Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb:
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90). It is at least detected by
# sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1900
[CanoScan], chip=GL842) at libusb:/dev/usb1:/dev/ugen0
- No /dev/uscanner0 is
Hi!
Seems that the CanoScan LiDe 90 is one of the scanners built by
Canon that are not supported well. That's a reason to avoid them. :-)
I had similar issues with a LiDE 45 (I think it was), and I did
soon replace it with a SCSI scanner that worked out of the box
without problems.
On Sun, 14
Hello!
Polytropon schrieb:
Hi!
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:40:54 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb:
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90).
Mayve the SANE team will get this scanner to work later on.
But at this point
Hello list,
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90). It is at least detected by
# sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1900
[CanoScan], chip=GL842) at libusb:/dev/usb1:/dev/ugen0
- No /dev/uscanner0 is produced.
- #