see if I can see sendmail doing it, but
it looks like since its on the local machine it might be using syslogs char
special device.  How would I debug that (Short of running syslog in debug
mode)

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: syslog marking sendmail output as kernel:

2007-10-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  It's just a formatting issue.
  
   Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf5069206: SYSERR(root): 
   snip
   Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: added newline
   Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla sm-mta[69206]: l9G40Kf5069206: SYSERR(root): 
   snip
  
  There must be somewhere in the kernel where we're writing to the syslog 
  with 
  an empty error string.  The syslog routines expect a newline-terminated 
  character string, so the lack of a newline causes the next entry to be on 
  the same line as the (non-existant) kernel message.
  
  The trouble will be tracking this down.
  
   But look at it again...
 
 Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla sm-mta[69570]: l9G42RKM069570: SYSERR(root): 
 collect: I/O error on connection from 
 dsl-189-133-2-240.prod-infinitum.com.mx, from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla kernel: Oct 16 00:02:32 valhalla sm-mta[69570]: 
 l9G42RKM069570: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from 
 dsl-189-133-2-240.prod-infinitum.com.mx, from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   I didn't wrap the lines this time. 
 
   Its the SAME message. Once normal, ONCE logged as kernel. I would 
 believe
 something is KNOWINGLY outputting it twice. If it was 2 DIFFERENT messages, I
 could see it was completely a lack of new line issue. But why would it log
 the sm-mta output, then *something* part log a kernel message, THEN re-log
 out the sm-mta message?
 
   I tried to tcpdump port 514 to see if I can see sendmail doing it, but
 it looks like since its on the local machine it might be using syslogs char
 special device.  How would I debug that (Short of running syslog in debug
 mode)
 
Sorry to reply to my own message... But I did some debug on syslog.
Here is what it sees :

logmsg: pri 22, flags 0, from valhalla, msg Oct 16 21:29:00 sm-mta[31804]: 
l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from 
[61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Logging to CONSOLE /dev/console^M
Logging to FILE /var/log/spool^M
logmsg: pri 166, flags 17, from valhalla, msg Oct 16 21:29:00 valhalla 
sm-mta[31804]: l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection 
from [61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Logging to FILE /var/log/spool^M


So something IS sending it twice, once at pri 22, no flags, then once
at 166 flags 17. So its not getting something improperly terminated. Its
getting the line twice at different pri/flags causing it to prepend the
Oct 16 00:00:25 valhalla kernel: to the already formatted 
Oct 16 21:29:00 valhalla sm-mta[31804]: l9H1Srwd031804: SYSERR(root): collect: 
I/O error on connection from [61.177.142.218], from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Is Apache rotatelogs efficienct for real world use?

2007-10-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Hi all,
 
 Is Apache rotatelogs suitable for handling large volumes of
 access logs, i.e. around 50K requests per hour at _peak_ time which is
 1.2M requests per day.  According to Apache website
 (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/logs.html#rotation) this becomes
 about 120MB in size per day.
 
 Does somebody have similar experience with rotatelogs?  Would you
 direct me to the proper tool in case it's not efficient enough ?
 
 TIA,
 
 Bahman

We've used /usr/ports/sysutils/cronolog pretty much since
the author first wrote it. Something to consider.

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Server rebooting itself

2007-08-28 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
   I tried installing 'mbmon' port, but when I run mbmon -d I get:
  
   mbmon -d
   InitMBInfo: Operation not permitted
   This program needs setuid root!!
  
   The SUID flag is set, and I'm running it from root. I am wondering if 
 there
   is a possible power supply issue, or something like that. 


ODD STORY... We used to buy servers custom built for us. One of my
requirements was it had to be put on the net for me to check remotely.
SOMEHOW I got the idea to compile perl to put the machine through its
paces. (Don't remember how/why/etc). Once machine I was doing it on
and all of a sudden the compile fails. WEIRD. So I try a few more
times.. Dies in the same place every time. SHRUG. The integrator
swaps this, that, the other things, to the point only 2 things weren't
swapped. Case and power supply. Swaps the power supply, thing builds
fine. Next machine, it starts failing again. I asked if he used the 
power supply from last time and he told me YES. I offered to BUY
the power supply and throw it in the garbage. 

SO, long story short (TOO LATE), WEIRD WEIRD STUFF can happen with
a seemingly good power supply.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: time issue

2007-08-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 Hello,
 
 I recently noticed that my clock was running a few minutes slow, even thoug=
 h I
 have ntpd running on the box. Now I'm seeing this on occasion.=20
 
 Aug 24 20:17:10 kanga dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 105 seconds. Th=
 is
 might c
 ause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now.
 http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeMov
 edBackwards
 
 
 Does this suggest a hardware clock issue?
 
Hi,

Do you do an ntpdate at boot, or just run ntpd? If just ntpd,
you should consider ntpdate, that way the major adjustment is done before
most anything else is started up and your dovecot probably will stop 
committing  hara-kiri.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Donation Manager Needed

2007-08-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I know its REALLY bad form to feed the trolls, but I found
this seriously funny... ESPECIALLY when you look up the WHOIS record
for this and it mentions Lagos, Nigeria. 

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mplayer, vlc, gimp issues in the past week

2007-08-22 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 mplayer foo.flv results in it crashing with:
 X11 error: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)
 MPlayer interrupted by signal 6 in module: decode_video

Hey, I started getting that too. The only thing *I* linked
it to was I had installed nsplayer. Weird that they'd be associated,
but was the only thing I changed recently. As soon as I exit my
web browser that stops.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Flash

2007-08-17 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Very simple.
 Step 1 Install Linux compatibility layer
 Step 2 In your rc.conf file type linux_enable=yes
 Step 3 UNINSTALL linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 if you installed in the past
 Step 4 Install nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4_2
 Step 5 Install Flush 7 from ports
 Step 6 when you type about:plugin into your Firefox it should list Flush
 
Ok, so now that you've gotten my flash to work... :) (THANKS!)

