Hi,
I was reading through cpufreq(4) and in the bugs section it mentions that per
core (or CPU) frequency control is not supported. That all cores/CPUs have to
be at the same speed.
What is the reason for that?
Is it an infrastructure problem with FreeBSD or has it just not been
On 09.11.2010 11:56, David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
I was reading through cpufreq(4) and in the bugs section it mentions that per
core (or CPU) frequency control is not supported. That all cores/CPUs have
to
be at the same speed.
What is the reason for that?
Is it an infrastructure
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
You did read the symmetric part of symmetric multi processor didn't you?
It's a limitation of the technology. One clock.
I don't think that's quite true. The newer Intel server chipsets have
On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:54 AM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
You did read the symmetric part of symmetric multi processor didn't you?
It's a limitation of the technology. One clock.
I don't think
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
svein-listm...@stillbilde.net wrote:
You did read the symmetric part of symmetric multi processor didn't
you?
It's a limitation of the technology. One clock.
