On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:04:23 -0700
Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read reports to the effect that GBDE is vulnerable to online
dictionary attacks unless two-factor authentication is used. The only
such report I can find now is this discussion of NetBSD's CGD, where
its author contrasts it with GBDE:
http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/6384
Is this still the case? Are there any other security concerns
related to GBDE's implementation that you might mention? How well
does GELI stack up against GBDE?
I think it's this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2005/03/02/0003.html
I don't know much about the internals of GBDE, but if we take his
description of it at face value, it seems to be fair criticism.
I think it's actually saying that GBDE assumes the user will provide
enough user-key entropy, and doesn't do anything to mitigate the use
of weaker passphrases.
Geli uses salt and PKCS #5 so it's pretty much blameless in this area.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]