How about Java ;)

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Embedded in 3rd Party Applications and Appliances?

2007-08-14 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 A better approach in my opinion would be to look at specific use
 cases; the FreeBSD web site includes some information of that sort.
 One example not listed there is that Juniper Networks routers control
 plane (JunOS, I think) is based on FreeBSD.
 
I believe NetApp filers are, or atleast at one time were based
on FreeBSD.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Dell Wireless All-In-One 966 Printer

2007-08-11 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 There are wireless print servers and access points with printer ports 
 that will let you make most non-host-based printers wireless.  Costs 
 more, but gives more choices.  The openprinting.org site is a good place 
 to check printer compatibility.
 
Be *VERY* careful if you decide to purchase one. They are
very strict about what printers THEY will and won't work with and in
exactly what capacity. I bought one companies wireless version, only 
to be told the printer was only supported on the wired one. I purchased 
the wired one and it was an ever loving SOB to get working. I ended up
just attaching it to a Winderz PC and making the Winderz a print server.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now?

2007-08-06 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:01:51AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
   
   On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 
 On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to 
  update
  the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it 
  used to
  actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old 
  behaviour?
  With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) 
  its a
  killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still 
  killing
  that CF chip.
 
 Please show us how you came to this conclusion.
 
 Kris

script output from a recent update :

---  Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 
10:52:00 -0400
---  Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats)
OK? [yes] 
---  Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 
-0400
---  Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats'
===  Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4
===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===  Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4
===  Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4
===  Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4
---  Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 
-0400 (cons
umed 00:00:00)
---  Updating dependency info
---  Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS
   
   Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see
   whether they need to be updated?
   
   Kris
   
  I was truthfully only going by what I believed it was saying, that
  it was really modifying them.
  
  I upgraded fetchyahoo tonite after I emailed this, and if I do an
  ls -lt in /var/db/pkg I see :
  
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  15891456 Aug  6 00:59 pkgdb.db
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Compress-Zlib-2.005
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.005
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-libwww-5.805
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 openssl-0.9.8e_1
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Authen-SASL-2.10_1
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Digest-MD5-2.36
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-MIME-Tools-5.420_1,2
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Net-1.21,1
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.005
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-GSSAPI-0.24
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-HTML-Parser-3.56
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-HTML-Tagset-3.10
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.005
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Digest-1.15
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-IO-stringy-2.110
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-MIME-Base64-3.07
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:59 p5-Mail-Tools-1.74
  
  (etc)
  
  
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2
  drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel   512 Aug  6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3
  
  I thought the timestamp of a directory only changes if a
  file was added or modified in the directory. 
  
  If I do the ls -lt */\+CONTENTS, I see :
  
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel2386 Aug  6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1113 Aug  6 00:59 xset-1.0.2/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel 976 Aug  6 00:59 xsetmode-1.0.0/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1003 Aug  6 00:59 xsetpointer-1.0.0/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1204 Aug  6 00:59 xsetroot-1.0.1/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1597 Aug  6 00:59 xsm-1.0.1/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1149 Aug  6 00:59 xstdcmap-1.0.1/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel5124 Aug  6 00:59 xterm-228/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel1157 Aug  6 00:59 xtrans-1.0.3/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel3097 Aug  6 00:59 xtrap-1.0.2/+CONTENTS
  -rw-r--r--  1

Re: Re[2]: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now?

2007-08-06 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On August 06, 2007 at 02:55AM Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 
 
 [snip}
 
  Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it
  here, is the old Is anyone else seeing this. When/if you use portupgrade, 
  does
  it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to 
  inherit
  on atleast 2 of my machines?
 
 I have noticed the same behavior. I have some 815 ports installed;
 however, I had not noticed any significant deterioration in
 performance.
 
Ok, so someone else is seeing it... 

Its not performance I'm worried about though. For the laptop, its
just sitting and watching it go through 915 files for an update to a small
program that doesn't rely on anything but perl.

For my Soekris, it IS bothersome. CF cards have a limited life, and
all those rewrites decrease it.

So I guess its the new way it does it then.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now?

2007-08-05 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update
the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to
actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour?
With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a
killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing
that CF chip.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall rules / Proper directory

2007-08-03 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  I've made a /etc/rc.firewall.local I may rename it in the future
  to stand out more, but we'll see how it goes for now.
 
 Neat.  Have fun with the new firewall ruleset then.
 
Thanks. I wish it wasn't necessary, but the server runs MySQL
and if I turn TCPwrappers on, someone just trying to connect a few
times creates a DOS on it. I've tried before to bring this up with
the MySQL people with no luck.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Firewall rules / Proper directory

2007-08-02 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering
what the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw firewall_script?

I'd normally drop it onto /usr/local/etc somewhere, but my /u/l/e
is an NFS filesystem, and according to rcorder it starts ipfw WAY before 
the nfsclient. I don't want to stomp on /etc/rc.firewall, I like having
it as a reference and one less thing to have to worry about mergemaster
overwriting.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall rules / Proper directory

2007-08-02 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On 2007-08-02 12:36, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
  I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering what
  the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw firewall_script?
 
 I usually save my rules in '/etc/pf.conf' or '/etc/ipfw.rules'.
 
 It's not like the '/etc' directory is a please do not touch area.
 
Thanks...

I always DO try to keep things out of /etc if at all possible, I
regard that as system space, and if I do trespass into it its usually
a file or directory previously allocated for that (/etc/rc.conf, /etc/mail/*).

I've made a /etc/rc.firewall.local I may rename it in the future
to stand out more, but we'll see how it goes for now.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: IPv6 Tunnel Brokers?

2007-08-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 I second that recommendation. The ISP in question is Hurricane Electric 
 and the process is 100% web driven. It took me less than a day to get a 
 gif tunnel up and an ipv6 /64 assignment.
 

