I've always used cvsup to maintain the ports tree up to date
cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile ( with all options )
On 06/29/2010 01:27 PM, Peter Boosten wrote:
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How d
On 29-6-2010 13:19, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> ok thanks a lot
I noticed in an earlier post that you manually upgrade openldap.
How do you maintain other ports, like dependencies?
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
ok thanks a lot
On 06/29/2010 12:14 PM, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
in order to reuse the 2.4.21
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:49:38AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
> I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
> in order to reuse the 2.4.21 version.
ports-mgmt/portdowngrade is like
Hello
Due to my unsolved problem with openldap24-server 2.4.22 port
I would like to know of ot is possible to move backward the ports tree
in order to reuse the 2.4.21 version.
The machine is dedicated to LDAP service so it won't hurt
anything else :-)
Than
currently
> > broken.
> >
> > gimp depends on gegl, so the latest update to gimp will not build.
> >
> > Known problem?
> >
>
> reconfigure graphics/gegl whit out ffmpeg support
>
> cd /user/ports/graphics/gegl && make WITHOUT_FFMPEG=yes
>
reconfigure graphics/gegl whit out ffmpeg support
cd /user/ports/graphics/gegl && make WITHOUT_FFMPEG=yes config
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Greetings.
uname -a:
FreeBSD libertas.local.camdensoftware.com 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE
#1: Thu Jun 24 13:38:09 PDT 2010
sterl...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
As of a portsnap fetch update this morning, the gegl port will not build
===
On 06/24/10 06:10, b. f. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use
>> PORTMASTER tool to upgrade my ports via packages only. Then I added
>> the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc file,
> Hi,
>
> On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
> to upgrade my ports via packages only.
> Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
> file, and re-opened user's session :
> setenv PAC
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.
I'm about to upgrade my ports, since it's over 3 months since the last
upgrade I'm expecting this to be a mega upgrade. In preparation for
this I've run portmaster -na to get all the configs up to date and
avoid the need for frequent manual intervention when I run the upgrad
thanks for helping me.
i have reinstalled kde4 and i installed.Everything is fine now :)
thanks again for helping me..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:34:25 +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
> On Saturday 19 June 2010 01:28:51 Polytropon wrote:
> > # cd /usr/ports/x1/kde4
> > # make
> > # make deinstall
> > # make reinstall
>
> Not right. By this way you deinstall metaport only.
On Saturday 19 June 2010 01:28:51 Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:21:30 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
> wrote:
> > i know that i can reinstall the packages and install them again as ports but
> > i don't want to do that,i want to convert the package insta
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:21:30 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
wrote:
> i know that i can reinstall the packages and install them again as ports but
> i don't want to do that,i want to convert the package installiation into
> ports installiation.
Okay, I think I basically understand.
On Friday 18 June 2010 22:21:30 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> well,
>
> i have install kde4 with the package system and i want to reinstall it via
> the ports system.
> because my system will have better perfomance and less hardware
> requierements.
>
> the previous time
well,
i have install kde4 with the package system and i want to reinstall it via
the ports system.
because my system will have better perfomance and less hardware
requierements.
the previous time that i had install kde4 via ports it was working fine but
this time with packages it freezes and
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:26:07 +0300, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
wrote:
> i didn't understand your answers..
>
> can u give me commands??
I would try - but I'm not sure I did understand you correctly.
Can you please specify (1) what's your current state and (2)
what you do want to achieve (including re
i didn't understand your answers..
can u give me commands??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thank you for correcting me
--- En date de : Ven 18.6.10, Polytropon a écrit :
> De: Polytropon
> Objet: Re: Re : change kde4 (pkg) to kde4 (ports)
> À: "Alexandre L."
> Cc: "Giorgos Tsiapaliokas" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Vendredi 18 juin 201
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:21:53 + (GMT), "Alexandre L."
wrote:
> Why do you want to do that ?
> Packages are in this directory by default : /usr/ports/distfiles/
>
> --- En date de : Jeu 17.6.10, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas a
> écrit :
>
> > De: Giorgos Tsiapal
Why do you want to do that ?
Packages are in this directory by default : /usr/ports/distfiles/
--- En date de : Jeu 17.6.10, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas a
écrit :
> De: Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
> Objet: change kde4 (pkg) to kde4 (ports)
> À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Jeudi
hello,
i have installed kde4 via the package system.
how can i install the kde4 via ports system without deleting the packages
and then compiling them?
thank you for answering :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hello
Does anyone has ported "kolabd" to FreeBSD ?
