Hi--
On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Carl Johnson wrote:
> The following are the ports if anybody has any ideas, but I would also like
> to know how to trace them down myself:
>
> tcp4 0 0 *.876 *.*LISTEN
> tcp6
I am running rkhunter and it keeps reporting a port inconsistency
between sockstat and netstat -a. Netstat shows an extra 5 ports open,
but netstat doesn't show what is holding ports open, so I don't know
what they are. Does anybody know how to determine what is holding open
a port? I
using portupgrade or some other port management utility for
upgrades, there are ways to set the default options for the ports you
use.
Hindsight is 20/20, but I'll go out on a limb here and say that it's
generally considered good practice to test software after upgrading --
particularl
On 17/09/2010 22:36:07, Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if I can simply recompile sendmail from the ports collection
> for
> FreeBSD 7.1 server.
> I need to recompile the sendmail on the server to add Cyrus SASL2 support.
> The
> instructions on FreeBSD
Hi,
I was wondering if I can simply recompile sendmail from the ports collection
for
FreeBSD 7.1 server.
I need to recompile the sendmail on the server to add Cyrus SASL2 support. The
instructions on FreeBSD point to src /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail which doesn't
exist and I was wondering
is
unknown. I have a new KVM switch. I do need direct control of the
console for many reasons, but mostly to portupgrad ports.
In the months since I first got ethic working, everything _but_ X11
worked. In late August I upgraded apache and php5, rebooted, and
just-assumed {TM} that apach
Hi,
I am upgrading a system from freebsd 6.4 to freebsd 7.3 from source. On
this system, the ports openssl package has been installed.
With the make buildworld, the compilation of sendmail fails with the
message:
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libz.so.3, needed by
/usr/local/lib
Hello,
I'm looking for something which can be used as a small customer database
to store: name, contacts, system environment, comments; it should be
managed via browser; is the something in the ports or some other Open
Source, ready for FreeBSD (before building something by my own based on
On 2010-08-31 12:38, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev:
On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Put this in your .xinitrc
setxkbmap se
Thanks for the suggestion!
I wonder, is this metod the correct way.
I think so, as long X is concerned.
> According to th
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:38:57 +0200
Bernt Hansson articulated:
> 2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev:
> >
> >
> > On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >> Put this in your .xinitrc
> >> setxkbmap se
> >>
> >>
> > Thanks for the suggestion!
> >
> > I wonder, is this metod the correct way.
>
2010-08-31 10:29, Leslie Jensen skrev:
On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Put this in your .xinitrc
setxkbmap se
Thanks for the suggestion!
I wonder, is this metod the correct way.
I think so, as long X is concerned.
> According to the handbook one
should use the
/usr/local/etc
On 2010-08-30 21:02, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Put this in your .xinitrc
setxkbmap se
Thanks for the suggestion!
I wonder, is this metod the correct way. According to the handbook one
should use the
/usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi
file.
/Leslie
__
Put this in your .xinitrc
setxkbmap se
2010-08-30 15:06, Leslie Jensen skrev:
Hello
After upgrading to xorg-7.5 on 8.1-RELEASE
I've got a problem with X not reading my
/usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi
---
terminate:ctrl_alt_bks
Hello
After upgrading to xorg-7.5 on 8.1-RELEASE
I've got a problem with X not reading my
/usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi
---
type="string">terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp<
/merge>
logiitc
se
---
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:59:25 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
>
> > > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port
> >
> > It should be, better suited:
> >
> > # cd /usr
> > # tar cf ports.tar ports
> >
> > So one
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:36:18PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:07:45 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Is that supposed to say this?
> >
> > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port
>
> I think the - infront of the options string isn't neccessary for
> tar, but it's optional in thi
On 29-8-2010 0:59, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
>
>>> tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port
>>
>> It should be, better suited:
>>
>> # cd /usr
>> # tar cf ports.tar ports
>>
>> So one could do "tar xf port
Polytropon wrote:
> > tar -cf ports.tar /usr/port
>
> It should be, better suited:
>
> # cd /usr
> # tar cf ports.tar ports
>
> So one could do "tar xf ports.tar" in the target machine's /usr
> ...
Better put the created tarfile
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:07:45 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:46PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > At least you need one machine with Internet connection to get
> > the ports update, e. g. using "portsnap fetch extract" or
> > "
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:46PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> At least you need one machine with Internet connection to get
> the ports update, e. g. using "portsnap fetch extract" or
> "make update" (using csup). Once done, tar cf ports.tar /usr/ports
>
well, I could just update the database offline, then use another machine
download right software and put them in /usr/ports/distfiles...
--- On Thu, 8/26/10, Adam Vande More wrote:
From: Adam Vande More
Subject: Re: ports database
To: "gahn"
Cc: "freebsd general questions&q
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:13 PM, gahn wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> Is it possible to update the database of ports offline.
