Re: 5.2-current: device pcm

[mazpe]

Hello Hanspeter:

Read the /usr/src/UPDATING and also take a look at the
/usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES.

But this is what it comes down to: adding device sound and device snd_*.
(removing device pcm or whatever you had there before of course)

I would recommend adding device sound to your kernel and even all the
snd_* drivers, until you find out which one worked...  Then remove the
rest and only leave the one that matched the specs of your pc.  Unless
of course you see your sound card on the /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES and you
know exactly what snd_* you need.

something like this..

device  sound

device  snd_ad1816
device  snd_als4000
#device snd_au88x0
device  snd_cmi
device  snd_cs4281
device  snd_csa
device  snd_ds1
device  snd_emu10k1
device  snd_es137x
device  snd_ess
device  snd_fm801
device  snd_gusc
device  snd_ich
device  snd_maestro
device  snd_maestro3
device  snd_mss
device  snd_neomagic
device  snd_sb16
device  snd_sb8
device  snd_sbc
device  snd_solo
device  snd_t4dwave
device  snd_via8233
device  snd_via82c686
device  snd_vibes
#device snd_vortex1
device  snd_uaudio

hope this helps...

-Lester A. Mesa
-aka: mazpe

On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 11:18, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
   On Aug 07 at 17:41, Radek Kozlowski spoke:
 
  Read /usr/src/UPDATING:
  
  20040716:
  The sound device drivers are renamed.  `sound' is always required,
  while `snd_*' should be configured accordingly to your hardware.
  Refer to NOTES for the detail of the drivers.
 
 I have now added `device sound' to the kernel configuration. But
 this doesn't make the sound module available. Also there isn't a
 /dev/mixer*.
 
 What does snd_* mean?
 I tried to add `device snd_pcm'. But this isn't accepted by config.
 Dmesg shows:
 
 pci0: multimedia, audio at device 31.5 (no driver attached)
 
 What else is required?
 
 -Hanspeter
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Newbie Security Question

[mazpe]

Hello James:

Thats just letting you know that someone from that IP Address tried to
access your system using the root account and the password they provided
failed to authenticate.

Could've been an ssh scanner or something of that nature.

Most likely script kiddies.  

Make sure you do not allow root to login via ssh by setting your
sshd_config PermitRootLogin no.

Use sudo or su - instead.

or you can always use key-based authentication.


Lester A. Mesa
aka: mazpe
-

On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 08:26, James A. Coulter wrote:
 I recently got my firewall up and configured (many thanks to JJB and everyone else 
 for their help) and have been reading the daily security message from root with a 
 great deal of interest.
 
 My question is, when I see entries like this:
 
 Aug  5 17:55:54 sara sshd[2099]: Failed password for root from 209.120.224.13
 +port 40515 ssh2
 Aug  5 17:55:55 sara sshd[2101]: Failed password for root from 209.120.224.13
 +port 60426 ssh2
 Aug  5 17:55:55 sara sshd[2103]: Failed password for root from 209.120.224.13
 +port 54447 ssh2
 Aug  5 17:55:59 sara sshd[2105]: Failed password for root from 209.120.224.13
 +port 44460 ssh2
 
 is it safe to assume someone has been trying to hack my system?
 
 I did a whois search on the IP and it went to a provider in Colorado.
 
 I'm asking because I'm curious - thanks again for everyone's help.
 
 Jim C.
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]