I don't find it in the ports tree
Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any m
I found a more elegant way of doing this, thanks to google on my 7.3 system. I
added:
ldconfig_paths="/usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib
/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg"
to rc.conf and rebooted (I couldn't shutdown to single user then exit as I
don't have physical access at the moment).
really not the way to go.
man libmap.conf
--- En date de : Mer 16.6.10, C. P. Ghost a écrit :
De: C. P. Ghost
Objet: Re: RESOLVED: Problem upgrading ports - libintl.so.8 not found
À: "Scott Schappell"
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mercredi 16 juin 2010, 12h52
On Wed, Ju
only way I got the gnupg and ghostscript8-nox11
ports to update was by copying the .8 libraries over from a backup.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
s a bad idea.
Instead use /etc/libmap.conf or just recompile the ports.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-q
FreeBSD.
Is anyone is using Fuse-SSHFS and which version : the one from ports or from
the project website ?
I haven't found anything on Google.
Thanks.
Alexandre.
nb : excuse-me for my previous message without object.
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
Objet: Re: RESOLVED: Problem upgrading ports - libintl.so.8 not found
> À: "Scott Schappell"
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Mercredi 16 juin 2010, 12h52
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM,
> Scott Schappell
> wrote:
> > After digging through /usr/port
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Scott Schappell wrote:
> After digging through /usr/ports/UPDATING, I copied all .so.8 and .so.16
> libraries to /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg and those ports are
> now compiling. I'm assuming that's the approved solut
pt8-nox11
ports to update was by copying the .8 libraries over from a backup.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Eitan Adler writes:
> > What do I need to do to fix this problem?
>
> 20100530:
>AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU)
>AUTHOR: a...@freebsd.org
When doing this, I also had problems with something which led
to a problem with textproc/flex. I have to completely de-insta
always read UPDATING
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Scott Schappell wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one
> of them:
...
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libintl.so.8" not found, required by
> "libgcrypt.so.1
On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Scott Schappell wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one
> of them:
>
> echo '#!/bin/sh' >./gpg_dearmor
> echo "../../g10/gpg2 --no-options --no-greeting \
>
I'm trying to upgrade ports and they keep choking. In particular gpg is one of
them:
echo '#!/bin/sh' >./gpg_dearmor
echo "../../g10/gpg2 --no-options --no-greeting \
--no-secmem-warning --batch --dearmor" >>./gpg_dearmor
chmod 755 ./gpg_dea
On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Finally, it's gone. Thank you!
You're most welcome
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mai
> > there is no security/php5-mhash. How can I remove this safely?
>
> pkg_delete -f php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
>
corvus-root@/usr/ports/security/php52-mhash: pkg_delete -f
php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/php/20060613/mhash.so' doesn't exist
pkg_de
On 6/11/10 6:56 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> Right. My issue is, there isn't a path of /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
> -- only /usr/ports/security/php52-mhash. How can I remove the
> security/php5-mhash with a missing directory? I am unable to deinstall.
> How does one remove?
p
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> I meant to say security/php5-mhash and security/php52-mhash. Again,
> there is no security/php5-mhash. How can I remove this safely?
pkg_delete -f php5-mhash-5.2.12_2
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-qu
ash. Only lang/php52-mhash. Should I
> deinstall and install?
>
> If I recall right, mhash is now built-in or emulated in php-5.3; I
> think you can simply deinstall it.
>
Right. My issue is, there isn't a path of /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
-- only /usr/ports/security/
> > I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to
> > uninstall
> > lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes
> for
> > security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to
> > return
> > to the php52 por
Hi--
On Jun 11, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Doug Sampson wrote:
> portmaster -o lang/php52 lang/php5
>
> Now I am left with only one item as follows:
>
> php5-mhash-5.2.12_2 < needs updating (port has 5.3.2_1)
>
> There is *no* lang/php5-mhash. Only lang/php52-mhash. Should I deinstall and
> in
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to
> uninstall
> lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes for
> security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to
> return
> to the php52 ports. So that
Hello,
I have a messed up ports index that I cannot clean. I want to uninstall
lang/php5 but it does not seem to uninstall. The same thing goes for
security/php5-hash. I was uninstalling php5 ports in an effort to return
to the php52 ports. So that is how this happened. I ran the pkgdb -F but
it
ght?
The packages are built from the ports tree itself. Therefore if your
ports tree matches the one that is used to build the packages exactly
you will have no problems.
If your ports tree is newer you will have no problems attempting to
upgrade using a port.
However if you want to use packages a
tween
package and port versions, but I suppose this is handled by port
management tools automagically)
2010/6/10 Erik Trulsson :
>
> A package is best seen as simply a pre-compiled port, i.e. packages are
> built from ports. After it has been installed there is no
> difference between s
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
> Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
>
> I assume that packages and ports may have diff
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software (am I right?) so, for instance, if you install gnome
with pa
On Sunday 06 of June 2010 13:32:56 Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> On 06/06/2010 1:11 ?.?., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > i have FBSD 8.0 i have install the base system plus the bash shell
> > from the CD.after the installiation of the system i install ports with
> > portsnap a
On 06/06/2010 1:11 ?.?., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> i have FBSD 8.0 i have install the base system plus the bash shell
> from the CD.after the installiation of the system i install ports with
> portsnap and i update them with portmaster,no error came up,but now i
> receive error
rs come up.