They are FAIRLY response to service issues (I had problems getting
to FTP1.FREEBSD.ORG for a bit, and within 8 hours of putting a ticket in
it was resolved). They also show exact configuration for 1/2 a dozen
different OS/routers.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Xorg upgrade (wrong library) issue [more info]

2007-07-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

And yes, I did do according to the instructions :

Script started on Mon Jul 23 00:05:00 2007
himinbjorg# setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes
himinbjorg# portupgrade -Rfi libXft
---  Session started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:34 -0400
---  Reinstallation of x11/xproto started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:38 -0400
---  Reinstalling 'xproto-7.0.10' (x11/xproto)
OK? [yes] 
---  Build of x11/xproto started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:42 -0400


So not sure why I'm running into this and the rest of the world
didn't. If the path to the old one is before the new one, no one should
have gotten it to work... Or did I do something wrong or have a 
special situation?

Thanks, Tuc


 
  
  Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
   snip
   himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
   work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
 libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
 libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
   
 WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
   Xfont from /usr/X11R6/lib?
   
  
  Because /usr/X11R6 is a symlink to /usr/local,
 
 drwxr-xr-x  16 root  wheel  512 Jul 22 22:02 /usr/X11R6
 
   Not yet... I haven't finished the upgrade. I'm still mid upgrade.
 I won't go any further until I find out whats happening. So thats not
 the case.
 
  and both appear in the
  library path hints, so the first one listed gets used when resolving the
  library paths at runtime.
 
   So how did everyone else in the world get away without running 
 into this? I see that it initially was put into /usr/X11R6 as part of
 xorg-libraries-6.9.0 . The additional Xfont came about because :
 
 1) portupgrade was upgrading xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 to 
   encodings-1.0.2,1
 2) portupgrade then realized it needed mkfontscale so started to work
   on that
 3) mkfontscale needed libfontenc
 
 4) With those 2 resolved, it then went for bdftopcf
 
 5) bdftopcf needed libXfont
 
   So at this point it was installing libXfont when it already had
 the one from xorg-libraries-6.9.0 there, hence the problem apparently
 started.
  
  (Hint: 'strings /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints' and 'ldconfig -r')
  
   Ok, so what do I do now? I'm mid build, I don't have X installed
 or running, and I have atleast 1894 font files that are incorrect at the
 current moment I still don't get why I ran into this and others didn't.
 Did I miss a step that would have removed the xorg-libraries?
 
   Thanks, Tuc
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Xorg upgrade (wrong library) issue

2007-07-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :

/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip  
lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol 
serverClient
/usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR14.bdf /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 
ISO8859-13
Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR14-ISO8859-13.bdf'.
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR14-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip  
lubR14-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol 
serverClient
/usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR18.bdf /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 
ISO8859-13
Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR18-ISO8859-13.bdf'.
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR18-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip  
lubR18-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol 
serverClient
/usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR19.bdf /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 
ISO8859-13
Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR19-ISO8859-13.bdf'.

I won't go any further as I'm sure this is indicating a problem.
But where/how?

-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  5308 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf:
libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2807f000)
libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e5000)

Looks like its picking up libXfont.so.1 from the /usr/X11R6 :

-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  424992 Oct 26  2006 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1

and not from the local :

-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  432705 Jul 23 13:18 /usr/local/lib/libXfont.so.1

What could cause it? How do I fix it mid build? Is there anything
else I should be looking at?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Xorg upgrade (wrong library) issue [more info]

2007-07-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Hi,
 
   I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
 and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :
 
 /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip  
 lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol 
 serverClient
 /usr/local/bin/ucs2any lubR14.bdf 
 /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/map-ISO8859-13 ISO8859-13
 Writing 192 characters into file 'lubR14-ISO8859-13.bdf'.

So I went to x11-fonts/bdftopcf. I set my XORG_UPGRADE variable
(Just incase) and did :

===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===  Extracting for bdftopcf-1.0.1
= MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2.
= SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2.
===  Patching for bdftopcf-1.0.1
===   bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xfont.pc - 
found
===   bdftopcf-1.0.1 depends on executable in : pkg-config - found
===  Configuring for bdftopcf-1.0.1
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking if xorg-macros used to generate configure is at least 1.1... yes, 1.1.5
checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of cc... gcc3
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.5-pkg-config... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for BDFTOPCF... yes
checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5
checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.5
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
===  Building for bdftopcf-1.0.1
make  all-am
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-I/usr/local/include 
-I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -O -pipe -MT bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo -c -o bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o `test -f 'bdftopcf.c' 
|| echo './'`bdftopcf.c;  then mv -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo 
.deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Po; else rm -f .deps/bdftopcf-bdftopcf.Tpo; exit 1; 
fi
cc  -O -pipe   -o bdftopcf  bdftopcf-bdftopcf.o -L/usr/local/lib -lXfont 
sed -e 's|__vendorversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|'  -e 
's|__xorgversion__|bdftopcf 1.0.1 X Version 11|'  -e 
's|__xservername__|Xorg|g'  -e 's|__xconfigfile__|xorg.conf|g'  -e 
's|__projectroot__|/usr/local|g'  -e 's|__apploaddir__||'  -e 
's|__appmansuffix__|1|g'  -e 's|__libmansuffix__|3|g'  -e 
's|__adminmansuffix__|8|g'  -e 's|__miscmansuffix__|7|g'  -e 
's|__filemansuffix__|5|g'  bdftopcf.man  bdftopcf.1
himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)

WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
Xfont from /usr/X11R6/lib?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Xorg upgrade (wrong library) issue [more info]

2007-07-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  snip
  himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
  work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
  libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
  libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
  
  WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
  Xfont from /usr/X11R6/lib?
  
