Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:33:06, netch wrote about "Re: Boot2 loading process":
>> Not according to that piece of architecture documentation that was quoted.
>> www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/book.html#BOOT-BOOT0
>> It says that boot1 is used only with floppy boots.
> The
Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 21:15:55, jerrymc wrote about "Re: Boot2 loading
process":
> >> So my question is: where does the rest of the boot2 binary is located and
> >> how is it loaded ?
>> You skipped boot1 from attention. boot2 is loaded by boot1, not boot0.
> Not according to that piece of arch
Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 09:41:01, jan.pfeifer wrote about "Boot2 loading
process":
> I was reading through the architecture handbook
> (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/book.html)
> about the boot process, and something strange caught my attention.
> According to
Sun, May 01, 2005 at 23:07:36, vizion wrote about "Ignorance and file
suffixes":
> I have tried unsuccessfuly to find out from the manual what the suffixes
> mean on the files collected by cvsup (e.g. "v") is there a reference for
> such info?
,v is RCS and CVS suffix. You can use CVS (`info c
Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 16:38:18, atkielski.anthony wrote about "Re: WEIRD:
telnet":
>> 1. Telnet can use any ports providing the user redirects.
>> 2. Telnet passes clear text no matter what.
>> 3. ssh ought to be used to replace Telnet whenever possible.
>> 4. ssh also can be made to work with a
Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 13:04:59, fquest wrote about "boot up notification":
> I would like one of my servers to send me an email when
> it boots. I envision a script in rc.conf to do this.
This is too bad, as rc.conf is called tens times during boot.
> Is there an easier way, or an automatic syst
Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:43:25, mr_bond_james_bond_007 wrote about "new":
> sir i am new in BSD
> i think this is the UNIX operating system and it's free ? to use ? or what ?
Generally isn't strict Unix, only unix-like, but in real this difference
makes taste only for world of High Technology Ce
Hi,
Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 15:21:47, madhvin wrote about "Windows-based RFC868
Time":
> I am trying to replace a Windows server with a FreeBSD one .
> Does anyone know the equivalent UNIX package for a Windows-based RFC868 Time
> Protocol server.
> Thanx in advance for your response
timed and i
Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:56:09, gesmith wrote about "Keeping ports and FreeBSD
up-to-date without X":
> Anytime I start to update my system, FreeBSD 5.3, applications that I
> compiled explicitly, -DWITHOUT_X, will try to compile X during the
> upgrade. Is there an easier way aroung this without
Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 20:38:36, s.wingate (Steve Wingate) wrote about "Re: Dualbooting
STABLE & CURRENT":
> >> I don't like the sound of that. I'll just stick with STABLE until 5.x is
> >> really ready.
>> -STABLE will have the same problem since its in boot0 and the BIOS, not
>> the OS on the p
Sorry, it was reply to another maillist, which was in Bcc of original message.
Ignore it if you can't read ;)
Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:10:09, netch wrote about "Re: [freebsd] System calls: int
$0x80 vs. lcall $7, $0":
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:10:09 +0200
> From: Vale
Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 15:57:22, useperl wrote about "[freebsd] System calls: int $0x80
vs. lcall $7, $0":
éÚ×ÉÎÉÔÅ, ÚÄÅÓØ ÌÕÞÛÅ ÐÏ-ÒÕÓÓËÉ.
> Gentlemen, I am new to FreeBSD programming and going to write a simple
> program which will not use libc. I tried to find out how to make a
> syst
12 matches
Mail list logo
