RE: Mystery Ports
On Mon, 24 May 2004, JJB wrote: > Then you must have moved up to 5.2.1 using the source buildworld > method. > If you install from the mini iso file then NFS is indeed run with > the only way to get rid of it is by recompile kernel. > > SO it's NOT literally preposterous and ridiculous, you just upgraded > and did not install from scratch so you have not seen this bug. Or else he installed from floppies like i did (and didnt get this bug.) have to says its the first i've heard of it. > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Nehren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:49 PM > To: JJB > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mystery Ports > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:58:43 EDT, JJB scribbled these > curious markings: > > If you are running 5.x releases they have bug where NFS is run all > > the time even if you don't want them. You have to recompile your > > kernel without NFS support before they go away. You should submit > > an bug report about this. > > ... what? That's literally preposterous and ridiculous. My 5.2.1 > system > doesn't demonstrate this behavior. > > -- > I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded > pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson > - > Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. > - > Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s). > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Mystery Ports
Then you must have moved up to 5.2.1 using the source buildworld method. If you install from the mini iso file then NFS is indeed run with the only way to get rid of it is by recompile kernel. SO it's NOT literally preposterous and ridiculous, you just upgraded and did not install from scratch so you have not seen this bug. -Original Message- From: Christopher Nehren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:49 PM To: JJB Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mystery Ports On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:58:43 EDT, JJB scribbled these curious markings: > If you are running 5.x releases they have bug where NFS is run all > the time even if you don't want them. You have to recompile your > kernel without NFS support before they go away. You should submit > an bug report about this. ... what? That's literally preposterous and ridiculous. My 5.2.1 system doesn't demonstrate this behavior. -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson - Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. - Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s). ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mystery Ports
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:58:43 EDT, JJB scribbled these curious markings: > If you are running 5.x releases they have bug where NFS is run all > the time even if you don't want them. You have to recompile your > kernel without NFS support before they go away. You should submit > an bug report about this. ... what? That's literally preposterous and ridiculous. My 5.2.1 system doesn't demonstrate this behavior. -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson - Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. - Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s). pgpH2GsCxpn7D.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mystery Ports
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:44:40 EDT, Jason Dusek scribbled these curious markings: > Hey, > > So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How do I > find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to nfs, > so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem... Check the output of sockstat(1). 111 is rpcbind, needed for NFS, FAM, and some other things. 1023 is also NFS-related, IIRC. -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson - Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. - Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s). pgpo0ht4CKCae.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mystery Ports
Jason Dusek wrote: Hey, So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How do I find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to nfs, so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem... Two answers for two questions: First, those two ports are open because portmapper is running. See the docs on how to shut it down. Portmapper is often associated with NFS, but there are other programs that use it as well. Second, to find out what is opening a port, use "sockstat -4". -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Mystery Ports
If you are running 5.x releases they have bug where NFS is run all
the time even if you don't want them. You have to recompile your
kernel without NFS support before they go away. You should submit
an bug report about this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Dusek
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mystery Ports
Hey,
So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How
do I
find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to
nfs,
so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem...
--
-- Jason Dusek ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
-- | `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
-- | (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
-- | _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
-- | (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-'
--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mystery Ports
On Mon, 24 May 2004 10:44:40 -0500 Jason Dusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How do > I find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to > nfs, so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem... you can look at /etc/services or ps auxw|grep nfs or netstat -ta |less might help ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mystery Ports
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:44:40AM -0500, Jason Dusek wrote: > Hey, > > So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How do I > find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to nfs, > so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem... 111 is the rpcbind port. 1023 is open because your portmapper is running. Kill rpcbind to close them both. Use sockstat(1) to get an overview of what ports are in use, and by what process. HTH Dan pgphFs1kdtwFN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Mystery Ports
Hey,
So I have some ports open (111 and 1023) and I don't know why. How do I
find out what is keeping them open? I'm told that 111 is related to nfs,
so I knocked off nfsiod but that didn't solve the problem...
--
-- Jason Dusek ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
-- | `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
-- | (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
-- | _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
-- | (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-'
--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