 
 Because /usr/X11R6 is a symlink to /usr/local,

drwxr-xr-x  16 root  wheel  512 Jul 22 22:02 /usr/X11R6

Not yet... I haven't finished the upgrade. I'm still mid upgrade.
I won't go any further until I find out whats happening. So thats not
the case.

 and both appear in the
 library path hints, so the first one listed gets used when resolving the
 library paths at runtime.

So how did everyone else in the world get away without running 
into this? I see that it initially was put into /usr/X11R6 as part of
xorg-libraries-6.9.0 . The additional Xfont came about because :

1) portupgrade was upgrading xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 to 
encodings-1.0.2,1
2) portupgrade then realized it needed mkfontscale so started to work
on that
3) mkfontscale needed libfontenc

4) With those 2 resolved, it then went for bdftopcf

5) bdftopcf needed libXfont

So at this point it was installing libXfont when it already had
the one from xorg-libraries-6.9.0 there, hence the problem apparently
started.
 
 (Hint: 'strings /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints' and 'ldconfig -r')
 
Ok, so what do I do now? I'm mid build, I don't have X installed
or running, and I have atleast 1894 font files that are incorrect at the
current moment I still don't get why I ran into this and others didn't.
Did I miss a step that would have removed the xorg-libraries?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: plz help!

2007-06-22 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Second, is there some special reason you would want to install
 the 4.8 version?It is long ago obsolete.   I would suggest
 installing 6.2-RELEASE unless there is a very good reason to
 go with 4.8.
 
Older laptops for one... :)

(Actually, mine can go to 5.4 ... Once I try 5.5, it
locks up on the ata1 probe)

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ata1 probe causes lockup

2007-06-11 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Having a problem installing 5.5 on a Toshiba 2805-S301 laptop.
(I *HAVE* to load 5.5 on it for various reasons). I can load 5.4 
perfectly, but as soon as I go to 5.5, the kernel won't boot. If
I boot in 5.4 with verbose, I get

Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller port 
0xfff0-0x,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 5.1 on pci0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 
at 0xfff0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 
at 0x1f0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 
at 0x3f6
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0-slave:  stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 
devices=0x1ATA_MASTER
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: [MPSAFE]
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 
at 0x170
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x1c type 4 
at 0x376

 (5.5 STOPS HERE)


Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1-master: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1-slave:  stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: reset tp2 stat0=00 stat1=00 
devices=0xcATAPI_SLAVE,ATAPI_MASTER
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: [MPSAFE]
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller 
port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 5.2 on pci0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: Reserved 0x20 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 
at 0xff80
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: usb0: Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller 
on uhci0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 
1.00/1.00, addr 1
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: pci0: bridge at device 5.3 (no driver attached)


Any idea how to get 5.5 to get past that atapci0: Reserved part?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to replace perl-threaded with perl?

2007-05-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I installed lang/perl5.8 and set it to be threaded. I'm having
problems getting mod_perl working, and I know at one time atleast that
it was because of using threaded perl. How do I portupgrade and tell it
to :

1) Uninstall perl-threaded-5.8.8
2) Install perl 5.8
3) Make sure no previous shared libs are saved
4) Recompile everything that depended previously on perl-threaded and now
depends on perl 5.8

I looked at portupgrade, and for #1/#2 I see the -o syntax, but
am not sure if it works correctly in this instance. For #3, it would be
the -u syntax, correct? And then for #4 be -fr?


Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fresh OS/Perl{Threaded}/Apache 1.3.37/modperl segfault

2007-05-14 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Installed a fresh 5.5-R-p12 (I *NEED* to run 5.5, sorry) with 

apache+mod_ssl+mod_deflate-1.3.37+2.8.28
perl-threaded-5.8.8
mod_perl-1.30

When I try to start it I get a segfault. The backtrace is :

(gdb) bt
#0  0x286e9350 in Perl_newSVpvn ()
   from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
#1  0x2873e1bd in PerlIO_open ()
   from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
#2  0x2868736a in S_open_script ()
   from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
#3  0x28684267 in S_parse_body ()
   from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
#4  0x286837fe in perl_parse ()
   from /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
#5  0x2861ddb4 in perl_startup () from /usr/local/libexec/apache/libperl.so
#6  0x2861d82a in perl_module_init () from /usr/local/libexec/apache/libperl.so
#7  0x0805683e in ap_init_modules ()
#8  0x0805f5df in main ()


Is this because I'm using threaded perl? 

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Ports wrangling

2007-05-04 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I have a machine in the midst of taking a dirt nap. I bought a
replacement and want to start loading all my ports on it. I have 
a few questions.

Is there a way to get a report of what my first level ports
are (Those that don't depend on anyone, and aren't depended by anyone),
then my second level ports (Those that depend on others, but aren't
depended on), etc.

Is there a way to get a report per port what files were ACTUALLY
installed and where? (Or do I just do a find -newer) ?


Thanks, Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to get watchdogd from biting me!?

2007-03-28 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm starting it with :

watchdogd -s 15 -t 120 -e logger I'm gonna hurl

And sometimes within a few minutes it reboots, and
other times its hours... But at no time was the system inactive
(I've been on it 3 of 4 reboots) and its never logged that
for me either.

What am I doing wrong??

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Is there a way from serial TTY to get system attention?

2007-03-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,
 
I have a Soekris 4801 I bought about a year + 1/2 
ago. It runs FreeBSD (5.5) off a CF card with a USB flash 
to help it. It ran great for 10 months, but over the last 
8 months its been locking up on me. I put that in quotes 
because I'm not sure if its the OS or the unit. I do see 
POWER onand the NET light blinking. No ERROR or DISK. 
When I try to serial tty in, I get nothing. 

Is there any way anyone knows to find out if the
OS has gone south, or the unit is not operating properly.
Is there some sort of key sequence to ask FreeBSD if its
running or to give SOME sort of life or something? My
only access to it is via a serial TTY.
 