> i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with portage i
> didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when portage
> "died")
>
> am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
>
>
> P.S.: 1
.
i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with
portage i
didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when
portage
"died")
am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
P.S.: 1 week not i haven't manage to install a grap
any errors come up.
> i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with portage i
> didn't have so many errors (actually i can't recall a time when portage
> "died")
>
> am i doing sth wrong or ports comes up with many errors??
>
Need to specify
hello,
i am coming from the linux world i was a gentoo user and i have install on
my second machine FBSD,i have made many formats but every time i try to
install a graphical enviroment (such as xfce,kde) many many errors come up.
i have heard that the ports are more stable than portage but with
Yavuz Maşlak wrote:
> I use freebsd7.3 . I ran portsnap update .
>
> I can't install php5-mhash from ports
> cd /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
> # make
> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
> ===> License check disabled, port has not define
I use freebsd7.3 . I ran portsnap update .
I can't install php5-mhash from ports
cd /usr/ports/security/php5-mhash
# make
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Extracting for php5-mhash-5.3.2
=> MD
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Luca Renaud wrote:
>
> Krb5-1.8.1 is object of a security warning,and I am not able to compile
> it.It tells me to update the ports tree
> and try again,which I have done several times but the same warning stands.
> Is this port not yet s
Krb5-1.8.1 is object of a security warning,and I am not able to compile
it.It tells me to update the ports tree
and try again,which I have done several times but the same warning stands.
Is this port not yet security updated with a security patch?
Is there a way to compile without the security
Hi, x11-toolkits/gtk20 stops. Thanks in advance!
Winston Weinert
/usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner --add-include-path=../gdk-pixbuf
--namespace=Gdk --nsversion=2.0 --libtool="/bin/sh
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gnome-libtool"
--library=libgdk-x11-2.0.la --include=Gio-2.0
From: Max Brazhnikov
To: kde-free...@kde.org
Cc: Dino Vliet ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
k...@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 11:59:10 AM
Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-assistant
On Thu, 13 May 2010 03:54:46 -0700 (PDT
;
> The error I get is:
>
> Script started on Thu May 13 12:41:26 2010
> cd /usr/ports/x11/kde4
> weka# make install distclean
I would not recommend to use make install for kde4 or any other dependency-
heavy port. Take a look on ports-mgmt/portmaster (or portupgrade).
> ===>
Hi people,
I get this error when trying to install kde4 on my amd64 system. I had
everything removed first (I didn't like the way I have installed it in the
past) with pkg_delete -fxvir kde and qt.
The error I get is:
Script started on Thu May 13 12:41:26 2010
cd /usr/ports/x11/kde4
ctly
>> and via chain-loading.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/grub/pkg-descr
Thank you, but this is legacy GRUB, and not what I'm looking for.
I specifically need GRUB2, that's why I've asked for a port or if
someone is interested in or already makin
g if there is an effort underway
to make the kernel multiboot-compliant... maybe like NetBSD[2]?
[1]: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-1.98.tar.gz
[2]: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-i386/2010/01/09/msg001747.html
Thanks,
-cpghost.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/grub
Hello,
has someone successfully ported GRUB2[1] to FreeBSD/i386
and FreeBSD/amd64? I see no port sysutils/grub2 in the tree,
even though I know that GRUB2 *can* boot FreeBSD directly
and via chain-loading.
And while we're at it, I'm wondering if there is an effort underway
to make the kernel mult
-4.3.5_1 updated
skipping kdeedu-4.3.1 /misc/kdeedu4 until dependency kdelibs-4.3.5_1 updated
portmanager 0.4.1_9 INFO: finished with some ports not updated if --log was
used see /var/log/portmanager.log
Above are the final lines
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes:
[...]
> Interesting project.. but the link to the patches are broken ===>
> http://home.no.net/andenore/patches/
> does someone knows a site with have the patches??? I would like to give
> it a try...
Must be in FreeBSD's perforce repository.
--
Sent via Gnus f
Em Qui, 2010-04-29 às 23:27 +0530, Ashish SHUKLA escreveu:
> Aldis Berjoza writes:
> > Hello!
>
> > Some time ago I've read, that FreeBSD might be interested
> > to move ports tree to database (sqlite?).
> > This would require rewriting of all existing and wr
I recall building CUPS from ports last Fall (9/2009) at version 1.3.10
or 1.3.11 which had GSSAPI (Kerberos 5) support as an option.