>
> It is nice to use "portsnap fetch/extract/update", but I can't use that
> since one of my server has no connection to the internet...
>
I
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:13:14 -0700 (PDT), gahn wrote:
> Is it possible to update the database of ports offline.
>
> It is nice to use "portsnap fetch/extract/update", but I can't
> use that since one of my server has no connection to the internet...
At least you nee
Hi all:
Is it possible to update the database of ports offline.
It is nice to use "portsnap fetch/extract/update", but I can't use that since
one of my server has no connection to the internet...
_dave
___
freebsd-questi
On Tue 17 Aug 2010 at 15:05:27 PDT Danny Carroll wrote:
I wonder what happens when you upgrade a port, don't restart, then the
following week upgrade it again hmmm.
I don't think it would be any different than not restarting it after the
first upgrade (assuming the port doesn't try to ope
sequences from
> overwriting a running port with a newer version. Hypothetically, you
> might install a new Python including a new standard library, and if your
> running (old) Python process tries to load one of its deleted modules
> from disk something could break. Or not; I'
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:23 +0200
Beat Siegenthaler wrote:
> It never causes trouble. The only thing that if I use restart, rc says
> the daemon is not running (but running fine) .
> But after reading Your article it is now clear why.
I don't think it should be. Most daemons write their pid (pr
process tries to load one of its deleted modules
> from disk something could break. Or not; I'm no expert on the ports
> system, they might have some way of working around this. But as for a
> pragmatic answer to your question, I err on the side of caution with
> this stuff
Wow,
ello
This simple program will start printing "Hello" repeatedly. Now if I
switch to another terminal, I can delete the hello binary:
$ rm hello
But switching back to the first terminal, I see the program is still
running just fine. Running programs can be unlinked.
And this is
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:01:03 +1000, Danny Carroll wrote:
> Will a port install fail if it cannot write to a file because it's in-use?
At least, the step that wants to write will fail, and this will
mostly be (finally) signaled by a make error. UNIX doesn't have
a "file in use" paradigm per se; i.
Hiya All,
I just finished upgrading perl on one of my machines and something
crossed my mind while it was busy compiling and reinstalling all of the
ports that depended on perl.
Will a port install fail if it cannot write to a file because it's in-use?
Also, is it necessary to restart the s
> Contact the port maintainers in the first instance -- they may well have
> beta test versions of the ports you can download. Failing that, it is
> perfectly feasible for you to update a port yourself.
> Generally, you will want to work on a copy of the port directory
> some
Quoth Matthew Seaman on Friday, 13 August 2010:
> On 13/08/2010 07:44, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > What do I do if I want to build and run a package where version in
> > ports collection is not up-to-date, and I want to build and run the
> > current release version of that
On 13/08/2010 07:44, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> What do I do if I want to build and run a package where version in
> ports collection is not up-to-date, and I want to build and run the
> current release version of that package, like Abiword 2.8.6 for
> instance, when version in ports i
What do I do if I want to build and run a package where version in ports
collection is not up-to-date, and I want to build and run the current release
version of that package, like Abiword 2.8.6 for instance, when version in ports
is behind? Or maybe I want to try a new alpha or beta
Hello guys,
my system: 8.0-release i386
my question: Is there a way to manually rescan the com devices ?
reason: yesterday I added a USR external modem on one com port and the
system did not detect it until a reboot. Is this normal ?
btw, is there a way to manually detect newly added hardware ? s
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:12:36AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thank you Roland; I didn't know portsnap is part of the base install.
>
> :-)
>
> >From a book that I have (Absolute FreeBSD - 2nd Edition), it says"
>
> PORTSNAP VS. CSUP
> Use either ports
Ed Flecko writes:
> To keep my "ports" up to date, do I simply need to add:
>
> ports-all tag=.
>
> to this file before running csup or cvsup?
Yes.
Or just use /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile.
___
freebsd-questions
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Thank you Roland; I didn't know portsnap is part of the base install.
>
> :-)
>
> >From a book that I have (Absolute FreeBSD - 2nd Edition), it says"
>
> PORTSNAP VS. CSUP
> Use either portsnap(8) or csup(1
Hi,
If you want to stick with cvsup, or csup, you can use the example port
updating supfile (if you have the example files).
for example:
csup -L 2 -g -h cvsup10.us.freebsd.org/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile
You can check the example file, what csup or cvsup needs in the supfile, and
Thank you Roland; I didn't know portsnap is part of the base install.
:-)
>From a book that I have (Absolute FreeBSD - 2nd Edition), it says"
PORTSNAP VS. CSUP
Use either portsnap(8) or csup(1) to update the Ports Collection, but
not both. The
two tools are incompatible. csup is m
Hi folks,
I'm trying to learn how to keep my FreeBSD 8.0 updated (patched with
security updates) the "correct" (I know that's subjective) way.
