Using a phoronix link as an example, ext4 still has some pretty bad
data loss bugs:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=Nzk0OA
imo: data security of ufs speed of ext4
ymmv
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 9 February 2010 16:11, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0700, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:00:00PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
AFAIK, the system compiler is going to be clang in the future and for
ports
On 9 February 2010 01:54, J65nko j65...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:46 AM, alex a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net wrote:
I do suspect personally that the ext4 filesystem is the reason for the
difference here, since ext4 has a number of features such as deferred
disk
writes etc.
For what is worth these are the results on my Lenovo Thinkpad T500 with zfs.
http://global.phoronix-test-suite.com/?k=profileu=thuglife-5875-16786-4629
dmesg | grep ada0
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: WDC WD2500BEKT-00A25T0 01.01A01 ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0700, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:00:00PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
AFAIK, the system compiler is going to be clang in the future and for
ports you'll install a compiler from ports.
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of
On Monday 08 February 2010 05:46:07 alex wrote:
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
The fact that the limit is 86MB/sec (which is very low for a raid0 array)
makes me think the box suffers from sub optimal network performance
during a simple stream test like yours. This could be due to FreeBSD
having
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:01:05AM +1100, alex wrote:
Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:41:29AM +1100, alex wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:01:05AM +1100, alex wrote:
Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:41:29AM +1100, alex wrote:
I see a number of factors putting freebsd behind:
* The teams stubbornness with compiler/base tools (wont move away from
gcc 4.2.1 because they just cant
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:00:00PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
AFAIK, the system compiler is going to be clang in the future and for
ports you'll install a compiler from ports.
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
--
Chad Perrin
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
A quick search yielded these links:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
On Monday 08 February 2010 12:54:26 Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Even deleting a large file off that raid array I can
see a difference, prior to reformatting, i deleted a 190GB file off the
raid, under UFS the delete took quite some time (well over 10 seconds),
under ext4 the deletion of the
On 2010-02-08, at 2:58 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
Here's last year's status report where they talk about it:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-May/049873.html
It was also in
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:11:26PM -0700, Ben Schumacher wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
A quick search yielded these links:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:12:25PM -0500, Derek Buttineau wrote:
On 2010-02-08, at 2:58 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
Here's last year's status report where they talk about it:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:12:25PM -0500, Derek Buttineau wrote:
On 2010-02-08, at 2:58 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Can you provide a URL for some discussion of this? I hadn't heard that
FreeBSD was moving to Clang.
On Monday 08 February 2010 21:19:01 Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Monday 08 February 2010 12:54:26 Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Even deleting a large file off that raid array I can
see a difference, prior to reformatting, i deleted a 190GB file off the
raid, under UFS the delete took quite some time
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:46 AM, alex a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net wrote:
I do suspect personally that the ext4 filesystem is the reason for the
difference here, since ext4 has a number of features such as deferred disk
writes etc. Even deleting a large file off that raid array I can see a
Hi Guys,
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
setup with 2 hard disks in the very same machine.
Previously, the maximum I could get across my gigabit enabled network
was 60MB/s
Original Message
Subject:FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:41:29 +1100
From: alex a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hi Guys,
Previously, the maximum I could get across my gigabit enabled network
was 60MB/s (megabytes) per second
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:41:29AM +1100, alex wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
setup with 2 hard disks in the very same machine.
So you had a machine that had
Frank Shute wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:41:29AM +1100, alex wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
setup with 2 hard disks in the very same machine.
So
On Sunday 07 February 2010 15:41:29 alex wrote:
Hi Guys,
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
setup with 2 hard disks in the very same machine.
Previously, the maximum I could get
Hi,
On 07 February 2010 pm 22:41:29 alex wrote:
Today I reformatted a machine (network server) thats run FreeBSD nonstop
for at least the last 3 years and installed linux on it. I have a raid 0
setup with 2 hard disks in the very same machine.
can you do the same for FreeBSD? Just install
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
The fact that the limit is 86MB/sec (which is very low for a raid0 array)
makes me think the box suffers from sub optimal network performance during a
simple stream test like yours. This could be due to FreeBSD having a poor
network driver for your particular NIC or
24 matches
Mail list logo