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD on IDE Flash disk drive

2007-03-09 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Hello Derek,
 
  You will want the swap to some other device such a a regular hard 
  drive.  A flash drive can get worn out cells and fail.
 
 Also when just reading the flash drive? I would like to write to it
 only when it is absolutely necessary (configuration change). I think
 2 million configuration changes should be enough? If it lasts only year,
 no problem I can exchange it every now and then. I just hope it is more
 damage-proof than ordinary hard drives (for example at power outages).
 
 Bye,
 Nejc
 
The answer is NO... (IMNSHO)

I have a few Soekris servers running FreeBSD 5.5 at a 
*REMOTE* location (When I say remote, I don't mean the next city, or
next state, or even a few states away... I mean a few states away
*AND* you need a 4WD to drive 9 miles to get to it. Its ~500 feet
from the Atlantic Ocean in an area without any paved roads). I
have CF cards in them for the primary, the more durable/rugged of 
the SanDisk line and USB for swap/ports/squid data. It is *STILL* 
only rated for about 10K R/W operations. I also find when the facility 
DOES lose power (We are still building it out) that the CF and USB 
seem MUCH MORE prone to having issues coming back.

I had thought to use CF/USB because they wouldn't crash and
be more tolerant of bad conditions (heat and salt air humidity). 
I'm pretty much giving up and switching to notebook IDE drives the
next time I am there.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Enable type 28 (SHM) in base NTPD

2007-02-03 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm trying to enable the type 28 clock, SHM, in the FreeBSD
5.X base package. It seems to have only a few clocks available, and
thats not one. I've been google'n for 1/2 an hour with no luck. 
Should I just install from ports?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problems with 5.5-REL FTP install

2006-11-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something 
I can do to supplement/replace this need?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems with 5.5-REL FTP install

2006-11-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
 =20
  I'm running into a problem trying to install
  5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
  them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something=20
  I can do to supplement/replace this need?
 
 Why do you think you need it?  crypto has been an integral part of the
 base for some time now.
 
Don't look at me! I select the Minimal install and sysinstall
seems to be going after it. :)

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems with 5.5-REL FTP install

2006-11-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:15:40PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
   On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:31:36PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
   =3D20
I'm running into a problem trying to install
5.5-RELEASE from FTP. I've tried a few sites, and none of
them seem to have the crypto package. Is there something=3D20
I can do to supplement/replace this need?
  =20
   Why do you think you need it?  crypto has been an integral part of the
   base for some time now.
  =20
  Don't look at me! I select the Minimal install and sysinstall
  seems to be going after it. :)
 
 sysinstall from what version?  I suspect not 5.5 :-)
 
Oh. Ok. :-/ Yea, its 5.3. I'm trying to install to a CF card
and my 5.5 system locks when I do. I run FreeSBIE (5.3) it works fine.

I guess I'll install 5.3 and then upgrade to 5.5 . :-/ I
hate to do all these CF writes.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: win32 codecs not fixed?

2006-11-14 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Yousef Adnan Raffah wrote:
  I have tried to portsnap this morning in order to see if the security
  issue with the multimedia/win32-codecs was resolved, which seems like it
  is not.
  What does usually happen when such a thing is happening, does the
  package/port stay restricted until the developer/port owner fix the
  security issue or does something else happens?
 
 Run portaudit -F to fetch the most current database. The Issue has been
 removed some time ago by adding the option to not install quicktime (see
 http://www.freshports.org/multimedia/win32-codecs )
 
Probably needs to remove /var/db/ports/win32-codecs/options and
then reconfigure it w/o Quicktime. Then it won't give the error anymore.

Is there a better way to have a port forget its previous
options?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Extra line from quoting

2006-11-06 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I run a cvsup and if there is any output, I send an email to myself.
For some reason, in recent weeks I'm getting an email with just a blank
line.

The command is :

/usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 -h $(/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -c us -Q) 
/usr/local/etc/ports-supfile  /usr/local/machine/logs/updateports.log 21

I can do it with backticks too, and that too does it. If I do each
command on its own, I don't get it. 

Any idea what/where this is happening?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


TAP usage questions

2006-11-02 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I need to use a TAP interface for a project. Right now I have
the item using the TAP configured with A.B.C.2 and tap0 as
A.B.C.1, with net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 set in sysctl. So now I
have the ability to route to the item on the .2 without issue. 

But now I want to have the IP of the item to be in the same
subnet at my wi0. Is there a way to do this without much hassle?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tunnels to Cisco through NAT?

2006-10-27 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On Oct 20, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Is anyone aware of a tunnel between FreeBSD and Cisco that
  can go through a NAT on the Cisco side?
 
 If you update the Cisco firmware with the latest IOS+VPN version, you  
 ought to gain proper NAT-T support which will work with most IPSEC/ 
 VPN implementations.  Otherwise, if you only need to implement a  
 single VPN tunnel, you can use something like OpenVPN, which only  
 needs you to forward a single UDP port (1194)...
 
Ok, I've :

1) Updated the IOS to c2500-ik8os-l.122-32
2) I've installed ipsec-tools on FreeBSD after applying
the NAT-T patch (freebsd6-natt.diff) to
5.5-RELEASE-p8 and recompiling.
3) Set up on FreeBSD :

ifconfig gre0 unplumb
ifconfig gre0 create
ifconfig gre0 192.168.4.1 192.168.4.2 netmask 0x link1 up
ifconfig gre0 tunnel 192.136.64.116 69.28.185.2

4) Set up on Cisco :

interface Tunnel0
 ip address 192.168.4.2 255.255.255.0
 tunnel source Ethernet0
 tunnel destination 192.136.64.116
! 
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 69.28.185.2 255.255.255.240



So now I can ping across the GRE, which is really nice.