Here's what my supfile looks like now:
# If you add any of the ports or doc collections to this file, be sure to
# specify them
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I'm trying to learn how to keep my FreeBSD 8.0 updated (patched with
> security updates) the "correct" (I know that's subjective) way.
> To keep my "ports" up to date, do I simply
ell things do work.
>
That's my experience, too. When I was told that in order to get my
wireless device working I would need to upgrade to STABLE, I shuddered
with the fearful anticipation of using a "development version" of the
O/S. But it has lived up to the name STABLE.
L
On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Polytropon wrote:
For servers, especially where I run critical apps, I follow the
bugs and announce lists (of the installed programs) to decide if
an update is required due to security reasons, then I update.
I find the VuXML FreeBSD RSS feed to be quite handy for
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:16:15 +0200, claudiu vasadi
wrote:
> Hello fellas,
>
> I was wondering about your update strategy. Do you update your apps as soon
> as a new version is available in the ports ? Or do you follow the "if it
> works, don't touch it" strategy ?
Aiza writes:
> Where can I find the description of the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file?
Try bsd.ports.mk.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>I was wondering about your update strategy. Do you update your apps as soon
>as a new version is available in the ports ? Or do you follow the "if it
>works, don't touch it" strategy ?
>
There is no one strategy that pleases everyone. You'll have to
consid
I was wondering about your update strategy. Do you update your apps as soon
as a new version is available in the ports ? Or do you follow the "if it
works, don't touch it" strategy ?
I'm guessing "portupgrade" is your preferred way of doing this hence, do you
also
Where can I find the description of the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello fellas,
I was wondering about your update strategy. Do you update your apps as soon
as a new version is available in the ports ? Or do you follow the "if it
works, don't touch it" strategy ?
I'm guessing "portupgrade" is your preferred way of doing this hence
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:56:56 +0800
Fbsd8 wrote:
> tree is no big deal, but I bet they don't do backups.
If that's an issue, don't back it up.
> That ports tree
> directory is a large resource hog if you lift the blinders and look
> at the big picture.
> Ju
On 07/23/2010 01:56 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Now about my project. Since about 4.0 I stopped using the ports tree
> method. I now all most totally use the package system. I do not upgrade
> a RELEASE but instead use the "install from scratch" method about a few
> weeks after a ne
On 07/23/2010 03:56 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Now the Freebsd method of the 22,000 individual ports each with 3 to 5
> files is a method which has out lived its usefulness. TAKE NOTE: NO
> FLAME WAR INTENDED. I just think a option should exist for us who don't
> follow the bleeding e
s all negative.
> I will explain what my goal is.
>
> First though, I have verified that the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file can be
> gotten without the using cvs or cvsup.
>
> fetch -m "http://www.freebsd.org/ports/INDEX-8.bz2"; does if fact work
> and the data on the file
b. f. wrote:
Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Prob
>Benjamin Lee wrote:
>> On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
>>> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
>>> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
>>> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
>>> just populat
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:14:12AM +0100, Matthew Seaman thus spake:
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the port
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
I've heard of
Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
>
> Problem is
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both c
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a pristine install of 8.0.
> There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
> I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
> just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
>
> Problem is in
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the "portcheckout" port and the "porteasy" port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing INDEX file
to
On 7/22/10 1:15 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the "rmconfig-recursive". I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what
all the make targets are in /usr
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:15:10 -0500, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
> make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Yes, "man 7 ports", section TARGETS.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBS
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the "rmconfig-recursive". I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Quoth claudiu vasadi on Thursday, 22 July 2010:
> in the meantime I wrote the following quick script:
>
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
>
> # Create a list of all dir's
> find /usr/ports/ -depth 2 -type directory -print > ports_structure
>
> # for each discover
in the meantime I wrote the following quick script:
#!/bin/sh
# Create a list of all dir's
find /usr/ports/ -depth 2 -type directory -print > ports_structure
# for each discovered dir, cd into it and do rmconfig
file=ports_structure
while read dr1
do
cd $dr1;make rmconfig
done<$fi
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the "rmconfig-recursive". I did not know about it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 07/21/2010 04:38 PM, claudiu vasadi wrote:
> hello guys,
>
> is there a way to do "make rmconfig" for all ports at once ?
The fastest way is:
rm -rf /var/db/ports/*
but this breaks the abstraction. The "right" thing to do would be to
make rmconfig in each port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
claudiu vasadi wrote:
> one solution I just created would be:
>
> for i in `find /usr/ports/ -type directory -print`; do `cd $i && make
> rmconfig`;done
>
> but I am wondering if there is a "official way".
one solution I just created would be:
for i in `find /usr/ports/ -type directory -print`; do `cd $i && make
rmconfig`;done
but I am wondering if there is a "official way". man portsclean did not give
me any options to do it.