Today, the cups-base-1.4.3 port specifically excludes GSSAPI support
(--disable-gssapi in the Makefile) which means CUPS cannot perform
Kerberos authentication (to
I see this message here and there. Once it came up during compile, I
figured out that an extra gcc option '-lm' (explicitely adding libm)
helps. Now devel/ddd fails in configure. But when I go into the
directory and rerun configure with the same options by hand it succeeds.
Do you see such pro
2010/4/23 Антон Клесс :
> There are no archivers/php52-zlib.
> So, it is unavailable to install lang/php52 with lang/php5-extensions,
> having zlib extension choosen at make config.
>
looks like these ports are making it into the tree also, I just did a
portsnap fetch update this m
r Mueller
> wrote:
> > > And if you are patient, some devs are planing to add a php52 port,
> there
> > > is even something in the PR DB :
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/145772 (but I don't
> > > know how active they are, maybe aski
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:34 -0400, doug schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Olivier Mueller wrote:
> > And if you are patient, some devs are planing to add a php52 port, there
> > is even something in the PR DB :
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Olivier Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 22:06 +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > Is there 5.2.x in ports, or is there other way to get it installed?
>> > For MySQL, for example, there are both 5.0.x and 5.1.x in ports.
>>
>>
Hi,
Yuri wrote:
> I see there are two ports:
> /usr/ports/audio/mpc
> /usr/ports/math/mpc
>
> When I run 'pkg_add -r mpc' the first one gets installed, there is 'All'
> directory under packages, here all of them from all subdirectories are
> drop
I see there are two ports:
/usr/ports/audio/mpc
/usr/ports/math/mpc
When I run 'pkg_add -r mpc' the first one gets installed, there is 'All'
directory under packages, here all of them from all subdirectories are
dropped.
Shouldn't dup
ve to downgrade something
> else? At least, lang/php5-extensions, I guess?
>
i had to do the same last week. i downgraded both lang/php5 and
lang/php5-extensions. php5-extensions was a little
fussy due to some ports being removed from the tree as they were now
included in php5-5.3.2 base.
portdowngrade seems is what I need.
So, I run it:
# portdowngrade lang/php5
portdowngrade 0.6 by Heiner Eichmann
Please note, that nothing is changed in the ports tree
unless it is explicitly permitted in step 6!
Seeking port lang/php5 ...
Found several matches:
1: lang/php5
On Apr 22 2010 16:08, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> > I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there
> > a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't
> > seem to say anything on the subject.
>
Hi--
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there
> a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't
> seem to say anything on the subject.
Try this sequence:
portsdb -Fu
pkgdb -aF
(Additional
On Apr 22 2010 12:07, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden
> > wrote:
> > > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64
> >
> > With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 22:06 +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > Is there 5.2.x in ports, or is there other way to get it installed?
> > For MySQL, for example, there are both 5.0.x and 5.1.x in ports.
>
> php 5.2 is not currently in the ports system. You could get it by
&
On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64
>
> With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the Makefile?
>
> :g
# $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/
> Is there 5.2.x in ports, or is there other way to get it installed?
> For MySQL, for example, there are both 5.0.x and 5.1.x in ports.
php 5.2 is not currently in the ports system. You could get it by
using porteasy or portdowngrade.
___
f
Good day everyone!
After # portsnap fetch extract, I see only PHP 5.3.2 in ports, but no
5.2.x.
Is there 5.2.x in ports, or is there other way to get it installed?
For MySQL, for example, there are both 5.0.x and 5.1.x in ports
>
> But it's working today. I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a
> delay in that process?
Yes - there is. I've found it takes a couple of hours to get the
newest updates but once in a while it takes longer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
On Apr 22 2010 10:24, Gabor PALI wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something.
>
> Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on
> amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those p
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something.
Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on
amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms.
Otherwise it must be okay.
Cheers,
g.
___
uot;configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to m...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
"/usr/ports/multimedia/x264/work/x264-snapshot-20100222-2245/config.log"
including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be
a good idea to provide an overvi
I tried to update my system from KDE-4.3.1 (came in FreeBSD 8 install CDs)
to KDE-4.3.5( in updated ports system)
but it gives error during the compilation of QT related code(libpng.so not
found for compile of libQTsvg.so,or so).
Are there binaries for KDE-4.3.5 for updating my KDE to 4.3.5
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:46PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> >
> > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
> > lan
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>
> Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
> lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected
> in our -exp run becaus
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC
> > (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into
> > periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building
> > with NO_CACHE=yes is a necess
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM,
> wrote:
> > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> >>
> >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
> >
> > As far as I know, the gna
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>>
>> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
>
> As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
> fine as they're bundled with the libgm
On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>
> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used
to build them. Whether gcc
A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in
our -exp run because of being masked by other issues.
It will take a few days to fix lang/ghc.
I&#x
Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg
In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go o
901 - 1000 of 6569 matches
Mail list logo