So now the next part is getting IPSEC over it And
I'm again stuck. I'm trying to use :

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094bff.shtml

as a reference, but there seems to be alot more going
on that really confuses me. Has anyone gone this route?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.'

2006-10-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Thanks... Any idea where to look for the answer? I did find
references, but to UPDATING that didn't exist. Wondered how all 
of a sudden items I haven't recompiled in a while started having
it.

Thanks, Tuc

 
 This is a FAQ; you have something linked to two thread libraries.
 
 Kris
 
 On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:18:57PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
 =20
  Out of no where I started to get :
 =20
  Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file /usr/=
 src/lib
  /libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno =3D 0)
 =20
  On alot of programs. I thought it had to do with GTK/GNOME so I
  did :
 =20
pkgdb -Ff
portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*
 =20
  as per the 20061014 instructions. I got to ORBit2.0 and it did
  it again. The compile was called as :
 =20
  configure:22617: cc -o conftest -O -pipe  -I/usr/local/include  -L/usr/lo=
 cal/lib
   conftest.c -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -lgobject-2.0 =
 -lgthre
  ad-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv5
 =20
  and gave :
 =20
  Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file /usr/=
 src/lib
  /libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno =3D 0)
 =20
 =20
  If I look at all the libraries :
 =20
  -lgobject-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
  -lgthread-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
  -lgmodule-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
  -lglib-2.0: New as of Oct 25 09:53
 =20
  So I'm stuck now... Help
 =20
  My /etc/libmap.conf only does mapping by file, not
  generically  :
 =20
  [/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so]
  [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
  [/usr/local/Acrobat7/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
  [/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so]
  [/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3D.so]
  [/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libj3daudio.so]
  [/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3DUtils.so]
  [/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_jai/libmlib_jai.so]
  [/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libclib_jiio.so]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problems compiling : libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la'

2006-10-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Trying to compile wireshark (Which I had running
previously) and I get :

libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la' or 
unhandled argument `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la'

The reason it can't find it is its in /usr/local/lib
now. But why is wireshark thinking its in /usr/X11R6/lib? I
saw something about GNOME trying to change the location of libraries,
but I don't know what it is that might be telling it the wrong
location.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems compiling : libtool: link: cannot find the

2006-10-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On 27/10/2006 00:37, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
 =20
  Trying to compile wireshark (Which I had running
  previously) and I get :
 =20
  libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.=
 0.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la'
 =20
  The reason it can't find it is its in /usr/local/lib
  now. But why is wireshark thinking its in /usr/X11R6/lib? I
  saw something about GNOME trying to change the location of libraries,
  but I don't know what it is that might be telling it the wrong
  location.
 
 I've seen that few times already, basically some gnome's libraries
 weren't upgraded properly (not only pango). For a quick fix you can
 either find out which one is to blame or upgrade everything on which
 broken port depends, in case of wireshark:
 
 # portupgrade -fR wireshark

Ok, thanks, will try that(See below)
 
 The proper method, however, is described in /usr/ports/UPDATING
 (20061014) and use that if you're not sure what above quick method can
 brake ;)
 
I've done it twice already... I'm on my third time, but this
time I'm scripting the session since when I do 3 or 4 of them fail.
2-3 from fetch issues, and one for an uninstall issue. I need to find
out better why the uninstall/fetch issues are happening and then
progress from there.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems compiling : libtool: link: cannot find the library

2006-10-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  Trying to compile wireshark (Which I had running
  previously) and I get :
 
  libtool: link: cannot find the library 
  `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la' or unhandled argument 
  `/usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la'
 
  The reason it can't find it is its in /usr/local/lib
  now. But why is wireshark thinking its in /usr/X11R6/lib? I
  saw something about GNOME trying to change the location of libraries,
  but I don't know what it is that might be telling it the wrong
  location.
 
  Thanks, Tuc
 
 You've got some pre-GNOME-2.16 librar{y/ies} which references 
 /usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la. Just check which one (I had some 
 non-port and had to use grep: 
 grep -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libpango `find /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib -name 
 *.la`
 ) and reinstall it. BTW, you can get this error with other libs (GTK2, 
 for one) as well.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Vladimir
 
Hi,

Thank you very much, thats a great way to do it. I've never used the
grep -l . The list of what it found is below. I have a feeling that the gtk-2.0
is the one thats failing the uninstall. Perhaps then other ones are skipped
because of it. 

Thanks, Tuc
himinbjorg# grep -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libpango `find /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib 
-name *.la`
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/docklet.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/gaim-remote.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/gestures.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/ticker.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/history.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/iconaway.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/notify.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/spellchk.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gaim/timestamp.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-am-et.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-cedilla.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-cyrillic-translit.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-inuktitut.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-ipa.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-thai-broken.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-ti-er.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-ti-et.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-viqr.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libpixmap.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libclearlooks.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libcrux-engine.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libhcengine.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libindustrial.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/liblighthouseblue.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libmetal.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libmist.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libredmond95.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libsmooth.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libthinice.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libsvg.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libglade/2.0/libcanvas.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libglade-2.0.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgailutil.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/librsvg-2.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgtkhtml-2.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgtkspell.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgimpwidgets-2.0.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgimpui-2.0.la
/usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.'

2006-10-26 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:33:09PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
 =20
  Thanks... Any idea where to look for the answer? I did find
  references, but to UPDATING that didn't exist. Wondered how all=20
  of a sudden items I haven't recompiled in a while started having
  it.
 
 You had old packages linked against an old version of the library from
 a previous revision of FreeBSD, and they only broke when your recent
 update changed one of them to link to both versions.

FreeBSD himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com 5.5-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 
5.5-RELEASE-p2 #0: Tue Jun 20 15:27:48 EDT 2006 [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HIMINBJORG53noagp  i386

As you see, I haven't updated my base OS in 4 months.

 portupgrade -fa is the most convenient way to solve this.
 