Another thing would be to make rmconfig in
hello guys,
is there a way to do "make rmconfig" for all ports at once ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-que
G version the port is trying to build has a security
> issue. How can I work arround this (I really need the GD extension).
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> ds9# pwd
> /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions
>
> ===> png-1.4.1_1 is forbidden: vulnerable to remote buffer
need the GD extension).
Any help would be appreciated.
ds9# pwd
/usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions
ds9# make
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Found saved configuration for php4-extensions-1.0
===> Ex
ibe in your mail,
the using of this option is not applied for my case.
> Meanwhile, you might also consider simply running
> portmaster as root.
> There is nothing preferable about running it with sudo, it
> is a feature
> that I added because users so often requested it.
I have app
package available for the port, I got the message
> (it is an example) :
>
> => libpng-1.4.3.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist in
> /usr/ports/distfiles//. => /usr/ports/distfiles/ is not writable by
> you; cannot fetch.
That tells me that you haven't followed the instr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2010 18:57:11, Polytropon wrote:
>> I don't know where these 'do not mix ports and packages' warnings come
>> > from, but I suspect it's from people who think that they're different :)
> I thin
something was installed by
> making a port is that /var/db/ports will contain a directory for that
> port with the file 'options', created or updated by 'make config'.
A package is a precompiled port - as you said correctly, using
the default options for that port. N
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 317, Issue 9, Message: 26
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:52:54 -0400 Glen Barber wrote:
> On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
>
On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz
wrote:
> > Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
> > locally compiled "port"?
>
> portmaster -f -a
>
> > Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
>
> Be prepared to answer hund
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> However, your comment seems to be in disagreement with online
> warnings of "do not mix 'pkg_add' packages with 'make' ports".
>
> My origina
Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my
> 'pkg_add' installed packages using por
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB, ENTER.
Chris> Unfortunately, I already pressed TAB, ENTER about a hundred
Chris> times. The build is now going. Hopefully any extra "TAB, ENTER"
Chris> sequences I made will be forgotten by portm
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options"
> questions. To take the default option you must press
> "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
>
> I just hit the letter "O" for "OK".
Randal,
Thank you, pressing "O" is indeed easier than TAB,
> "Chris" == Chris Stankevitz writes:
Chris> Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the
default option you must press "TAB, ENTER" to each query. Have fun!
Chris> Chris
Chris> TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB, ENTER, TAB,
Chris> ENTER, TAB, ENTE
On 7/1/10 7:27 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" ques
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the
> locally compiled "port"?
portmaster -f -a
> Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions
Be prepared to answer hundreds of "options" questions. To take the default
option you mus
On 7/1/10 5:58 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
there is no
differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packa
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote:
> Once "ports" or "packages" are installed,
> there is no
> differentiation to the system.
Interesting. If this is true, then I can just start upgrading my 'pkg_add'
installed packages using ports and eventually th
On 7/1/10 5:31 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed
and 0 "ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with t
Hi, Chris
On 7/1/10 5:23 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed and 0
"ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally compiled
"port"?
I
Hello,
I setup my system using "packages". I have 675 "packages" installed and 0
"ports" installed.
Q: Is there a simple way to replace each "package" with the locally compiled
"port"?
Ideally the procedure will not ask me any questions and
ecking for zlib: found version 1.2.3, OK.
> Checking for SDL: found version 1.2.14, OK.
> Checking for X libraries: found, OK.
> Checking for Xcursor: found, OK.
> Checking for Xinerama: found, OK.
> Checking for Xrandr: found, OK.
> Checking for Xmu: found, OK.
> Checking for M
openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like dependencies?
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ve tried without the line PM_SU_VERBOSE, just with
PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/bin/sudo
I can install without problem packages with
$ portmaster -P -a -x openoffice
But if there is no package available for the port, I got the message (it is an
example) :
=> libpng-1.4.3.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist i
ot changed substantially, editing
PORTVERSION in the Makefile might work. You will need to do "make makesum deinstall
install clean" afterward.
--Original Message--
From: Frank Bonnet
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: move bac
BTW the anoncvs.freebsd.org server seems unreachable
from here ( france ) ...
On 06/29/2010 01:27 PM, Peter Boosten wrote:
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like
On 29 jun 2010, at 13:56, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> I've always used cvsup to maintain the ports tree up to date
>
> cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile ( with all options )
Yeah, that takes care of the ports... but do you recompile dependancies
as well?
For instance:
ra% pkg_info -r
801 - 900 of 6569 matches
Mail list logo