That scares me to no ever loving end. I usually end up
with issues. I'm doing a portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* for the
3rd time right now. It hasn't worked properly the other 2
times. Some packages had fetch errors, and one had uninstall
issues.  Whenever I've done an upgrade before, ruby and perl
usually end up broken pretty bad.

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.'

2006-10-25 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Out of no where I started to get :

Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file /usr/src/lib
/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0)

On alot of programs. I thought it had to do with GTK/GNOME so I
did :

  pkgdb -Ff
  portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*

as per the 20061014 instructions. I got to ORBit2.0 and it did
it again. The compile was called as :

configure:22617: cc -o conftest -O -pipe  -I/usr/local/include  -L/usr/local/lib
 conftest.c -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -lgobject-2.0 -lgthre
ad-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv5

and gave :

Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 87 in file /usr/src/lib
/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0)


If I look at all the libraries :

-lgobject-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
-lgthread-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
-lgmodule-2.0 : New as of Oct 25 09:53
-lglib-2.0: New as of Oct 25 09:53

So I'm stuck now... Help

My /etc/libmap.conf only does mapping by file, not
generically  :

[/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin7/libflashplayer.so]
[/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
[/usr/local/Acrobat7/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so]
[/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/plugins/nphelix.so]
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3D.so]
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libj3daudio.so]
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libJ3DUtils.so]
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_jai/libmlib_jai.so]
[/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libclib_jiio.so]


Thanks, Tuc

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: GRE to Cisco

2006-10-24 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On 10/24/06, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I was wondering if anyone has used GRE tunnel extensively. I'm 
  trying to
  connect a FreeBSD system to a Cisco router. For testing ONLY I'm trying to 
  do
  it to two devices on the same subnet. When I bring the gre up, I can't
  ping the other side. I have my FreeBSD at 192.168.3.21 and gre0 looks like :
 
  gre0: flags=9051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,LINK0,MULTICAST mtu 1476
  tunnel inet 192.168.3.21 -- 192.168.3.149
  inet6 fe80::212:3fff:fedd:58b2%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
  inet 192.168.3.21 -- 192.168.3.149 netmask 0x
 
  My Cisco is at 192.168.3.149 and looks like :
 
  interface Tunnel0
   ip unnumbered Ethernet0
   tunnel source Ethernet0
   tunnel destination 192.168.3.21
  !
  interface Ethernet0
   ip address 192.168.3.149 255.255.255.0
 
  Ideas?
 
 I'm not very experienced with this, but if your routing table
 lists 192.168.3.149 as reachable through the tunnel, then
 the tunnel itself can't function, naturally.

It looks like the man page and lack of sleep made this a
disaster... I've changed things around :

FREEBSD:
ifconfig wi0 192.168.3.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
ifconfig gre0 unplumb
ifconfig gre0 create
ifconfig gre0 192.168.4.1 192.168.4.2 netmask 0xff00 link0 up
ifconfig gre0 tunnel 192.168.3.21 192.168.3.149


Cisco:

interface Tunnel0
 ip address 192.168.4.2 255.255.255.0
 tunnel source Ethernet0
 tunnel destination 192.168.3.21
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 192.168.3.149 255.255.255.0


But still can't ping 192.168.4.2 .

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


GRE to Cisco

2006-10-23 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

I was wondering if anyone has used GRE tunnel extensively. I'm trying to
connect a FreeBSD system to a Cisco router. For testing ONLY I'm trying to do
it to two devices on the same subnet. When I bring the gre up, I can't
ping the other side. I have my FreeBSD at 192.168.3.21 and gre0 looks like :

gre0: flags=9051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,LINK0,MULTICAST mtu 1476
tunnel inet 192.168.3.21 -- 192.168.3.149
inet6 fe80::212:3fff:fedd:58b2%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 
inet 192.168.3.21 -- 192.168.3.149 netmask 0x 

My Cisco is at 192.168.3.149 and looks like :

interface Tunnel0
 ip unnumbered Ethernet0
 tunnel source Ethernet0
 tunnel destination 192.168.3.21
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 192.168.3.149 255.255.255.0

Ideas?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Tunnels to Cisco through NAT?

2006-10-20 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

Is anyone aware of a tunnel between FreeBSD and Cisco that
can go through a NAT on the Cisco side?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tunnels to Cisco through NAT?

2006-10-20 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 On Oct 20, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Is anyone aware of a tunnel between FreeBSD and Cisco that
  can go through a NAT on the Cisco side?
 
 If you update the Cisco firmware with the latest IOS+VPN version, you  
 ought to gain proper NAT-T support which will work with most IPSEC/ 
 VPN implementations.  Otherwise, if you only need to implement a  
 single VPN tunnel, you can use something like OpenVPN, which only  
 needs you to forward a single UDP port (1194)...
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I guess my question wasn't phrased
exact enough...

The long of it is that I have a low end Cisco router
sitting at a location behind a consumer grade broadband router,
connected to a satellite connection. The satellite does not
allow direct TCP inbound connections, so anything I use has
to be OpenVPN. I have a Soekris box with FreeBSD 5.5 running
OpenVPN via UDP to a server in the datacenter, and it works
fine and good. The issue is I want to set up another tunnel
(The cisco is actually a 2509, 8 port serial. This new tunnel
is for when the Soekris is down to be able to administer
it via the serial port).

So I'm looking for an application where if you
want to think in reverse... The FreeBSD box needs to be able
to get to the Cisco through a NAT (And only via UDP).

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: BSDstats Project v2.0 ...

2006-08-07 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 To enable the port, edit or create /etc/periodic.conf and add this line:
 monthly_statistics_enable=yes
 
Shouldn't it be /etc/periodic.conf.local since its not part
of the base? Thats where I've put other things that install periodics
that aren't part of the base.

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN

2006-07-19 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard kernel: Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: 
  Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
 
   I'm not sure who/what/where to start looking.  Ideas?
  
  Hey Darek,
 
  Good to hear from NYI. :)
 
 Heh, are you a customer, or just familiar with the company?

NYIIX peer and 25B compatriot.
 
  SSH is TCPWrapper'd, and only *1* machine in the entire
  datacenter can access it (Typical jump box configuration). 

 
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/2006/05/msg00092.html

Confused a bit by this reference, but its been a long
day. 

 Does root have /bin/nologin for the shell?

No.

 If it does, then the UNKNOWN 
 would refer to the terminal,  Just the way the 'nologin' binary is set 
 to log to syslog.  Basically means that someone tried to log in as root, 
 but before they could even provide a password, the nologin binary kicked 
 them off.  That's why the terminal type is set to UNKNOWN because it 
 hadn't been set yet.

Are you sure? If I ssh to the machine as tuc, then su to root
I see :

$ id
uid=1001(tuc) gid=1001(tuc) groups=1001(tuc), 0(wheel)
$ su - spamd
Password:
su: Sorry
$ su -
Password:
asgard# su - spamd
This account is currently not available.

asgard# grep nologin /var/log/spool
Jul 19 01:52:47 asgard nologin: Attempted login by tuc on /dev/ttyp0
Jul 19 01:52:47 asgard kernel: Jul 19 01:52:47 asgard nologin: Attempted login 
by tuc on /dev/ttyp0

In my example, shouldn't it be saying spamd since thats who I 
tried to log on as?
 
 You'll have to figure out how that person is getting access as 
 apparently they are reaching the box.
 
I'm just not seeing it. netstat isn't showing any TCP
connections out of the ordinary...

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN

2006-07-19 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 
 Jul 18 14:08:47 asgard nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
   
 
 Something running *as* root is trying to su to an account which has 
 /bin/nologin as a shell
 
 e.g. # su avahi
 
 cartman nologin: Attempted login by alex on /dev/ttyp7
 
 avahi:*:558:558:Avahi Daemon User:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin

Thats what I was thinking...
 
 If it were running detached from a terminal (in the background; started 
 from an rc script) then it would have no terminal to report, hence UNKNOWN.

Makes sense. :)
 
 Tracking down what, is another matter.  ps uagx and kill processes one 
 by one until the message stops!  Or try ktracing suspects for a less 
 drastic approach.
 
I'm pretty sure it has to do with my sendmail. Why all of a sudden
its done this I'm not sure. I shut down sendmail for an hour and the messages
stopped. When I started it back up, it started again. I'm running :

sendmail / procmail / SpamAssassin

If I was to ktrace sendmail, what would I be looking for? What
options do I pass to it to get all the sub processes?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN

2006-07-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard kernel: Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: 
  Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
 
   I'm not sure who/what/where to start looking.  Ideas?

Hey Darek,

Good to hear from NYI. :)
 
 I believe that I've seen this before.  If I remember correctly, the 
 UNKNOWN part happens because the connection was closed before sshd or 
 the system got info on the client's host.  This is probably not very 
 accurate, but the overall result was that it was not cause for concern.
 
 The only thing that this shows is that ssh is open to anyone, so you 
 might want to close it with a firewall, or within /etc/ssh/sshd_config 
 with the AllowUsers directive.  Also within that file, you probably 
 should have PermitRootLogin set to no.

SSH is TCPWrapper'd, and only *1* machine in the entire
datacenter can access it (Typical jump box configuration). 

 Also look at the output of 'last' and 'last -f /var/log/wtmp.0 ... 
 wtmp.N' just to make sure root didn't log in.
 
Nope, root didn't.

Its just really weird that all of a sudden it started @1:30
today and hasn't stopped since.

Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN

2006-07-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
  Jul 18 14:08:47 asgard nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
  Jul 18 14:08:47 asgard kernel: Jul 18 14:08:47 asgard nologin: Attempted 
  login by root on UNKNOWN
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: Attempted login by root on UNKNOWN
  Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard kernel: Jul 18 14:21:02 asgard nologin: Attempted 
  login by root on UNKNOWN
 
   I'm not sure who/what/where to start looking.  Ideas?
 
 What does /var/log/auth.log show?
 
Nothing since I send everything to a single file and
a syslog server.

*.debug /var/log/spool
*.debug @syslog.t-b-o-h.net
*.err;kern.debug;auth.notice;mail.crit  /dev/console
*.emerg *


Tuc/TBOH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Possible to go from 5.5 to 5.4?

2006-06-17 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc wrote:
  Hi,
 
   I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 5.5, and now if I leave it in X for a
  few minutes it ends up locking up, usually when the screen blanks on
  its own. I wanted to go backwards to see if that behaviour goes away.
 
   I wasn't sure if there was a risk doing this.
 
  Thanks, Tuc
 

 Have you tried recompiling X? That might help. Take a look at 
 sysutils/portupgrade, if you haven't used that before. I think going 
 backward is unwise, there must be a better way.
 
Complete recompile of X, and anything supporting X, as
well as nvidia driver and reboot


Still happening..


Suggestions where/what to do next, or guidance for going back
to 5.4?

Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Possible to go from 5.5 to 5.4?

2006-06-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 05:08:30PM -0400, Scott Tuc Ellentuch at T-B-O-H 
 wrote:
 
  6) portupgrade -Ri of anything that was xorg*, nvidia*
 
 If you didn't use -f for nvidia-driver then it may not have rebuilt.
 
Well, my nvidia-driver was out of date as is. So I didn't
need to do an -f. Same with alot of my xorg*. I probably should
have been smarter (TOO LATE!!) to upgrade my nvidia first, run for
a while THEN go to 5.5 . 

So it did get rebuilt. And when I portdowngraded and then
portupgraded -f'd it, (I did mention that, right?) it would have
re-installed it anyway.

Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]